Bike Forums

Bike Forums (https://www.bikeforums.net/forum.php)
-   Classic & Vintage (https://www.bikeforums.net/classic-vintage/)
-   -   Quill stem design question (https://www.bikeforums.net/classic-vintage/1026901-quill-stem-design-question.html)

rootboy 01-13-16 01:46 PM

Looks to me like the clamp bolt in the stem on the right may not be original. Almost looks like a hex-head bolt for hex key/allen wrench.
But that's beside the point.

79pmooney 01-13-16 01:51 PM


Originally Posted by rhm (Post 18112307)
Without disagreeing with any of the above, I see mainly a chronological difference. The stem on the right is an earlier design.

Note also the stem on the right has a steel bolt with a steel nut, while the other has a steel bolt that threads into a threads tapped into a blind hole in the stem. That hole is a potential weak spot. It is also possible to strip the threads.

If you visit Hazardous bicycle handlebar stems you can see examples of failures of stems similar to the left hand one. Rather chilling. I haven't heard of Cinellis failing that way, but that may be just because they are relatively recent and made very well. Could be a different story when those become as old (and treasured) as some of the IAs (similar to the right hand model).

Ben

SJX426 01-13-16 02:03 PM

Did not see an example. The second and third picture are of the same stem, Modolo, that looks like the inverse design of an XA not the one on the left from the OP.

rhm 01-13-16 02:10 PM


Originally Posted by 79pmooney (Post 18457104)
If you visit Hazardous bicycle handlebar stems you can see examples of failures of stems similar to the left hand one. Rather chilling. I haven't heard of Cinellis failing that way, but that may be just because they are relatively recent and made very well. Could be a different story when those become as old (and treasured) as some of the IAs (similar to the right hand model).

Ben

I don't know whether it's a coincidence or a real pattern, but: all the stems that I've seen, that failed in this way, were 3TTT stems.

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-V...2/IMG_8250.JPG

crank_addict 01-13-16 02:37 PM


Originally Posted by SJX426 (Post 18457056)
@crank_addict - Is that adjustable?

Correct, approx. 1 cm fore - aft. Cinetica also offered the same less integrated bar.

SJX426 01-14-16 05:36 AM


Originally Posted by crank_addict (Post 18457234)
Correct, approx. 1 cm fore - aft. Cinetica also offered the same less integrated bar.

Interesting approach. I like the idea but the execution looks like it was a bit challenging, aesthetically.

jimmuller 01-14-16 06:04 AM


Originally Posted by SJX426 (Post 18112261)
The total length for circumferential deformation is greater for the stem on the left.

That was my first observation. In theory this means less deformation on any given section of the clamp, which should mean less likelihood of failure.

I would guess that in practice it depends on the thickness and width of the clamping area, and the quality of the metal used. And the details of whatever forging technique was used. That's just a techie-sounding way to say either one could probably made to work just fine, or to fail if made wrong. So it probably boils down to aesthetics.

Prowler 01-14-16 07:08 AM


Originally Posted by jimmuller (Post 18458477)
I would guess that in practice it depends on the thickness and width of the clamping area, and the quality of the metal used. And the details of whatever forging technique was used. That's just a techie-sounding way to say either one could probably made to work just fine, or to fail if made wrong. So it probably boils down to aesthetics.

I have one of each (the OPs left example on the Nishiki and the OPs right example on the Raleigh). Both SR stems from the late 70s. They both work just fine for my purposes. As the guy who fell off the Empire State building said, while dropping past the 58th floor - "everything seems just fine so far".

SJX426 01-14-16 07:43 AM


Originally Posted by jimmuller (Post 18458477)
That was my first observation. In theory this means less deformation on any given section of the clamp, which should mean less likelihood of failure.

I would guess that in practice it depends on the thickness and width of the clamping area, and the quality of the metal used. And the details of whatever forging technique was used. That's just a techie-sounding way to say either one could probably made to work just fine, or to fail if made wrong. So it probably boils down to aesthetics.

I was going to say that!:) I decided to work with what was given. From a design POV, if they were designed by the same experienced person, it is likely that they would be equal in overall performance, but I am sure they were not. In todays design efforts, FEA along with other tools would be used to ensure there would be a margin of safety to avoid litigation or name brand erosion.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:42 PM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.