22-32 Double up front. Which 10sp front derailleur can I use?
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 9
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
22-32 Double up front. Which 10sp front derailleur can I use?
I picked myself up a 10 speed SLX triple crankset, but am planning on taking off the large chainring and running it as a 22-32 double. I am not quite sure what front derailleur I should be looking at. I was initially set on getting the XT-M786, which is the XT FD for doubles, but the specs say:
44-38 tooth outer ring compatible, total capacity 14 teeth
Since my outer chainring will only 32t, it seems this FD might not work so well, as it was designed for a much larger outer chainring.
Does anyone know what shimano FD I should be purchasing, given than I am running a 22-32 up front and 10sp in the rear? Should I be buying a triple FD and then setting the limit screw in? If so, would I be getting double or triple shifters?
Thanks for the help. I tried searching for answers, but I'm still not 100% clear.
44-38 tooth outer ring compatible, total capacity 14 teeth
Since my outer chainring will only 32t, it seems this FD might not work so well, as it was designed for a much larger outer chainring.
Does anyone know what shimano FD I should be purchasing, given than I am running a 22-32 up front and 10sp in the rear? Should I be buying a triple FD and then setting the limit screw in? If so, would I be getting double or triple shifters?
Thanks for the help. I tried searching for answers, but I'm still not 100% clear.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
Posts: 9,545
Bikes: https://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=152015&p=1404231
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1528 Post(s)
Liked 718 Times
in
510 Posts
First, why on Earth would you want to lose the big ring? 44 isn't very big anyway, let alone 32.
But if you do have some good reason to this crazy-sounding thing, you need to use a triple FD. I suppose you could turn the big ring into a chainguard. A BB spindle that's longer by the distance between the chainrings will correct the chainline. Either double or triple shifters should work, provided they're compatible with the FD's actuation ratio.
But if you do have some good reason to this crazy-sounding thing, you need to use a triple FD. I suppose you could turn the big ring into a chainguard. A BB spindle that's longer by the distance between the chainrings will correct the chainline. Either double or triple shifters should work, provided they're compatible with the FD's actuation ratio.
#3
Mechanic/Tourist
First, why on Earth would you want to lose the big ring? 44 isn't very big anyway, let alone 32.
But if you do have some good reason to this crazy-sounding thing, you need to use a triple FD. I suppose you could turn the big ring into a chainguard. A BB spindle that's longer by the distance between the chainrings will correct the chainline. Either double or triple shifters should work, provided they're compatible with the FD's actuation ratio.
But if you do have some good reason to this crazy-sounding thing, you need to use a triple FD. I suppose you could turn the big ring into a chainguard. A BB spindle that's longer by the distance between the chainrings will correct the chainline. Either double or triple shifters should work, provided they're compatible with the FD's actuation ratio.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Hollister, CA
Posts: 3,957
Bikes: Volagi, daVinci Joint Venture
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
Still, if that's what you want to do the FD should work. I've got a daVinci tandem with four chainrings (30,24,18,12) and standard triple FDs work. Some may work better than others, but if you're only shifting a double, albeit a strange double, you'll find one that works just fine.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TurbineBlade
Bicycle Mechanics
0
07-17-11 04:57 PM