Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

What's the difference between T-Servs and Paselas?

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

What's the difference between T-Servs and Paselas?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-23-16 | 08:22 PM
  #1  
agmetal's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 28
From: Boston, MA

Bikes: Bianchi Volpe, ANT 3-speed roadster, New Albion Privateer singlespeed, Raleigh One Way singlespeed, Raleigh Professional "retro roadie" rebuild, 198? Fuji(?) franken-5-speed, 1937 Raleigh Tourist, 1952 Raleigh Sports, 1966 Raleigh Sports step-through

What's the difference between T-Servs and Paselas?

I haven't been able to find much in the way of specifics...best I can tell is, the T-Serv is a bit heavier duty? How does the ride quality compare, and how much do I need to worry about the Pasela's sidewalls falling apart like I read about everywhere?
agmetal is offline  
Reply
Old 02-23-16 | 09:51 PM
  #2  
The Golden Boy's Avatar
Extraordinary Magnitude
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 14,087
Likes: 2,147
From: Waukesha WI

Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT

Originally Posted by agmetal
I haven't been able to find much in the way of specifics...best I can tell is, the T-Serv is a bit heavier duty? How does the ride quality compare, and how much do I need to worry about the Pasela's sidewalls falling apart like I read about everywhere?
I have a set of Paselas that I've had for around 5 years, their sidewalls are intact.
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*

Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!

"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
The Golden Boy is offline  
Reply
Old 02-23-16 | 10:39 PM
  #3  
KonAaron Snake's Avatar
Fat Guy on a Little Bike
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 15,946
Likes: 371
From: Philadelphia, PA

Bikes: Two wheeled ones

The t-Serv feels ok on a commuter bike where your expectations should be low. They're quite flat resistant and are priced reasonably. They're good at what they're designed to be.

The Pasela is, to me, a one size fits none tire; they don't ride well enough for that to recommend them, and they're awful on flat resistance, so they really aren't suitable for commuting. There's actually no tire that I dislike more, and if they didn't have a gum wall, I doubt many would buy them. There are so many tires that feel better than the Pasela and have similar, or better flat protection.

I should mention that the Pasela TG doesn't feel any better than the tserv without offering equal protection.

I have had Pasela side wall failures - I truly hate them.

YMMV

Last edited by KonAaron Snake; 02-23-16 at 10:47 PM.
KonAaron Snake is offline  
Reply
Old 02-23-16 | 11:33 PM
  #4  
rccardr's Avatar
aka: Dr. Cannondale
Titanium Club Membership
Sheldon Brown Memorial - Titanium
15 Anniversary
Active Streak: 30 Days
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 8,693
Likes: 6,429
Hunh. I have Pasela TG's on, let me see....five bikes. One set of 27", three 25's and a 28. Never had a flat or sidewall failure on, well, any of them. And they get ridden. A lot.
__________________
Hard at work in the Secret Underground Laboratory...
rccardr is offline  
Reply
Old 02-23-16 | 11:39 PM
  #5  
Banned.
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 4,816
Likes: 29
From: on the beach

Bikes: '73 falcon sr, '76 grand record, '84 davidson

pasela is my go-to, and i even have them in all black on a bike.
eschlwc is offline  
Reply
Old 02-23-16 | 11:49 PM
  #6  
agmetal's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 28
From: Boston, MA

Bikes: Bianchi Volpe, ANT 3-speed roadster, New Albion Privateer singlespeed, Raleigh One Way singlespeed, Raleigh Professional "retro roadie" rebuild, 198? Fuji(?) franken-5-speed, 1937 Raleigh Tourist, 1952 Raleigh Sports, 1966 Raleigh Sports step-through

Originally Posted by eschlwc
pasela is my go-to, and i even have them in all black on a bike.
That reminds me - is 35mm the widest they make them with black sidwalls in 700C, and how do they black sidewalls hold up compared to the regular skinwall counterparts? I prefer the black sidewalls...
agmetal is offline  
Reply
Old 02-24-16 | 12:34 AM
  #7  
verktyg's Avatar
verktyg
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,034
Likes: 1,273
From: SF Bay Area

Bikes: Current favorites: 1988 Peugeot Birraritz, 1984 Gitane Super Corsa, 1980s DeRosa, 1981 Bianchi Campione Del Mondo, 1992 Paramount OS, 1988 Colnago Technos, 1985 RalieghUSA SBDU Team Pro

Originally Posted by rccardr
Hunh. I have Pasela TG's on, let me see....five bikes. One set of 27", three 25's and a 28. Never had a flat or sidewall failure on, well, any of them. And they get ridden. A lot.
+25 +

I have tan sidewall Pasela TGs on "many" of my bikes: 26 x 1.50, 700c x 23, 700c x 25, 700c x 28, 700c x 32 and 27 x 1 1/8.

I've been riding Pasela TGs for 10 years and never had any sidewall problems with them. They ride very smoothly, have good traction wet or dry with very few punctures.

My favorite "performance" tires are the Continental Gran Prix (GP 3000?) 700c x 23 style that were discontinued back about 6-7 years ago. They were supposed to have been ridden by some Pro teams???



I bought 24 of them for ~$12 each on a clearance sale about 2010. The ride and handling is superb but... THEY DO HAVE very fragile sidewalls and even with a strip under the treads they puncture a lot more than Pasela TGs.

The absolute worst riding "performance" tires I've ever tried are these discontinued Continental 700c x 23 Duraskin+K tires. They have Gatorskin style sidewalls but feel like solid rubber.




To each his own but I can't recall ever having to replace a Pasela tire but I've gone through most of the Continental Grand Prixs due to sidewall cuts. Maybe it's where and how I ride???

BTW I run 95-100 psi in my 700c x 23 tires.

verktyg

Chas.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
ContinentalGrandPrixGP3000.jpg (12.3 KB, 214 views)
File Type: jpg
ContinentalGrandPrixGP3000a.jpg (72.9 KB, 212 views)
File Type: jpg
PeugeotBiarritz1988RearTire.jpg (74.2 KB, 217 views)
__________________
Don't believe everything you think! History is written by those who weren't there....

Chas. ;-)


Last edited by verktyg; 02-24-16 at 12:43 AM.
verktyg is offline  
Reply
Old 02-24-16 | 12:50 AM
  #8  
Banned.
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 4,816
Likes: 29
From: on the beach

Bikes: '73 falcon sr, '76 grand record, '84 davidson

Originally Posted by agmetal
That reminds me - is 35mm the widest they make them with black sidwalls in 700C, and how do they black sidewalls hold up compared to the regular skinwall counterparts? I prefer the black sidewalls...
niagara shows a 38mm tire.

i've only had one set of blackwalls, and they continue to ride just fine.
eschlwc is offline  
Reply
Old 02-24-16 | 12:51 AM
  #9  
non-fixie's Avatar
Cyclotouriste
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 11,795
Likes: 7,024
From: South Holland, NL

Bikes: Yes, please.

I've been doing most of my riding on Pasela-tired bikes for the past three years, and have had no flats or any other mishaps. They are all 28mm TG folding tires in 700c and 27". Routes included the rutted strade bianche in Tuscany and the bone-jarring cobblestones in Flanders. I keep them at the prescribed 105 psi, as I'm a big guy.
__________________
Shuffling with the prince












non-fixie is offline  
Reply
Old 02-24-16 | 12:54 AM
  #10  
verktyg's Avatar
verktyg
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,034
Likes: 1,273
From: SF Bay Area

Bikes: Current favorites: 1988 Peugeot Birraritz, 1984 Gitane Super Corsa, 1980s DeRosa, 1981 Bianchi Campione Del Mondo, 1992 Paramount OS, 1988 Colnago Technos, 1985 RalieghUSA SBDU Team Pro

ADDENDUM .... Paselas - sont-ils morts?

It looks like Panaracer may have discontinued the Pasela and Pasela TG tires???

When I went to their new website the Pasela TG link takes me to the new Pasela ProTite page.

"Excellent urban or touring tire with 400D Lite Extra casing cord for a supple and responsive ride and ProTite puncture protection." (wonderful "Jinglish" description)...

Pasela TG ? Panaracer Bicycle Tires

It doesn't mention whether they come with tan sidewalls or just black???

Looks like I may have to stock up on some Paselas?


verktyg

Chas.
__________________
Don't believe everything you think! History is written by those who weren't there....

Chas. ;-)

verktyg is offline  
Reply
Old 02-24-16 | 01:16 AM
  #11  
Darth Lefty's Avatar
Disco Infiltrator
Titanium Club Membership
10 Anniversary
Community Builder
Active Streak: 30 Days
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 15,350
Likes: 3,551
From: Folsom CA

Bikes: Stormchaser, Paramount, Tilt, Samba tandem

I had a sidewall failure on a basic Pasela, a 32-630 size. It was not road damage. An edge on the rim, created where the weld was badly finished, gradually ground through it. I also had a good number of flats, since they were the unarmored version.
__________________
Genesis 49:16-17
"Well, well!" said Holmes, impatiently. "A good cyclist does not need a high road. The moor is intersected with paths and the moon is at the full."
Darth Lefty is offline  
Reply
Old 02-24-16 | 04:33 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 14,492
Likes: 270
From: STP
Originally Posted by KonAaron Snake
The t-Serv feels ok on a commuter bike where your expectations should be low. They're quite flat resistant and are priced reasonably. They're good at what they're designed to be.

The Pasela is, to me, a one size fits none tire; they don't ride well enough for that to recommend them, and they're awful on flat resistance, so they really aren't suitable for commuting. There's actually no tire that I dislike more, and if they didn't have a gum wall, I doubt many would buy them. There are so many tires that feel better than the Pasela and have similar, or better flat protection.

I should mention that the Pasela TG doesn't feel any better than the tserv without offering equal protection.

I have had Pasela side wall failures - I truly hate them.

YMMV

Pretty much my experience, but I ride with folks that swear by them for spring rides.

I have a set of TG 32s on my Merckx cross bike, which gets ridden through the winter.

That doesn't mean I like them much. I have them here until they wear out, which will hopefully be soon.

Slow and dead feeling. Imho
gomango is offline  
Reply
Old 02-24-16 | 04:35 AM
  #13  
Banned.
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 4,816
Likes: 29
From: on the beach

Bikes: '73 falcon sr, '76 grand record, '84 davidson

Originally Posted by non-fixie
I've been doing most of my riding on Pasela-tired bikes for the past three years .. They are all 28mm TG folding tires.
why folding? lighter?

always thought they were just more expensive and more difficult to mount than the steel beaded.
eschlwc is offline  
Reply
Old 02-24-16 | 05:28 AM
  #14  
seedsbelize's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 15,315
Likes: 903
From: Tixkokob, Yucatán, México

Bikes: 79 Trek 930, 80 Trek 414, 84 Schwinn Letour Luxe (coupled), 92 Schwinn Paramount PDG 5

Originally Posted by KonAaron Snake
The t-Serv feels ok on a commuter bike where your expectations should be low. They're quite flat resistant and are priced reasonably. They're good at what they're designed to be.

The Pasela is, to me, a one size fits none tire; they don't ride well enough for that to recommend them, and they're awful on flat resistance, so they really aren't suitable for commuting. There's actually no tire that I dislike more, and if they didn't have a gum wall, I doubt many would buy them. There are so many tires that feel better than the Pasela and have similar, or better flat protection.

I should mention that the Pasela TG doesn't feel any better than the tserv without offering equal protection.

I have had Pasela side wall failures - I truly hate them.

YMMV
Well, there are two of us anyway.
seedsbelize is offline  
Reply
Old 02-24-16 | 05:49 AM
  #15  
tarwheel's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 8,896
Likes: 7
From: Raleigh, NC

Bikes: Waterford RST-22, Bob Jackson World Tour, Ritchey Breakaway Cross, Soma Saga, De Bernardi SL, Specialized Sequoia

Pasela TGs are now called PTs. I have had excellent wear and flat resistance with my Pasela PTs in 700x32 and 28. I've never had a sidewall failure. That said, they aren't the nicest rolling tires and seem to have a lot of rolling resistance. A much better rolling and riding alternative is the panaracer Gravel Kings with the smooth tread. These are the nicest rolling 28s that I've ever used, measure a true 28mm wide on Open Pro rims, and are very light for such a wide tire. They are only available in all black.
tarwheel is offline  
Reply
Old 02-24-16 | 06:19 AM
  #16  
KonAaron Snake's Avatar
Fat Guy on a Little Bike
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 15,946
Likes: 371
From: Philadelphia, PA

Bikes: Two wheeled ones

Originally Posted by rccardr
Hunh. I have Pasela TG's on, let me see....five bikes. One set of 27", three 25's and a 28. Never had a flat or sidewall failure on, well, any of them. And they get ridden. A lot.
They're not bad on flat protection, but you can't use them on a tandem. You can use the t Serv.

I'm heavy and philly streets can be rough; I also ride in gravel a good bit.

Last edited by KonAaron Snake; 02-24-16 at 06:23 AM.
KonAaron Snake is offline  
Reply
Old 02-24-16 | 06:42 AM
  #17  
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 2,406
Likes: 1,595
From: Near Pottstown, PA: 30 miles NW of Philadelphia

Bikes: 2 Trek Mtn, Cannondale R600 road, 6 vintage road bikes

Originally Posted by eschlwc
why folding? lighter? always thought they were just more expensive and more difficult to mount than the steel beaded.
I now have about 3000 miles on Pasela PTs, half ona set of 27 x 1 1/8 and half ona set of 700 x 28 (measures 28mm at 85psi). No complaints. I ride for pleasure and health (work that heart) so am not particular about rolling resistance (as if I could tell) but durability matters and these have done fine. A frequent ride includes 16 paved miles on the SRT then 4 gravel and packed cinder miles on the Manayunk path then a mile on Manayunk Main Street then the highly variable pavement on the rest of the SRT to the South Street bridge. Then do a tight U turn and go home. No quite like commuting on North Broad street but a great variety of surface conditions that I think the PTs handle very nicely.

The folding version is a bit lighter and I find them easier to mount and dismount than wire bead tires. I like them. The sidewalls have not failed nor exploded yet but I keep them close to the ground in case they do. With any luck I'll wear out the tread before the sidewalls go all to Ellen Gone.
Prowler is offline  
Reply
Old 02-24-16 | 06:49 AM
  #18  
bikemig's Avatar
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
10 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 21,850
Likes: 5,825
From: Middle Earth (aka IA)

Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones

I'm neutral on the paselas. I like them OK but I have 2 sets but I doubt I'll buy any more of them. They're good tires but I think there are better tires out there.
bikemig is online now  
Reply
Old 02-24-16 | 06:52 AM
  #19  
10 Wheels's Avatar
Galveston County Texas
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 33,335
Likes: 1,286
From: In The Wind

Bikes: 02 GTO, 2011 Magnum

Originally Posted by agmetal
I haven't been able to find much in the way of specifics...best I can tell is, the T-Serv is a bit heavier duty? How does the ride quality compare, and how much do I need to worry about the Pasela's sidewalls falling apart like I read about everywhere?
T-Servs have a Very Thin Sidewalll..
I tried them.
Less then 100 miles I hit a Small twig that went into the side wall and destroyed the tire.





__________________
Fred "The Real Fred"


Last edited by 10 Wheels; 02-24-16 at 06:56 AM.
10 Wheels is offline  
Reply
Old 02-24-16 | 07:40 AM
  #20  
Hypno Toad's Avatar
meh
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,742
Likes: 1,129
From: Hopkins, MN

Bikes: 23 Cutthroat, 21 CoMotion Java; 21 Bianchi Infinito; 15 Surly Pugsley; 11 Globe Daily; 09 Kona Dew Drop; 96 Mondonico

Originally Posted by agmetal
I haven't been able to find much in the way of specifics...best I can tell is, the T-Serv is a bit heavier duty? How does the ride quality compare, and how much do I need to worry about the Pasela's sidewalls falling apart like I read about everywhere?
I have both, I use T-Serv on a number of bike (my go-to, general-purpose choice) and I have the Paselas on my old steel road bike. I got the Paselas for the looks of a classic tire; they are my newer tires (bought them early 2015 and have 1200 miles on them), I can't say I've noticed the difference in comfort and I have no complaints.

I believe the T-Servs are heavier duty, I've put mine through some crazy hard riding (ie gravel centuries) and never had an issue. My Paselas will never see anything but typical road conditions, since I won't take that bike on any crazy rides.
Hypno Toad is offline  
Reply
Old 02-24-16 | 07:54 AM
  #21  
Hypno Toad's Avatar
meh
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,742
Likes: 1,129
From: Hopkins, MN

Bikes: 23 Cutthroat, 21 CoMotion Java; 21 Bianchi Infinito; 15 Surly Pugsley; 11 Globe Daily; 09 Kona Dew Drop; 96 Mondonico

Originally Posted by 10 Wheels
T-Servs have a Very Thin Sidewalll..
I tried them.
Less then 100 miles I hit a Small twig that went into the side wall and destroyed the tire.
That must have been a defective tire. I've run them on a number of bikes with out any issues. My primary bike (Kona Dew Drop) has 7,000 miles on two sets of T-Serv 700x28. Never had an issue, and (like I said in my other post) I've done two gravel centuries on these tires, plus thousands of miles of commuting and other riding over a wide variety of conditions.

I was just working on my daughter's summer commuter, she has a blue T-Serv from 2010, still in good condition. I have no idea how many miles, she doesn't track her mileage.

Last edited by Hypno Toad; 02-24-16 at 02:43 PM.
Hypno Toad is offline  
Reply
Old 02-24-16 | 11:25 AM
  #22  
Full Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 386
Likes: 3
I wrote a long thing, but then I thought... you don't need that much info. Let's just say 80% of my bikes run Paselas from the most basic, non folding, non TourGuard versions to their new folding, PT version and they've been nothing but enjoyable for me. Probably some of the most satisfyingly average, and reliable tires I run and even on my abused, heavily loaded sound bike there hasn't been a single hint of sidewall failure... so yeah, ymmv.

In my experience proper inflation and keeping my eyes on the road for hazards has done more to protect from flats than any tire with exotic flat protection I've ever purchased. In fact, I've had the most insane glass cuts and punctures on the more protected and slow tires I've owned.

I think personal 'luck' plays the biggest part with flat protection =)
carbomb is offline  
Reply
Old 02-24-16 | 12:20 PM
  #23  
Bikedued's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,984
Likes: 145
The ONLY flat I've EVER had with a PT(Tourguard) was when one blew off the rim from too much pressure. They ride fine, handle okay, and never had a single sidewall failure. Zero..,,,,BD
Bikedued is offline  
Reply
Old 02-24-16 | 12:30 PM
  #24  
USAZorro's Avatar
Señor Member
Titanium Club Membership
Sheldon Brown Memorial - Titanium
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 18,489
Likes: 1,568
From: Hardy, VA

Bikes: Mostly English - predominantly Raleighs

I consider Paselas to be a compromise also. If I have a bike that I know I won't have concern bout rolling resistance or road feel, I would definitely consider using them. If I'm just putting something on to flip, I'd go cheap and get Kenda's. If I want something for a frequent rider, I'll upgrade to something better. If I am concerned about rough terrain, I probably won't ride there.
__________________
In search of what to search for.
USAZorro is offline  
Reply
Old 02-24-16 | 12:37 PM
  #25  
non-fixie's Avatar
Cyclotouriste
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 11,795
Likes: 7,024
From: South Holland, NL

Bikes: Yes, please.

Originally Posted by eschlwc
why folding? lighter?

always thought they were just more expensive and more difficult to mount than the steel beaded.
Yes, because they're lighter and also because they're easier to take along if needed. I haven't tried the steel-beaded ones yet (I probably will, as I have a nice 27" wheelset with non-hooked rims), so I don't know how easy they are to mount. The folding ones do take some effort, especially the first time, but I haven't lost a fight yet.
__________________
Shuffling with the prince












non-fixie is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.