Is low normal better than high normal with STI shifters?
01-18-10, 05:52 AM
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Southern Maine
Posts: 8,941
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12185 Post(s)
Liked 1,492 Times
in
1,104 Posts
Is low normal better than high normal with STI shifters?
Looking at XT rear derailleurs and wondering if one was better than the other.
I'm just a commuter/recreational rider.
I'm just a commuter/recreational rider.
Last edited by late; 01-18-10 at 05:56 AM.
01-18-10, 07:00 AM
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Backwoods of Ontario
Posts: 2,152
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I would prefer high normal with STI. I am more likely to want to sweep multiple gears while braking coming to a stop in traffic than in any kind of accelerating scenario.
01-18-10, 07:40 AM
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Peters, Missouri
Posts: 30,225
Bikes: Catrike 559 I own some others but they don't get ridden very much.
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1572 Post(s)
Liked 643 Times
in
364 Posts
I much prefer high normal. For one thing, that's the way that STI's are designed to work.
Low normal was originally designed for mountain bikes because it's supposed to offer some kind of advantage when coming down one steep hill and immediately riding up another. My son likes low normal for his freeride bike because it lets him do something that I don't quite understand while he's riding a wheelie.
Low normal was originally designed for mountain bikes because it's supposed to offer some kind of advantage when coming down one steep hill and immediately riding up another. My son likes low normal for his freeride bike because it lets him do something that I don't quite understand while he's riding a wheelie.
01-18-10, 07:55 AM
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Southern Maine
Posts: 8,941
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12185 Post(s)
Liked 1,492 Times
in
1,104 Posts
Thanks,
I have used high normal before; but I was wondering... The description says
reverse spring which I think means high normal.
This summer I was touring and coming into Bucksport and the derailleur wire broke leaving
me with a limited choice of gears.
That's not what the post id about, I am trying to work up the courage to pull the trigger
on a new bike.
I have used high normal before; but I was wondering... The description says
reverse spring which I think means high normal.
This summer I was touring and coming into Bucksport and the derailleur wire broke leaving
me with a limited choice of gears.
That's not what the post id about, I am trying to work up the courage to pull the trigger
on a new bike.
01-18-10, 08:49 AM
#5
Call me The Breeze
"reverse spring" would be low normal. Also known as "rapid rise"
Annoying if you ask me. I prefer the traditional high normal design.
Annoying if you ask me. I prefer the traditional high normal design.
01-18-10, 08:58 AM
#6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Southern Maine
Posts: 8,941
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12185 Post(s)
Liked 1,492 Times
in
1,104 Posts
Ahhh,
thanks again.
thanks again.
01-18-10, 09:21 AM
#7
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 23
Bikes: Serotta Legend Ti, Surly Long Haul Trucker, Specialized Epic
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I prefer the XT rapid rise on my touring and commuting bikes but I use Campy shifters not STI. The reason: when I'm carrying a load and climbing the effort to shift to an easier gear takes less effort and "throw". I've used both high and low normal and for me I like the rapid rise. FYI the campy shifters work perfect with the jtek adapters, don't know about Shimano road shifters and rapid rise. My guess it would work just fine, but it's just a guess.
01-18-10, 10:01 AM
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,095 Times
in
741 Posts
I prefer the XT rapid rise on my touring and commuting bikes but I use Campy shifters not STI. The reason: when I'm carrying a load and climbing the effort to shift to an easier gear takes less effort and "throw". I've used both high and low normal and for me I like the rapid rise. FYI the campy shifters work perfect with the jtek adapters, don't know about Shimano road shifters and rapid rise. My guess it would work just fine, but it's just a guess.
The reason Ergos work well with a "rapid rise" rear derailleur is (assuming they are NOT the escapement version) they allow multiple shifts in both directions so you can sweep several downshifts using the mouse-ear. Shimano STI's, with their one "upshift" at a time, cannot downshift multiple cogs with one sweep when used with a rapid rise rd.
