![]() |
How Tight?
I have a track bike with a carbon fork. The dropouts, on the fork, appear to be carbon sandwiched between a piece of metal on each side. Just curious, how much torque should I use to tighten the axle bolts? The same as I would for aluminum or steel dropouts?
Thanks. |
Good design would dictate that the dropouts should tolerate full (same as for steel) tightening on the axle nuts, especially in back. It's hard enough to get rear wheels so they don't slip under chain load, so it would be poor design to force someone to back off from properly and fully securing his wheels.
That said, I'd shoot for the lowest torque that I felt i could trust to hold my wheels on, and keep the rear from slipping. |
I'll let the engineers debate design goals and material limitations, but I know of a number of situations where carbon instead of steel/AL requires torque levels different then the metals.
When I first read this post earlier I was going to say that just tight enough was the best amount but in hind sight that means you need to have had slippage at least once. I don't know if I'd want the chance to gauge up a carbon drop out experimenting. Does the OP have contact with the manufacturer or does the seller have info? The Op is wise to worry. Andy. |
Originally Posted by Andrew R Stewart
(Post 17623458)
I'll let the engineers debate design goals and material limitations, but I know of a number of situations where carbon instead of steel/AL requires torque levels different then the metals.
When I first read this post earlier I was going to say that just tight enough was the best amount but in hind sight that means you need to have had slippage at least once. I don't know if I'd want the chance to gauge up a carbon drop out experimenting. Does the OP have contact with the manufacturer or does the seller have info? The Op is wise to worry. Andy. |
Of course. But I'll quibble in that just as the OP had the choice to not buy this bike he also has the choice to move it along before he mounts wheels. Harsh? Maybe, but I don't have as much confidence in some of the carbon products that are in the market place as some do. Andy.
|
Thanks for your input, everyone.
I reread my original post and it doesn't seem all together very clear. What I meant to ask was, how much torque do you think is required, for the axle nuts, on the carbon fork? The rear dropouts don't concern me much as they are aluminum with steel plates. My main concern is, how much torque is enough, on the front carbon dropouts, to hold the wheel in place while not harming the carbon? |
Like you, I probably wouldn't buy a frame with this type of dropout, especially for track use. OTOH, I tend to be conservative and prefer bikes that are forgiving of rough treatment, and offer maximum margins of error between what's necessary, and what the frame can take.
But we weren't asked about the choice, only about how to approach axle torque. My advice is actually consistent with how I approach tightening just about everything on bike. I use enough torque to do the job, no more, no less. Torque spec can be a useful guide, but I prefer the old school of feeling, not the torque per se, but how the fastener is responding. |
Originally Posted by mrblue
(Post 17623595)
My main concern is, how much torque is enough, on the front carbon dropouts, to hold the wheel in place while not harming the carbon?
It's a front wheel, tighten it to where you feel you can trust it at any speed. |
Originally Posted by FBinNY
(Post 17623601)
It's a front wheel, tighten it to where you feel you can trust it at any speed.
|
Originally Posted by mrblue
(Post 17623595)
Thanks for your input, everyone.
I reread my original post and it doesn't seem all together very clear. What I meant to ask was, how much torque do you think is required, for the axle nuts, on the carbon fork? The rear dropouts don't concern me much as they are aluminum with steel plates. My main concern is, how much torque is enough, on the front carbon dropouts, to hold the wheel in place while not harming the carbon? |
Originally Posted by dsbrantjr
(Post 17623794)
What does the manufacturer have to say about this? They (presumably) designed it, and should be aware of its limitations, so should be the best source of this kind of information.
|
Front wheels don't need to be that tight. I've had instances where I've crashed and then noticed the front wheel is out of alignment because it moved in the fork ends. No big deal, loosen it up and re-tighten in the correct spot. The thing you really don't want to have happen is it to fall out when you wheelie, or loosen up on its own. So tighten it like you would on a normal fork but no need to crank it down.
Rear wheels, of course, DO need to be tight to prevent slippage with horizontal dropouts or track ends. I tighten those about as much as I can, especially on my fixed gears (I should note I'm talking about quick release skewers on my bikes, not track nuts.) |
If you don't have disc brakes, there is very little force acting on the front axle. If your track bike is actually for the track and not just a fixie for street use, the only force acting on the dropouts is the weight of the bike and rider pushing the axle into the dropouts, and so I would say they need to be good and snug, but not too tight. Sorry I have no torque numbers to equate this to.
|
I have two bikes with Easton carbon forks that are 100% carbon, even the dropouts, and they have no metal reinforcements. I have always tightened the qr skewers (Shimano and Campy internal cam type) to the same tension as I do for aluminum and steel dropouts and have never had any problems. After 33,000 miles on one bike and 29,000 on the other, if I was going to damage the dropouts I believe the problem would have shown up by now.
|
Originally Posted by HillRider
(Post 17624413)
I have two bikes with Easton carbon forks that are 100% carbon, even the dropouts, and they have no metal reinforcements. I have always tightened the qr skewers (Shimano and Campy internal cam type) to the same tension as I do for aluminum and steel dropouts and have never had any problems. After 33,000 miles on one bike and 29,000 on the other, if I was going to damage the dropouts I believe the problem would have shown up by now.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:16 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.