Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Vintage versus New... Brooks Proofide

Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Vintage versus New... Brooks Proofide

Old 05-23-16, 07:12 AM
  #1  
rhm
multimodal commuter
Thread Starter
 
rhm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NJ, NYC, LI
Posts: 19,852

Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...

Mentioned: 584 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1908 Post(s)
Liked 574 Times in 339 Posts
Vintage versus New... Brooks Proofide

I just happened to get all three of my tins of Brooks Proofide in one place this morning, so I took a couple photos to celebrate the occasion.



The biggest tin, I don't know how old it is, I've had it since 1983 or so, having found it in the saddle bag of a Raleigh Sports that came into the bike shop as a trade-in. It's probably from about 1970. Printed on the edge are the words "MINIMUM NETT WEIGHT 2 OZS"

The little tin, I don't know how old that is either. It came with a ruined Brooks saddle I bought for the frame. I'd guess it's from about 2000. Printed on the edge are the words "MADE IN ENGLAND. MINIMUM NETT WEIGHT 2 OZS (56 GRAMMES)

The medium tin, I got it last year. It's probably from 2015. There is no printing on the edge, but you can see where it says "Net Weight 40g."

I can't check those weights; the first two are pretty well empty. But it's pretty bizarre, I think, that the biggest tin and the littlest were stated to contain the same amount.

Anyway, the point is, Brooks has evidently changed the recipe. Does anyone know why? Do they serve the same purpose? How is the new version better?

The instructions on the oldest tin, in case you can't read them, are as follows:
Originally Posted by printing on the tin
For Conditioning, Preserving,
Waterproofing Saddles and
other leather articles. Apply
lightly, using Soft Cloth to
finished side of leather, allow
dressing to permeate until dry,
then polish. If leather is wet,
apply and allow to dry naturally.
In contrast, the current instructions on Brooks' website are as follows:
Originally Posted by URL="https://www.brooksengland.com/catalogue-and-shop/spareparts/maintenance+products/Proofide+40g+Tin/"
A new saddle should be treated with Brooks Proofide leather
dressing to help assist the ‘breaking-in’ process. Proofide
keeps the leather supple as it is specially formulated from
natural ingredients to condition, preserve and shower
proof your saddle. Proofide is the only substance that should
be used to care for your Brooks Leather Saddle.
Apply a little Proofide to the finished side of the leather.
Allow the Proofide to permeate until dry and then polish off.
Proofide should be used several times during the ‘breaking-in’
period and every 3-6 months thereafter. On bicycles not fitted
with mudguards, an initial application to the underside of
the saddle will be beneficial, this needs not to be polished
off. The leather gets its colour during the tanning process and it
is possible, therefore, that some colour residues will remain. It
is recommended to polish the saddle with a soft cloth before first
use.
I find it interesting that the new stuff is recommended for "breaking in" the saddle, while the old stuff was not. For what it's worth, I wholeheartedly reject the notion that this stuff should be used for "breaking in" a saddle.
__________________
www.rhmsaddles.com.

Last edited by rhm; 05-23-16 at 08:56 AM.
rhm is offline  
Old 05-23-16, 10:26 AM
  #2  
Old fart
 
JohnDThompson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,936

Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.

Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3571 Post(s)
Liked 3,367 Times in 1,916 Posts
I think the new formulation (medium tin in your picture) has citronella oil added to keep the tallow from going rancid.
JohnDThompson is offline  
Old 05-23-16, 10:33 AM
  #3  
Phyllo-buster
 
clubman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 8,831

Bikes: roadsters, club bikes, fixed and classic

Mentioned: 133 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2287 Post(s)
Liked 2,031 Times in 1,245 Posts
Originally Posted by rhm
I find it interesting that the new stuff is recommended for "breaking in" the saddle, while the old stuff was not. For what it's worth, I wholeheartedly reject the notion that this stuff should be used for "breaking in" a saddle.
Exactly.
clubman is offline  
Old 05-23-16, 11:06 AM
  #4  
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 25
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
How does proofide differ from dubbin? Looks the same to me.
atriot is offline  
Old 05-23-16, 11:58 AM
  #5  
rhm
multimodal commuter
Thread Starter
 
rhm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NJ, NYC, LI
Posts: 19,852

Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...

Mentioned: 584 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1908 Post(s)
Liked 574 Times in 339 Posts
Originally Posted by atriot
How does proofide differ from dubbin? Looks the same to me.
As far as I know, it doesn't; but dubbin is a generic term, while Proofide is a brand name.

Originally Posted by wikipedia
Dubbin is a wax product used to soften, condition and waterproof leather and other materials. It consists of natural wax, oil and tallow.

It is different from shoe polish, which is used to impart shine and colour to leather.

Dubbin has been used since medieval times to waterproof and soften leather boots.

The name dubbin is a contraction of the gerund dubbing, describing the action of applying the wax to leather.
Wikipedia - Dubbin



(Photo from Wikipedia)


Another brand-name alternative is Obenauf's, which appears to be beeswax and propolis suspended in oil. Propolis and beeswax are naturally found together, around the edges of the beehive, but when heated the wax melts at a much lower temperature than the propolis. I'm intrigued about how they make it.
Originally Posted by obenaufs.com
Obenauf’s Heavy Duty LP (Leather Preservative) is the most durable protection available. Originally developed for the severe conditions endured by wildland firefighters, LP protects, preserves, and restores boots, saddles, motorcycle leathers, tool pouches, baseball gloves, and more. It provides industrial strength protection for leather that gets exposed to harsh environments.
Three natural oils are suspended in Beeswax and Propolis. In the leather these oils gradually seep out of the Beeswax/Propolis* Suspension Formula. If exposed to heat or flexing the oils are released faster so leather gets oiled when and where it needs it most instead of parched and cracked. This Beeswax/Propolis* Suspension Formula provides a time release lubrication to inner fibers while the surface is reinforced against scuffing and abrasions while the leather still breathes.
*Propolis is an antibacterial resin from trees that resists bacteria and mold. It is a barrier against body acids, salt, and caustic chemicals. Combined with beeswax it will repel water better and longer.
https://www.obenaufs.com/Heavy-Duty-L...vy-duty-lp.htm
__________________
www.rhmsaddles.com.

Last edited by rhm; 05-23-16 at 12:10 PM.
rhm is offline  
Old 05-23-16, 04:35 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,655

Bikes: iele Latina, Miele Suprema, Miele Uno LS, Miele Miele Beta, MMTB, Bianchi Model Unknown, Fiori Venezia, Fiori Napoli, VeloSport Adamas AX

Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1324 Post(s)
Liked 927 Times in 640 Posts
Hi RHm.

Here are two images of one of my WRIGHT'S saddles. It's the one I think is on its last legs. Note he split at the left rear rivet. What do you think? Imminent failure on a bump?

IMG_3788 by Miele Man, on Flickr

IMG_3791 by Miele Man, on Flickr

Also, here are three images of the DUBBIN that I use. The DUBBIN is actually white not the off colour due to the lighting I took the images under. IS this acceptable to you as a leather preservative?

IMG_3785 by Miele Man, on Flickr

IMG_3786 by Miele Man, on Flickr

IMG_3787 by Miele Man, on Flickr

Thanks again for starting this thread.

Cheers
Miele Man is offline  
Old 05-23-16, 04:56 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
rootboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Wherever
Posts: 16,755
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 556 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 132 Times in 78 Posts
I could be wrong but I was always under the impression that dubbin was more a mixture of greases and oils. But I haven't used it in about forty five years. Used to put it on my Dunham's of Maine hiking boots. Then I discovered Snoseal, and always used that on my lineman's boots, and Pivetta rock climbing boots. Didn't soften the toe and heel counters.
If it were my saddle, I don't think I'd use dubbin on a leather saddle. But only because I'm not sure what's in it.
rootboy is offline  
Old 05-23-16, 05:23 PM
  #8  
bicyclatte!
 
echo victor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 545
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 45 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Miele Man
...


...
I'm no expert, but I remember reading a rumor that the wide, hammered rivets on Brooks saddles started out with a company that would drill out the original rivets, make some changes, and then needed a larger rivet to replace the originals. Maybe you could try something similar to salvage this saddle - drill out that rivet, cut some of the leather in that location, maybe punch a small hole or something at the edge of the existing crack so it doesn't spread further, then re-rivet with a larger headed rivet?
__________________
If someone can pour a Guinness with a cycle instead of a shamrock on top, I'll update my profile pic.
echo victor is offline  
Old 05-23-16, 06:12 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
rootboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Wherever
Posts: 16,755
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 556 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 132 Times in 78 Posts
I remember really liking the smell of that old stuff, RHM. Had a nice and distinctive odor to it. Sort of a salmon-orange color.
Love the old tin too and I think you're right, early seventies. Somewhere around I still have an old tin like that. Couldn't get it open last time I tried.
rootboy is offline  
Old 05-23-16, 07:25 PM
  #10  
Get off my lawn!
 
Velognome's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: The Garden State
Posts: 6,253

Bikes: 1917 Loomis, 1923 Rudge, 1930 Hercules Renown, 1947 Mclean, 1948 JA Holland, 1955 Hetchins, 1957 Carlton Flyer, 1962 Raleigh Sport, 1978&81 Raleigh Gomp GS', 2010 Raliegh Clubman

Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 93 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 98 Times in 48 Posts
Simple, folks have gotten soft!

Heck, if you can break a horse without cream ya can break in a saddle!
Velognome is offline  
Old 05-23-16, 09:06 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Lascauxcaveman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Port Angeles, WA
Posts: 8,016

Bikes: A green one, "Ragleigh," or something.

Mentioned: 194 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1627 Post(s)
Liked 629 Times in 355 Posts
I'm not entirely convinced saddles need to be "broken in" at all. I've got a couple of B17's with only a couple thousand miles on them that are feeling a bit too squishy these days. They felt fine when I first got them.

Harumph.
__________________
● 1971 Grandis SL ● 1972 Lambert Grand Prix frankenbike ● 1972 Raleigh Super Course fixie ● 1973 Nishiki Semi-Pro ● 1979 Motobecane Grand Jubile ●1980 Apollo "Legnano" ● 1984 Peugeot Vagabond ● 1985 Shogun Prairie Breaker ● 1986 Merckx Super Corsa ● 1987 Schwinn Tempo ● 1988 Schwinn Voyageur ● 1989 Bottechia Team ADR replica ● 1990 Cannondale ST600 ● 1993 Technium RT600 ● 1996 Kona Lava Dome ●

Lascauxcaveman is offline  
Old 05-24-16, 08:29 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: So Cal, for now
Posts: 2,475

Bikes: 1974 Bob Jackson - Nuovo Record, Brooks Pro, Clips & Straps

Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1104 Post(s)
Liked 794 Times in 452 Posts
Originally Posted by Lascauxcaveman
I'm not entirely convinced saddles need to be "broken in" at all. I've got a couple of B17's with only a couple thousand miles on them that are feeling a bit too squishy these days. They felt fine when I first got them.

Harumph.
If we are talking about a Brooks Pro, I think it is your butt that gets "broken in". Well, on saddles with thinner leather, the leather does move and soften a bit.
Bad Lag is offline  
Old 05-24-16, 08:51 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
gearbasher's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Sitting on my butt in front of a computer
Posts: 1,535
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 440 Post(s)
Liked 835 Times in 363 Posts
Well here are my three tins...though the middle one is plastic, so maybe I should call it a "tic". Two are the same as the OP's.



From left to right: Mid '80s, late '90s, and current?



I never liked the one on the left. It never really was absorbed by the leather. It just sat there. The middle is my favorite. The one on the right gets absorbed too fast.

Last edited by gearbasher; 05-24-16 at 09:17 AM. Reason: I don't know my left from my right.
gearbasher is offline  
Old 05-24-16, 09:10 AM
  #14  
working on my sandal tan
 
ThermionicScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,625

Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)

Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3868 Post(s)
Liked 2,560 Times in 1,574 Posts
Originally Posted by Lascauxcaveman
I'm not entirely convinced saddles need to be "broken in" at all. I've got a couple of B17's with only a couple thousand miles on them that are feeling a bit too squishy these days. They felt fine when I first got them.

Harumph.
I've read that the squishier B17s and the recent recommendation of Proofide as a break-in accelerant are both due to Selle Royal catering to newbie Brooks riders. It sure rings true to me, even if it isn't.
__________________
Originally Posted by chandltp
There's no such thing as too far.. just lack of time
Originally Posted by noglider
People in this forum are not typical.
RUSA #7498
ThermionicScott is offline  
Old 05-24-16, 09:15 AM
  #15  
Extraordinary Magnitude
 
The Golden Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 13,640

Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT

Mentioned: 84 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2597 Post(s)
Liked 1,678 Times in 926 Posts
Originally Posted by rootboy
I could be wrong but I was always under the impression that dubbin was more a mixture of greases and oils. But I haven't used it in about forty five years. Used to put it on my Dunham's of Maine hiking boots. Then I discovered Snoseal, and always used that on my lineman's boots, and Pivetta rock climbing boots. Didn't soften the toe and heel counters.
I made the mistake of using Snoseal on two pairs of really nice Allen Edmonds boots. I was going to do one, figured I'd do 'em both at the same time. Totally darkened the leather and made it feel oil soaked and clammy. What had been the most soft and supple leather I've ever felt on a shoe became the same as combat boots that were soaked in diesel.

I also used that stuff on my B-17- but it didn't have that dramatic of effect on that.
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*

Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!

"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
The Golden Boy is offline  
Old 05-24-16, 09:24 AM
  #16  
rhm
multimodal commuter
Thread Starter
 
rhm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NJ, NYC, LI
Posts: 19,852

Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...

Mentioned: 584 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1908 Post(s)
Liked 574 Times in 339 Posts
Originally Posted by Bad Lag
If we are talking about a Brooks Pro, I think it is your butt that gets "broken in". Well, on saddles with thinner leather, the leather does move and soften a bit.
That is what people say! But since I've been recovering saddles I've learned that if I use the same leather on a B.72, and on a B.17 Standard, and on a Professional, and on a B.17 Narrow, the B.72 will be very soft, the B.17 Standard also pretty soft, the Professional a lot harder, and the Narrow very hard indeed. The width, not the thickness of the leather, determines the hardness.

Originally Posted by gearbasher
Well here are my three tins...
I never liked the one on the left. It never really was absorbed by the leather. It just sat there. The middle is my favorite. The one on the right gets absorbed too fast.
So we confirm, that they have changed their recipe over the years.

Originally Posted by ThermionicScott
I've read that the squishier B17s and the recent recommendation of Proofide as a break-in accelerant are both due to Selle Royal catering to newbie Brooks riders. It sure rings true to me, even if it isn't.
I think I read that as well. But I may have made it up myself and posted it, and then you read it there. I do believe it, for sure.
__________________
www.rhmsaddles.com.
rhm is offline  
Old 05-24-16, 09:54 AM
  #17  
working on my sandal tan
 
ThermionicScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,625

Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)

Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3868 Post(s)
Liked 2,560 Times in 1,574 Posts
Originally Posted by rhm
That is what people say! But since I've been recovering saddles I've learned that if I use the same leather on a B.72, and on a B.17 Standard, and on a Professional, and on a B.17 Narrow, the B.72 will be very soft, the B.17 Standard also pretty soft, the Professional a lot harder, and the Narrow very hard indeed. The width, not the thickness of the leather, determines the hardness.
That's really interesting data! The B17 Narrow is my favorite Brooks shape so far, and had assumed that Brooks has been using thinner leather on the B17 Standard specifically for those aforementioned newbies. I will correct my mental model.

While we're at it, do you suppose the width (and resulting flexibility) is why B72s are notorious for cracking around the nose?
__________________
Originally Posted by chandltp
There's no such thing as too far.. just lack of time
Originally Posted by noglider
People in this forum are not typical.
RUSA #7498
ThermionicScott is offline  
Old 05-24-16, 09:58 AM
  #18  
rhm
multimodal commuter
Thread Starter
 
rhm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NJ, NYC, LI
Posts: 19,852

Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...

Mentioned: 584 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1908 Post(s)
Liked 574 Times in 339 Posts
Originally Posted by ThermionicScott
... Do you suppose the width (and resulting flexibility) is why B72s are notorious for cracking around the nose?
Possibly! But I hadn't noticed that that's where B.72's always fail. Truth be told, I have a strong dislike of B.72's which makes me a very poor judge of their strengths and weaknesses. I think this is because I habitually ride with my hands far below the saddle, and the B.72 is designed for much more upright posture. Which I can't stand.
__________________
www.rhmsaddles.com.
rhm is offline  
Old 05-24-16, 10:09 AM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
Chombi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 11,138

Bikes: 1986 Alan Record Carbonio, 1985 Vitus Plus Carbone 7, 1984 Peugeot PSV, 1972 Line Seeker, 1986(est.) Medici Aerodynamic (Project), 1985(est.) Peugeot PY10FC

Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 150 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 34 Times in 27 Posts
Shhhhh......... don't tell anyone, but I've been using Giles Berthoud leather dressing on my Brooks Pros, Imperial and my Berthoud Galibier saddles for some time now and it has worked really nice.
Even hit the bottoms (sparingly, and just once so far) with no problems.
The French stuff looks a bit yellower in color than the new Proofide, but does not have any discernable odor to it...
Been wondering though, where all this stuff cones from. I doubt if Brooks or Berthoud owns proprietary plants to produce these things. I think it's most likely contracted out......

Last edited by Chombi; 05-24-16 at 10:12 AM.
Chombi is offline  
Old 05-24-16, 12:27 PM
  #20  
working on my sandal tan
 
ThermionicScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,625

Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)

Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3868 Post(s)
Liked 2,560 Times in 1,574 Posts
Originally Posted by rhm
Possibly! But I hadn't noticed that that's where B.72's always fail. Truth be told, I have a strong dislike of B.72's which makes me a very poor judge of their strengths and weaknesses. I think this is because I habitually ride with my hands far below the saddle, and the B.72 is designed for much more upright posture. Which I can't stand.


Shortly after buying my '64 Armstrong 3-speed, I decided it needed something more "respectable" than the mattress saddle on it. A visit to Sheldon Brown indicated that the comparable Raleigh would have come with a B72 or B66, so I did more research and found some stories about older B72s cracking through the leather at the nose. Undaunted, I found a good deal on one and bought it. But like you, I rarely found myself in the mood to ride a bike so upright, and the frame is a smidgen too small for me, so I don't have much data to add either way.

I really should just find another home for that bike.
__________________
Originally Posted by chandltp
There's no such thing as too far.. just lack of time
Originally Posted by noglider
People in this forum are not typical.
RUSA #7498
ThermionicScott is offline  
Old 05-24-16, 03:28 PM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 807
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 202 Post(s)
Liked 154 Times in 77 Posts
curious that Brooks recommend using Proofide on a new saddle
because on another section they say it is not necessary.

BROOKS ENGLAND LTD. | FAQS | SADDLE_MAINTENANCE
Q How often should I apply Proofide to my Brooks saddle?
A The primary function of Brooks Proofide is to nourish the leather to keep it supple and to prevent it from drying out with age. With this in mind, it is generally not necessary to apply Proofide to a new saddle. Instead, it is recommended to apply it after every 6 months.
Proofide should be applied sparingly to the upper surface of the leather using just enough to cover the entire upper surface area. This should then be left on the leather for several hours (perhaps overnight) in order to allow penetration through into the inner fibres, before buffing off thoroughly with a soft cloth.
Some Brooks saddle owners use Proofide for two further purposes:
a/ If the saddle is giving excessive discomfort after some time of use, then Proofide will soften the leather and hence encourage it to break-in more readily
b/ If riding regularly over wet surfaces (especially if you bicycle does not have mudguards), then a coating of Proofide applied and left onto the underside of the leather will offer some moisture shielding to the leather
HOWEVER, in both of these two cases, it is very important to be mindful of the irreversible damage that can result from excessive application of Proofide. There is a risk that the leather will over soften and then no longer be able to support the rider’s weight.
Proofide is a tried and trusted product, the ingredients of which are all know to Brooks. This is the only dressing, therefore, that we can endorse for use on a Brooks leather product. The use of any other product is frowned upon and will also jeopardize your warranty rights.
Big Block is offline  
Old 05-24-16, 05:49 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
dailycommute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: RiverRoad, ME
Posts: 798
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 71 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Obenhaufs is a fine leather preservative but like it does tend to darken leather but so do most that actually penetrate dried hide. I have used many different products over the years on hiking boots and other leather products and it is hands down the best. Brooks saddles are funny beasts, for example I found the "broken in" b17 model to be the hardest rock of a brooks I have ever sat on. It also soaked up obenhaufs like crazy due to whatever process they used to age it. Leather does need some type of preservative if used actively but a little goes a long way.
dailycommute is offline  
Old 05-24-16, 09:15 PM
  #23  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: So Cal, for now
Posts: 2,475

Bikes: 1974 Bob Jackson - Nuovo Record, Brooks Pro, Clips & Straps

Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1104 Post(s)
Liked 794 Times in 452 Posts
Originally Posted by rhm
That is what people say! But since I've been recovering saddles I've learned that if I use the same leather on a B.72, and on a B.17 Standard, and on a Professional, and on a B.17 Narrow, the B.72 will be very soft, the B.17 Standard also pretty soft, the Professional a lot harder, and the Narrow very hard indeed. The width, not the thickness of the leather, determines the hardness.


So we confirm, that they have changed their recipe over the years.

I think I read that as well. But I may have made it up myself and posted it, and then you read it there. I do believe it, for sure.

Two things combine to give a saddle its stiffness - shape and material.

For sure, shape affects the compliance of the saddle. But for a given shape, thicker is stiffer. This is a simple fact of mechanical engineering.


I also have a tin of Proofide with the orange lid. My tin is from about 1973. When comparing new to old, you have to consider storage conditions and evaporative losses of the solvents over the several intervening decades.
Bad Lag is offline  
Old 05-25-16, 06:49 AM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
rootboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Wherever
Posts: 16,755
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 556 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 132 Times in 78 Posts
Originally Posted by The Golden Boy
I made the mistake of using Snoseal on two pairs of really nice Allen Edmonds boots. ....
Oh man. Yeah, I would never use Snoseal on anything but work or climbing boots. Which is what it was intended for.
I used to be able to Snoseal my 18 inch tall Westco lineman's boots and the next day stand in ankle deep water, with no wet feet.
I didn't stand in ankle deep water often but calf deep snow?...very often.
rootboy is offline  
Old 05-25-16, 07:19 AM
  #25  
Extraordinary Magnitude
 
The Golden Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 13,640

Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT

Mentioned: 84 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2597 Post(s)
Liked 1,678 Times in 926 Posts
Originally Posted by rootboy
Oh man. Yeah, I would never use Snoseal on anything but work or climbing boots. Which is what it was intended for.
I used to be able to Snoseal my 18 inch tall Westco lineman's boots and the next day stand in ankle deep water, with no wet feet.
I didn't stand in ankle deep water often but calf deep snow?...very often.
*sigh*
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*

Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!

"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
The Golden Boy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Road Fan
Classic & Vintage
45
05-23-19 03:35 PM
eschlwc
Classic & Vintage
44
09-04-15 04:18 PM
deepinahartatx
Classic & Vintage
5
11-10-13 11:48 AM
Dav305z
Classic & Vintage
61
09-08-11 06:28 AM
vanno
Classic & Vintage
16
05-22-11 08:36 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.