Changing My dura ace 10 sp cassette
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Changing My dura ace 10 sp cassette
I have a DA 7800 12-27 10sp cassett that needs replacing. I see they have a cs7900 10sp 11-27 cassette. Would a lot of adjustment be necessary if I put that one on? Will my existing chain be OK, because it is new?
Thank you
Thank you
#2
Senior Member
You shouldn't need to make any derailler adjustments to run the 11-27. Your chain should not have the be adjusted unless it was sized for the small/small combo with no room for error. You can quickly determine if you'll need to shorten your chain by installing the cassette and shifting into the small/small combo. If the chain is still tensioned by the derailler and the upper jockey wheel is not touching the chain, you are fine.
As a side note, there's no reason that you have to use a Dura Ace cassette to replace your old Dura Ace cassette. Ultegra or 105 will work just as well with a slight weight penalty. For the price of a DA7900 cassette, you can buy 2 or 3 Ultegra or 105 cassettes.
As a side note, there's no reason that you have to use a Dura Ace cassette to replace your old Dura Ace cassette. Ultegra or 105 will work just as well with a slight weight penalty. For the price of a DA7900 cassette, you can buy 2 or 3 Ultegra or 105 cassettes.
#5
Senior Member
I just installed the same Ultegra 6700 cassette on a friend's DA7800 bike this weekend. No problems at all.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2025 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,086 Times
in
734 Posts
+1 on the Ultegra or 105 cassette. You should be able to find a 12x27 in either model if you want to stay with that range.
There is a very small weight penalty but the cost of either cassette is much lower than Dura Ace, there is no performance or shifting penalty and the larger cogs are more durable since they are steel instead of Ti. Unless weight (or snob appeal) is your overiding concern, either Ultegra or 105 is a more sensible choice.
There is a very small weight penalty but the cost of either cassette is much lower than Dura Ace, there is no performance or shifting penalty and the larger cogs are more durable since they are steel instead of Ti. Unless weight (or snob appeal) is your overiding concern, either Ultegra or 105 is a more sensible choice.
#7
Senior Member
This is currently one of the best deals going for an Ultegra 6700 cassette (especially with the extra 10% off coupon and team points): https://www.performancebike.com/bikes...0_20000_400189
Shimano seems to have dropped the 12/27 option for Ultegra 6700 though so if you want that combo in non-DA, you'll need to find a 105 or Ultegra 6600 cassette, or use SRAM.
Shimano seems to have dropped the 12/27 option for Ultegra 6700 though so if you want that combo in non-DA, you'll need to find a 105 or Ultegra 6600 cassette, or use SRAM.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2025 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,086 Times
in
734 Posts
OT: [rant]What is with this insistance on 11T small cogs on road bikes? How many riders, even fairly strong ones, using typical road cranks (50, 52 or 53T big chainrings) can make any use of the 122 to 130 gear-inch high gear they produce? Using a 12T is a reach for most. An 11T on a MTB with a 42 or 44T big chainring may make some sense but not on a road bike unless you are National Team or ProTour material.[/rant]
#9
Senior Member
OT: [rant]What is with this insistance on 11T small cogs on road bikes? How many riders, even fairly strong ones, using typical road cranks (50, 52 or 53T big chainrings) can make any use of the 122 to 130 gear-inch high gear they produce? Using a 12T is a reach for most. An 11T on a MTB with a 42 or 44T big chainring may make some sense but not on a road bike unless you are National Team or ProTour material.[/rant]
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2025 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,086 Times
in
734 Posts
There is another use for those little cogs which is extension of the top end range of the inner ring (or middle ring on a triple). Especially with the changeover from 42 to 39T inner/middle rings in the past few years (and the compact double), those desiring to stay in one ring for most of their cycling have either needed to learn to spin faster or use smaller little cogs. I'm a holdout using 42T middle rings to avoid the hassles of quick wearing 11T cogs that I'd otherwise want.
A 39/11 combination is the worst kind of cross chaining, the very thing we warn so many riders against?
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 9,438
Bikes: Trek 5500, Colnago C-50
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
5 Posts
I think a 12-27 would be the better choice. That would give you the 16 in the middle and closer ratios on the top end.
#12
Senior Member
A cassette starting with an 11T means that each of the first few cogs is 1 tooth smaller than a comparable cassette starting with a 12T. So at the same level of cross-chaining, you get a higher gear using a cassette starting with an 11T even if you never use the inner/middle ring with the 11T (for a small trade off in spacing of the big cogs).
#13
Senior Member
Thread Starter
So I put the 11-28 Ultegra cassette on. No problems at all. I do notice a little more chain noise than with the dura-ace cassette. Do you think that will subside after break in?
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2025 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,086 Times
in
734 Posts
There shouldn't be any more noise. Changing cassettes often requires minor limit screw and/or cable tension adjustments to compensate for small position differences. Also, be sure the b-screw is set far enought in to keep the derailleur's jockey pulley clear of the 28T cog.
#15
Senior Member
Thread Starter
So I'm enjoying m new cassette, except for one problem. the shift to one of the cogs is balky. It is the 13 toothed cog. All the othert shifts seem fine. I did not have a torque wrench, so I really cranked the lock ring. Could I have over-tightened it?
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 9,438
Bikes: Trek 5500, Colnago C-50
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
5 Posts
Are you having trouble shifting from the 11 to the 13 or from the 14 to the 13?
You may need to add or reduce shift cable tension.
You may need to add or reduce shift cable tension.