Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

Will longer nips solve my wheel-building problem?

Search
Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

Will longer nips solve my wheel-building problem?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-14-14, 06:43 PM
  #1  
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
daveed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: on a leafy block
Posts: 317

Bikes: Soma Double Cross, ‘79 Centurian Mixte, generic mountain bikes (Nasbar frames)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Will longer nips solve my wheel-building problem?

I gave up lacing my fifth wheel build tonight after being unable to lace a driveside DT Swiss Comp to a 700 rim (WTB i19s). The dang spoke just wouldn't reach the 12mm nipple no matter how hard I pulled on the hub.

I laced the first 8 DS spokes w/o a problem, turning each three times. I managed to lace three of the second eight DS spokes (under-under-over) before the aforementioned problem. Will 16mm nips work for the remaining DS spokes? I'd hate to go back and re-lace everything using 16s. Btw I checked the lengths with the bike shop before ordering the spokes so I likely have the right size for the Shimano 105 5700 hub.

Any help is much appreciated.
daveed is offline  
Old 10-14-14, 07:06 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
fholt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NC
Posts: 253

Bikes: 2006 Novara Randonee, 2009 Fuji Cross Pro, 2013 Specialized Roubaix Pro, 2013 Allez Smartweld A5 Frankenbike, 2021 Diverge Comp Carbon

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 2 Posts
don't try it. You either don't have the correct spoke length, or you're not laced right. Are you sure you are only crossing 3 spokes (knowing the first cross is normally right at the hub?). If your spokes are too short, it's worth it to figure out your options. You might find you're 2mm short, in which case 14mm nips might make sense to save the day, but all around for sure. You might also adjust the cross down to 2, depending on the numbers you find. It might also be that you really don't have workable spokes. Do not half ass the drive side with 3 12mm nips, and 5 16mm. Really not a quality build there, even if you do get it laced.
__________________
-------------------------------
'06 Novara Randonee
'09 Fuji Cross Pro
'13 Specialized Roubaix Pro
'13 Specialized Allez Smartweld Frankenbike
'21 Diverge Comp Carbon
fholt is offline  
Old 10-14-14, 07:38 PM
  #3  
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
daveed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: on a leafy block
Posts: 317

Bikes: Soma Double Cross, ‘79 Centurian Mixte, generic mountain bikes (Nasbar frames)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
That sounds like sensible advice fholt. Thank you! FYI: I'm sticking with a 3x lace if only because I laced the front that way.
daveed is offline  
Old 10-14-14, 07:52 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Wind Tunnels of Cheyenne
Posts: 361

Bikes: Burley Duet [of some unknown year] (the guinea pig); 2001 Ventana ECDM (the project); And always one less than I think I really need.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I'm not sure, but I thought I heard somewhere (perhaps a Bill Mould youtube video???) that using longer spoke nipples actually didn't give you more/lower threads. Again, not sure because why longer ones then, but for some reason this comes to mind.

Then, even if the longer spoke nipples do get the spoke threads to engage, will there be enough engagement to keep from ripping the nipple head off? Shouldn't the spokes be threaded as close to the screwdriver slot as possible for this reason?

If your first group all threaded ok, and the second set is the same size, then it must be a lacing problem causing the problem. Can't see how all the outer (sounds like you laced the outers first) all threaded but the same size inners won't.
LastKraftWagen is offline  
Old 10-14-14, 08:34 PM
  #5  
Passista
 
Reynolds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,597

Bikes: 1998 Pinarello Asolo, 1992 KHS Montańa pro, 1980 Raleigh DL-1, IGH Hybrid, IGH Utility

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 866 Post(s)
Liked 721 Times in 396 Posts
According to Edd and Spocalc, your spokes should be 295mm left/294mm right.
Reynolds is offline  
Old 10-14-14, 08:51 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
mrrabbit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 3,504

Bikes: 2001 Tommasini Sintesi w/ Campagnolo Daytona 10 Speed

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 145 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 35 Times in 30 Posts
Nipples are nipples...they are not spoke extenders. If the ends of the spokes do not penetrate the full thickness of the rim seat - those ends become stress risers where the barrel meets the head. Problem worsens if the ends of the spokes barely make it to the inner rim surface to begin with.

Check your lacing - else longer spokes - both already noted above.

=8-)
__________________
5000+ wheels built since 1984...

Disclaimer:

1. I do not claim to be an expert in bicycle mechanics despite my experience.
2. I like anyone will comment in other areas.
3. I do not own the preexisting concepts of DISH and ERD.
4. I will provide information as I always have to others that I believe will help them protect themselves from unscrupulous mechanics.
5. My all time favorite book is:

Kahane, Howard. Logic and Contemporary Rhetoric: The Use of Reason in Everyday Life
mrrabbit is offline  
Old 10-14-14, 08:59 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,701

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5776 Post(s)
Liked 2,574 Times in 1,425 Posts
Nipple length has nothing to do with correct spoke length. The spoke is supposed to reach into the head of the nipple which is always the same place regardless of nipple length. The main (only?) advantage(?) of using longer nipples is that they hide the threads when the spokes are too short. They can also make lacing simper, since it's easier to catch the 1st thread, which is one reason high production builders seem to like them

The real reason for longer nipples is for rims like the wood insert type of back when, that are thicker beween the nipple seat and inner surface. Otherwise there's no benefit to longer nipples in most builds.

BTW- if the spokes don't reach here are the 3 most common reasons

1- miscalculated spoke length
2- incorrect lacing, either more crosses, or incorrect phasing between the flanges
3- flanges are thick and the spokes are bowed using some working length. Set the elbow by pushing the spoke to the need line of action.
3- above 3 are actually OK, but the nipples are hanging up in the holes opposite where you're working. This is fairly common with non-eyeletted rims.

Check 1&2 and lace carefully, then deal with no. 3 or 4 if they apply.

Good luck.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is offline  
Old 10-15-14, 03:07 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,688
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1074 Post(s)
Liked 295 Times in 222 Posts
Originally Posted by FBinNY
Nipple length has nothing to do with correct spoke length. The spoke is supposed to reach into the head of the nipple which is always the same place regardless of nipple length.
Kinda-sorta. Yes, the spoke head is always in the same place. But - for DT at least - a spoke will bottom out earlier in a longer nipple. A 16 mm DT nipple won't allow a regular DT spoke to reach full penetration of the spoke head before running out of thread. Tried it myself too.
If you want to keep some marging for future trueing on a DT parts wheel build, with 16 mm nipples you need to let the spoke end below the head at time-of-build. Or be ready to drill out the threads a bit. Or replace the spokes with shorter.

See pic:

(Pic gratefully stolen from Nipple length affecting spoke length?- Mtbr.com)
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
SpokesandNipples.jpg (31.8 KB, 35 views)
dabac is offline  
Old 10-15-14, 06:59 AM
  #9  
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
daveed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: on a leafy block
Posts: 317

Bikes: Soma Double Cross, ‘79 Centurian Mixte, generic mountain bikes (Nasbar frames)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Reynolds
According to Edd and Spocalc, your spokes should be 295mm left/294mm right.
Gulp. I'm using 293s on the drive-side. Thanks for all the advice, everyone.
daveed is offline  
Old 10-15-14, 07:11 AM
  #10  
Senior member
 
Dan Burkhart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Oakville Ontario
Posts: 8,117
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 943 Post(s)
Liked 658 Times in 371 Posts
Originally Posted by dabac
Kinda-sorta. Yes, the spoke head is always in the same place. But - for DT at least - a spoke will bottom out earlier in a longer nipple. A 16 mm DT nipple won't allow a regular DT spoke to reach full penetration of the spoke head before running out of thread. Tried it myself too.
If you want to keep some marging for future trueing on a DT parts wheel build, with 16 mm nipples you need to let the spoke end below the head at time-of-build. Or be ready to drill out the threads a bit. Or replace the spokes with shorter.

See pic:

(Pic gratefully stolen from Nipple length affecting spoke length?- Mtbr.com)
This is true. It is why I adapted my spoke threader to apply 13mm of thread for occasions when I use 16mm nipples.
Dan Burkhart is offline  
Old 10-15-14, 07:49 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,701

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5776 Post(s)
Liked 2,574 Times in 1,425 Posts
Originally Posted by daveed
Gulp. I'm using 293s on the drive-side. Thanks for all the advice, everyone.
1mm or even 2mm short shouldn't casue your problem lacing. Something lse is going on, so check 2-4 on the list I posted above. Most likely two.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is offline  
Old 10-15-14, 08:50 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,688
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1074 Post(s)
Liked 295 Times in 222 Posts
Originally Posted by Dan Burkhart
..my spoke threader...
Gotta get me one of those...

Drilling out the nipples from the narrow end works, but it's a slow process. Good for repair work, to be able to finish something off, but not something to plan a build around. Unless you have extra time to kill off.
dabac is offline  
Old 10-15-14, 10:18 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,701

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5776 Post(s)
Liked 2,574 Times in 1,425 Posts
Originally Posted by dabac
.... But - for DT at least - a spoke will bottom out earlier in a longer nipple. A 16 mm DT nipple won't allow a regular DT spoke to reach full penetration of the spoke head before running out of thread. ....
Agreed, but to me, this is just another reason not to use longer nipples. As I posted earlier, unless the rim calls for longer nipples, which is rare these days, there's no benefi to longer nipples, so shortening the spoke length is the wrong solution. The right answer is that if the nipple doesn't allow the spoke to reach the head, with margin for error, change the nipple to one that's correct.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is offline  
Old 10-15-14, 11:01 AM
  #14  
Passista
 
Reynolds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,597

Bikes: 1998 Pinarello Asolo, 1992 KHS Montańa pro, 1980 Raleigh DL-1, IGH Hybrid, IGH Utility

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 866 Post(s)
Liked 721 Times in 396 Posts
Originally Posted by dabac
Kinda-sorta. Yes, the spoke head is always in the same place. But - for DT at least - a spoke will bottom out earlier in a longer nipple. A 16 mm DT nipple won't allow a regular DT spoke to reach full penetration of the spoke head before running out of thread. Tried it myself too.
If you want to keep some marging for future trueing on a DT parts wheel build, with 16 mm nipples you need to let the spoke end below the head at time-of-build. Or be ready to drill out the threads a bit. Or replace the spokes with shorter.

See pic:

(Pic gratefully stolen from Nipple length affecting spoke length?- Mtbr.com)
It's not good practice, but I've seen wheels built with too long spokes and when the nipples bottomed out, they were forced past the threads a couple of turns and the protruding spoke tips were ground off with no bad practical consequences. Maybe the builder was too lazy to unlace the wheel, get the correct spokes and lace again, or more likely he had to do with what spokes he had at hand.

Originally Posted by FBinNY
1mm or even 2mm short shouldn't casue your problem lacing. Something lse is going on, so check 2-4 on the list I posted above. Most likely two.
+1

Last edited by Reynolds; 10-15-14 at 11:05 AM.
Reynolds is offline  
Old 10-15-14, 11:40 AM
  #15  
Senior member
 
Dan Burkhart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Oakville Ontario
Posts: 8,117
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 943 Post(s)
Liked 658 Times in 371 Posts
Originally Posted by FBinNY
Agreed, but to me, this is just another reason not to use longer nipples. As I posted earlier, unless the rim calls for longer nipples, which is rare these days, there's no benefi to longer nipples, so shortening the spoke length is the wrong solution. The right answer is that if the nipple doesn't allow the spoke to reach the head, with margin for error, change the nipple to one that's correct.
This is true, and where I use long nipples, it's mostly for aesthetic reasons. 12mm nipples just look wrong on a rim with a 80mm profile, at least in my humble opinion.
Dan Burkhart is offline  
Old 10-15-14, 11:49 AM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,701

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5776 Post(s)
Liked 2,574 Times in 1,425 Posts
Originally Posted by Dan Burkhart
This is true, and where I use long nipples, it's mostly for aesthetic reasons. 12mm nipples just look wrong on a rim with a 80mm profile, at least in my humble opinion.
Yes, I should have said no mechanical benefit. Cosmetic benefits also count, and I agree that longer nipples somehow look better on some combinations.

Also, as I mentioned earlier, the women lacing 60 wheels per hour in production find it easier to work with long nipples, which is one reason we see them so often on production wheels. Some spoke makers compensate with longer threads on the spokes they sell to OEMs so it all works out correctly.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is offline  
Old 10-15-14, 12:06 PM
  #17  
Seńor Member
 
Wilfred Laurier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 5,066
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 649 Post(s)
Liked 292 Times in 215 Posts
Originally Posted by daveed
The dang spoke just wouldn't reach the 12mm nipple no matter how hard I pulled on the hub.
Sounds like the common hub flange phase shift that FB mentioned.
Wilfred Laurier is offline  
Old 10-15-14, 12:31 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,701

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5776 Post(s)
Liked 2,574 Times in 1,425 Posts
Originally Posted by daveed

....I laced the first 8 DS spokes w/o a problem, turning each three times. I managed to lace three of the second eight DS spokes (under-under-over) before the aforementioned problem. Will 16mm nips work for the remaining DS spokes? I'd hate to go back and re-lace everything using 16s. Btw I checked the lengths with the bike shop before ordering the spokes so I likely have the right size for the Shimano 105 5700 hub.

Any help is much appreciated.
If this is the first flange laced, it's almost certainly because of crossing one too many.

If it's the second flange laced, it's most likely a phasing error, and odds are you'll have to remove all the spokes from this flange and move them over one hole. You also get this error if you reverse the pulling and pushing spokes when lacing that flange, so may not have to move the spokes, just switch the direction.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is offline  
Old 10-15-14, 08:05 PM
  #19  
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
daveed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: on a leafy block
Posts: 317

Bikes: Soma Double Cross, ‘79 Centurian Mixte, generic mountain bikes (Nasbar frames)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by FBinNY
If this is the first flange laced, it's almost certainly because of crossing one too many.

If it's the second flange laced, it's most likely a phasing error, and odds are you'll have to remove all the spokes from this flange and move them over one hole. You also get this error if you reverse the pulling and pushing spokes when lacing that flange, so may not have to move the spokes, just switch the direction.
Yes FBinNY it was a phasing problem. I don't why I can't figure our where to put the first spoke. I probably should take a wheel-building class. Still, I love telling people I built my wheels.
daveed is offline  
Old 10-15-14, 08:34 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,701

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5776 Post(s)
Liked 2,574 Times in 1,425 Posts
Originally Posted by daveed
Yes FBinNY it was a phasing problem. I don't why I can't figure our where to put the first spoke. I probably should take a wheel-building class. Still, I love telling people I built my wheels.
Phasing is really easy to get right. Unfortunately it seems easy to get wrong also. Here's how to get it right every time.

Hold the rim vertical in front of you with the valve at 9 o'clock. If you care about the label, the built wheel will be rolling to your right, so turn the label accordingly. Now look at the two holes immediately above the valve, where you'll be attaching the 2 "pulling" spokes (1ea. from each flange). Counting up from the valve, determine if the holes are right (toward you)/left, or left right. Whichever way it is, make note because that's how the spokes go to the respective flanges, and which is first.

Now, take the hub and put a dot at a hole in the right flange. Put a straightedge (or spoke) across the hub and put a dot at the gap between the two holes opposite the one you marked.

Now to phase. If the rim is left/right, the hub has to be also, so the left flange spoke will go to the hole in the left flange to the left of the dot, or before (earlier on a clock) than the one on the right. These two pulling spokes can be elbow-in or elbow-out depending on your choice (I build pulling elbow out, JB followers build elbow in). BTW- if the rim is right left, the left spoke will be to the right of the dot (later by the clock).

You can thread the one left spoke now so you don't forget, or can mark the hole for the other pulling spoke at your option.

So it's that simple, left/right in the rim means left/right in the hub. Once you have it in your head you'll never make this mistake again, and can move onto more interesting errors.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.

Last edited by FBinNY; 10-15-14 at 08:50 PM.
FBinNY is offline  
Old 10-16-14, 06:46 AM
  #21  
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
daveed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: on a leafy block
Posts: 317

Bikes: Soma Double Cross, ‘79 Centurian Mixte, generic mountain bikes (Nasbar frames)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
"So it's that simple, left/right in the rim means left/right in the hub. Once you have it in your head you'll never make this mistake again, and can move onto more interesting errors.

Ha! Thanks for the detailed instructions FBinNY. I can't wait.
daveed is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RamirAngeles
Bicycle Mechanics
11
05-30-15 06:51 AM
bikeboy100
Bicycle Mechanics
15
06-01-14 06:48 PM
FastJake
Bicycle Mechanics
9
08-08-11 12:56 AM
noglider
Classic & Vintage
35
07-26-11 06:43 PM
serpico7
Bicycle Mechanics
24
06-16-11 04:21 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.