Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

1981 & 1982 Trek 610/613/614 Ishiwata Forks

Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.
View Poll Results: 1981 & 1982 Trek 610/613/614 Ishiwata Forks
1. Own one of these models and the fork has no issues
2. Own one of these models and the fork cracked
Voters: 16. You may not vote on this poll

1981 & 1982 Trek 610/613/614 Ishiwata Forks

Old 01-03-16, 07:04 PM
smallpox champ
Senior Member
smallpox champ's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 157

Bikes: '84 specialized expedition, '87 specialized sirrus, '84 specialized stumpjumper sport

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 32 Post(s)
Liked 59 Times in 14 Posts
Originally Posted by elboGreaze
So to be clear, your 311 fork that cracked had the Trek logo stamped on the crown ? I'm asking because mine has the stamp , thanks !
Yes, it was stamped TREK.
smallpox champ is offline  
Old 01-04-16, 12:28 AM
Senior Member
NukeouT's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 446

Bikes: 1996 LeMond Yellow Jersey, 2013 Soma Saga, 1980 Zebrakenko Wind, 1980 Nishiki Ultimate

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by elboGreaze
So to be clear, your 311 fork that cracked had the Trek logo stamped on the crown ? I'm asking because mine has the stamp , thanks !
I've actually heard 2nd hand from master frame builder Mr.Yamaguchi who has built steel frames for US Olympic events (currently resides in Colorado) that in particular "... stamped seat stays by major manufacturers was an attempt to replicate one of his signature design style tricks, which in most cases was done incorrectly and led to many premature failures in the 80's-90's."

Because Trek only started in 1976 and my app tells me the 1981 613/614 forks were Ishiwata 0265 Hi-Ten I assume they were not high-quality forks and Trek was still figuring stuff out, possibly stamping them in the process to market them as 'higher value' feel.

That being said, I had a Taiwaneese 1983 Raleigh Olympian with stamped fork crown and seat stays ive run into many ditches/potholes during its 5 years of heavy use before giving it up due to sizing issues. It never actually failed as a frameset.
NukeouT is offline  
Old 01-04-16, 09:54 AM
Old fart
JohnDThompson's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,580

Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.

Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3409 Post(s)
Liked 3,018 Times in 1,731 Posts
Originally Posted by NukeouT
Because Trek only started in 1976 and my app tells me the 1981 613/614 forks were Ishiwata 0265 Hi-Ten I assume they were not high-quality forks and Trek was still figuring stuff out, possibly stamping them in the process to market them as 'higher value' feel.
The forks with the "TREK" stamped fork crowns were actually made and brazed in Japan and shipped to Waterloo unpainted. The forks we built in Waterloo all used investment-cast crowns (e.g. Ishiwata SCM, Cinelli, Haden, Tange).
JohnDThompson is offline  
Old 01-22-16, 06:49 PM
Full Member
Thread Starter
Bruce27's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 395
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 48 Post(s)
Liked 167 Times in 56 Posts
Choices should have been Own or "Did Own" one of these forks so bumping this thread looking for more input.
Surely there must be more than 9 members (votes) who have owned one of these bike.
Bruce27 is offline  
Old 02-22-16, 03:05 PM
Senior Member
lonesomesteve's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 646
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 80 Post(s)
Liked 213 Times in 64 Posts
Unfortunately I'm only able to vote once, but I have a fair amount of experience with the fork in question...

I had an '82 311 that I bought in 2010 and commuted on, randonneured with, and generally rode its wheels off until it was stolen last fall. I put more than 14,000 miles on that bike, mostly set up as a single speed, but eventually with gears and 650b wheels. It looked like it hadn't seen many miles when I bought it, but it had been stored in a fisherman's net locker for decades, so it had some rust. No fork problems ever.

I bought an '82 614 in 2012. I continued to ride the 311 as a single speed at that time, and used the 614 when I wanted gears. I rode the 614 for about 4,300 miles until I sold it a couple years ago (and I still can't figure out why I ever sold that bike). No fork problems.

This past December I bought another '82 614 to replace my stolen 311. It's been set up with 650b wheels and so far I've only put about 500 miles on that bike. No fork problems.

So, altogether I've ridden nearly 19,000 trouble-free miles on the dreaded Trek "death fork" in the past few years. Many of those miles have been on gravel roads. I've hit quite a few pot holes and even bunny-hopped a few curbs in that time. Yes, I check for cracks now and then, but then I do that with all of my bikes.

I'm looking forward to many more happy miles on my old Treks.

lonesomesteve is offline  
Old 07-31-16, 01:41 PM
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: SE Wisconsin
Posts: 13

Bikes: Trek FX 7.4

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
My 1981 Trek 613, with less than 500 miles, has no issues in the fork area, does not have the Trek stamp, and I am the original owner. (I voted anyhow.)

Last edited by dklanecky1; 07-31-16 at 01:47 PM. Reason: grammar
dklanecky1 is offline  
Old 08-01-16, 12:08 PM
afraid of whales
Mr IGH's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Front Range, CO
Posts: 4,306
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 347 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
The steer tube on those forks is straight wall, no extra thickness at the crown. I replaced mine before I toured on a 510 frame and was surprised to figure out why the fork was so flexible. Not surprised to hear it has issues.
Mr IGH is offline  
Old 08-23-16, 08:26 PM
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Well, I finally decided to stop lurking and actually make an account on this forum, and I guess this will be my first post!

I recently helped my brother buy a 1981 Trek 610 that was manufactured in 1981 according to the Trek database (ser. 008335). But after doing some reading I discovered a few threads warning about potential fork/crown issues. So far, I can't conclude whether the Ishiwata forks on these bikes are inherently dangerous. Here are my observations:

I found an in-depth post by thebulls which talks about the crown design of these bikes:https://www.bikeforums.net/16898705-post23.html
My interpretation was that the inside of the crown needs to have lugs that are curved, or pointed in order to reduce the possibility of a stress fracture occurring along the tubes. So, to evaluate this claim I tried to find some other examples of crowns that look similar.

1981 Trek 610 Fork (my brother's bike):

Early 90s Trek 420 Fork:

These bikes were built about a decade apart, but both have the same lug design on the inside-facing portion of the crown (although the one on the 420 is slightly more rounded). The 420 was bought new by my dad and ridden thousands of miles across both road and trails and still exhibits no signs of stress fractures. However, this is just anecdotal information, so I decided to take a look at some new-production crowns: https://www.ceeway.com/NEWPARTSPAGES/...k%20Crowns.htm

Most of these indeed have deeply sloping or pointed lugs on the inside portion of the crown (LC-15, LC-16). However, there are also a few varieties that look very similar to the ones on the 610 (ELC, C-52). If this crown design was inherently dangerous, than it seems unlikely that companies would still be producing it, or offering it to builders. This leads me to believe that the Trek 610 crown design is not inherently dangerous or the instigator that leads to fork failure (although one could argue that it is less strong than other designs).

However, on this forum there are still three separate, documented cases of this fork failing. Is it a coincidence? Is there some defect in the fork that we don't know about? Was QC not as good as it was in other years? It's tough to say. One thing I DID notice was that the fit and finish of 610 crown was noticeably worse than on the 420, despite them both being stamped and welded units.


I kept digging around and found some useful links:
1981 Trek Catalog: https://www.vintage-trek.com/TrekBrochure1981.htm
Ishiwata Catalog: https://www.equusbicycle.com/bike/ish...%20opt%205.pdf

In short, the fork tubes are your basic hi-ten steel that you find on entry level bikes. I doubt this could be a potential cause for failure since this type of steel has been used for awhile and its properties are well-understood.


After looking though all of this again I'm feeling more confident that the forks on these Trek bikes are fine. I haven't found any concrete evidence that they would be prone to failure, and the bikes themselves are over three decades old, potentially with multiple owners and unknown histories (crashes, heavy off-road use, etc.).

Last edited by MrChubbs; 08-24-16 at 02:26 AM. Reason: Grammer
MrChubbs is offline  
Likes For MrChubbs:
Old 09-01-22, 07:26 AM
Join Date: Nov 2019
Posts: 21
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked 15 Times in 10 Posts
Old thread resurrection but I'm a #1 on this.

I have an '82 613 that I picked up a few years ago with mostly original components. I dimpled the chain stays and painted them to clean up some surface rust from chain slap, then installed 42 mm tires and have ridden the bike as a mixed surface rig including single track, gravel and pavement for. I weigh a little over 200 lbs and have ridden this bike hard including small jumps and steep rocky/rooty sections. When I really push it I can feel the flex in various parts of the bike (stem, fork, frame) but that flex and the larger tires smooth out the feel and it's a lot of fun to ride. I've seen no issues with the fork when I've inspected it after hard rides. These days a lighter, gentler rider is the primary user of this bike but I'm glad that I tested it out as it cured my worries about the fork.

jpbiking is offline  
Likes For jpbiking:
Old 09-01-22, 02:04 PM
Road Fan
Senior Member
Road Fan's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,714

Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8

Mentioned: 48 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1791 Post(s)
Liked 613 Times in 466 Posts
Originally Posted by Bruce27
I own a 1982 Trek 613 and just purchased a 1981 614. Didn't know this until recently but it's been mentioned that the Ishiwata CCL fork crown had some issues with breakage (I have not had any issues with my 1982) so, before I go off increasing my life insurance, I figured I'd get input and have the owners of these bikes weigh-in on their own experience with this fork.

So if you've rode your bike hard and believe it has in excess of 1,000 miles, are you a #1 or #2 ?

1. Own one of these models and the fork has no issues
2. Own one of these models and the fork cracked
Too soon to comment on my 1981 but, #1 for me on my 1982.

Anyone else?
I thought fork crowns which are suspect in this respect could also be present on models through 1985, if not later. And were all forks delivered in 1981 and 1982 subject to this concern? Without this survey, how many relevant fork are known to have failed in some way, and were all failures of the same failure mode?
Road Fan is offline  
Related Topics
Thread Starter
Last Post
Bicycle Mechanics
02-19-19 11:31 AM
Classic & Vintage
07-19-18 12:44 PM
Classic & Vintage
12-02-14 09:59 PM
Steve Whitlatch
Classic and Vintage Bicycles: Whats it Worth? Appraisals.
03-23-14 12:38 PM
Bicycle Mechanics
06-02-10 07:21 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information -

Copyright © 2023 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.