![]() |
Is the dark side stronger?
Last night I installed my first non-square taper crankset -- a splined FSA with outboard bearings. It was the easiest installation of any component I've ever put on a bicycle. Changing pedals takes more work. And the bottom bracket weighs next to nothing.
Easier doesn't necessarily mean better, but color me impressed. |
Keep in mind the new stuff has been designed to improve on the old designs. It's the way it works.
There's probably a whole lot of stuff I'd really like, if I could just get over the modern styling of stuff. :D |
I wish someone would design a classic looking crankset designed for the modern bottom bracket.
|
I have installed Campy threaded outboard bottom brackets on three bikes now, two modern bikes and an early '90s Basso. Incredibly easy installation and so far have had no issues with them whatsoever. Arguably they're not very pretty, but if the modern alternative is press fit, I'll stick with not pretty.
|
I am not repulsed by carbon fiber bicycles... but I have negligible attraction to the material and the products it's used to make.
But with CF set aside.... I like the looks and functional improvements of modern bicycles. My own personal favorite bike is made of aluminum and has brifters and everything. However, I still have a special heart-warming feeling when working with and/or riding vintage (or classic) steel bicycles. To me... if there is a dark-side to bicycle design/style... it is carbon fiber... or plastic by any name. |
1 Attachment(s)
I don't know about the rest of you, but a 5-bolt spider (or maybe a 3-to-6 bolt) looks a lot better to me than a modern 4-bolt.
|
The crankset in question. I wouldn't call it pretty, but I've seen uglier.
http://www.cambriabike.com/images/pr..._silver_04.jpg |
Faster to install on the assembly line putting components on a bike frame, destined for the market, is one of the design criteria..
|
Originally Posted by John E
(Post 18335708)
I don't know about the rest of you, but a 5-bolt spider (or maybe a 3-to-6 bolt) looks a lot better to me than a modern 4-bolt.
My newest stuff is still square taper. I had no desire to upgrade, but good to hear about the OPs experience. I sure don't have any desire to go in the OTHER direction. I hope to never again deal with cotter pins, even though some claim that it is no big deal with the proper tools.
Originally Posted by icepick_trotsky
(Post 18335624)
Last night I installed my first non-square taper crankset -- a splined FSA with outboard bearings. It was the easiest installation of any component I've ever put on a bicycle. Changing pedals takes more work. And the bottom bracket weighs next to nothing.
Easier doesn't necessarily mean better, but color me impressed. |
Im sure new bikes ride great. I wouldn't know because I have never ridden one, and have no interest in doing so. I just look at them and for me it's like looking at a refrigerator: no reaction at all. Show me an old frame with faded decals, tubulars and ratty cloth tape and that's another story. Whatever floats your boat, in the end. There's nothing morally superior about old bikes, I just like them better.
|
I don't object to carbon fiber, splined BB, or anything like it. What I hate is every component being powder coated and covered in tasteless and over the top graphics. Newer components could be designed tastefully in some sort of aesthetically pleasing way, but instead they seem to be all done by fresh out of design class 23 years olds with no taste.
|
I went with a splined ISIS (not a terrorist) cartridge style BB unit on my Cannondale. Really enjoyed the simplicity of plug-n-play and very cheap. This is the final outcome:
http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h8...6212E9BA10.jpg I would NOT go with anything BB30. |
Originally Posted by Salamandrine
(Post 18335799)
I don't object to carbon fiber, splined BB, or anything like it. What I hate is every component being powder coated and covered in tasteless and over the top graphics. Newer components could be designed tastefully in some sort of aesthetically pleasing way, but instead they seem to be all done by fresh out of design class 23 years olds with no taste.
I feel the same about the goofy looking jerseys covered in names and bright colors too, that you see all the time. The few cycling jerseys and shorts I own all have solid colors and dont look like 'bike racer' clothing. I've never thought clothing like that did a lot for the images of cyclists. |
Originally Posted by exmechanic89
(Post 18335840)
What I dislike though - and as has been mentioned above - are all the graphics on everything - everything.
And high-contrast graphics on bikes is out. For several years now. "Black on black" - type, low contrast graphics are all the rage. |
Originally Posted by Vinnems
(Post 18335650)
I wish someone would design a classic looking crankset designed for the modern bottom bracket.
|
^ Doesn't look bad. And only $625 or so, such a deal :)
|
1 Attachment(s)
As I always mention in these threads, Athena looks great.
http://www.bikeforums.net/attachment...0&d=1446221108 |
I kinda ride it all, except the last few years innovations = no electronic shift or roadie discs yet, or hidden in seattube motor assist. Friction 5/6 to 10sp cassettes; Racer to touring; R531, SL/SLX, Oria, Ishiwata, Tange, carbon & titanium, currently no Al; even some off trail, non-technical.
Dark side? It will all become vintage soon enough. |
Originally Posted by Salamandrine
(Post 18335799)
Newer components could be designed tastefully in some sort of aesthetically pleasing way,
As this is my 2nd post in this thread- most of all my objection to new stuff is all about aesthetics. |
Originally Posted by Darth Lefty
(Post 18335892)
As I always mention in these threads, Athena looks great.
I prefer the pre-2005 (or was it 07) Veloce, Centaur groups with multiple shifts up and down and a more graduated feel on the FD with chainline trim ability (esp on a triple). Record & Chorus always the standard, eh? The new Ergos are comfortable but with large hands the old ones fit me well. Wireless electronic and 10 pound production bikes are almost here. That makes me feel like my 15yo 10sp bikes are almost vintage. Maybe Dark, too. |
Originally Posted by Darth Lefty
(Post 18335892)
As I always mention in these threads, Athena looks great.
http://www.bikeforums.net/attachment...0&d=1446221108 |
Originally Posted by loky1179
(Post 18335738)
I hope to never again deal with cotter pins, even though some claim that it is no big deal with the proper tools.
|
I went the outboard bearing route when I upgraded or modernized or what ever, my Cyclops. I, too, have great appreciation for the spline bottom bracket style and overall appearance, not to mention performance of this...
http://www.mytenspeeds.com/My_TenSpe...PD_Crank_1.jpg |
Originally Posted by loky1179
(Post 18335738)
My knees hurt just looking at that low seat position.
My newest stuff is still square taper. I had no desire to upgrade, but good to hear about the OPs experience. I sure don't have any desire to go in the OTHER direction. I hope to never again deal with cotter pins, even though some claim that it is no big deal with the proper tools. Did you need to get the bb faced? Was this install on a new frame? Just curious. |
Originally Posted by Pars
(Post 18335891)
^ Doesn't look bad. And only $625 or so, such a deal :)
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:00 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.