Threadless vs. Quill
#1
The Female Enduro
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Pennsylvania, United States of America
Posts: 1,183
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Threadless vs. Quill
What exactly is the difference between threadless and quill systems? Is threadless really better? Why?
Thanks,
velo
Thanks,
velo
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 306
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Threadless is supposed to be lighter because the set-up does not require a quill to be fitted into the steerer. (I wonder how much weight that saves.) What you lose with threadless is the ability to adjust your stem. If you want to try to raise your handlebars with an aheadset, you have to buy another stem. With a quill stem, you just raise it. My vote (6 roadbikes worth) is for a quill stem.
#3
human
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: living in the moment
Posts: 3,562
Bikes: 2005 Litespeed Teramo, 2000 Marinoni Leggero, 2001 Kona Major Jake (with Campy Centaur), 1997 Specialized S-Works M2, 1992 Specialized Rockhopper
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Threadless is slightly simpler mechanically than quill, principally because it's a somewhat more modular design. The main point of failure on quill stems is the binder wedge; the analogous part on the threadless headset is the star bolt, which is considerably more accessible for self-service and maintenance. The other advantage to threadless is that it is pretty simple to swap, flip, mix and match stems, which is more of an interest to bike shops than to riders...
Having said all that, it's really six of one and half-dozen of the other. My preference is threadless but they really are about euqal in terms of reliability, weight, maintenance and almost anything else you care to mention.
Having said all that, it's really six of one and half-dozen of the other. My preference is threadless but they really are about euqal in terms of reliability, weight, maintenance and almost anything else you care to mention.
__________________
when walking, just walk. when sitting, just sit. when riding, just ride. above all, don't wobble.
The Irregular Cycling Club of Montreal
Cycling irregularly since 2002
when walking, just walk. when sitting, just sit. when riding, just ride. above all, don't wobble.
The Irregular Cycling Club of Montreal
Cycling irregularly since 2002
#4
Chi-Chi Monger
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Santa Clarita, California
Posts: 368
Bikes: 08 Cannondale Synapse, 09 Marin Alpine Trail 29er
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I prefer threadless. It's simple and it works well. I remember beating the snot out of quill types when I was younger trying to get the damned things dislodged. Of course now that I'm older and wiser I know to just get a bigger hammer

__________________
When it's good it's really good...And when it's bad I go to pieces - David Bowie
When it's good it's really good...And when it's bad I go to pieces - David Bowie
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Downey, CA.
Posts: 1,166
Bikes: Litespeed Classic (55cm), Specialized Tarmac Pro (56cm)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
4 Posts
Aren't quill systems getting harder to find? I image with the integrated headsets coming up the quills will fade away and threadless will reign.
__________________
Litespeed, lasts a lifetime.
Specialized Tarmac, lasts a lifetime, or until it breaks.
Litespeed, lasts a lifetime.
Specialized Tarmac, lasts a lifetime, or until it breaks.
#6
The Female Enduro
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Pennsylvania, United States of America
Posts: 1,183
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally posted by Bobsled
Aren't quill systems getting harder to find? I image with the integrated headsets coming up the quills will fade away and threadless will reign.
Aren't quill systems getting harder to find? I image with the integrated headsets coming up the quills will fade away and threadless will reign.
I have all quill stems, and I just wanted to know if the advantage of threadless was anything significant, but from the posts here I guess it is not.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Spokane WA
Posts: 1,150
Bikes: Seven Axiom Ti, Trek 620, Masi cylocross (steel). Masi Souleville 8spd, Fat Chance Mtn. (steel), Schwinn Triple Bar cruiser, Mazi Speciale Fix/single, Schwinn Typhoon
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
One point or two not mentioned yet, since no threads have been cut into a threadless steer tube, the threadless tube is stronger than the threaded/quill type. If the the tube is the standard 1" variety threads can be cut into it accept the quill/thread system. If you try the newer system and don't like it, you CAN go back.
Ride Both Ways
Pat
Ride Both Ways
Pat
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: England
Posts: 12,948
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
The biggest advantage of threadless systems is for long distance tourists. You can adjust them using only allen keys, so your toolkit can lose the headset spanners.
#9
Mr. Cellophane
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 3,037
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I like threadless strictly for ease of swapping things out. I always seem to be playing with something - handlebar, stem length, etc. With threadless stem with two bolt clamp, I can pull the bar off to change stems in just a few seconds. I also might get a wild hair to swap handlebars from one bike to another to try the shifters or something. Who knows? To me, playing around with this stuff is part of the fun of riding. When I changed forks on my commuter, I changed to an actual threadless fork, but before that I had installed an inexpensive quill-to-threadless adapter and short threadless stem when I wanted to shorten the saddle to bar distance. I also installed a quill-to-threadless adapter on my road bike for the same reason.
You can get a 1 1/8" q-to-t adapter from chucksbikes.com for either 5 or 8 bucks and threadless stems from $5 up. It's an easy inexpensive way to try different stem lengths. The stems are decent brand. To me the nice thing is to be able to try different stems cheap. You can always spring for that Ritchey WCS stem once you figure out the length you need using 5-dollar stems. I got the 1" Cinell q-to-t adapter for $20 from cbike.com.
FWIW,
Raymond
You can get a 1 1/8" q-to-t adapter from chucksbikes.com for either 5 or 8 bucks and threadless stems from $5 up. It's an easy inexpensive way to try different stem lengths. The stems are decent brand. To me the nice thing is to be able to try different stems cheap. You can always spring for that Ritchey WCS stem once you figure out the length you need using 5-dollar stems. I got the 1" Cinell q-to-t adapter for $20 from cbike.com.
FWIW,
Raymond
__________________
If it ain't broke, mess with it anyway!
If it ain't broke, mess with it anyway!
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Parrish, FL
Posts: 7,963
Bikes: Lots
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The big reason for the switch to threadless is due to weight. Not of the stem, but of the steerer tube. Newer forks switched to aluminum steerer tubes and the threads did not hold up. Someone (who I don't know) decided that a friction clamp would work and not weaken the connection. Thus, threadless was born (or invented). Now some manuf. (like Cannondale) are using Carbon Fiber steerer tubes.
I don't think quill stems will ever dissappear, but threadless will (has) become standard.
I don't think quill stems will ever dissappear, but threadless will (has) become standard.
__________________
"Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming, "WOW, What a Ride!" - unknown
"Your Bike Sucks" - Sky Yaeger
"Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming, "WOW, What a Ride!" - unknown
"Your Bike Sucks" - Sky Yaeger
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: England
Posts: 12,948
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
Threadless steerer headsets were re-invented. Cheater-Lea used to make them in the 1930's. I dont think there is anything new in cycling.
#12
I have senior moments...
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Woodside, CA
Posts: 2,151
Bikes: Many
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Threadless is supposed to be lighter because the set-up does not require a quill to be fitted into the steerer. (I wonder how much weight that saves.) What you lose with threadless is the ability to adjust your stem. If you want to try to raise your handlebars with an aheadset, you have to buy another stem. With a quill stem, you just raise it. My vote (6 roadbikes worth) is for a quill stem.
#13
I have senior moments...
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Woodside, CA
Posts: 2,151
Bikes: Many
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Threadless is slightly simpler mechanically than quill, principally because it's a somewhat more modular design. The main point of failure on quill stems is the binder wedge; the analogous part on the threadless headset is the star bolt, which is considerably more accessible for self-service and maintenance. The other advantage to threadless is that it is pretty simple to swap, flip, mix and match stems, which is more of an interest to bike shops than to riders...
Having said all that, it's really six of one and half-dozen of the other. My preference is threadless but they really are about euqal in terms of reliability, weight, maintenance and almost anything else you care to mention.
Having said all that, it's really six of one and half-dozen of the other. My preference is threadless but they really are about euqal in terms of reliability, weight, maintenance and almost anything else you care to mention.
#14
Perineal Pressurized
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: In Ebritated
Posts: 6,555
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Suggest you start with Sheldon Browns website. Tons of information there.
__________________
This is Africa, 1943. War spits out its violence overhead and the sandy graveyard swallows it up. Her name is King Nine, B-25, medium bomber, Twelfth Air Force. On a hot, still morning she took off from Tunisia to bomb the southern tip of Italy. An errant piece of flak tore a hole in a wing tank and, like a wounded bird, this is where she landed, not to return on this day, or any other day.
This is Africa, 1943. War spits out its violence overhead and the sandy graveyard swallows it up. Her name is King Nine, B-25, medium bomber, Twelfth Air Force. On a hot, still morning she took off from Tunisia to bomb the southern tip of Italy. An errant piece of flak tore a hole in a wing tank and, like a wounded bird, this is where she landed, not to return on this day, or any other day.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,688
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1074 Post(s)
Liked 292 Times
in
219 Posts

Until the point when it gets cut down. After which, of course, it will be the owner's problem, and no longer feature into the manufacturer's considerations.
I believe the threadless is a tad mechanically superior. I've had two quill forks fail just at the beginning of the thread, but I've never seen a threadless fork fail mid-shaft.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,539
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1963 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 977 Times
in
675 Posts
The argument that quill stems can be adjusted for height any time is true but not as important as it seems. The vast majority of riders set their bar height once and never change it.
A threadless steerer can be cut slightly long and a spacer installed above the stem to allow a future height increase if desired. I cut mine to allow a 10 mm spacer above the stem but have never had to remove it to raise the stem. Lowering the stem is, of course, easy. Just move some spacers around and cut the steerer only after you are sure that's where you want the bars.
As noted there are two advantages to threadless:
1. Weight reduction as the steerers can be made of Al alloy or carbon and a threadless stem is significantly lighter than a quill stem
2. Simplicity for fork and bike manufacturers. They inventory one fork length and it fits everything. All forks are made with the same length steerer (long) and the forks are cut to length to fit for various frame and headset requirement.
A threadless steerer can be cut slightly long and a spacer installed above the stem to allow a future height increase if desired. I cut mine to allow a 10 mm spacer above the stem but have never had to remove it to raise the stem. Lowering the stem is, of course, easy. Just move some spacers around and cut the steerer only after you are sure that's where you want the bars.
As noted there are two advantages to threadless:
1. Weight reduction as the steerers can be made of Al alloy or carbon and a threadless stem is significantly lighter than a quill stem
2. Simplicity for fork and bike manufacturers. They inventory one fork length and it fits everything. All forks are made with the same length steerer (long) and the forks are cut to length to fit for various frame and headset requirement.
#17
biked well
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,435
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 131 Post(s)
Liked 126 Times
in
69 Posts
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/gloss_ha-i.html#headset
Keep in mind, it's really the fork steerer tube that's threaded or not. That determines whether you use a quill stem that goes down into the steerer and has the headset threaded onto the top of the steerer tube, or a threadless steerer that has the stem clamped to the top portion of the steerer tube. With threadless, a star spangled nut (installed inside the threadless steerer tube) is necessary for the top cap bolt on the headset to screw into, which preloads the headset bearings.
#18
Great State of Varmint
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Dante's Third Ring
Posts: 7,476
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times
in
11 Posts
On a fast and nimble road-bike, I go with 1" threaded and won't change that. Adopt it for 1-1/8" stems - yes. But nothing will get me to abandon my Tange Levin headset.
For hybrids I prefer the threadless. They just feel right for these bikes. Mountain-bikes, too.
For hybrids I prefer the threadless. They just feel right for these bikes. Mountain-bikes, too.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,539
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1963 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 977 Times
in
675 Posts
What got me to abandon my two OEM Tange Levin headsets was "brinelling" of the crown race and lower cup in less than 4000 miles. And, yes, these headsets were properly adjusted, lubricated and kept relatively clean and used on road bikes.
A Shimano 600 (loose bearing version, not the newer cartridge bearing model) replacement headset lasted over 15,000 miles on the same bike.
A Shimano 600 (loose bearing version, not the newer cartridge bearing model) replacement headset lasted over 15,000 miles on the same bike.
#20
Great State of Varmint
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Dante's Third Ring
Posts: 7,476
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times
in
11 Posts
I've never had a problem on god-only-knows how many miles. But I bought it in 1982, and the same headset is still available today - for about double the price of then. If the Shimano 600 works for you - go for it. If my Tange dies on me - I'll take a look at the Shimano. Thanks!
#21
WV is not flat..
I added the threadless adapter to my Kestrel mainly so I could have more options for sizing and comfort. I really like being able to change up and it really does'nt look that bad to me..Very functional..Here's a before and after..I know I'll hear it---"FLIP THE STEM"...but it's where I like it...
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: La La Land (We love it!)
Posts: 6,301
Bikes: Gilmour road, Curtlo road; both steel (of course)
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 273 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
9 Posts
I've always considered the headset's fine threads and limited amount of engagement to be a real weak link. Using aluminum to save weight makes it even worse. Also, adjusting threaded requires expensive wrenches that have no other use.
Think about how many "stuck stem" posts we get here; yes, those are older bikes but I expect this won't occur with threadless since the wedge has been eliminated.
I think threadless is a huge improvement.
Think about how many "stuck stem" posts we get here; yes, those are older bikes but I expect this won't occur with threadless since the wedge has been eliminated.
I think threadless is a huge improvement.
__________________
Today, I believe my jurisdiction ends here...
Today, I believe my jurisdiction ends here...
Likes For rmfnla:
#23
Great State of Varmint
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Dante's Third Ring
Posts: 7,476
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times
in
11 Posts
brandenjs -
I think we're on the same page! LOL. Anywho, I also did a conversion - keeping my Tange Levin. Sorry for the poor photography:
I think we're on the same page! LOL. Anywho, I also did a conversion - keeping my Tange Levin. Sorry for the poor photography:

#24
The Improbable Bulk
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wilkes-Barre, PA
Posts: 8,401
Bikes: Many
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
6 Posts

Seriously though, how is the threadless adapter working out as far as stiffness etc? Do you recall which model you bought?
#25
Great State of Varmint
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Dante's Third Ring
Posts: 7,476
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times
in
11 Posts
Mine is a Profile Design stem-converter. It's totally solid - as is the Ritchey adjustable stem. Can't tell it's a 2-piece stem unless you look at it.