change cassette or chainrings?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
change cassette or chainrings?
Hi--I am currently using a 53/39 with an 11-23 cassette. I need to get an easier gear for climbs. Should I change out the cassette or change the chainrings? thanks
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Oregon
Posts: 6,489
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1182 Post(s)
Liked 833 Times
in
435 Posts
Hi,
One option is to change out the casette. IMO that is where there is more bang, in this case gear changes, for the buck. I've set up several road bikes (most had triples, but would work OK on a double) with an 11-34 cassette, Shimano Deore RD (this has relatively short cage and does not look too dorky). A new chain will probably also be needed.
Just going with the biggest road cassette, you will probably top out at an 11-27. This is not much gain for the price. You maight gain a little going to a compact crankset, but again there is a small gain for the price. The mountain bike components work well and shift as smooth as my "road" components.
One option is to change out the casette. IMO that is where there is more bang, in this case gear changes, for the buck. I've set up several road bikes (most had triples, but would work OK on a double) with an 11-34 cassette, Shimano Deore RD (this has relatively short cage and does not look too dorky). A new chain will probably also be needed.
Just going with the biggest road cassette, you will probably top out at an 11-27. This is not much gain for the price. You maight gain a little going to a compact crankset, but again there is a small gain for the price. The mountain bike components work well and shift as smooth as my "road" components.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Gainesville/Tampa, FL
Posts: 2,343
Bikes: Trek 1000, two mtbs and working on a fixie for commuting.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I would change rings. Search the forums - there were quite a few threads on this a little bit ago.
#4
cab horn
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 28,353
Bikes: 1987 Bianchi Campione
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 42 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 26 Times
in
19 Posts
Define easier gears before we start recommending ****? I would've said rear cassette and possible new derailleur if you like say 11-34.
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
looking at a gear ratio chart I was thinking either an 11-25---maybe a 12-17-----or to either the smallest chainring being a 36
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Florida and Ontario
Posts: 168
Bikes: Litespeed Classic, Lynskey
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
How often do you use that 11 ? I use a 12-27 as my standard cassette both on my lightweight bike with 53/39 chainrings and on my rando bike with a compact crankset.
#7
Senior Member
Thread Starter
I have been using the 11 with the 39 alot only because the front deraileur is malfunctioning. It keeps throwing the chain off when going from the small ring to the big ring. I had a tune-up done at a LBS to fix that problem but it only lasted 2 weeks before it started throwing it off again. So I guess if I get the FD fixed I won't really need the 11 as much.
#8
Experienced
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,039
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
You can easily fit an 11-28, either a SRAM or a DuraAce 7900, assuming you're not on Campagnolo and that you use a ten-speed rear. Either would be fine. You may have to adjust the B screw on the derailleur.
#9
Senior Member
9 or 10 speed was not mentioned, nor was the brand of drivetrain. An 11-34 is a 9 speed MTB cassette that requires a long cage RD.
If the bike is 10 speed, a 12-27 Shimano cassette is usually a good option. Assuming you have a Shimano drivetrain. A 39/27 is LOT lower than a 39/23. Not many riders need a 53/11 top gear.
If the bike is 10 speed, a 12-27 Shimano cassette is usually a good option. Assuming you have a Shimano drivetrain. A 39/27 is LOT lower than a 39/23. Not many riders need a 53/11 top gear.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times
in
742 Posts
If your current crank has the standard road bolt circle diameter of 130 mm (or 135 mm for Campy), your 39T small chainring is the smallest generally available and a 38T is the smallest that will fit. So going to smaller chainrings will mean a new crank and possibly a new bottom bracket which will be an expensive change.
A 12x27 cassette is much cheaper and will give you a significanty lower gear.
BTW, get the front derailleur shifting properly. There is no reason it shouldn't and your bike shop should make it operate correctly or find a better shop. Or, learn to do it yourself. When you can use the 53T chainring, an 11T cog should be unnecessary.
A 12x27 cassette is much cheaper and will give you a significanty lower gear.
BTW, get the front derailleur shifting properly. There is no reason it shouldn't and your bike shop should make it operate correctly or find a better shop. Or, learn to do it yourself. When you can use the 53T chainring, an 11T cog should be unnecessary.
#12
wannabe
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 273
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Check out Harris Cyclery for the cassette. i just bought the "century special" which is 13-30 for my 9 spd Ultegra drivetrain. Haven't installed it yet as it arrived yesterday.