Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

Chain-L vs. Boeshield T9 for chain lube?

Search
Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

Chain-L vs. Boeshield T9 for chain lube?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-30-13, 12:17 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 771
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
Chain-L vs. Boeshield T9 for chain lube?

Chain-L lasts way longer between relubes, which I like.
Other than that, I have no idea what might make one "better" than the other.
I ride in Maryland. Between 28F and 105F. On road riding 99.999% of the time. Rain when caught in it. No sand around here in central MD.

Thinking of going back to Chain-L. I just like that re-lubes only need to be done 8 times a year with my riding. Rather than every 200 miles with the Boeshield.

Any reason why sticking with Boeshield might be better?
lungimsam is offline  
Old 11-30-13, 12:34 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
mconlonx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,558
Mentioned: 47 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7148 Post(s)
Liked 134 Times in 92 Posts
Because Boeshield is made from jet planes crushed by half-naked cheerleaders.
mconlonx is offline  
Old 11-30-13, 04:36 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,701

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5776 Post(s)
Liked 2,574 Times in 1,425 Posts
I'm certainly not going to talk you out of coming back to Chain-L.

However, others might find it easier to answer if you explained what benefit you were looking to achieve with T-9, or what issues you've had with either product.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is online now  
Old 11-30-13, 04:54 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 461
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I use T-9 in the winter and it works well. But is Chain-L any less sticky? The problem here in Minneapolis is the sand that's dumped on the streets (and, for some incomprehensible reason, on the bike paths) in the winter.
jim hughes is offline  
Old 11-30-13, 05:03 PM
  #5  
aka Phil Jungels
 
Wanderer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: North Aurora, IL
Posts: 8,234

Bikes: 08 Specialized Crosstrail Sport, 05 Sirrus Comp

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 202 Post(s)
Liked 86 Times in 60 Posts
I don't know what is in Chain - L, but I like it.

It seems similar to my own mix of motor oil(full syn), hypoid gear oil(full syn), chain saw bar oil, and mineral spirits.

Yeah, they both get dirty, but sure feel smooth......................

p.s.(edit) mine smells worse!
Wanderer is offline  
Old 11-30-13, 05:07 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
JerrySTL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Near St. Louis, Missouri
Posts: 1,471

Bikes: Giant Defy Advanced, Breezer Doppler Team, Schwinn Twinn Tandem, Windsor Tourist, 1954 JC Higgens

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 36 Post(s)
Liked 10 Times in 8 Posts
According to the Friction Facts lube test, Chain-L is about a 1/3rd watt better than Boeshield T-9. A third of a watt is next to nothing. They didn't list either on how long they lasted. If you want long time between lubes AND less friction, go old school with paraffin wax.

https://www.friction-facts.com/test-r...hain-lube-test
JerrySTL is offline  
Old 11-30-13, 06:35 PM
  #7  
bike whisperer
 
Kimmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
Posts: 9,545

Bikes: https://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=152015&p=1404231

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1528 Post(s)
Liked 718 Times in 510 Posts
A long time between lubes with wax, eh?

Excuse me if I chortle.
Kimmo is offline  
Old 11-30-13, 06:39 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656

Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!

Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times in 742 Posts
Originally Posted by JerrySTL
If you want long time between lubes AND less friction, go old school with paraffin wax.
Huh? I'm laughing right with Kimmo on this one. I don't know of any lube less durable than paraffin. And, yes, I used it exclusively for a year or more so I'm talking from experience, not second hand info.
HillRider is offline  
Old 11-30-13, 07:26 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
rootboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Wherever
Posts: 16,748
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 556 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 132 Times in 78 Posts
We used to wax our chains for a while in the 70s. What a hassle, and no improvement in wear that I could tell.
rootboy is offline  
Old 11-30-13, 07:50 PM
  #10  
Ancient Clydesdale
 
2 wheeler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Columbia River Gorge
Posts: 683

Bikes: Specialized Allez Elite

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I'm with Kimmo and HillRider: PARAFFIN WAX!?!!
2 wheeler is offline  
Old 11-30-13, 08:52 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 9,438

Bikes: Trek 5500, Colnago C-50

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by mconlonx
Because Boeshield is made from jet planes crushed by half-naked cheerleaders.
This certainly seems like the best answer here.
Al1943 is offline  
Old 11-30-13, 10:17 PM
  #12  
Really Old Senior Member
 
Bill Kapaun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Mid Willamette Valley, Orygun
Posts: 13,872

Bikes: 87 RockHopper,2008 Specialized Globe. Both upgraded to 9 speeds. 2019 Giant Explore E+3

Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1793 Post(s)
Liked 1,268 Times in 875 Posts
What was wrong with Chain A > K?
OTOH, T9?
Bill Kapaun is offline  
Old 11-30-13, 10:49 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,701

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5776 Post(s)
Liked 2,574 Times in 1,425 Posts
Originally Posted by jim hughes
I use T-9 in the winter and it works well. But is Chain-L any less sticky? The problem here in Minneapolis is the sand that's dumped on the streets (and, for some incomprehensible reason, on the bike paths) in the winter.
If anything Chain-L is stickier than T9. IMO, it's much stickier which is the point.

OTOH the long service life means you can wipe down the outside of the chain until it's almost dry, then re-wipe as needed so stuff doesn't build up. The long life means you won't be reapplying and starting the entire process anew.

I developed Chain-L as a road lube around northeastern conditions, but it gets solid reviews from people using it under just about all conditions, and it's very rare that people challenge the my service life claims.

I try to avoid direct comparisons to other lubes because some are very different but equally good in their own way, and I think people should use whatever works for them according to where/how they ride, and the considerations they rank as most important.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is online now  
Likes For FBinNY:
Old 12-02-13, 03:51 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
Dfrost's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 1,989

Bikes: ‘87 Marinoni SLX Sports Tourer, ‘79 Miyata 912 by Gugificazione

Mentioned: 166 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 500 Post(s)
Liked 466 Times in 256 Posts
Originally Posted by lungimsam
Chain-L lasts way longer between relubes, which I like.
Other than that, I have no idea what might make one "better" than the other.
I ride in Maryland. Between 28F and 105F. On road riding 99.999% of the time. Rain when caught in it. No sand around here in central MD.

Thinking of going back to Chain-L. I just like that re-lubes only need to be done 8 times a year with my riding. Rather than every 200 miles with the Boeshield.

Any reason why sticking with Boeshield might be better?
When I kept close records of such things, I typically got 650-700 miles between applications of Boeshield on either of our road bikes. Pro-Link has been comparable. Haven't tried Chain-L yet.
Dfrost is offline  
Old 12-02-13, 04:20 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
zvez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Columbus, GA
Posts: 536

Bikes: 2014 Cervelo R5 Dura Ace,2014 Specialized S-Works Roubaix

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
What do you recommend to clean the chain with before application?

As to lube I've been using a wax type but am interested in trying yours. I've got long experience with chain lubes on motorcycles but as the rpms are so much lower I feel like the typical mc chain lube would be a bit heavy, tho I've thought of trying the silicone chain saver that dupont makes, been using on mcs for years.

Just ordered a bottle.

Thanks
Chris

Originally Posted by Dfrost
When I kept close records of such things, I typically got 650-700 miles between applications of Boeshield on either of our road bikes. Pro-Link has been comparable. Haven't tried Chain-L yet.
zvez is offline  
Old 12-02-13, 04:53 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,701

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5776 Post(s)
Liked 2,574 Times in 1,425 Posts
Originally Posted by zvez
What do you recommend to clean the chain with before application?....
Based on many years of experience, I now only use petroleum solvents such as naphtha or mineral spirits. These are about the most effective at breaking down oils, greases, and most waxes, and yet not harmful to the chain itself. They (mostly) also dry completely on their own.

The key to cleaning chains is to make sure you do a thorough job and don't leave dirt and compromised and half broken down oil still inside the chain.

You'll need a coffee can or similar to wash chains, and airtight containers to store used solvent. Dirt settles out and solvents can be reused.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is online now  
Old 12-02-13, 05:06 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
zvez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Columbus, GA
Posts: 536

Bikes: 2014 Cervelo R5 Dura Ace,2014 Specialized S-Works Roubaix

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks very much! On my mc's I've always used wd 40 to clean the chain and then ddry thoroughly but an mc chain gets substantially grittier. Kerosene is very popular for cleaning mc chains, so I might try this.


Originally Posted by FBinNY
Based on many years of experience, I now only use petroleum solvents such as naphtha or mineral spirits. These are about the most effective at breaking down oils, greases, and most waxes, and yet not harmful to the chain itself. They (mostly) also dry completely on their own.

The key to cleaning chains is to make sure you do a thorough job and don't leave dirt and compromised and half broken down oil still inside the chain.

You'll need a coffee can or similar to wash chains, and airtight containers to store used solvent. Dirt settles out and solvents can be reused.
zvez is offline  
Old 12-02-13, 05:14 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,701

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5776 Post(s)
Liked 2,574 Times in 1,425 Posts
Originally Posted by zvez
Thanks very much! On my mc's I've always used wd 40 to clean the chain and then ddry thoroughly but an mc chain gets substantially grittier. Kerosene is very popular for cleaning mc chains, so I might try this.
Kerosene does a good job as a cleaner, but doesn't dry completely, so you should consider mineral spirits as a final rinse to ensure that the chain will be dry before you oil it.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is online now  
Old 12-02-13, 05:27 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 6,660
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 582 Post(s)
Liked 171 Times in 138 Posts
I use Simple Green in an ultrasonic cleaner. It (the ultrasonic) has doubled the life of my chains.
davidad is offline  
Old 12-03-13, 07:13 AM
  #20  
bike whisperer
 
Kimmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
Posts: 9,545

Bikes: https://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=152015&p=1404231

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1528 Post(s)
Liked 718 Times in 510 Posts
Originally Posted by lungimsam
I have no idea what might make one "better" than the other.
They are both fine lubes, but the Boeshield is a lot thinner so it's best suited to the sort of conditions you want a thinner lube for, whatever they are.

For folks who want their chain to stay lubed for good while despite riding in the wet, it's pretty tough to beat Chain-L... I'm not aware of anything that can match it.

Maybe if you find the Chain-L a bit sticky you could dilute it a bit with some Boeshield

...Someone who has both* should try it and report back!

*My mate lost my bottle of Chain-L
Kimmo is offline  
Old 12-03-13, 08:27 AM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
mconlonx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,558
Mentioned: 47 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7148 Post(s)
Liked 134 Times in 92 Posts
Boeshield for light lubing needs, like road riding in decent weather, and for those who lube their chains frequently. Bonus as a lighter-weight oil is it can be used for other lubrication needs, like derailleur pivots and such.

Chain-L for everything else, especially commuting in all weather and riding year round, for those who are less than persnickety about frequency of chain lubing. I'd not use a heavier oil like this as a general lubricant.
mconlonx is offline  
Old 12-04-13, 05:05 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
Dunbar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: SoCal
Posts: 3,078

Bikes: Roubaix SL4 Expert , Cervelo S2

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 85 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I've used Chain-L before moving to the coast then switched to Boeshield T-9. The Chain-L does last much longer but is too sticky to use in sandy conditions. I'm lucky to 300 miles out of Boeshield between applications but I don't like the sound of a squeaky chain. I also (lightly) wipe the chain down between rides to remove any sand from the drivetrain.
Dunbar is offline  
Old 12-07-13, 11:30 AM
  #23  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 771
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
I think I'm gonna go back to Chain-L because I like not having to relube a lot.
lungimsam is offline  
Old 12-07-13, 12:22 PM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: lebanon oregon
Posts: 196

Bikes: trex 7500, old diamondback, older diamondback old frankenbike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have been very happy with chain-L. I ride about 100-120 miles a week, this time of year often in rain, yesterday in snow.
BTW , did not like riding in snow, so this weeks miles will be a low
niuoka is offline  
Old 12-09-13, 11:55 AM
  #25  
2k miles from the midwest
 
Dylansbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Washington
Posts: 1,964

Bikes: ~'75 Colin Laing, '80s Schwinn SuperSport 650b, ex-Backroads ti project...

Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 525 Post(s)
Liked 931 Times in 446 Posts
We tried a sample bottle of Chain L at work over a course of a month or two of wet commuting. We all seemed to notice it wearing off quickly with the first application, however we were all trying to get our chains cleaned beforehand, so that may have played a part. The "smooth" feeling is amazing compared the the T9 we all normally use. I applied to my fixed commuter, the rest to geared bikes. Whether the wet roads were a contributor or not, I noticed alot more derailleur pulley butter (that caked on encapsulated grit and grime) with the Chain L.
Dylansbob is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.