I want to build a touring bike out of a road frame and have questions.
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,303
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I want to build a touring bike out of a road frame and have questions.
Besides frame geometry, how is a road bike different from a touring bike? I don't plan to hang fenders or racks at this point.
#2
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,779
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3583 Post(s)
Liked 3,395 Times
in
1,929 Posts
If you're not going to be using fenders or racks, you may as well stay with a standard road bike.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,869
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1854 Post(s)
Liked 661 Times
in
504 Posts
Touring bikes are often built with heavier and stiffer tubing than road bikes. To support the loads at their contact points and simultaneously to function well as a bicycle, extra rigidity is needed. Both Reynolds and Columbus had special touring grades of the 531 (Super Tourist) and Cyclex (SP) tubes.
#4
Guest
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Grid Reference, SK
Posts: 3,768
Bikes: I never learned to ride a bike. It is my deepest shame.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
6 Posts
Touring bikes are usually equipped with triple-chainring cranksets and compatible shifters and derailleurs... the extra chainring is usually a 'granny' gear for easier climbing up large hills, especially if you are carrying extra equipment on the bike. Road bikes often only hafve two chainrings and the smaller of the two is a larger gear than the smallest on a triple.
Touring bikes also often have a wider range of cogs on the back, and a long-cage rear derailleur to accomodate. Road bikes usually have a tighter gear cluster and a short cage derailleur that can not accomodate large cogs.
Touring bikes have more room for wider tires for a smoother ride, and room for fenders. Many road bikes (especially bikes made in the last 5 - 10 years AFAIK) do not have room for fenders with anything but the skinniest tires. Most modern road bikes can only fit tires up to 25mm wide (maybe 28mm).
Also, touring bikes often have a slightly different cockpit layout (height and reach to bars), although this is generally a matter of personal preference.
Finally, touring bikes are often made of heavier tubes to make the bike carry loads better and to ensure durability.
If you like your road bike and there is no specific reason why it won't work (like you want fenders or wide tires) then there is no reason why you cannot use a road bike for all your riding.
Touring bikes also often have a wider range of cogs on the back, and a long-cage rear derailleur to accomodate. Road bikes usually have a tighter gear cluster and a short cage derailleur that can not accomodate large cogs.
Touring bikes have more room for wider tires for a smoother ride, and room for fenders. Many road bikes (especially bikes made in the last 5 - 10 years AFAIK) do not have room for fenders with anything but the skinniest tires. Most modern road bikes can only fit tires up to 25mm wide (maybe 28mm).
Also, touring bikes often have a slightly different cockpit layout (height and reach to bars), although this is generally a matter of personal preference.
Finally, touring bikes are often made of heavier tubes to make the bike carry loads better and to ensure durability.
If you like your road bike and there is no specific reason why it won't work (like you want fenders or wide tires) then there is no reason why you cannot use a road bike for all your riding.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SW Idaho
Posts: 643
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Retro's question is a very salient one: Why do you want to build a touring bike if your not going to equip it like one? If we knew a liitle more about the intended use of your new build, we could be a little more specific about addressing your concern.
I'll tell you one thing - if you put a "touring" load on a road bike with a normal (racing) geometry, you'll be in for a very exciting ride!
I'll tell you one thing - if you put a "touring" load on a road bike with a normal (racing) geometry, you'll be in for a very exciting ride!
#7
cycles per second
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,930
Bikes: Early 1980's Ishiwata 022 steel sport/touring, 1986 Vitus 979, 1988 DiamondBack Apex, 1997 Softride PowerWing 700, 2001 Trek OCLV 110
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 44 Post(s)
Liked 71 Times
in
48 Posts
Touring bikes also often have cantilever brakes for better stopping power with the extra weight.
#9
cab horn
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 28,353
Bikes: 1987 Bianchi Campione
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 42 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 25 Times
in
18 Posts
Since he's not putting any racks on it, it's clearly obvious that he's going credit card touring. I mean, really who wants to lug around 50lbs of gear anyways. It's not about the scenery or the journey, it's about how fast you can get from a to b.
#10
cycles per second
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,930
Bikes: Early 1980's Ishiwata 022 steel sport/touring, 1986 Vitus 979, 1988 DiamondBack Apex, 1997 Softride PowerWing 700, 2001 Trek OCLV 110
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 44 Post(s)
Liked 71 Times
in
48 Posts
#12
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,303
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I have an old Nishiki frame with whachmacalits for attaching fenders but it is a road bike frame. The thing is heavy as compared to my road bike frame but I have no doubt it'll give me the smooth ride I seek. I think what I meant about building it up as a touring is that I want to put a large cog in the rear, something like a 11/34 cassette and a triple up front. I didn't know what else it would require in order to have that sort of set up.
I've been intrigued with this set up ever since I perused the touring bike gallery in that forum. Plus, when the baby is big enough, I want to haul him around in the Burley. I attached it onto my road bike and it felt squirrley.
I've been intrigued with this set up ever since I perused the touring bike gallery in that forum. Plus, when the baby is big enough, I want to haul him around in the Burley. I attached it onto my road bike and it felt squirrley.
#13
Guest
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Grid Reference, SK
Posts: 3,768
Bikes: I never learned to ride a bike. It is my deepest shame.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
6 Posts
I have an old Nishiki frame with whachmacalits for attaching fenders but it is a road bike frame. The thing is heavy as compared to my road bike frame but I have no doubt it'll give me the smooth ride I seek. I think what I meant about building it up as a touring is that I want to put a large cog in the rear, something like a 11/34 cassette and a triple up front. I didn't know what else it would require in order to have that sort of set up.
I've been intrigued with this set up ever since I perused the touring bike gallery in that forum. Plus, when the baby is big enough, I want to haul him around in the Burley. I attached it onto my road bike and it felt squirrley.
I've been intrigued with this set up ever since I perused the touring bike gallery in that forum. Plus, when the baby is big enough, I want to haul him around in the Burley. I attached it onto my road bike and it felt squirrley.
#14
Banned.
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Fort Wayne, Indiana
Posts: 4,761
Bikes: 84 Trek 660 Suntour Superbe; 87 Giant Rincon Shimano XT; 07 Mercian Vincitore Campy Veloce
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
I have an old racing frame that I cash/credit card toured on with no problems. I never used any racks or fenders either. But there is fenders on the market for racing bikes. All I used was my seat bag to carry tools and spare stuff (ask if your wondering what stuff); and a large handlebar bag for a jacket, set of jersey and shorts, food etc. The bike already had two water bottle brackets so I bought a clamp on Minoura BH95X bracket that I can mount to the handlebar for a third bottle: https://www.minourausa.com/english/accessory-e.html#.
Now I have a touring bike to do loaded touring with, but credit card touring is a blast.
Now I have a touring bike to do loaded touring with, but credit card touring is a blast.
#15
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,303
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Yes, but I want to do centuries on it also. I know it'll be slow what with all that extra weight and 28 tires but I don;t care about finishing fast.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 659
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Basically, where you don't carry much of your own equipment, but rent or buy what you need (food, lodgings, etc.) at each stop along the way. As opposed to "loaded touring" where you are completely self-supported and carry it all with you.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Peters, Missouri
Posts: 30,225
Bikes: Catrike 559 I own some others but they don't get ridden very much.
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1572 Post(s)
Liked 643 Times
in
364 Posts
I have an old Nishiki frame with whachmacalits for attaching fenders but it is a road bike frame. The thing is heavy as compared to my road bike frame but I have no doubt it'll give me the smooth ride I seek. I think what I meant about building it up as a touring is that I want to put a large cog in the rear, something like a 11/34 cassette and a triple up front. I didn't know what else it would require in order to have that sort of set up.
I've been intrigued with this set up ever since I perused the touring bike gallery in that forum. Plus, when the baby is big enough, I want to haul him around in the Burley. I attached it onto my road bike and it felt squirrley.
I've been intrigued with this set up ever since I perused the touring bike gallery in that forum. Plus, when the baby is big enough, I want to haul him around in the Burley. I attached it onto my road bike and it felt squirrley.
I really like the bike and I ride it a lot. The thing that I miss are eyelets for a luggage rack. I frequently find myself wishing that I had one for clothes that I want to shed or to carry something that I'd like to buy along the way. I tried installing one using 2 sets of P clamps but I wasn't satisfied with the lack of stability.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,869
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1854 Post(s)
Liked 661 Times
in
504 Posts
You can put wide-range gears on nearly any road bike, at least I can't think of a reason why not, right now. You will probably need to replace the crank and derailleurs, but that's not a problem, just a cost.
If you want a handlebar bag or not, that is a break point. Road frames are generally designed to be stable and maneuverable without any added weight on the handlebars, beyond a light and computer and such. Long-distance riders often want to put a handlebar bag on, to be able to reach a map, a munchie, warm gloves, or what-not without stopping. Doing this can make a bike shimmy. To design a bike for this purpose, the fork needs more rake, which creates less trail, and reduces this tendency.
Bikes for this kind of riding are usually lightweight, but probably don't go crazy with weight reduction. Reliability and on-road servicability are important.
Road Fan
If you want a handlebar bag or not, that is a break point. Road frames are generally designed to be stable and maneuverable without any added weight on the handlebars, beyond a light and computer and such. Long-distance riders often want to put a handlebar bag on, to be able to reach a map, a munchie, warm gloves, or what-not without stopping. Doing this can make a bike shimmy. To design a bike for this purpose, the fork needs more rake, which creates less trail, and reduces this tendency.
Bikes for this kind of riding are usually lightweight, but probably don't go crazy with weight reduction. Reliability and on-road servicability are important.
Road Fan
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,869
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1854 Post(s)
Liked 661 Times
in
504 Posts
Just noticed, "grouch" is a last name! So is "fan", for that matter.
#23
Banned.
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Fort Wayne, Indiana
Posts: 4,761
Bikes: 84 Trek 660 Suntour Superbe; 87 Giant Rincon Shimano XT; 07 Mercian Vincitore Campy Veloce
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Road frames are generally designed to be stable and maneuverable without any added weight on the handlebars, beyond a light and computer and such. Long-distance riders often want to put a handlebar bag on, to be able to reach a map, a munchie, warm gloves, or what-not without stopping. Doing this can make a bike shimmy. To design a bike for this purpose, the fork needs more rake, which creates less trail, and reduces this tendency.
Road Fan
Road Fan
10 to maybe even 15 pounds on a handlebar is nothing for a bike to handle.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,869
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1854 Post(s)
Liked 661 Times
in
504 Posts
I'm sorry Road Fan but this statement is not necessarily correct. It may be correct if your hauling 50 pounds on a handlebar bag! But my front bag loaded only weighs 12 pounds, and that may be an over estimate. My Trek 660 is pure racing with a short rake on the fork and the rear is so tight I have to deflate the tire and flatten it against the seat tube to get it off! I have NEVER experienced any shimmy and can easily reach or stuff with out stopping, but doing so, like text messaging while driving, could cause one to swerve which could be hazardous to one's health.
10 to maybe even 15 pounds on a handlebar is nothing for a bike to handle.
10 to maybe even 15 pounds on a handlebar is nothing for a bike to handle.
So I agree with you, my statement is not necessarily correct. Thanks!
I didn't say anything about chainstay length.
Glad your 660 works for you, froze.
Road Fan