Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

The gear inches on my 3 speed IGH

Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

The gear inches on my 3 speed IGH

Old 11-04-13, 09:34 AM
  #1  
Shahmatt
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Shahmatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Singapore
Posts: 473

Bikes: Cruzbike Flamingo folding conversion, Oyama East Village

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
The gear inches on my 3 speed IGH

I've just checked the gear inches on my folding bicycle according to Sheldon Brown's Bicycle Gear Calculator here:

https://sheldonbrown.com/gears/

I came up with the following numbers:

Gear 1: 42
Gear 2: 57.3
Gear 3: 78.1

I use a Shimano Nexus 3 Speed, with a 46T chainring and 15T sprocket on the hub. The tyre size is 20" - 406. The crank length input is not necessary for gear inches I think.

Have I got this right? I'm not sure but the lowest gear seems still a bit high at 42. There aren't many hills where I live so I don't struggle too much. But I've been considering going lower on a bike I want to build and I'm using my existing bike as guidance. What's a good nominal amount of gear inches to keep to? How much should I try to lower this by?
Shahmatt is offline  
Old 11-04-13, 09:42 AM
  #2  
fietsbob
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Posts: 43,599

Bikes: 8

Mentioned: 197 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7607 Post(s)
Liked 1,346 Times in 853 Posts
the gear ratio of your 2nd gear is the cog and chainring combination [(Ft)'/,(Rt)x (W) ... wheel diameter ]
1st is 0.73 of that, 3rd is 1.36 x the 2nd gear..

lower the external gear , to lower all 3,... less teeth on the chainring or more on the hub cog ..

Last edited by fietsbob; 11-04-13 at 09:49 AM.
fietsbob is offline  
Old 11-04-13, 10:57 AM
  #3  
GamblerGORD53
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Elevation 666m Edmonton Canada
Posts: 2,195

Bikes: 2013 Custom SA5w / Rohloff Tourster

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1080 Post(s)
Liked 238 Times in 184 Posts
I've been riding a heavy bike with a SA RD5w. My GIs were 43.5 to 111 last year and 45.5 to 116 this year. I chug up 10% hills no problem. I went from 165 to 180 cranks. Yes it doesn't change GIs but it IS 9.1% easier/faster going up hills and in any situation I shifted 1 or 2 mph sooner. Not everyone can do this. I use mid 90s GI with the wind on flat land. Your current 3sp is set up pretty good for city riding.

As for your new build, you need to provide more info about what load you want to carry and how many gears, IGH or not.
With an Alfine8 you can set it up nicely to about 31 to 100. I very seldom used my 30/30 gear, 27GI. Most tour bike guys crow about derailler GIs in low 20s or less, but I just don't get it.
GamblerGORD53 is offline  
Old 11-04-13, 11:14 AM
  #4  
noglider 
aka Tom Reingold
 
noglider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, USA
Posts: 40,272

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

Mentioned: 499 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7066 Post(s)
Liked 1,917 Times in 1,160 Posts
Shahmatt, you are correct that crank length doesn't figure into gear inches. I get different results with your numbers, though. 46/15*20 = 61.3. That makes your bottom gear 46 inches and your top gear 82 inches.

As for what gear you need, only you can answer that. You'll feel a difference if you make it 15% lower or more.

fietsbob, most 3-speed hubs are .75/1.0/1.33. Not a big difference, but I thought I should toss that in there.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline  
Old 11-04-13, 11:28 AM
  #5  
Dan Burkhart 
Senior member
 
Dan Burkhart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Oakville Ontario
Posts: 7,983
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 896 Post(s)
Liked 513 Times in 302 Posts
You did not say what the tire size was other than 20 inch. I threw the numbers into this calculator using 20 x 1.35 and came up with this. Looks like your numbers are pretty close, maybe a shade low.

Last edited by Dan Burkhart; 11-04-13 at 11:32 AM.
Dan Burkhart is offline  
Old 11-04-13, 11:53 AM
  #6  
fietsbob
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Posts: 43,599

Bikes: 8

Mentioned: 197 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7607 Post(s)
Liked 1,346 Times in 853 Posts
I looked it up, on referenced SB gear chart.

Seems the nexus 3 is more like Sachs in that , than Sturmey..


John Allen & others keeps updating Sheldon's site with data about stuff made since SB's passing.
fietsbob is offline  
Old 11-04-13, 12:30 PM
  #7  
JohnDThompson 
Old fart
 
JohnDThompson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,347

Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.

Mentioned: 149 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3307 Post(s)
Liked 2,786 Times in 1,608 Posts
Originally Posted by noglider
most 3-speed hubs are .75/1.0/1.33. Not a big difference, but I thought I should toss that in there.
The Sturmey-Archer AW is probably the most popular 3-speed hub and has the 0.75/1.0/1.33 ratios you mention, but the Shimano Nexus is 0.73/1.0/1.36 as fietsbob stated:

https://www.shimano.com/publish/conte...03%20Speed.pdf

Other hubs had different ratios, e.g. the Sturmey-Archer SW was 0.72/1.0/1.38, the ASC was 0.75/0.9/1.0, the S3X is 0.625/0.75/1.0, etc.
JohnDThompson is offline  
Old 11-05-13, 12:34 AM
  #8  
Shahmatt
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Shahmatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Singapore
Posts: 473

Bikes: Cruzbike Flamingo folding conversion, Oyama East Village

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Thanks all for the replies.

OK so a GI of around about 42 or 46 is then probably about right. I couldn't believe that this bike was geared so high after reading through random google posts where claims of GIs circa 20 are mentioned.

I'm trying to build a folding recumbent with a Cruzbike conversion kit. I have no experience with building bikes so I guess I'll have to learn as I go along. The purpose is for commuting to work. I'm looking at a comfortable range of around 10 miles. The load will be around 4lbs max = backpack, tools, books and a change of clothes. I weigh around 175lbs.

A folding frame is likely to weigh heavier, as well as an IGH. But recumbents are aerodynamically efficient machines, and the cruzbike drivetrain is stiff on account of the short front triangle, so I'm hoping that this will help, at least theoretically.

Anyway, I'm considering the Nuvinci N360 with 52T on the chainring and maybe a 13T (if this is available) on the rear.

This will yield me a GI of 37.4 to 134.5, which seems to me to be a comfortable range.

Last edited by Shahmatt; 11-05-13 at 08:27 AM.
Shahmatt is offline  
Old 11-05-13, 09:50 AM
  #9  
fietsbob
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Posts: 43,599

Bikes: 8

Mentioned: 197 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7607 Post(s)
Liked 1,346 Times in 853 Posts
Nuvinci N360 is set up like a 3 speed .. direct drive of hub-shell, by the cog , in the middle .

overdrive above , and reduction gear below, are 180% ... just step less ..
fietsbob is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ArmChairRider
Beach Cruisers
38
10-30-16 08:30 AM
Wildh2o
Bicycle Mechanics
9
07-28-15 08:00 AM
Still Pedaling
Folding Bikes
8
08-24-14 05:23 PM
TallRider
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
94
07-27-10 11:13 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information -

Copyright © 2023 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.