Nishiki Cresta
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 43
Bikes: 1983 Nishiki Cresta, 1991 Bianchi Virata
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Nishiki Cresta
I found a seemingly good condition Nishiki Cresta about 2 hours away from me. It's a 48cm, which I believe will fit me quite well. I'm only 5'5" with a 29" inseam.
The seller is asking for $220 which I think it fair. What do you think?
Check out the pictures below:
The seller is asking for $220 which I think it fair. What do you think?
Check out the pictures below:
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,223
Mentioned: 654 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4722 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3,036 Times
in
1,874 Posts
This Cresta is circa 1983 and is intended for light touring. The use of side-pull brakes prevents it from being classified as a true grand touring model. The frame is Tange #2 double butted CrMo main tubes with hi-tensile stays and forks, so the fork is a downgrade over the Univega being considered. It lacks the Univega's brazed-on boss for the shift levers but does have dedicated rack eyelets and a 2nd set of bottle bosses (under the down tube). The Cyclone M-II derailleurs are a definite upgrade over the Univega's BL derailleurs. The Sugino GT crankset could also be considered a upgrade over Univega's Sakae CX, but only if you need the wider gears. The others components appear equivalent.
The Nishiki does appear to be in slightly better condition but it is also $100 more expensive. IMO,the Univaga is the better value, assuming comparable mechanical condition. However, the big factor is the difference in size. While the Univega is small, the Nishiki appears to be 2-3 cm smaller and the prime consideration should be which bicycle is the better fit.
The Nishiki does appear to be in slightly better condition but it is also $100 more expensive. IMO,the Univaga is the better value, assuming comparable mechanical condition. However, the big factor is the difference in size. While the Univega is small, the Nishiki appears to be 2-3 cm smaller and the prime consideration should be which bicycle is the better fit.
#3
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 43
Bikes: 1983 Nishiki Cresta, 1991 Bianchi Virata
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
This Cresta is circa 1983 and is intended for light touring. The use of side-pull brakes prevents it from being classified as a true grand touring model. The frame is Tange #2 double butted CrMo main tubes with hi-tensile stays and forks, so the fork is a downgrade over the Univega being considered. It lacks the Univega's brazed-on boss for the shift levers but does have dedicated rack eyelets and a 2nd set of bottle bosses (under the down tube). The Cyclone M-II derailleurs are a definite upgrade over the Univega's BL derailleurs. The Sugino GT crankset could also be considered a upgrade over Univega's Sakae CX, but only if you need the wider gears. The others components appear equivalent.
The Nishiki does appear to be in slightly better condition but it is also $100 more expensive. IMO,the Univaga is the better value, assuming comparable mechanical condition. However, the big factor is the difference in size. While the Univega is small, the Nishiki appears to be 2-3 cm smaller and the prime consideration should be which bicycle is the better fit.
The Nishiki does appear to be in slightly better condition but it is also $100 more expensive. IMO,the Univaga is the better value, assuming comparable mechanical condition. However, the big factor is the difference in size. While the Univega is small, the Nishiki appears to be 2-3 cm smaller and the prime consideration should be which bicycle is the better fit.
I'll mainly be using it to get around town, pick up groceries, and things like that. All I'm really looking for is a bike that fits with eyelets for racks. Seems like the bikes are pretty equivalent to you? Spending $100 more to get a bike in better condition and possibly higher quality isn't an issue for me.
#4
Senior Member
OMG !!!!!!! That's the tiniest little frame I think I've ever seen!!!! The top tube and down tube are connected to the same lug. Amazing. At $220 it's a little rich for my taste. But, if it fits you then maybe that's a reasonable price. I would love to get my hands on that little frame and put some upright handlebars on it & turn it into a city cruiser grocery getter bike. My 5' tall 90 year old grandma could ride that frame. Awesome. Be good. Have fun.
#5
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 43
Bikes: 1983 Nishiki Cresta, 1991 Bianchi Virata
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
OMG !!!!!!! That's the tiniest little frame I think I've ever seen!!!! The top tube and down tube are connected to the same lug. Amazing. At $220 it's a little rich for my taste. But, if it fits you then maybe that's a reasonable price. I would love to get my hands on that little frame and put some upright handlebars on it & turn it into a city cruiser grocery getter bike. My 5' tall 90 year old grandma could ride that frame. Awesome. Be good. Have fun.
#7
Thrifty Bill
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mountains of Western NC
Posts: 23,523
Bikes: 86 Katakura Silk, 87 Prologue X2, 88 Cimarron LE, 1975 Sekai 4000 Professional, 73 Paramount, plus more
Mentioned: 96 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1236 Post(s)
Liked 964 Times
in
628 Posts
Get your sizing right first, then shop. Also, are you using "bicycle inseam"? Likely 18 inch frame.
#9
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 43
Bikes: 1983 Nishiki Cresta, 1991 Bianchi Virata
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
This Cresta is circa 1983 and is intended for light touring. The use of side-pull brakes prevents it from being classified as a true grand touring model. The frame is Tange #2 double butted CrMo main tubes with hi-tensile stays and forks, so the fork is a downgrade over the Univega being considered. It lacks the Univega's brazed-on boss for the shift levers but does have dedicated rack eyelets and a 2nd set of bottle bosses (under the down tube). The Cyclone M-II derailleurs are a definite upgrade over the Univega's BL derailleurs. The Sugino GT crankset could also be considered a upgrade over Univega's Sakae CX, but only if you need the wider gears. The others components appear equivalent.
The Nishiki does appear to be in slightly better condition but it is also $100 more expensive. IMO,the Univaga is the better value, assuming comparable mechanical condition. However, the big factor is the difference in size. While the Univega is small, the Nishiki appears to be 2-3 cm smaller and the prime consideration should be which bicycle is the better fit.
The Nishiki does appear to be in slightly better condition but it is also $100 more expensive. IMO,the Univaga is the better value, assuming comparable mechanical condition. However, the big factor is the difference in size. While the Univega is small, the Nishiki appears to be 2-3 cm smaller and the prime consideration should be which bicycle is the better fit.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jjames1452
Classic and Vintage Bicycles: Whats it Worth? Appraisals.
4
07-10-12 02:47 AM
jazzycise
Classic and Vintage Bicycles: Whats it Worth? Appraisals.
3
04-22-12 09:50 AM