![]() |
Shifting under load and skipping
I have a shifting problem.
The bike has a 9 speed drivetrain with low miles. The fd/rd/crankset are Ultegra 6500. It is a triple crankset. The rd cable is new. The shifter is a 7700 bar end. When I have the bike in the middle ring, and I pedal hard (like standing up), the chain skips on to the small ring on the crankset. The problem has gotten worse over time, so that I can reproduce it fairly easily now. The chain does not skip when it is on the largest (outer) chainring. I am trying to diagnose what the problem is. The list of potential causes is:
In addition to these causes, what are the other ones that I need to look for? |
The FD adjustment is most likely, especially since it started with the cable replacement.
When you stand and pedal hard the tops of the rings flex outward. So if the FD trim is a bit inboard, it might be OK on the stand or when pedlaing lightly, but will cause a shift when the rings move out (same as if the FD moved in). If you have an inline adjuster, trim the FD outboard a bit more and it should (hopefully) resolve. |
You are going about things backward. Diagnosis is not a matter of multiple choice, unless you want to spend all day trying each possibility. You need to go through a logical process to narrow down possible causes before you go to checking them. First determine the exact condition under which it does or does not occur. Then look at the items that would be relevant under the conditions where the problem occurs and that don't apply when the problem does not occur.
|
BB shot, frame cracked.
|
Fork's bent.
|
While I agree with the comment about going about things backward (i.e., if you've thought about those things, why haven't they been eliminated yet?), I can see why you might want to gather all possibilities before trying to troubleshoot.
Here's another possibility-- there is not enough friction holding the shifter in place. I'm assuming the FD is friction shifting only. It's possible that in the large ring positions, the shifter has enough friction, but has a low friction spot where its position corresponds to being in the middle ring. I actually had this problem with a Shimano 77xx series bar end shifter when mounted on a Paul thumbie mount. I had to torque the pivot bolt pretty hard to prevent the FD from slowly migrating toward the small ring. |
Originally Posted by southpawboston
(Post 17219862)
I can see why you might want to gather all possibilities before trying to troubleshoot.
Some problems on a bike can have dozens of possible causes, and randomly trying each one is just wasteful. In fact I have seen people do just that and end up "fixing" a click by replacing pedals or a bottom bracket when it may have been caused by insufficient tightening. |
Interesting that this same possible problem, low shift lever friction, surfaced in another thread recently. AS in that thread, TimmyT has a simple experiment to try to see if der adjustment or cable/lever holding are part of the problem. Remove the der and place the chain on the middle ring then test ride. Reinstall the der and leave the cable off but wind in the limit screw so the cage is clear of the chain while on the middle ring and again test ride.
I have seen worn chains and rings do this auto shifting thing when under power. Replacing both (and often the cassette too) has fixed it before. Do I have a pat explanation? No but it has worked. Andy. |
what has helped me is to aim a GoPro camera at the front crank and play back in slo-mo to analyze what happens.
Many times, it's multiple factors that contribute: - loose BB - loose chainring bolts - FD trim / cable-tension - riding style This last item was helped by having riders behind me show me videos of myself. Learning to push and pull at the same time out of the saddle allows me to keep the bike and my body perfectly upright. None of the power is wasted flexing the frame laterally and no rubbing of the chainrings or auto shifting. |
Originally Posted by FBinNY
(Post 17219463)
The FD adjustment is most likely, especially since it started with the cable replacement.
Originally Posted by cny-bikeman
(Post 17219468)
You are going about things backward. Diagnosis is not a matter of multiple choice, unless you want to spend all day trying each possibility.
Originally Posted by Jiggle
(Post 17219485)
BB shot, frame cracked.
Originally Posted by southpawboston
(Post 17219827)
Fork's bent.
Originally Posted by southpawboston
(Post 17219862)
Here's another possibility-- there is not enough friction holding the shifter in place. I'm assuming the FD is friction shifting only. It's possible that in the large ring positions, the shifter has enough friction, but has a low friction spot where its position corresponds to being in the middle ring.
I actually had this problem with a Shimano 77xx series bar end shifter when mounted on a Paul thumbie mount. I had to torque the pivot bolt pretty hard to prevent the FD from slowly migrating toward the small ring. |
Originally Posted by DannoXYZ
(Post 17220379)
what has helped me is to aim a GoPro camera at the front crank and play back in slo-mo to analyze what happens.
Many times, it's multiple factors that contribute: - loose BB - loose chainring bolts - FD trim / cable-tension - riding style This last item was helped by having riders behind me show me videos of myself. Learning to push and pull at the same time out of the saddle allows me to keep the bike and my body perfectly upright. None of the power is wasted flexing the frame laterally and no rubbing of the chainrings or auto shifting. The bb seems OK. The chainring bolts are tight. FD trim is OK, but it's angle is less than perfect. Nevertheless, I did a lot of miles with the fd at that angle. Right now, I'm leaning towards a worn middle ring. I was looking at it last night on the train, and it seems like the chain is not sitting right in the hollows of the ring. When I compared the middle ring to the small ring, it's clear that there is a lot of wear on the middle. I ordered a new ring. Hopefully, this does the trick. Thanks for the help, guys! I appreciate it. |
Originally Posted by TimmyT
(Post 17228477)
. . . The process of elimination starts with finding the options, and then eliminating them. . .
|
You were given good advice early on, but you choose to reject or ignore it and go about this your own way. That's OK by me since I'm not nearly as invested in the problem as you are. So I wish you luck, and leave you with one last bit of advice you and take or reject.
Your problem is shifting off the chainring under load, so focus your attention to what happens at the top of the ring when under load. One simple diagnostic is to look down through the FD cage and see what's happening there. |
Originally Posted by AnkleWork
(Post 17228497)
Of the options on your list, which ones have you eliminated?
Originally Posted by FBinNY
(Post 17228516)
You were given good advice early on, but you choose to reject or ignore it and go about this your own way. That's OK by me since I'm not nearly as invested in the problem as you are. So I wish you luck, and leave you with one last bit of advice you and take or reject.
Your problem is shifting off the chainring under load, so focus your attention to what happens at the top of the ring when under load. One simple diagnostic is to look down through the FD cage and see what's happening there. |
Originally Posted by FBinNY
(Post 17228516)
You were given good advice early on, but you choose to reject or ignore it and go about this your own .
Don't confuse good advice with the advice you give. Just because you googled it and regurgitated the results as a forum post doesn't mean its worth anything. |
Originally Posted by Zaphod Beeblebrox
(Post 17228559)
No he wasn't. He was given advice by you and you're butthurt that you're looking foolish
Don't confuse good advice with the advice you give. Just because you googled it and regurgitated the results as a forum post doesn't mean its worth anything. But instead of criticizing others (me, if you prefer) about whom you know absolutely nothing, you might consider offering some positive advice of your own. BTW- I like that part about googling and regurgitating.....You definitely have me down. |
Yep. I know em when i see em.
My advice is simply not to take advice from self important internet heroes. Nobody in particular in mind. |
|
Number 1, You dont Have to shift under a Load, get ahead of the gear , then take the load off the chain and it will shift , easier..
|
See, FB, many, many years, of training and experience, just can't stand up to googled regurgitation.......................:rolleyes:
I guess I will have someone new to ignore...............;) |
Originally Posted by Zaphod Beeblebrox
(Post 17228559)
No he wasn't. He was given advice by you and you're butthurt that you're looking foolish
Don't confuse good advice with the advice you give. Just because you googled it and regurgitated the results as a forum post doesn't mean its worth anything. |
Originally Posted by Zaphod Beeblebrox
(Post 17228599)
.....
My advice is simply not to take advice from self important internet heroes. Nobody in particular in mind. |
David, now that was funny!!!!!
|
No wonder FB replies more quickly and better than I would have, he just does a quick Google search and posts the first thing that shows up. I knew it :crash:
|
Originally Posted by TimmyT
(Post 17228477)
The process of elimination starts with finding the options, and then eliminating them.
I'll take your initial list as an example, keeping in mind that one could probably create a much larger one for skipping under load.
Further, as it happens only on the middle ring it cannot be any component at the rear of the bike, as those would be factors on any chainring, and more so on the inner or outer - the middle is the easiest one for all rear cog combos to deal with. I would take the process from the beginning but we don't have the info necessary to do so, including:
In many cases a mechanic solves a problem through observation and logic, rather than having seen the exact problem and cause before. Those of us who were mechanics before the Internet age fixed bikes without forum, websites and often without repair manuals because we used the aforementioned "tools." Applying that do what we do know results in the following: The problem happens only on the middle ring, therefore the most likely cause/contributor is a characteristic of that ring. It happens only under high pressure, so another factor would be the chain, which transmits the pressure from chainwheel to the rear cogs. A third possible contribution is frame flex, which can change the chain angle, but that would seem unlikely - as noted above there are more extreme chain angles possible with the other two chainwheels. That leaves us with the chainrings and chain. Without having the full info noted above my first hypothesis would be that the chain is unshipping due to a combination of chain and middle chainwheel wear. A smaller profile on the chainwheel teeth make it harder for the chain to remain engaged when coming in at an angle, and chain wear would mean that the chain is also not engaging fully in the valley of the chainwheel. Solution would be to replace the middle ring and chain and most likely the cassette. Of course I Googled the above.... |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:11 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.