Bike Forums > Alfine 11 design
 Register All Albums Elite Membership Forum Rules Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

 10-17-11, 03:11 AM #1 trike_guy Senior Member Thread Starter   Join Date: Jul 2011 Location: Oslo, Norway Bikes: Posts: 91 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s) Quoted: 0 Post(s) Alfine 11 design So the other day it occurred to me how Shimano arranged their planetary gearsets in the Alfine 11. (I might be the only person who finds this interesting.) Hopefully I am not repeating something that has already been posted. I've been goofing around with hub ratios in Excel and found http://john-s-allen.com/gears/hubratios.htm to be really helpful. Anyway, looks to me like they basically started with the design of a Nexus 7 and started improving things. So, on Nexus 7 there are four sets of planetary gears, each one of which is only run "one way", that is, to increase or decrease the ratio, and not both. If we call these gears A, B, C and D we have: 1: 1/A 2: 1/B 3: C/A 4: C/B 5: D/B 6: C 7: D Note that A ~= D and B ~= C. Now for Alfine 11 we also have four sets of planetary gears, and A ~= D and B ~= C as before. They just allow 3 of the 4 to run both ways. 1: 1/A * 1/C 2: 1/A 3: 1/B 4: C/A 5: C/B 6: D/B 7: C 8: D 9: B*C 10: B*D 11: A*D My spreadsheet can fairly closely replicate the 7 "derived" gears starting with the ratios of 2, 3, 7 and 8. The Nexus 8 / Alfine 8 are totally different. They also have 4 sets of planetary gears, but obtain their ratios as folllows: 1: 1/A 2: B/A 3: C/A 4: D/A 5: 1.0 6: B 7: C 8: D So there you have it, for what's it worth. Now, owners of the Alfine 11 can obsess about just how many planeteries are spinning around while they charge a hill.
 10-17-11, 08:52 AM #2 tcs Palmer     Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Parts Unknown Bikes: 1980 Mike Melton, 1982 Stumpjumper, 1982 Santana, 1984 Alex Moulton AM7, 1987 Dahon Classic III, 2007 Cannondale Capo, 2010 Dawes Briercliffe, 2017 Dahon Curl i3 Posts: 5,085 Mentioned: 11 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s) Quoted: 192 Post(s) So in your analysis, 7 of the 11 gears are dual stage compounded, and there's no direct drive. I'd love to see an instrumented efficiency test on the Alfine 11.
 10-17-11, 09:58 PM #3 Wallstreetjazz Junior Member   Join Date: Apr 2011 Location: Dubuque, IA Bikes: All City Nature Boy Posts: 12 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s) Quoted: 0 Post(s) Cool, I now know how my Alfine 8 is shifting. I had trouble visualizing the gears in the Alfine because the Shifting is much more complex than the Sturmey-Archer 3/5 speeds. I wish the direct drive was higher though for maximum cruzing efficiency, but that's not why I bought it in the first place.
10-18-11, 01:18 AM   #4
trike_guy
Senior Member

Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Oslo, Norway
Bikes:
Posts: 91
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
 Originally Posted by tcs So in your analysis, 7 of the 11 gears are dual stage compounded, and there's no direct drive.
But at least there seems to be no need for triple-compounded gears (such as 3rd and 5th on Rohloff).

I'm also very excited to be able to understand why the hub favors high ratios instead of low, and why there is that huge gap at the bottom. (They didn't reinforce "1/B" enough to take the torque from "1/C", and they didn't reinforce "1/A" enough to take the torque from "1/D"... only "1/C".) If they had reinforced A and B sufficiently, they could have made a symmetric 13 speed hub (with a 0.47 first gear, which is about 5th gear on a Rohloff).

Also you can sort of conclude that you can stomp on gear 2 all you like, but gear 1 is more of a risk because its actually the same final planetary stage at work, just with your torque increased by 29% on the input. (I assume that "A" and "B" are the second stage gear sets, because they typically increase torque.) Gear 3 might even be less strong than gear 2, since gear 2 is running a gear set that was significantly reinforced.

Last edited by trike_guy; 10-18-11 at 01:22 AM.

 10-27-11, 04:44 AM #5 h264 Newbie   Join Date: Jul 2007 Bikes: Posts: 1 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s) Quoted: 0 Post(s) It seems that gear 2 it's not that strong: http://forums.mtbr.com/internal-gear...cs-696480.html
10-31-11, 04:46 AM   #6
trike_guy
Senior Member

Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Oslo, Norway
Bikes:
Posts: 91
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
 Originally Posted by h264 It seems that gear 2 it's not that strong: http://forums.mtbr.com/internal-gear...cs-696480.html
Wow, that's a forum I don't think I'll try posting on.

Anyway I imagine that he just broke gear 2 ("1/A") because that is what he was using to muscle up some particular slope.

1st gear should really be placing more torque on "1/A" than 2nd gear does. I don't think Shimano would run the torque from "1/A" through "1/C" because if they where willing to do that, then it would have been no trouble to also run "1/B" through "1/C" and thereby eliminate the large gap between 1st and 2nd gears (and make a 12 speed hub). So I stand by my estimation that 1st gear should be weaker than 2nd gear.