![]() |
V-brakes also have the advantage of not sticking outside the frame. My tektro wide profiles stick a full 3cm outside the fork and frame and they do catch body parts and clothing.
|
Originally Posted by fuzz2050
(Post 8221932)
TGive it about a day until the Canti people come out in force, and then three pages of diatribes and anecdotal experiences later ....
|
Originally Posted by cyccommute
(Post 8220023)
You are correct in everything but...
(edit: A hint on how to avoid frustration if installing fenders on a bike with U brakes: don't.) Of course, all this depends on proper set up, and cantis are a pain in the arse if you don't have a lot of practice. Vs can't be tweaked to have quite as much power as a carefully set up canti, but they have more than enough power for just about anything and are dead simple to adjust. |
Originally Posted by AnthonyG
(Post 8219609)
Now some argue that cantilevers can be just as good but I disagree. Yes you can setup cantilever brakes if you know what you are doing and have the patience to be good enough for someone with strong hands but thats not the same as the power available from v-brakes. I have poor hand strength and I can easily lock up a front v-brake for better or worse.
A cantilever brake has the advantage of you being able to use it with STI levers but a v-brake with the right lever will outperform it. Anthony |
Originally Posted by LarDasse74
(Post 8224331)
Actually, the centre-pull cable design of low profile cantis allows for nearly infinite power (really!!!) if you know what you are doing. The power of a V brake is fixed and less than that of a canti set up for super high power. But Vs are waaaay easier to set up and much less likely to be done wrong or in a way that gives you less than maximum power.
Now I'm sure that what your doing with a low profile cantilever setup is making the cross cable so short that it effectively pulls as sideways as possible, just like a v-brake and since you are using low cable pull levers you have good mechanical advantage but you also have all the issues of close clearances with no tolerance for any out of true wheels or non centering pads. In the real world v-brakes offer you the best of all worlds with no fussy issues to sort out. Anthony |
Originally Posted by AnthonyG
(Post 8224624)
Actually I'm sure you could get even more power out of a v-brake if you used a standard pull lever and NOT a v-brake specific lever. The drawback is that you will have minimal pad to rim clearance to get it to work and NO tolerance for any rim that is even slightly out of true or pads that don't want to centre reliably.
Now I'm sure that what your doing with a low profile cantilever setup is making the cross cable so short that it effectively pulls as sideways as possible, just like a v-brake and since you are using low cable pull levers you have good mechanical advantage but you also have all the issues of close clearances with no tolerance for any out of true wheels or non centering pads. In the real world v-brakes offer you the best of all worlds with no fussy issues to sort out. Anthony The actual amount of tension in the straddle cable is: t/(2 X Sine A) where A is the angle between the straddle cable and horizontal... As A approaches zero (horizontal), Sine A gets extremely close to zero, and a non zero number, 't' divided by a number approaching zero approaches infinity... For example, if the straddle cable is at 30 degrees, with cable tension of 10 lbs: 10lbs/(2 X Sine 30) = 10 lbs cable tension in the straddle cable. If A is decreased to 10 degrees 10lbs/(2 X Sine 10) = 28.8 lbs. at 5 degrees the tension is 57.4 lbs, at one degree the tension is 286.5 lbs... If you pull the brake cable on a V brake with 10 lbs tension, the brake sees 10 lbs tension - no more and no less. The problem, as you said, is that it gets increasingly hard to set up a brake with a very low straddle cable, including tire or fender clearance and rim run-out clearance. Also, the more you pull the cable the higher the straddle angle gets and the less this trigonometric leverage effect works for you. But it is not difficult at all to set up a low-profile canti with significantly more power than a V brake. |
Originally Posted by AnthonyG
(Post 8224624)
In the real world v-brakes offer you the best of all worlds with no fussy issues to sort out. Anthony |
1 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by cyccommute
(Post 8223256)
Moving the end of the anchor arm up or down does not change the relative position of the anchor point.
Originally Posted by cyccommute
(Post 8223256)
In order to get more or less cable pull, you'd have to move the anchor point relative to the pivot point.
As far as the mechanical forces are concerned the cable might just as well run "straight" from the barrel adjuster and to where the slider sits on the stroke adjustment screw. Attachment 92647 Green, red and yellow are the available effective lever lengths(somewhat exagerrated) The part circled in turquoise is the link that's free to toggle. When the brake is engaged it'll align itself along the shortest route available between the adjustable slider and where the cable enters the barrel adjuster. With the adjuster set at its two opposite end points you get a slightly different angle between the cable and the lever but more importantly you do get different effective lever lengths, and with that different strokes. There's really no way around it. If you're able to change the "feel" of a brake w/o changing the stroke or the leverage - then what is it you're changing? The flexibility of the brake lever? |
Originally Posted by dabac
(Post 8225872)
OK, I admit. I forgot about the oblong thingy that goes between the slider that moves up & down as you adjust the lever and the cable end point. But as it's free to tilt it doesn't change the leverage.
But that's exactly what you do. The only thing confusing the issue is the intermediate link between the cable anchor point and the adjustable slider in the setup. And since that link is hinged and free to align itself with the pull it doesn't affect the leverage. As far as the mechanical forces are concerned the cable might just as well run "straight" from the barrel adjuster and to where the slider sits on the stroke adjustment screw. Attachment 92647 Green, red and yellow are the available effective lever lengths(somewhat exagerrated) The part circled in turquoise is the link that's free to toggle. When the brake is engaged it'll align itself along the shortest route available between the adjustable slider and where the cable enters the barrel adjuster. With the adjuster set at its two opposite end points you get a slightly different angle between the cable and the lever but more importantly you do get different effective lever lengths, and with that different strokes. There's really no way around it. If you're able to change the "feel" of a brake w/o changing the stroke or the leverage - then what is it you're changing? The flexibility of the brake lever? I've played a little with the Speed Dials and, personally, the difference is pretty subtle. More a gimmick than an actual benefit:rolleyes: |
Shimano Servo-wave levers do make a difference. If nothing else, the variance in leverage creates a level of modulation you can't get with conventional rim brake levers. That and the fact that at max leverage and properly set up brakes, the brakes will throw you over the bars if you don't mind your manners.
It's funny, there's a section in the Shimano instructions that advise practicing braking with these levers in a controlled situation so that you don't do an unexpected endo later on. This, of course, is only true if you remove the adjusment blocks so that max leverage can be applied. In all seriousness, they really are good levers- |
Originally Posted by cyccommute
(Post 8226620)
You are changing the length of the lever arm
Originally Posted by cyccommute
(Post 8226620)
..but not the amount of cable that the arm pulls.
If you have two levers of different length but both moving the same number of degrees, then the tip of the longer lever will traverse a greater distance than the tip of the shorter lever. Changing the length of the lever, and maintaining the degree of arc w/o changing the distance covered is pretty much the same as claiming to be able to draw two circles of different diameters but with the same circumference.
Originally Posted by cyccommute
(Post 8226620)
... The anchor point is free to pivot so all it does is change the angle at which the cable pulls out of the housing.
Originally Posted by cyccommute
(Post 8226620)
The length of cable pulled out remains the same.
Your results may vary if you've engaged the reach adjustment screws, but apart from that my results should be repeatable within a mm or so. |
Originally Posted by cyccommute
(Post 8223256)
Your picture illustrates what I've been saying
http://www.bikeforums.net/attachment...0&d=1232572359 Moving the end of the anchor arm up or down does not change the relative position of the anchor point. In order to get more or less cable pull, you'd have to move the anchor point relative to the pivot point. That just doesn't happen in the Speed Dial (or Servo Wave) levers. Frankly, you are the first person I've ever run across who says that the Speed Dial or Servo-Wave feature can be used in the way you are describing. The little hinge part that the cable head goes into (circled in blue in the drawing) always stays parallel with the cable and for that reason can be considered part of the cable. The point where this hinge attaches to the speed dial adjusting rod can be considered the cable anchor point, and this point moves. The closer to the lever pivot this attachment point the shorter the radius of the arc the cable end travels, and so the less the cable is pulled. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:39 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.