1991 Trek 2300 Conversion - 23 Speed Possible?
#51
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: South Orange County
Posts: 37
Bikes: 1991 Trek 2300
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Funny, Jake. I used to think I was so fast back in the 90's b/c I was always in the front of the pack with the guys. But it was probably just MY bike. Now that I can't keep up, it must be THEIR bikes! Ha, ha! That's a nice bike you have.
#53
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: South Orange County
Posts: 37
Bikes: 1991 Trek 2300
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Yes, I accidentally got this from a CL post - a beautiful Bianchi upgrade that was a typo, but modern components and inspiration for me all the same. I wish I could edit the title of this thread, but can't. I learned a lot here and will update my progress hoping it will help another woman that is DIYing - or a guy since there is some curiosity and interest about Trek 2300's. I actually do well in math, algebra and geometry - thank God we don't have to hire a tutor for our three kids and the 23 didn't make sense to me either but I'm new to this and didn't know for sure. I stand corrected! And not on that alone! My husband would agree but the kids still think I'm pretty smart.
#54
Banned
Ive been OK with a 7 speed freewheel hub bike x3 . a triple crank .. is 21 'speeds'
[ though now I use my IGH bike the most , as it shifts at any rate of speed . even stopped ..]
derailleur drivetrains have to be moving and rotating ..
more math : count teeth and discover the ratios that the chainring turning the rear cog represents.(ex.. 40:20=2:1)
that is the actual gear. F '/, R x wheel diameter gives an equivalent wheel diameter as if it were a big old highwheeler
turning the pedal once... gets you down the road that circumference.
then you can see what the "speeds" really are.
(often the ratios are overlapping so not really having 21 actual different gears)
as aGo fast race style bike its pretty easy to get into tapping the kid's college funds
to get the latest stuff..
but one constraint is all the new bikes have 130mm wide axles ..
the wheels in the 7 speed era were narrower.. 126mm..
[ though now I use my IGH bike the most , as it shifts at any rate of speed . even stopped ..]
derailleur drivetrains have to be moving and rotating ..
more math : count teeth and discover the ratios that the chainring turning the rear cog represents.(ex.. 40:20=2:1)
that is the actual gear. F '/, R x wheel diameter gives an equivalent wheel diameter as if it were a big old highwheeler
turning the pedal once... gets you down the road that circumference.
then you can see what the "speeds" really are.
(often the ratios are overlapping so not really having 21 actual different gears)
as aGo fast race style bike its pretty easy to get into tapping the kid's college funds
to get the latest stuff..
but one constraint is all the new bikes have 130mm wide axles ..
the wheels in the 7 speed era were narrower.. 126mm..
Last edited by fietsbob; 03-01-14 at 06:16 PM.
#55
Constant tinkerer
I get it! The cassette is off. There is a 600 long derailleur that I am going to get. (: New chain. And I think I will go for a 51- compact crank. That will still give me the downhill power I want. (Currently 53-39). I found a good LBS the next town over. They are happy to order parts so I'm going to buy from them.
BTW a long cage 600 RD will not work. It's a common misconception that the long cage is for bigger cogs but really it just gives you more teeth capacity (for when you're using a triple crank for example.) You need a MTB rear derailer for the 32T cassette. Deore, LX, XT, XTR, Alivio, Acera X, STX, are all fine choices that will work perfectly with your setup. Just avoid the super new 10-speed rear derailers.
#56
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: South Orange County
Posts: 37
Bikes: 1991 Trek 2300
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Yes, my bike is 126mm. I was wondering what the point of diminishing return is on gears. Tax return is coming. My husband knows I want a new bike. We have a lot of other stuff we NEED to do right now, but sometimes he spoils me. My mom is giving us a Silverado with a bike rack on it. We're going to throw all the surfboards in and load it up with bikes! Can't wait!
#57
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: South Orange County
Posts: 37
Bikes: 1991 Trek 2300
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
But for now the 53 will still give you a nice high cruising range with the 14T as your smallest cassette cog.
You need a MTB rear derailer for the 32T cassette. Deore, LX, XT, XTR, Alivio, Acera X, STX, are all fine choices that will work perfectly with your setup. Just avoid the super new 10-speed rear derailers.
You need a MTB rear derailer for the 32T cassette. Deore, LX, XT, XTR, Alivio, Acera X, STX, are all fine choices that will work perfectly with your setup. Just avoid the super new 10-speed rear derailers.
#58
Banned
costs a bit of money , but I have 20+ years of use out of Phil woods freewheel hubs in 126..
one down side of low cost freewheel hubs is broken axles .. Phil solved the issue 30 years ago ..
but as I say internal gear hubs are a lot better now.. 5 to 8speed but only 1 chain ring and cog .
there are 11 and 14 speed , but they need 135 wide frames.
one down side of low cost freewheel hubs is broken axles .. Phil solved the issue 30 years ago ..
but as I say internal gear hubs are a lot better now.. 5 to 8speed but only 1 chain ring and cog .
there are 11 and 14 speed , but they need 135 wide frames.
#59
Constant tinkerer
In my opinion, 8-speed is enough. That's what I have on my Trek with full Dura Ace including some C50 carbon tubular wheels. So it's not like I was on a real tight budget when I put the thing together. Mainly it's my objection to the never-ending "more speeds" nonsense. All my bikes are 7 or 8 speed rears and it allows me to mix and match quite easily.
Above 8-speeds the chains get narrower (chains and cassettes wear out faster) and derailer adjustment becomes more finicky. No thanks.
Above 8-speeds the chains get narrower (chains and cassettes wear out faster) and derailer adjustment becomes more finicky. No thanks.
#60
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: South Orange County
Posts: 37
Bikes: 1991 Trek 2300
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
My friend has a new Miele with Di2. Her bike blows mine away. She is really gracious and never made me feel bad when I rode with her and another friend and I enjoyed the ride anyway. I enjoy riding so much I don't care if I am alone, but it would be nice to meet up with friends too.
#61
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,688
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1074 Post(s)
Liked 295 Times
in
222 Posts
It's all in what speed range you need, ease of shifting pattern and a possible weight advantage.
First of all, the number of different combinations doesn't equal the number of usefully different gears. Expect abt 2/3 as many usefully different gears as you have combinations. I run a 3x7 with a tight ratio road cassette and a MTB triple on my commuter. It's a comfy ride that spins out at about 25 mph/40 kmh. No big deal for me to coast those precious seconds that happens on an urban commute. The granny gear is pretty much limited to
snow use. Now, I could get the same range and ratios by going to a 2x10 setup.
It'd be a tad lighter crank, I'd avoid some front shifts and it'd all wear a lot faster. No thanks.
But if I thought i needed a wider speed range, then I'd either need to put up with bigger steps between ratios or go to more gears.
First of all, the number of different combinations doesn't equal the number of usefully different gears. Expect abt 2/3 as many usefully different gears as you have combinations. I run a 3x7 with a tight ratio road cassette and a MTB triple on my commuter. It's a comfy ride that spins out at about 25 mph/40 kmh. No big deal for me to coast those precious seconds that happens on an urban commute. The granny gear is pretty much limited to
snow use. Now, I could get the same range and ratios by going to a 2x10 setup.
It'd be a tad lighter crank, I'd avoid some front shifts and it'd all wear a lot faster. No thanks.
But if I thought i needed a wider speed range, then I'd either need to put up with bigger steps between ratios or go to more gears.
Last edited by dabac; 03-01-14 at 09:55 PM.
#62
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: South Orange County
Posts: 37
Bikes: 1991 Trek 2300
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#63
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,688
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1074 Post(s)
Liked 295 Times
in
222 Posts
Has the option of 8-of-9 sprockets on a 7-speed body been mentioned yet? Or 9-of-10 on a 7-speed body for that matter. Assuming it's a freehub-equipped bike, that bypasses any issues with axle width or wheel swap.
#64
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 336
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
"My almost LBS had a Shimano 8sp cassette they tried on my hub but the 8th gear wouldn't fit."
Find a new LBS. A 7s hub will only fit a full cluster 7s or less. You can fit 7 cogs of an 8s etc. but not a full 8+s cassette. If you're relying on a LBS and that one seriously tried to mount a full 8s cassette on a 126mm 7s freehub, run away .
Find a new LBS. A 7s hub will only fit a full cluster 7s or less. You can fit 7 cogs of an 8s etc. but not a full 8+s cassette. If you're relying on a LBS and that one seriously tried to mount a full 8s cassette on a 126mm 7s freehub, run away .
#65
Really Old Senior Member
I'm an old guy with emphysema.
I basically have to "spin" lower gears at a narrow cadence range (80-85 RPM) so I don't "gas out"
My bikes are 9 speeds with (usually) 12-23 cassettes and 22-32-36/38T triples.
I usually ride the middle ring for around town, but have the granny in case I get a severe head wind etc. I might use the large ring (which basically gives me about 1.5 higher gears) if out in the countryside with a tail wind. That just kind of depends on which combination gives me a better chain line as much as anything else, since in those conditions I'm usually just trying to log miles and go for endurance by backing off just a bit.
So, around town, I'm usually cruising along in 32-13/14 on my hybrid.
A slight change in the head wind and I can make a slight change in my gearing.
I'm not fast, so shifting to a 1T smaller cog might only improve my speed about 7% (1 MPH), but IT'S 7% faster than if I didn't have that gear.
I am sticking to 9 speed since that 1 extra cog raises the price of cassettes & chains beyond cost effectiveness for my limited retirement income.
#66
Banned
that 8th cog was added on the end of a 7 speed stack, it is the same spacing as the other 7,
hence hub had to get wider.. 126 >130..
As a Touring cyclist I thought the gear selection of Shimano's K cassette 13~34t was just fine,
the 8th cog allowed a 12t, 7 the top cog was 13.
took several load carrying tours, 50:14 high, 24:34 low 40t chainring in the middle.
hence hub had to get wider.. 126 >130..
As a Touring cyclist I thought the gear selection of Shimano's K cassette 13~34t was just fine,
the 8th cog allowed a 12t, 7 the top cog was 13.
took several load carrying tours, 50:14 high, 24:34 low 40t chainring in the middle.
#67
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: South Orange County
Posts: 37
Bikes: 1991 Trek 2300
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Maybe they should run away from me (: I am inexperienced and I like to experiment when trying new disciplines so I asked him to try it. I'm satisfied with ordering the 32T 7 sp. cassette. But I am researching lightweight steel bikes that I can upgrade. I love the new carbon bikes but the long life of steel appeals to me if I can get the performance I want through an upgrade.
#68
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: South Orange County
Posts: 37
Bikes: 1991 Trek 2300
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
And her Trek 820 weighs a ton but I'm going to do some cosmetic upgrades for my son to ride it next.
#69
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: South Orange County
Posts: 37
Bikes: 1991 Trek 2300
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
That's fantastic Bill! I wish you could meet my husband. He has asthma and I dragged him on a cycling honeymoon back in '91. There was a terrible headwind the first day surrounded by sunflower fields. He affectionately refers to it as "Sunflower Hell" (: I'm going to take apart his Cannondale this summer with my daughter and hopefully with the bike rack on the truck I'll get him cruising again.
#70
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: South Orange County
Posts: 37
Bikes: 1991 Trek 2300
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
It's all in what speed range you need, ease of shifting pattern and a possible weight advantage.
First of all, the number of different combinations doesn't equal the number of usefully different gears. Expect abt 2/3 as many usefully different gears as you have combinations. I run a 3x7 with a tight ratio road cassette and a MTB triple on my commuter. It's a comfy ride that spins out at about 25 mph/40 kmh.
First of all, the number of different combinations doesn't equal the number of usefully different gears. Expect abt 2/3 as many usefully different gears as you have combinations. I run a 3x7 with a tight ratio road cassette and a MTB triple on my commuter. It's a comfy ride that spins out at about 25 mph/40 kmh.
#71
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,688
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1074 Post(s)
Liked 295 Times
in
222 Posts
This doesn't make sense. The cassette is the stack of sprockets at the rear. You'd want to use the biggest one on an extreme uphill.
I'm assuming you mean that you run your chain on the biggest chainring(up front) except on extreme uphills.
You might want to rethink that. Bicycling is a lot more about endurance than it is about brute strength. Keep those cranks turning. The stock recommendation is to aim for a cadence (pedalling rate) at about 80-100 turns/minute.
It might feel odd at first, you may start to bounce in the saddle. but your knees will thank you for it. They don't really approve of pushing hard-and-slow for extended periods. Spinning fast-and-light is a lot more to their liking.
And there's cross-chaining too. Not that important on a double, but if you're running the chain more diagonally than actually needed, you're losing a tiny bit of effort and running life for nothing compared to a chain that's running straighter. And as ratios repeat, you're not gaining anything by staying on a diagonal gear when there's a "straight" gear available.
I'm assuming you mean that you run your chain on the biggest chainring(up front) except on extreme uphills.
You might want to rethink that. Bicycling is a lot more about endurance than it is about brute strength. Keep those cranks turning. The stock recommendation is to aim for a cadence (pedalling rate) at about 80-100 turns/minute.
It might feel odd at first, you may start to bounce in the saddle. but your knees will thank you for it. They don't really approve of pushing hard-and-slow for extended periods. Spinning fast-and-light is a lot more to their liking.
And there's cross-chaining too. Not that important on a double, but if you're running the chain more diagonally than actually needed, you're losing a tiny bit of effort and running life for nothing compared to a chain that's running straighter. And as ratios repeat, you're not gaining anything by staying on a diagonal gear when there's a "straight" gear available.
#72
bike whisperer
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
Posts: 9,545
Bikes: https://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=152015&p=1404231
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1528 Post(s)
Liked 718 Times
in
510 Posts
So we're stuck at 126? Doesn't mean we're stuck with 7s.
You can have 8 or maybe 9 of 10 on your existing hub. Or, you can totally have the full monty if you lace a 8/9/10 hub (or your old hub with a new cassette body) into an off-centre rim; see the link in my sig for details.
Not so. You don't even need a new axle when going from 130 to 135 - the amount of axle in the dropout doesn't matter as long as it's enough to locate it; the locknuts and skewer do all the holding. The only part required is the spacer.
You can have 8 or maybe 9 of 10 on your existing hub. Or, you can totally have the full monty if you lace a 8/9/10 hub (or your old hub with a new cassette body) into an off-centre rim; see the link in my sig for details.
Not so. You don't even need a new axle when going from 130 to 135 - the amount of axle in the dropout doesn't matter as long as it's enough to locate it; the locknuts and skewer do all the holding. The only part required is the spacer.
__________________
Sheldon Brown's bike info ~~~ Park Tools repair help
Half-step triple, using double gear ~~~ 6400 STI rebuild walkthrough ~~~ Want 8/9/10s @126mm OLD? OCR. ~~~ Shimano cassette body overhaul ~~~ Ergopower Escape wear repair ~~~ PSA: drivetrain wear
List of US/Canada bike co-ops ~~~ Global list
Sheldon Brown's bike info ~~~ Park Tools repair help
Half-step triple, using double gear ~~~ 6400 STI rebuild walkthrough ~~~ Want 8/9/10s @126mm OLD? OCR. ~~~ Shimano cassette body overhaul ~~~ Ergopower Escape wear repair ~~~ PSA: drivetrain wear
List of US/Canada bike co-ops ~~~ Global list
#73
Rides Majestic
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Westfield, MA
Posts: 1,339
Bikes: 1983 Univega Gran Turismo, 1970 Schwinn Super Sport, 2001 Univega Modo Vincere, Self-Built Nashbar Touring, 1974 Peugeot U08, 1974 Atala Grand Prix, 1986 Ross Mt. Hood, 80's Maruishi MT-18
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
So we're stuck at 126? Doesn't mean we're stuck with 7s.
You can have 8 or maybe 9 of 10 on your existing hub. Or, you can totally have the full monty if you lace a 8/9/10 hub (or your old hub with a new cassette body) into an off-centre rim; see the link in my sig for details.
Not so. You don't even need a new axle when going from 130 to 135 - the amount of axle in the dropout doesn't matter as long as it's enough to locate it; the locknuts and skewer do all the holding. The only part required is the spacer.
You can have 8 or maybe 9 of 10 on your existing hub. Or, you can totally have the full monty if you lace a 8/9/10 hub (or your old hub with a new cassette body) into an off-centre rim; see the link in my sig for details.
Not so. You don't even need a new axle when going from 130 to 135 - the amount of axle in the dropout doesn't matter as long as it's enough to locate it; the locknuts and skewer do all the holding. The only part required is the spacer.
#74
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: South Orange County
Posts: 37
Bikes: 1991 Trek 2300
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Most recently I've ended up being on the small chain ring going uphill, chagrined to say. Believe me, I am experiencing all 14 of the gears and with its current teeth it's not enough! Ha! My kids are whipping me into shape and I'm learning that being fit means more than what you weigh on a scale.
My daughter trains 4 hours a day. I wish she would hit some beaches that don't involve a 3 mile round trip walk involving at least one steep hill. Or do I? I'm having fun with all 3 of the kids and I feel great!
Last edited by 5ofus; 03-03-14 at 10:17 PM. Reason: incomplete
#75
Keepin it Wheel
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: San Diego
Posts: 10,245
Bikes: Surly CrossCheck, Krampus
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26 Post(s)
Liked 3,426 Times
in
2,533 Posts
Haha, SRAM already makes an elite 1x11 mtn group, all you gotta do is build a 23-cog cassette! Before long Campy will offer 12-speed, so just slap a 12-speed and 11-speed onto a super-long freehub. Done! (spread those forks -- or get a fatbike frame)