Converting drops to flats-- shifter question
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 85
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Converting drops to flats-- shifter question
I've ridden drops for 20 years but (after commuting with a flat bar hybrid) have come to prefer the wider hand position of flat bars. I'm going to convert my road bike over and I'm looking at the shifters that Shimano designed for this ("sl-R440/R441) They list these as "2/3" referring to either a double or triple. I take that to mean they can be used for either. I don't know how that would work. I want to use them for a double, has anyone installed a set of these shifters and can explain the installation? Is there an ajustment for one or the other?
I also have another question. Will any brake levers designed for flat bars work with the existing 10 year old Ultegra calliper brakes I now have or do I need to look for a specific model?
Thanks,
Bob
I also have another question. Will any brake levers designed for flat bars work with the existing 10 year old Ultegra calliper brakes I now have or do I need to look for a specific model?
Thanks,
Bob
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,095 Times
in
741 Posts
Yes, the 2/3 means the front shifter will work with either a double or triple crank. The shifter will have four clicks that give four front derailleur positions, one is a trim. For a triple crank you use them all. For use with a double you adjust the front derailleur's low limit screw to keep it from moving too far inward and set the shift cable tension to use the outer three fd positions. (small ring, trim, big ring)
The reason for setting the double that way is that if you use the non-functional click, the cable merely goes slack. If you set the shifter to use the inner three positions and try to shift into the fourth non-available position you can break something.
Any flat bar brake levers designed to use with cantilever or caliper brakes will work with your Ultegra brakes. You cannot use levers designed for V-brakes.
The reason for setting the double that way is that if you use the non-functional click, the cable merely goes slack. If you set the shifter to use the inner three positions and try to shift into the fourth non-available position you can break something.
Any flat bar brake levers designed to use with cantilever or caliper brakes will work with your Ultegra brakes. You cannot use levers designed for V-brakes.
Last edited by HillRider; 11-26-12 at 08:32 AM.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 2,243
Bikes: Specialized Sequoia Elite/Motobecane Fantom Cross Team Ti/'85 Trek 520
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Do not get caught up in the Shimano hype that you *need* the SL 440 shifters, they are identical to standard mountain bike shifters in every way. As a matter of fact, I have a set of those SL440 and a set of Mega 9 mountain bike shifters and they are totally identical except that the 440 is silver and the Mega 9 is dark dark grey/black. All you need is a good set of mountain bike shifters.
Your current rear derailleur should work just fine, there isn't any difference between road and mountain bike derailleurs in regards to the rear ones for the most part (newer stuff does have some gotchas).
The big gotcha is the front derailleur. For proper operation, you will need to replace the front derailleur with one from the 440 series of Shimano derailleurs. They are designed with a cage made for the tall chainrings of a road bike (48t and taller) but with the cable pull of a mountain bike shifter (flat bar shifter). MTB/flatbar shifters pull much more cable per click than road bike shifters so its just much easier if you start out with compatible parts when converting to flat bars with road bike gears/chainrings.
So use any MTB shifter set that you find for a reasonable price that matches your current speeds, and get a front derailleur like the FD-443 which will allow the MTB shifter to work properly.
Your current rear derailleur should work just fine, there isn't any difference between road and mountain bike derailleurs in regards to the rear ones for the most part (newer stuff does have some gotchas).
The big gotcha is the front derailleur. For proper operation, you will need to replace the front derailleur with one from the 440 series of Shimano derailleurs. They are designed with a cage made for the tall chainrings of a road bike (48t and taller) but with the cable pull of a mountain bike shifter (flat bar shifter). MTB/flatbar shifters pull much more cable per click than road bike shifters so its just much easier if you start out with compatible parts when converting to flat bars with road bike gears/chainrings.
So use any MTB shifter set that you find for a reasonable price that matches your current speeds, and get a front derailleur like the FD-443 which will allow the MTB shifter to work properly.
#4
Certified Bike Brat
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 4,251
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
6 Posts
Do not get caught up in the Shimano hype that you *need* the SL 440 shifters, they are identical to standard mountain bike shifters in every way. As a matter of fact, I have a set of those SL440 and a set of Mega 9 mountain bike shifters and they are totally identical except that the 440 is silver and the Mega 9 is dark dark grey/black. All you need is a good set of mountain bike shifters.
Your current rear derailleur should work just fine, there isn't any difference between road and mountain bike derailleurs in regards to the rear ones for the most part (newer stuff does have some gotchas).
The big gotcha is the front derailleur. For proper operation, you will need to replace the front derailleur with one from the 440 series of Shimano derailleurs. They are designed with a cage made for the tall chainrings of a road bike (48t and taller) but with the cable pull of a mountain bike shifter (flat bar shifter). MTB/flatbar shifters pull much more cable per click than road bike shifters so its just much easier if you start out with compatible parts when converting to flat bars with road bike gears/chainrings.
So use any MTB shifter set that you find for a reasonable price that matches your current speeds, and get a front derailleur like the FD-443 which will allow the MTB shifter to work properly.
Your current rear derailleur should work just fine, there isn't any difference between road and mountain bike derailleurs in regards to the rear ones for the most part (newer stuff does have some gotchas).
The big gotcha is the front derailleur. For proper operation, you will need to replace the front derailleur with one from the 440 series of Shimano derailleurs. They are designed with a cage made for the tall chainrings of a road bike (48t and taller) but with the cable pull of a mountain bike shifter (flat bar shifter). MTB/flatbar shifters pull much more cable per click than road bike shifters so its just much easier if you start out with compatible parts when converting to flat bars with road bike gears/chainrings.
So use any MTB shifter set that you find for a reasonable price that matches your current speeds, and get a front derailleur like the FD-443 which will allow the MTB shifter to work properly.
Therefore the LH shifter specifically designed for flat bar road bikes IS different than the LH shifter for mtb bikes. If you're happy with something that's less than optimal - thats a personal choice, but IMO - when a compatability chart (like for that front derailleur you recommended) says: "Designed to be used with R440 or R660 shifters only." there's probably a good reason.
Last edited by Burton; 11-26-12 at 12:59 PM.
#5
Banned
Convert to a Thumb shifter pair, , and then all combinations will be fine ..
cantilever brake type flat bar levers. pull less cable than V types .
So if you have V levers, a lot of pad to Rim space can be left , no QR on the brake will be OK.
cantilever brake type flat bar levers. pull less cable than V types .
So if you have V levers, a lot of pad to Rim space can be left , no QR on the brake will be OK.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Sunnyvale, California
Posts: 1,180
Bikes: Bridgestone RB-1, 600, T700, MB-6 w/ Dirt Drops, MB-Zip, Bianchi Limited, Nashbar Hounder
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Yes, the 2/3 means the front shifter will work with either a double or triple crank. The shifter will have four clicks that give four front derailleur positions, one is a trim. For a triple crank you use them all. For use with a double you adjust the front derailleur's low limit screw to keep it from moving too far inward and set the shift cable tension to use the outer three fd positions. (small ring, trim, big ring)
The reason for setting the double that way is that if you use the non-functional click, the cable merely goes slack. If you set the shifter to use the inner three positions and try to shift into the fourth non-available position you can break something.
Any flat bar brake levers designed to use with cantilever or caliper brakes will work with your Ultegra brakes. You cannot use levers designed for V-brakes.
The reason for setting the double that way is that if you use the non-functional click, the cable merely goes slack. If you set the shifter to use the inner three positions and try to shift into the fourth non-available position you can break something.
Any flat bar brake levers designed to use with cantilever or caliper brakes will work with your Ultegra brakes. You cannot use levers designed for V-brakes.
The only exception is cable slack. If you do let cable go slack on the front, ensure you have snug cable housing ends that stay put inside their stops and the stops aren't slotted. If they wobble around, I've had some cheap ones continually fall out of slotted housing stops come back to haunt me as possible law suits (Knock on wood - never had one yet). Couldn't see a reason why it'd happen and it's never happened to me in the short time I did that because the amount of cable pull shouldn't have been long enough to allow the cable to go that slack to come out, but it did happen. So the safe thing was to keep it the cable taut always. YMMV.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Seattle
Posts: 3,248
Bikes: Kuota Ksano. Litespeed T5 gravel - brilliant!
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
In my experience Shimano isn't in the habit of putting out 'hype'. The chain line on a road bike is different than a mtb or hybrid (except for a few 'performance hybrids'). Shimano mtb front derailleurs are speced for a chainline from 47.5 to 50mm whereas their road (and flatbar FD's) are speced from 43.5 to 45mm. A mtb front derailleur isn't an optimal choice to deal with either the chainline or the larger chainring of a road bike, and as you already pointed out - the cable pull on a road bike FD is different than a mtb FD.
Therefore the LH shifter specifically designed for flat bar road bikes IS different than the LH shifter for mtb bikes. If you're happy with something that's less than optimal - thats a personal choice, but IMO - when a compatability chart (like for that front derailleur you recommended) says: "Designed to be used with R440 or R660 shifters only." there's probably a good reason.
Therefore the LH shifter specifically designed for flat bar road bikes IS different than the LH shifter for mtb bikes. If you're happy with something that's less than optimal - thats a personal choice, but IMO - when a compatability chart (like for that front derailleur you recommended) says: "Designed to be used with R440 or R660 shifters only." there's probably a good reason.
#9
Certified Bike Brat
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 4,251
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
6 Posts
So specific to this posting: Shimano makes two different models of the 440-series RapidFire shifters. The SL-M440 set has a LH shifter (M440) with a cable pull specific to MTB front derailleurs. The SL-R440 shifter has a LH shifter (R441) with a cable pull specific to road front derailleurs.
If that hasn't given you an issue yet - I assume you don't use the front derailleur much and you've been lucky.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 2,243
Bikes: Specialized Sequoia Elite/Motobecane Fantom Cross Team Ti/'85 Trek 520
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
In my experience Shimano isn't in the habit of putting out 'hype'. The chain line on a road bike is different than a mtb or hybrid (except for a few 'performance hybrids'). Shimano mtb front derailleurs are speced for a chainline from 47.5 to 50mm whereas their road (and flatbar FD's) are speced from 43.5 to 45mm. A mtb front derailleur isn't an optimal choice to deal with either the chainline or the larger chainring of a road bike, and as you already pointed out - the cable pull on a road bike FD is different than a mtb FD.
Therefore the LH shifter specifically designed for flat bar road bikes IS different than the LH shifter for mtb bikes. If you're happy with something that's less than optimal - thats a personal choice, but IMO - when a compatability chart (like for that front derailleur you recommended) says: "Designed to be used with R440 or R660 shifters only." there's probably a good reason.
Therefore the LH shifter specifically designed for flat bar road bikes IS different than the LH shifter for mtb bikes. If you're happy with something that's less than optimal - thats a personal choice, but IMO - when a compatability chart (like for that front derailleur you recommended) says: "Designed to be used with R440 or R660 shifters only." there's probably a good reason.
You will notice that the ONLY difference is the length of the pivot points. The Ultegra has a much shorter road bike derailleur hence road bike front shifters pull very little cable per click. On the other hand, the FD-R443 has a much larger pivot point requiring the MTB style shifter pull. MTB front shifters pull much more cable. The cages are identical to allow for the large road bike chainrings rather than the smaller MTB chainrings.
I wish I had taken the same picture with a front typical MTB derailleur as well then you could see that the FD-R443 has the same exact pivot point length that the MTB front derailleurs have. That is why you can use any standard MTB front derailleur with the FD-R443 flat bar derailleurs. I have measured it.
That is why I find those 440 series shifter sets to be an uncessary expense when you can use any standard Shimano (and I even think most Sram) MTB shifter sets. Much easier to get any ole Shimano MTB shifter set at your local bike store/coop rather than having to special order the shifters.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Seattle
Posts: 3,248
Bikes: Kuota Ksano. Litespeed T5 gravel - brilliant!
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
As far as I know - Shimano products are coded in an effort to make everybody's life a little easier. So ROAD specific products are coded with an R and MTB specific products are coded with an M. There are sections of the catalogue -trecking for example - where some components are mixed and the M components are matched against T (trekking) components. So they aren't in the habit of relabeling products and presenting them as 'new' in another section.
So specific to this posting: Shimano makes two different models of the 440-series RapidFire shifters. The SL-M440 set has a LH shifter (M440) with a cable pull specific to MTB front derailleurs. The SL-R440 shifter has a LH shifter (R441) with a cable pull specific to road front derailleurs.
If that hasn't given you an issue yet - I assume you don't use the front derailleur much and you've been lucky.
So specific to this posting: Shimano makes two different models of the 440-series RapidFire shifters. The SL-M440 set has a LH shifter (M440) with a cable pull specific to MTB front derailleurs. The SL-R440 shifter has a LH shifter (R441) with a cable pull specific to road front derailleurs.
If that hasn't given you an issue yet - I assume you don't use the front derailleur much and you've been lucky.
As far as my use of the my front derailleur, I have a double, of course I use it frequently. :-)
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,095 Times
in
741 Posts
It would equally easy to theorize that Shimano designates the Road specific shifters because they are color matched to the derailleurs. Companies frequently compose groupset where color is the only differentiation.
As far as my use of the my front derailleur, I have a double, of course I use it frequently. :-)
As far as my use of the my front derailleur, I have a double, of course I use it frequently. :-)
#13
Certified Bike Brat
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 4,251
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
6 Posts
Tell you what -I'm personally not interested in 'theorizing' anything. So I'll get in touch with the Shimano technical support regarding both the shifters and the derailleurs and get back to you.
#14
Insane Bicycle Mechanic
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: other Vancouver
Posts: 9,826
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 797 Post(s)
Liked 695 Times
in
372 Posts
Therefore the LH shifter specifically designed for flat bar road bikes IS different than the LH shifter for mtb bikes. If you're happy with something that's less than optimal - thats a personal choice, but IMO - when a compatability chart (like for that front derailleur you recommended) says: "Designed to be used with R440 or R660 shifters only." there's probably a good reason.
My bike: https://home.comcast.net/~jeff_wills/jeff-grr/index.htm
My wife's: https://home.comcast.net/~jeff_wills/diane-grr/index.htm
__________________
Jeff Wills
Comcast nuked my web page. It will return soon..
Jeff Wills
Comcast nuked my web page. It will return soon..
#15
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,627
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3870 Post(s)
Liked 2,563 Times
in
1,577 Posts
Shimano likes to over-spec parts compatibility. I'm sure it's some mix of covering themselves in case of a failure, or if a frankenstein mix of components doesn't work to the user's liking. (If you check the instructions included with cassettes, for example, there are dire warnings against mixing and matching cogs from different cassettes, and to only use Shimano chains. )
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 2,243
Bikes: Specialized Sequoia Elite/Motobecane Fantom Cross Team Ti/'85 Trek 520
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Its just about opening your eyes to alternative views and observations by other professional bike repair techs. But Shimano tech support isn't going to give you the answers that we have already deduced. Shimano is going to go strictly by the book and only reaffirm your conclusion that the 400 series of flat bar shifters are the only ones that will work with the FD-R44x series of flatbar conversion front derailleurs since that is what their books say.
There are lots of instances where people figure out compatible products because mechanically they might be identical to another product line but cosmetically they differ greatly. Kind of how 105 vs RX100 are the identical products but they have different finishes.
I just want to try to let you know that even if you call Shimano and talk to their tech people, they probably wont' tell you that "Sure our expensive Flatbar shifters are basically the same as our standard MTB shifters" because its just not in their best interest to do so either for CYA or sales reasons.
#17
Certified Bike Brat
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 4,251
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
6 Posts
So the reality is a little more complicated. The Shimano FD R440 and FD R453 9 speed front derailleurs and Shimano FD R440A and FD R443A 8 speed front derailleurs do in fact, use the same cable travel ratio as MTB front derailleurs. However, they are expected to be used with large chainring sizes normally found on road bikes - up to 50T. Therefore the LH shifter SL-R441 has a different internal mechanism which includes a TRIMMING. A functionality not necessary on mtb shifters because of the smaller chainrings.
The SL R780/783 and SL R4600/4603 flat bar shifters are optimized with a pull ratio to be used directly with existing road front derailleurs which will accept chainrings even larger than 50T. All of these models also incorporate a TRIMMING functionality.
So can you just replace the front derailleur with a FD R440 and use any 9 speed mtb shifters. Sure - if you're willing to live without TRIMMING. And if you're happy with replacing three components instead of just two. (I can't see any cost / quality advantage in doing that) Or if you're running a large chainring of less than 48T - but at that point I personally wouldn't call it a 'road bike' any more - I'd call it a 'hybrid'.
I'm going to repeat it again - the LH shifter specifically designed for flat bar road bikes IS different than the LH shifter for mtb bikes. If you're happy with something that's less than optimal - that's a personal choice, but IMO - when a compatability chart says: "Designed to be used with R440 or R660 shifters only." there's probably a good reason.
Posted just in case one or two people that might actually be interested.
Last edited by Burton; 11-29-12 at 04:32 PM.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Sunnyvale, California
Posts: 1,180
Bikes: Bridgestone RB-1, 600, T700, MB-6 w/ Dirt Drops, MB-Zip, Bianchi Limited, Nashbar Hounder
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Burton:
Nice points on the trim for the SL-R44x shifters. Forgot that with short chain stays and more narrow FD cages, chain rub at the extreme will require trim. Just like even the low-end brifters that have trim. I never had an issue with mtb, since usually, the FD cage is slightly wider and funnelled slightly and shaped to shift over the wider ranges well, whether 42T max or 48T max.
Nice points on the trim for the SL-R44x shifters. Forgot that with short chain stays and more narrow FD cages, chain rub at the extreme will require trim. Just like even the low-end brifters that have trim. I never had an issue with mtb, since usually, the FD cage is slightly wider and funnelled slightly and shaped to shift over the wider ranges well, whether 42T max or 48T max.
#19
Certified Bike Brat
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 4,251
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
6 Posts
Burton:
Nice points on the trim for the SL-R44x shifters. Forgot that with short chain stays and more narrow FD cages, chain rub at the extreme will require trim. Just like even the low-end brifters that have trim. I never had an issue with mtb, since usually, the FD cage is slightly wider and funnelled slightly and shaped to shift over the wider ranges well, whether 42T max or 48T max.
Nice points on the trim for the SL-R44x shifters. Forgot that with short chain stays and more narrow FD cages, chain rub at the extreme will require trim. Just like even the low-end brifters that have trim. I never had an issue with mtb, since usually, the FD cage is slightly wider and funnelled slightly and shaped to shift over the wider ranges well, whether 42T max or 48T max.
But there HAS been a lot of controversy around these so at least the info might help a few people make informed decisions. For example - anyone that wants to run a smaller main chainring than 48T for touring or radonneuring could go straight to a mtb FD and mtb RapidFire shifters with no issues.
Last edited by Burton; 11-29-12 at 09:15 PM.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: western Massachusetts (greater Springfield area)
Posts: 699
Bikes: Velosolex St. Tropez, LeMond Zurich (spine bike), Rotator swb recumbent
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 67 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 67 Times
in
32 Posts
Yes, the 2/3 means the front shifter will work with either a double or triple crank. The shifter will have four clicks that give four front derailleur positions, one is a trim. For a triple crank you use them all. For use with a double you adjust the front derailleur's low limit screw to keep it from moving too far inward and set the shift cable tension to use the outer three fd positions. (small ring, trim, big ring)
The reason for setting the double that way is that if you use the non-functional click, the cable merely goes slack. If you set the shifter to use the inner three positions and try to shift into the fourth non-available position you can break something
The reason for setting the double that way is that if you use the non-functional click, the cable merely goes slack. If you set the shifter to use the inner three positions and try to shift into the fourth non-available position you can break something
Last edited by MikeWMass; 12-01-12 at 11:27 AM. Reason: reread original
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
fmt_biker
Bicycle Mechanics
6
10-29-15 04:31 PM
Deetox
Bicycle Mechanics
11
08-19-12 10:16 PM
Barchettaman
Bicycle Mechanics
6
11-22-11 05:55 AM