Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

Why are the sprockets on the crank inverse from the sprockets on the cassette?

Search
Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

Why are the sprockets on the crank inverse from the sprockets on the cassette?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-23-09, 03:18 PM
  #26  
DOS
Senior Member
 
DOS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Arlington, VA USA
Posts: 2,108
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 253 Post(s)
Liked 69 Times in 56 Posts
Originally Posted by DiabloScott
Well, there's a big height difference between the captain and the stok-kid.



The ability to accomodate the height difference without any modifications was the reason I went with this Bike Friday tandem instead of something more conventional.
Well don't I feel like the schmuck for my chamois comment. Thats a very sweet picture (says I the father of 3 little girls).
DOS is offline  
Old 02-23-09, 06:03 PM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Alabama USA
Posts: 535

Bikes: TREK 1000c

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by bryroth
If you start from the frame and count outwards, the cassette goes large gear, smaller gear, smaller gear, etc. On the crank, assuming you have a double or a triple, they go smaller, larger, larger.

I know there is a good and probably obvious reason, but I am not mechanical enough to figure it out by intuition. Could someone please tell me?

Thanks.
On the front, the smaller tooth ring is lower gear and the higher tooth ring is higher gear
On the rear, the larger tooth cog is lower gear and the lower tooth cog is high gear.

In other words:
INBOARD (front and rear) = Lowest gear ratio = straight(est) chain line
OUTBOARD (front and rear) = Highest gear ratio = straight(est) chain line

Flipping one over to "look" the same would cause cross chaining in the "normal" gear selections.
tippy is offline  
Old 02-23-09, 06:06 PM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656

Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!

Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,095 Times in 741 Posts
Originally Posted by DiabloScott
Well, there's a big height difference between the captain and the stok-kid......The ability to accomodate the height difference without any modifications was the reason I went with this Bike Friday tandem instead of something more conventional.
Co-Motion makes a conventional 700c wheel tandem frame that has a three piece telescoping stoker seatpost. It will compress and extend over a huge range and allow kids to stoke without a kidback but will also accomodate full size adults. Truly a "one size fits all" tandem.
HillRider is offline  
Old 02-23-09, 11:28 PM
  #29  
Insane Bicycle Mechanic
 
Jeff Wills's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: other Vancouver
Posts: 9,827
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 797 Post(s)
Liked 695 Times in 372 Posts
Originally Posted by tatfiend
Not germane to chain line but many old tandems from the 1890s or so did have the lady up front as the old rules of courtesy included "ladies first". Most such setups included remote steering so that the stoker could steer the bike. Many had both capable of steering so that the strongest presumably won! Usually set up so the stoker had a higher saddle to look over the head of the captain. Added complication to meet the requirements of Victorian etiquette.
The bike shop I worked at had a tandem like that above and behind the cash register. I always wanted to take it out on Halloween and ride solo from the back seat. "Ghost Rider"!!

Never had the guts to try it, though. I wonder if it's still there, considering the shop has moved around the corner: https://www.insiderpages.com/b/3711097983

Here's a picture of an 1896 version:
__________________
Jeff Wills

Comcast nuked my web page. It will return soon..
Jeff Wills is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.