Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

Do 73mm BB shells offer more strength than 68mm?

Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

Do 73mm BB shells offer more strength than 68mm?

Old 07-31-10, 01:44 AM
  #1  
huffy owns
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Pennsylvania.
Posts: 572

Bikes: Catrike Expedition, KHS XC 204 mountain bike, Nashbar SS Road Bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Do 73mm BB shells offer more strength than 68mm?

Naturally I would think the default answer would be yes, however I was thinking more about the design of how bottom bracket shells are. It's only a 5 mm difference, and not only that but I would think the weld quality in that area which holds the shell to the actual tubing would weigh in heavily in terms of the strength factor.

I was just curious because as I was looking around at full suspension XC/AM frames, the vast majority of what I've found that didn't cost an absolute fortune tends to be 68mm. I just wasn't sure what the advantage was of 68 vs 73. The only thing I could think of for using 68 in this case would be to obtain better chain line, due to the way rear triangles are sometimes set up to provide the rear suspension.

Anyway, I was just curious what users had to say about this. I couldn't find any definitive reasoning behind what's what so I figured I'd ask. Thanks guys!
Roasted is offline  
Old 07-31-10, 03:32 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Torchy McFlux's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,437

Bikes: NOYB

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
No. It's not stronger.
73 was commonly used on many aluminum bikes where the diameter of the stays being welded to the BB shell were larger. Some companies (like GT) used them because they felt it allowed for more mud clearance between the rear tire and the chainstays.
Torchy McFlux is offline  
Old 07-31-10, 06:36 AM
  #3  
huffy owns
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Pennsylvania.
Posts: 572

Bikes: Catrike Expedition, KHS XC 204 mountain bike, Nashbar SS Road Bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks for the response. Is that the same reason 80mm popped up too?

(I have no idea what 80mm bottom brackets are, never seen them, but I saw some downhill frames that were listed to have an 80mm BB shell...)
Roasted is offline  
Old 08-01-10, 10:30 PM
  #4  
huffy owns
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Pennsylvania.
Posts: 572

Bikes: Catrike Expedition, KHS XC 204 mountain bike, Nashbar SS Road Bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have to wonder - wouldn't the wider diameter stays make for a stronger frame? I know that wouldn't be in direct relation to whether or not a BB shell width makes for a stronger setup, but I would think the stay diameter counts for something. Then again, when comparing my two hardtails (one uses 68, one uses 73), there's physically no difference in the stays. The only difference I see is the hardtail with 68mm shell, the stays are welded right up to the edge of the shell, whereas the other hardtail with the 73mm shell, the stays are not welded on the edge, and the shell itself has a bit of a lip on each side. Basically, I could sheer off a few mm on each side of the shell on the 73mm hardtail and not effect the welds.
Roasted is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
loubikes
Bicycle Mechanics
5
02-16-19 07:34 PM
jessejoshua
Classic & Vintage
3
07-23-18 09:59 AM
gremlin75
Bicycle Mechanics
19
03-08-15 12:09 AM
justin10054
Classic & Vintage
5
06-29-14 01:05 PM
TallRider
Bicycle Mechanics
21
10-17-12 09:33 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.