shimano 105
#2
Low car diet
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Corvallis, OR, USA
Posts: 2,407
Bikes: 2006 Windsor Dover w/105, 2007 GT Avalanche w/XT, 1995 Trek 820 setup for touring, 201? Yeah single-speed folder, 199? Huffy tandem.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
From: https://sheldonbrown.com/k7.html#roadmtb
Note, also that rear derailers do not care how many gears you have. You do not need to have a so-called "10-speed" derailer to use a 10-speed cassette. This is true of all Shimano derailers with the exception of 1996 and earlier (pre-9-speed) Dura-Ace units.
Note, also that rear derailers do not care how many gears you have. You do not need to have a so-called "10-speed" derailer to use a 10-speed cassette. This is true of all Shimano derailers with the exception of 1996 and earlier (pre-9-speed) Dura-Ace units.
#3
Great State of Varmint
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Dante's Third Ring
Posts: 7,476
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times
in
15 Posts
What does matter is your shifter. A friction-shifter setup will shift through all ranges. But an indexed-shifter has to match the number of gears you have in the rear, and how many chainrings you are running up front. So if you have a 9spd cassette in the back - you need a 9spd shifter. 3 chainrings? You need a 3spd shifter for the crankset.
#6
Low car diet
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Corvallis, OR, USA
Posts: 2,407
Bikes: 2006 Windsor Dover w/105, 2007 GT Avalanche w/XT, 1995 Trek 820 setup for touring, 201? Yeah single-speed folder, 199? Huffy tandem.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
Originally Posted by frothyllama (private message)
so i can use it with my 18 speed bike is what your saying????
Also, what's the range of gears (cogs) in the back? That rear derailleur is rated for up to 27-teeth, but that may be able to be exceeded somewhat.
#7
Great State of Varmint
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Dante's Third Ring
Posts: 7,476
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times
in
15 Posts
You can bet on it. A "medium" RD is more like a long-cage. The "long-cage" you see - rarely - are really long and designed for all-out mountain-bikers. Mediums will handle most situations. And Shimano shoots itself in the foot by saying 27T is maximum. Nonsense. I run Ultegra RD's and have seen them easily take on a 30 - 32T in the rear. Apparently the max-size is referring to the largest size in that particular gruppo.
Shimano discourages customers in this way, and the max-size they list should be ignored. I just installed a FD (Shimano) that was max at 44-48T (FD-M961). I put this on to work with an Ultegra triple - 30-39-52. It has plenty of room to spare and shifts flawlessly.
Wake up, Shimano!
Shimano discourages customers in this way, and the max-size they list should be ignored. I just installed a FD (Shimano) that was max at 44-48T (FD-M961). I put this on to work with an Ultegra triple - 30-39-52. It has plenty of room to spare and shifts flawlessly.
Wake up, Shimano!
Last edited by Panthers007; 02-22-09 at 06:56 PM. Reason: Syn
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 511
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts