Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

How to change from a quill stem to a thread-less ?

Search
Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

How to change from a quill stem to a thread-less ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-12-12, 01:12 PM
  #26  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 15
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
to go with this ( for example) ? https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/1-Ahead-Th...#ht_500wt_1156
martinarlaw is offline  
Old 04-12-12, 01:22 PM
  #27  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Posts: 43,598

Bikes: 8

Mentioned: 197 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7607 Post(s)
Liked 1,355 Times in 862 Posts
Its going to go UP, its an auction. kid. and what if the reach is wrong?
the tube quill type things are reduced at the bottom
so OD down there is ID at the top. they are for stuffing the same quill in the top.

Anyhow, many 1.125" hreadless stems come with a shim , down to 1.0" ..

Last edited by fietsbob; 04-12-12 at 04:54 PM.
fietsbob is offline  
Old 04-12-12, 01:26 PM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 489

Bikes: '74 Schwinn Le Tour (x2), '83 Bianchi, '96 Trek 820, '96 Trek 470, '99 Xmart Squishy Bike, '03 Giant Cypress

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
For the stem, and not being safe, we all managed to live with threaded headsets & quill stems until the mid 90's
We stopped using them in the mid 90's? I wish I had gotten the memo, I wouldn't have just bought that nice new Tange Seiki headset.
Wolfwerx is offline  
Old 04-12-12, 01:32 PM
  #29  
Constant tinkerer
 
FastJake's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 7,954
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 185 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 75 Posts
Ok, so you hate the look of a quill stem. Fair enough. I don't agree with this but I understand. The products you posted should work, just make sure if you get a 1" adapter you get a 1" stem, or 1 1/8" with 1 1/8". As long as the clamp diameter is correct.

As far as other upgrades, I would advise that you do nothing. Fix anything that breaks and save up for a better bike. A dual suspension BSO is about the last bike worth upgrading...
FastJake is offline  
Old 04-12-12, 01:54 PM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: West Yorkshire, United Kingdom
Posts: 5,773
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 453 Post(s)
Liked 104 Times in 87 Posts
Originally Posted by Wolfwerx
We stopped using them in the mid 90's? I wish I had gotten the memo, I wouldn't have just bought that nice new Tange Seiki headset.
Well Mountain bikes did; road bikes seemed to be the late 90's before they changed, but I was still using intragrated Bontrager bar/stem till last year which had a quill stem, and Nitto still make some very nice quill stems, looking at some on the images from this years NAHBS, threaded headsets seemed to be making a bit of a comeback.
jimc101 is offline  
Old 04-12-12, 02:05 PM
  #31  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 489

Bikes: '74 Schwinn Le Tour (x2), '83 Bianchi, '96 Trek 820, '96 Trek 470, '99 Xmart Squishy Bike, '03 Giant Cypress

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by jimc101
Well Mountain bikes did; road bikes seemed to be the late 90's before they changed, but I was still using intragrated Bontrager bar/stem till last year which had a quill stem, and Nitto still make some very nice quill stems, looking at some on the images from this years NAHBS, threaded headsets seemed to be making a bit of a comeback.
My post was jest. I'm retro-grouchy, mostly.


NB: Everything Nitto makes is nice-looking, IMO.

Last edited by Wolfwerx; 04-12-12 at 02:06 PM. Reason: more
Wolfwerx is offline  
Old 04-12-12, 02:10 PM
  #32  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Above ground, Walnut Creek, Ca
Posts: 6,681

Bikes: 8 ss bikes, 1 5-speed touring bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 86 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by martinarlaw
Yeah I was thinking about going with the 2nd option but its not worth me spending tons on forks considering I wont be able to use them on a new frame in the future is there ?
it is possible that you could use the fork on a new frame, but most bikes/frames come with a suitable fork anyway. to make it worth your while you would have to purchase a bike/frame without a fork and then only those that would be compatible. not very convienent, i think, but as i said possible.

Last edited by hueyhoolihan; 04-12-12 at 02:15 PM.
hueyhoolihan is offline  
Old 04-12-12, 04:28 PM
  #33  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 2,243

Bikes: Specialized Sequoia Elite/Motobecane Fantom Cross Team Ti/'85 Trek 520

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
All I'm going to say is that if you use a threaded to threadless stem adapter like the one in post 3, you still have a quill. The quill is the threadless adapter itself. The attachment point is identical. The only difference is that you can use threadless stems but the basic underlying structure is still the same. I just want you to realize that even after you change the parts out, you are really no further ahead than if you left it alone.

Except as DialboScott said, you now have 2 clamping surfaces to fail compared to 1 with just using a standard quill. Something to ponder. On a real threadless system, the steerer/fork is basically 1 unit with the stem attached at the top of the steerer for 2 parts just like a threaded system. Using the threadless adapter just introduces another fail point into the equation.
bobotech is offline  
Old 04-12-12, 04:57 PM
  #34  
Senior Member
 
surreal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NJ
Posts: 3,084
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
I'm not going to pass judgment on anyone, nor am I going to repeat any of the decent advice already offered. I just have to ask: WHAT YEAR IS THIS?!?!?!

This question is sooooooooooo ten years ago. At the turn of the century, some ppl with older bikes wanted to convert so they could run the hott new schtuff. By now, ppl who like quills get bikes with quills, and ppl who like threadless buy bikes with threadless. Money is no longer a deciding factor, as you can get cheap bikes or expensive bikes with either set up. What would possess someone to buy the style they dislike, only to convert it?

-rob
surreal is offline  
Old 04-12-12, 04:57 PM
  #35  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Posts: 43,598

Bikes: 8

Mentioned: 197 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7607 Post(s)
Liked 1,355 Times in 862 Posts
well the threadless changeover for New stuff, began in the 90's.. by the manufacturers..

some small builders will still make precision custom stuff to go with the older gear type.


What would possess someone to buy the style they dislike, only to convert it?
and cheap bikes sold in toy, and general merchandise stores
to people who cannot pony up the 4 figure price .. for a real FS bike .

Last edited by fietsbob; 04-12-12 at 05:03 PM.
fietsbob is offline  
Old 04-12-12, 05:12 PM
  #36  
Senior Member
 
surreal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NJ
Posts: 3,084
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by fietsbob
well the threadless changeover for New stuff, began in the 90's.. by the manufacturers..

some small builders will still make precision custom stuff to go with the older gear type.



and cheap bikes sold in toy, and general merchandise stores
to people who cannot pony up the 4 figure price .. for a real FS bike .
Yeah, i remember... in the 90s, high-end bikes made the threadless switch first, and it trickled down. Even today, some low-end bikeshop bikes come with quill stems, as do many of the dept store bikes and whatnot. (Some walmart bikes come threadless, too, though...) Of course, there are still custom and retro (thinkashley) makers who no the quill stuff. But, let's not forget the used market; it is there that you can get bikes with all kinds of componentry at all different pricepoints. You can definitely get a used "real" FS bike for under a grand; of course, the tech will be outdated, and it'll likely be either thrashed or neglected....but still.

Looking at my stable, as well as projects in the works, I see that I've got a definite preference for quill set-ups. I even have a few bikes with 21.1mm quills. Much easier to make fit adjustments, and they look better to my eye...but on an mtb that's going to see real offroad use, you can't beat 9/8" or greater threadless set-ups.

-rob
surreal is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Blind
Bicycle Mechanics
20
05-12-16 12:33 PM
Hopslam
Bicycle Mechanics
12
08-27-13 02:35 PM
clanmacleod
Bicycle Mechanics
3
06-13-13 12:32 PM
virtualelvis
Bicycle Mechanics
8
11-16-10 07:23 PM
mickel
Bicycle Mechanics
17
07-07-10 12:24 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.