FD Compatibility question
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 165
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
FD Compatibility question
Hi there - I'm switching from a road setup to a touring setup and am hoping to keep my front derailleur, a FD-6603 Ultegra SL (10-sp triple). I keep reading the specifications and seeing words of caution.
I'm moving to 9-speed chainrings (48-36-26) which is right at the listed 22t capacity of the derailleur.
I've found this too regarding the derailleur:
"Will work on 9-speed systems if used with 10-speed chain "
Which just doesn't make any sense to me at all.
FDs are pretty much the cheapest part of this equation so i don't mind getting a new one if there's some reason i should. And if i should could you recommend a suitable replacement? I'm using 9-sp dura-ace barcons, pull from under the BB...
thanks in advance!
I'm moving to 9-speed chainrings (48-36-26) which is right at the listed 22t capacity of the derailleur.
I've found this too regarding the derailleur:
"Will work on 9-speed systems if used with 10-speed chain "
Which just doesn't make any sense to me at all.
FDs are pretty much the cheapest part of this equation so i don't mind getting a new one if there's some reason i should. And if i should could you recommend a suitable replacement? I'm using 9-sp dura-ace barcons, pull from under the BB...
thanks in advance!
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: A Coffin Called Earth. or Toronto, ON
Posts: 12,257
Bikes: Bianchi, Miyata, Dahon, Rossin
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
you can use a current generation tiagra, or previous generation 105/ultegra/DA which are 9sp.
they recommend using a 10sp chain with the 9sp system because 10sp FDs are a bit narrower than 9sp FDs which can cause undesirable rubbing. while the 10sp chain has the same inner width as a 9sp so it's no big deal.
since you're using barcons, which I assume are friction, you have infinite trim and don't have to worry about the FD rubbing like indexed shifters and can use both 9 and 10sp chains.
9sp chains will last longer than 10sp chains and are a bit more durable, that's for sure.
they recommend using a 10sp chain with the 9sp system because 10sp FDs are a bit narrower than 9sp FDs which can cause undesirable rubbing. while the 10sp chain has the same inner width as a 9sp so it's no big deal.
since you're using barcons, which I assume are friction, you have infinite trim and don't have to worry about the FD rubbing like indexed shifters and can use both 9 and 10sp chains.
9sp chains will last longer than 10sp chains and are a bit more durable, that's for sure.
__________________
Food for thought: if you aren't dead by 2050, you and your entire family will be within a few years from starvation. Now that is a cruel gift to leave for your offspring. ;)
https://sanfrancisco.ibtimes.com/arti...ger-photos.htm
Food for thought: if you aren't dead by 2050, you and your entire family will be within a few years from starvation. Now that is a cruel gift to leave for your offspring. ;)
https://sanfrancisco.ibtimes.com/arti...ger-photos.htm
#3
Elitist Troglodyte
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Dallas
Posts: 6,925
Bikes: 03 Raleigh Professional (steel)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
If you feel you need a 9-speed chain (and for touring I would), then a 9-speed FD is the way to go.
__________________
Stupidity got us into this mess - why can't it get us out?
- Will Rogers
Stupidity got us into this mess - why can't it get us out?
- Will Rogers
#4
Insane Bicycle Mechanic
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: other Vancouver
Posts: 9,836
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 805 Post(s)
Liked 704 Times
in
376 Posts
Since you're using bar-end shifters, any question about cable-pull compatibility goes out the window, but...
The FD-R453 front derailleur is designed to use the longer, "MTB" cable pull. This means it takes less pressure to accomplish the shift. This may or may not be important to you.
The FD-R453 front derailleur is designed to use the longer, "MTB" cable pull. This means it takes less pressure to accomplish the shift. This may or may not be important to you.
__________________
Jeff Wills
Comcast nuked my web page. It will return soon..
Jeff Wills
Comcast nuked my web page. It will return soon..
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: arlington, VA
Posts: 1,764
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
4 Posts
Hi there - I'm switching from a road setup to a touring setup and am hoping to keep my front derailleur, a FD-6603 Ultegra SL (10-sp triple). I keep reading the specifications and seeing words of caution.
I'm moving to 9-speed chainrings (48-36-26) which is right at the listed 22t capacity of the derailleur.
I've found this too regarding the derailleur:
"Will work on 9-speed systems if used with 10-speed chain "
Which just doesn't make any sense to me at all.
FDs are pretty much the cheapest part of this equation so i don't mind getting a new one if there's some reason i should. And if i should could you recommend a suitable replacement? I'm using 9-sp dura-ace barcons, pull from under the BB...
thanks in advance!
I'm moving to 9-speed chainrings (48-36-26) which is right at the listed 22t capacity of the derailleur.
I've found this too regarding the derailleur:
"Will work on 9-speed systems if used with 10-speed chain "
Which just doesn't make any sense to me at all.
FDs are pretty much the cheapest part of this equation so i don't mind getting a new one if there's some reason i should. And if i should could you recommend a suitable replacement? I'm using 9-sp dura-ace barcons, pull from under the BB...
thanks in advance!
The Ultegra cage is optimized for a 52/53 tooth big ring, so shifting would slightly weaker with that fder than other comparable quailty fders. But it;s a mild enough effect I'd probably live with it.