![]() |
5-10 speed chains: What's the difference?
For years I'd thought you used a narrower chain as you go to higher cog counts (since 7- and 8-speed HG clusters are spaced more closely than 6-speeds or APII 7-speeds, and 9- and 10-speeds are said to be tighter still), but now I've come under the impression that ALL derailer systems use a chain that's 3/32" wide! Of course, there are lots of different chains specifically marketed for different cog-count shifting systems ... if they're not different in width, what IS the difference?
|
The difference IS the width. 5,6, 7, and 8 speed are pretty much the same width. 9 is a little narrower. 10 is a little more narrow than the 9. 11 is a little more narrow than the 10.
|
Originally Posted by 1987cp
(Post 14389397)
For years I'd thought you used a narrower chain as you go to higher cog counts (since 7- and 8-speed HG clusters are spaced more closely than 6-speeds or APII 7-speeds, and 9- and 10-speeds are said to be tighter still), but now I've come under the impression that ALL derailer systems use a chain that's 3/32" wide! Of course, there are lots of different chains specifically marketed for different cog-count shifting systems ... if they're not different in width, what IS the difference?
There's also a difference in construction that one need be aware of. 5 and 6s chains have pins that stick out, but at 7s, they didn't narrow the chain itself but used pins that ended flush with the outer plate. That creates a safety and structural issue, in that there's no room for plates to spread, and it's easy for the plate to come off the end of the shorter pin. They resolved the issue by peening the head over the plate, or into a countersunk recess in the outer plate to lock it in place in a way that structural steel is riveted. It's important because the rivet head is critical, and that's why 7 and more speed chains cannot be closed by simply pushing a bin back the way 5 and 6s chains can. |
Originally Posted by labrat
(Post 14389411)
The difference IS the width. 5,6, 7, and 8 speed are pretty much the same width. 9 is a little narrower. 10 is a little more narrow than the 9. 11 is a little more narrow than the 10.
Discounting minor variations between brands, 5 and 6s chains are the same, 7 and 8s are the same, then 9s, 10s and 11s are progressively narrower. |
Originally Posted by FBinNY
(Post 14389434)
Not so minor correction.
|
Originally Posted by FBinNY
(Post 14389413)
...that's why 7 and more speed chains cannot be closed by simply pushing a bin back the way 5 and 6s chains can.
Can you explain what this means? I recently used a normal chain tool to shorten a "7/8" speed chain in the normal manner, and it acted just like any other chain I've used a chain tool on. (for removal, I obviously use the SRAM-style quick release that came with it) I'll have to try comparing again against the older chains in my collection, as when I went comparing chains last night my OE six-speed chains (and probably the five-speed chain, if I can find it) appeared to differ from my 8-speed chains only in that the plates weren't contoured. |
Originally Posted by 1987cp
(Post 14390244)
Can you explain what this means? I recently used a normal chain tool to shorten a "7/8" speed chain in the normal manner, and it acted just like any other chain I've used a chain tool on. (for removal, I obviously use the SRAM-style quick release that came with it)
But you cannot splice it by pushing the pin back, because there's no way to restore the head on the rivet. Without the head to keep it secure, the plate which is already at the edge of the pin, can walk sideways a bit and fall off under load snapping the chain. |
Funky. I'll have to have another look at the pin in the links I removed.
I did have a more-careful look at dedicated 6, 7, and 8-speed chains, and I do see where the 6-speed chain is a little wider as you describe. I also understand why I found another thread talking about chain widths in tenths of millimeters instead of fractions of inches ... I'll have to take some measurements when I get a new battery in my digital caliper. So I guess the short of it is, always use a chain advertised for at least the number of cogs you're using, and if it comes with a quick-release link, you should use a chain tool only to shorten the chain and not to lengthen it? |
Originally Posted by 1987cp
(Post 14390747)
So I guess the short of it is, always use a chain advertised for at least the number of cogs you're using, and if it comes with a quick-release link, you should use a chain tool only to shorten the chain and not to lengthen it? |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:32 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.