Originally Posted by DieselDan
No. It's a consistant pattern.
|
It was the irony I missed :)
A double twisty pattern actually seems to hold up pretty well altho it seems to serve no real purpose. My wife likes the look, two cross is the prettiest, so I have done it several time. I think my front fixed wheel is a one cross full twisty, looks good and has lasted several years(OK the last year and a half was hanging on the wall, but it still looked good :) |
Originally Posted by monogodo
The front is a 3x with a single twist, the rear is a 3x with double twist. It's kinda hard to explain, that's why I want to get pics of them. I'll have to dig them out of storage.
|
I have found that you only need to add a mm to the normal spoke length,
|
Originally Posted by Rev.Chuck
I have found that you only need to add a mm to the normal spoke length,
|
When you say double twist, you mean that two spokes are twisted twice around each other? -As opposed to double twist meaning: two spokes get one twist, then split and each gets a second twist around a third and fourth spoke.
|
Originally Posted by Rev.Chuck
It was the irony I missed :)
A double twisty pattern actually seems to hold up pretty well altho it seems to serve no real purpose. My wife likes the look, two cross is the prettiest, so I have done it several time. I think my front fixed wheel is a one cross full twisty, looks good and has lasted several years(OK the last year and a half was hanging on the wall, but it still looked good :) |
look in the fixed gear picture sticky for cool lacing.
|
It's been 14+ years since I built the wheels, but I remember having to add a mm or two to the length to facilitate the twist. The reason the front is a single twist is because the spokes were too short to do two twists.
By single twist I mean the spokes wrap 180° around each other. A double twist would be 360°. With the single twist, the spoke ends up going into the nipple that normally connects with the spoke it would have crossed. With a double twist, the spokes continue to their normal holes. The only 'advantage' I found was cool looking wheels. |
Very interesting, but I don't think I want to try it. Thanks for the pictures.
Al |
I will do things just for enertainment value and proof of concept.. even if it is already proven.. no good reason at all. I do it more often with computers then my bikes on average though. In process of setting up a PBX with some VOIP phones.. I have no use for it or any real reason to set it up.. other then just for fun, learn and pass time. I do agree with everyone standard 3 cross is best way to go.. twisting sounds like fun hmmm maybe we'll see. It's all for cosmetics no question about that, I like radial lacing for that reason, I don't think it makes me any faster.. I can get away with it to since I'm not tall and fairly thin.. on my road/track bikes atleast.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:26 PM. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.