One slick tire on mountain bike. Should I replace the front or rear tire?
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
One slick tire on mountain bike. Should I replace the front or rear tire?
I have a mountain bike, and I'm thinking of replacing one of the tires with a slick tire like one on a road bike. I'm a bit cheap so I don't want to replace both, so I'll just do one.
Would there be a difference whether I replace the front tire, or rear tire? If so, which one would be better?
Would there be a difference whether I replace the front tire, or rear tire? If so, which one would be better?
#3
Guest
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Grid Reference, SK
Posts: 3,768
Bikes: I never learned to ride a bike. It is my deepest shame.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
6 Posts
In an ideal world, both is the correct answer. You said you don't want to replace both because you are cheap and don't want to - this may very well be your proud way of saying you are broke and can't.
If it were me I would probably replace the front as a slick tire will give you more traction on pavement and you always want your best tire on the front. If you have an imbalance of traction and one tire lets go before the other pray it is the rear, because when the front tire lets go you are almost certainly going down, but you have a decent chance of recovering from a rear wheel slide.
However, the most effect would likely come from putting the road tire on the rear as most of your weight is over the rear tire and the resulting tire flex is what causes rolling resistance, and a road tire is generally made to have less rolling resistance than a mtb tire. Also you generally put more pressure in a road tire which decreases the amount of flex.
So my recommendation is to get a decently wide road tire (similar width to the mtb tires you have) so your bike is not tilted fore or aft and making it feel and/or handle weird.
And inflate both the road and the remaining mtb tire up to their max pressure for least rolling resistance.
If it were me I would probably replace the front as a slick tire will give you more traction on pavement and you always want your best tire on the front. If you have an imbalance of traction and one tire lets go before the other pray it is the rear, because when the front tire lets go you are almost certainly going down, but you have a decent chance of recovering from a rear wheel slide.
However, the most effect would likely come from putting the road tire on the rear as most of your weight is over the rear tire and the resulting tire flex is what causes rolling resistance, and a road tire is generally made to have less rolling resistance than a mtb tire. Also you generally put more pressure in a road tire which decreases the amount of flex.
So my recommendation is to get a decently wide road tire (similar width to the mtb tires you have) so your bike is not tilted fore or aft and making it feel and/or handle weird.
And inflate both the road and the remaining mtb tire up to their max pressure for least rolling resistance.
#4
Have bike, will travel
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Lake Geneva, WI
Posts: 12,284
Bikes: Ridley Helium SLX, Canyon Endurance SL, De Rosa Professional, Eddy Merckx Corsa Extra, Schwinn Paramount (1 painted, 1 chrome), Peugeot PX10, Serotta Nova X, Simoncini Cyclocross Special, Raleigh Roker, Pedal Force CG2 and CX2
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 910 Post(s)
Liked 288 Times
in
158 Posts
Find a treaded tire and put it on the front. This one is affordable: https://www.performancebike.com/bikes...400904__400904
__________________
When I ride my bike I feel free and happy and strong. I'm liberated from the usual nonsense of day to day life. Solid, dependable, silent, my bike is my horse, my fighter jet, my island, my friend. Together we will conquer that hill and thereafter the world.
When I ride my bike I feel free and happy and strong. I'm liberated from the usual nonsense of day to day life. Solid, dependable, silent, my bike is my horse, my fighter jet, my island, my friend. Together we will conquer that hill and thereafter the world.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,688
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1074 Post(s)
Liked 295 Times
in
222 Posts
Unless you're looking to get a skinnier tire while you're at it, you can try sanding all the knobs off. It'll be reasonably fast with a power sander. Do note that puncture resistance will lessen, and it requires some skill. If you go too deep, you'll weaken the tire.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,706
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5779 Post(s)
Liked 2,576 Times
in
1,427 Posts
There's no automatic answer. It partly depends on your ultimate goal. I assuming that the bike is being converted to a pavement use bike.
If you want the most immediate benefit, put the slick in back because that's where most of the rolling resistance is generated.
But assuming that you have a long range plan to make this a road bike, and also assuming that the new slick tire will be narrower than the old tires, then you'd want it in front. That offers 2 benefits. The wider tire is the more loaded one, the tire you want to get rid of will wear out faster, getting you where you want to be sooner.
If you put the new tire in back, there's a good chance that it'll wear out and be replaced while you're still ridding the old one up front.
If you want the most immediate benefit, put the slick in back because that's where most of the rolling resistance is generated.
But assuming that you have a long range plan to make this a road bike, and also assuming that the new slick tire will be narrower than the old tires, then you'd want it in front. That offers 2 benefits. The wider tire is the more loaded one, the tire you want to get rid of will wear out faster, getting you where you want to be sooner.
If you put the new tire in back, there's a good chance that it'll wear out and be replaced while you're still ridding the old one up front.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#9
Banned
rear.
i have knobbies (MTB) and will replace the rear with a Schwalbe Marathon Plus (26 x 1.5"). When the front knobbie wears out I'll replace it as well.
start with the worn tires.
15 USD tires suck, but something good if you're changing from knobbies to slicks.
i have knobbies (MTB) and will replace the rear with a Schwalbe Marathon Plus (26 x 1.5"). When the front knobbie wears out I'll replace it as well.
start with the worn tires.
15 USD tires suck, but something good if you're changing from knobbies to slicks.
#10
Constant tinkerer
If they're the same width, I'd put the slick tire on the rear. I have this setup on my winter MTB (knobby front, slick rear) because when the ground is snow-covered the knobby front keeps me upright, but the slick rear keeps the bike a little quicker and a lot less noisy on dry pavement. Plus I can still hit the single-track with it if I want to.