Discrepency on chain width, 3/32 vs. 1/8
#1
Guest
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
Discrepency on chain width, 3/32 vs. 1/8
My bike is a 1989 Performance Vitesse, with a Biopace 52/42 front and 13-28 6 speed cassette.
While searching other threads, I found that the SRAM PC-830 was suggested and/or recommended. After buying it, I discovered that my original UG labeled chain is 1/8" while the one I just bought is 3/32". A 1/8" chain is available which is the SRAM PC-1 (made for single speeds).
Question: Should I go with the new chain PC-830 I already bought or just get a new 1/8" chain?
Is it strange that I got the 1/8" back then?
Thanks.
While searching other threads, I found that the SRAM PC-830 was suggested and/or recommended. After buying it, I discovered that my original UG labeled chain is 1/8" while the one I just bought is 3/32". A 1/8" chain is available which is the SRAM PC-1 (made for single speeds).
Question: Should I go with the new chain PC-830 I already bought or just get a new 1/8" chain?
Is it strange that I got the 1/8" back then?
Thanks.
Last edited by Tonycycling; 05-02-09 at 07:06 PM.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times
in
742 Posts
Your 6-speed freewheel or casette, assuming it was "standard spaced" may tolerate a 1/8" chain but a 3/32" is the correct one. I wonder if the 1/8" chain was a replacement and the purchaser made a mistake. Typically, 1/8" chain is only used on single speed/fixed gear road and track bikes.
#3
Great State of Varmint
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Dante's Third Ring
Posts: 7,476
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times
in
15 Posts
Yes indeed - the 3/32" chain is what it should have had all along. Forget about 1/8" - as stated they only do duty on fixed-gear and some BMX bikes.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Brookline, MA
Posts: 514
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I intentionally run a 1/8" chain on my 6-speed freewheel, because they work fine (if a tad noisy) and I bought a few by accident that I want to use up. But as for the OP, use the 3/32".
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: arlington, VA
Posts: 1,764
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
4 Posts
Is there any snagging or shifting problems?
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: angus scotland
Posts: 600
Bikes: Grifter BSA 20
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
you must have long chainstays. As the more sturdy 1/8" chain wont be bent by the deraileurs so easy. I couldnt get a 1/8" chain to work on my 6 speed bmx.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: arlington, VA
Posts: 1,764
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
4 Posts
Gredner, what bike(s) have you been running 1/8 inch chain on 6 speed.
#10
Call me The Breeze
How wide is the chain? 1/8 refers to the inside width, then you have to consider the plate thickness and pin length. Add to that the fact that the top pulley "floats" on an alivio derailleur for SIS purposes and I wouldnt' be so sure it'll work.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Brookline, MA
Posts: 514
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: arlington, VA
Posts: 1,764
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
4 Posts
As measured through the clear package, a 1/8 chain I haven't mounted yet appears to be about 3/8 wide at the pins. With the float I guess I could see some issues. My recollection is that the pre index shifters also had some float on that wheel, or is it more on the idexed shifters?
#13
Guest
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
Update: I installed the correct sized chain, 3/32". It sounds better overall. But now I'm having shifting problems.
The chain length was measured and calculated to be 54 links. Being the smart-ass that I am, I decided to 53 links. Why? Because of the advantages I read on epicidiot.com -
Disadvantages: (Read and heed these warnings)
You will not be able to use big cogs (rear wheel large granny gears) with the big ring (front fast gear).
The chain length was measured and calculated to be 54 links. Being the smart-ass that I am, I decided to 53 links. Why? Because of the advantages I read on epicidiot.com -
Disadvantages: (Read and heed these warnings)
You will not be able to use big cogs (rear wheel large granny gears) with the big ring (front fast gear).
- If you try to shift into the now illegal big ring combinations, you risk breaking your chain, derailleur, hanger, etc.
- If using the shorter derailleur cage, if you try to shift into the now illegal granny ring combinations, you risk dropping your chain due to the excess slack.
- Do this at your own risk!
- Crisper, faster, more reliable shifting.
- Can use a shorter rear derailleur cage.
- Less chance of over shifting (changing two gears when you only clicked one gear at the shifter).
- Less chain slap.
- Less chain weight.
#14
Insane Bicycle Mechanic
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: other Vancouver
Posts: 9,837
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 805 Post(s)
Liked 706 Times
in
377 Posts
Update: I installed the correct sized chain, 3/32". It sounds better overall. But now I'm having shifting problems.
The chain length was measured and calculated to be 54 links. Being the smart-ass that I am, I decided to 53 links. Why? Because of the advantages I read on epicidiot.com -
Disadvantages: (Read and heed these warnings)
I'm going to add the 1 link to see if that helps w/the shifting problem. I just may be the idiot here.
The chain length was measured and calculated to be 54 links. Being the smart-ass that I am, I decided to 53 links. Why? Because of the advantages I read on epicidiot.com -
Disadvantages: (Read and heed these warnings)
I'm going to add the 1 link to see if that helps w/the shifting problem. I just may be the idiot here.
I would never, ever, ever, ever, EVER run a chain that's even one link too short. Breaking off a rear derailleur hanger are just too expensive to risk it. You can say that you're good enough to never shift into the big/big combination, but I've known expert riders/mechanics who have done this and suffered the consequences. Anybody can go brain dead during a hard effort.
What short of shifting problems are you having?
__________________
Jeff Wills
Comcast nuked my web page. It will return soon..
Jeff Wills
Comcast nuked my web page. It will return soon..
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: yreka, ca
Posts: 542
Bikes: like 15. my favorite a 1951 schwinn spitfire cruiser. also have a 1959 amf roadmaster, 1962 jch deluxe cruiser among others.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
yeah, never run a chain thats too short. id definatly add a few links. now as for these illegal gear combinations, are they kidding me?
#16
Guest
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
Originally Posted by Jeff Wills
Anybody can go brain dead during a hard effort.
What short of shifting problems are you having?
What short of shifting problems are you having?
The shifting problem I'm experiencing is, it goes one way but not so much the other way.