How Many Frame Sizes Do You Ride?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: northern michigan
Posts: 13,317
Bikes: '77 Colnago Super, '76 Fuji The Finest, '88 Cannondale Criterium, '86 Trek 760, '87 Miyata 712
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 659 Post(s)
Liked 595 Times
in
313 Posts
How Many Frame Sizes Do You Ride?
Most of us have different and varying sizes and types/purposes of bikes in their collection they regularly or occasionally ride. I'm wondering what your range of sizes is that you would casually or even thrash now and then.
For me, I have 3. The optimum, perfect frame is the Cdale Crit with 54cm and fits me better than any other 54 I have owned. Then comes the Trek 760 that is one size down at 52. The seat post is a bit more exposed but the racing/crit geo fits just fine. From what I understand it was a common practice among racers in the day. Lastly, the '77 Colnago is my tallest. At 57cm it isnt too tall for comfort and is easily manageable. I'm able to hop from one to the other and feel at home but only that perfect fit 54cm Cannondale goes out on the open road, though I would take any of them for the pure joy of it.
How about you?
For me, I have 3. The optimum, perfect frame is the Cdale Crit with 54cm and fits me better than any other 54 I have owned. Then comes the Trek 760 that is one size down at 52. The seat post is a bit more exposed but the racing/crit geo fits just fine. From what I understand it was a common practice among racers in the day. Lastly, the '77 Colnago is my tallest. At 57cm it isnt too tall for comfort and is easily manageable. I'm able to hop from one to the other and feel at home but only that perfect fit 54cm Cannondale goes out on the open road, though I would take any of them for the pure joy of it.
How about you?
#2
Semper Fi
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 12,942
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1172 Post(s)
Liked 358 Times
in
241 Posts
My Medici is a 57cm height, the CAAD 10 is a 56cm, no explanation as to why both work, but they both feel right to me.
Bill
Bill
__________________
Semper Fi, USMC, 1975-1977
I Can Do All Things Through Him, Who Gives Me Strength. Philippians 4:13
Semper Fi, USMC, 1975-1977
I Can Do All Things Through Him, Who Gives Me Strength. Philippians 4:13
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Central Virginia
Posts: 4,777
Bikes: Numerous
Mentioned: 150 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1676 Post(s)
Liked 3,089 Times
in
911 Posts
When I think or talk of frame sizes I refer to top tube length. I tend to ride frames that most people would probably think too small for my height but it's what works for me. (6'2" with long trunk, short legs, short arms) My sweet spot is probably a 57, most of my bikes are 56. My smallest is my Eddy Merckx Pro with a 55 top tube but I think officially a 56 frame. My biggest is my Tommasini with a 57.5. I had a Bianchi 63 CT, 58.5 TT that should technically be my size but felt way too big, so I replaced with the same frame in a 57 TT and it is perfect.
Almost without fail, all my bikes, every ride, I think "this is a sweet bike".
Almost without fail, all my bikes, every ride, I think "this is a sweet bike".
#4
Friendship is Magic
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,984
Bikes: old ones
Mentioned: 304 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26400 Post(s)
Liked 10,373 Times
in
7,202 Posts
...depending on purpose (thus position on the bike), setup, and some fiddling, I regularly ride anything from about a 57-58 setup as an upright town bike to a 62 road bike I can just make the standover on. I think maybe I have one MTB that's even smaller.
I've never understood the fixation on frame size..
I've never understood the fixation on frame size..
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 3,783
Bikes: Bianchi San Mateo and a few others
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 634 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
9 Posts
My usual comfort zone is the 53-55 cm range, but I've ridden a few bikes outside that range that could've been adjusted to fit without too much fuss. My current bikes all happen to be the same size:
53 cm 2006 Bianchi San Mateo / 53.5 cm effective top tube
53 cm 2011 Diamondback Steilacoom CCX / 54 cm effective top tube
21" 1986 Trek 300 Elance / 54.5 cm top tube
21" 1972 Peugeot UO-8 / roughly 55 cm top tube IIRC
I recently came across a 50 cm 1984 Miyata 1000 that was too nice a bike to pass up. It's a little short, so I've got a fair amount of seatpost and quill showing, but it has a 53.5 cm top tube just like my Bianchi. The Bianchi fits great, so I figure I'll give the Miyata a shot.
53 cm 2006 Bianchi San Mateo / 53.5 cm effective top tube
53 cm 2011 Diamondback Steilacoom CCX / 54 cm effective top tube
21" 1986 Trek 300 Elance / 54.5 cm top tube
21" 1972 Peugeot UO-8 / roughly 55 cm top tube IIRC
I recently came across a 50 cm 1984 Miyata 1000 that was too nice a bike to pass up. It's a little short, so I've got a fair amount of seatpost and quill showing, but it has a 53.5 cm top tube just like my Bianchi. The Bianchi fits great, so I figure I'll give the Miyata a shot.
#6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: northern michigan
Posts: 13,317
Bikes: '77 Colnago Super, '76 Fuji The Finest, '88 Cannondale Criterium, '86 Trek 760, '87 Miyata 712
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 659 Post(s)
Liked 595 Times
in
313 Posts
...depending on purpose (thus position on the bike), setup, and some fiddling, I regularly ride anything from about a 57-58 setup as an upright town bike to a 62 road bike I can just make the standover on. I think maybe I have one MTB that's even smaller.
I've never understood the fixation on frame size..
I've never understood the fixation on frame size..
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,902
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4802 Post(s)
Liked 3,922 Times
in
2,551 Posts
I look at: where does the BB sit relative to the wheels, ie how is my weight balance? What do I have to do to [place the seat and handlebars where I want them? Can I do it with off the shelf and reasonably inexpensive parts? Am I willing to spend more/go custom on those parts?
Notice that frame size never enters directly into any of these questions. My preference is 58-59 with steepish angles and long top tubes but my commuters (horizontally dropped early to mid '80s bikes have twice been 25" frames. I don't get to pick when I have to shop for the next one. They die violent deaths. I also have now a considerably smaller Raleigh Competition that with a 140 stem I happened to have and a 60 mm setback seatpost I happened to find for $15 is a sweet fit. 21 1/2"? I measure up the frame to be, enter it into a drafting program with all the rest (to see what seatpost and stem will be needed) and call out the dimensions, but make zero attempt to remember them.
So right now, roughly, I have (2) 59s and a 58 (all custom), a probably 58 commuter and a 55? (the Raleigh).
Ben
Notice that frame size never enters directly into any of these questions. My preference is 58-59 with steepish angles and long top tubes but my commuters (horizontally dropped early to mid '80s bikes have twice been 25" frames. I don't get to pick when I have to shop for the next one. They die violent deaths. I also have now a considerably smaller Raleigh Competition that with a 140 stem I happened to have and a 60 mm setback seatpost I happened to find for $15 is a sweet fit. 21 1/2"? I measure up the frame to be, enter it into a drafting program with all the rest (to see what seatpost and stem will be needed) and call out the dimensions, but make zero attempt to remember them.
So right now, roughly, I have (2) 59s and a 58 (all custom), a probably 58 commuter and a 55? (the Raleigh).
Ben
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Twin Cities
Posts: 927
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 206 Post(s)
Liked 102 Times
in
46 Posts
2015 Cannondale CAADX = 56cm
1985 Gazelle AB frame = 60cm
2015 Cannondale Trail SL 1 29er = large
Measurements indicate a 58cm frame would be best for me fir a typical road bike.
1985 Gazelle AB frame = 60cm
2015 Cannondale Trail SL 1 29er = large
Measurements indicate a 58cm frame would be best for me fir a typical road bike.
__________________
Some days, it's not even worth gnawing through the restraints.
Some days, it's not even worth gnawing through the restraints.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,153
Mentioned: 481 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3806 Post(s)
Liked 6,674 Times
in
2,607 Posts
The key measurement for me is 73cm from the center of the crank to the top of the saddle. I can achieve that on frames ranging from 56-61cm seat tubes.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NW Burbs, Chicago
Posts: 12,053
Mentioned: 201 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3015 Post(s)
Liked 3,792 Times
in
1,406 Posts
Seat tube 55-58cm ctc.
Top tube + stem 68-69cm ctc.
Top tube + stem 68-69cm ctc.
#12
feros ferio
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
Posts: 21,796
Bikes: 1959 Capo Modell Campagnolo; 1960 Capo Sieger (2); 1962 Carlton Franco Suisse; 1970 Peugeot UO-8; 1982 Bianchi Campione d'Italia; 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10;
Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1392 Post(s)
Liked 1,324 Times
in
836 Posts
In a traditional road frame, 55cm C-T is my size. (Bianchi and both Capos.) I get a full, non-stretched leg extension with my heels on the pedals, I can just touch the handlebar with my elbow against the nose of the saddle, and I am just about at knee-over-pedal-spindle. Works for me.
The UO-8 is 53.5cm C-T, but with a disproportionately long top tube, so that also works.
The UO-8 is 53.5cm C-T, but with a disproportionately long top tube, so that also works.
__________________
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: D'uh... I am a Cutter
Posts: 6,139
Bikes: '17 Access Old Turnpike Gravel bike, '14 Trek 1.1, '13 Cannondale CAAD 10, '98 CAD 2, R300
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1571 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times
in
9 Posts
I have an old '88 Trek 360... that I believe it may be a 55cm, and I have a Fuji that I think is a 57cm. I have (another) Trek that is a 56cm as well as a 56cm Cannondale. All the bikes vary a little bit in top tube and seat tube measurements.
But once adjusted (including a shorter stem on the Fuji) they all measure pretty much the same when I put a tape measure to them. And they all feel really comfy. But they all ride differently as well.
But once adjusted (including a shorter stem on the Fuji) they all measure pretty much the same when I put a tape measure to them. And they all feel really comfy. But they all ride differently as well.
Last edited by Dave Cutter; 07-16-16 at 09:11 PM.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Norman, Oklahoma
Posts: 5,395
Bikes: Too many to list
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1765 Post(s)
Liked 1,124 Times
in
746 Posts
5'8 (but my internet dating profile says i'm 5'9 -- wink) -- I ride 53 or 54 --- and can adequately stretch it to a 55 at the most if the ancillary bits are sized right (crank length, stem, bars etc)
#15
Senior Member
I've been thinking lately about all the threads on fit, and I that regularly switch back and forth between a 52 and 56. Additionally, the 56 has a much longer stem. Both are perfectly comfortable. Really it's just a matter of being more upright, or not so upright. I have a couple others I don't ride nearly as often. Not sure what they are exactly, but reasonably sure within the range of the first two. I have another that's still project stage, a 54. Maybe I'll find that's a sweet spot.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 2,067
Bikes: 84 Pinarello Trevisio, 86 Guerciotti SLX, 96 Specialized Stumpjumper, 2010 Surly Cross Check, 88 Centurion Prestige, 73 Raleigh Sports, GT Force, Bridgestone MB4
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 278 Post(s)
Liked 71 Times
in
56 Posts
All of my road type bicycles seem to have a 22 inch top tube. The seat tube can vary between 54 and 56cm. For MTBs I seem to wind up on bikes in the 17 to 18 inch seat tube range.
#17
Senior Member
Miyata 912 - 62 seat tube, 58 top tube and a 90mm stem (deep drops)
Witcomb - 60 seat tube, 58 top tube and a 110 stem
Schwinn Fastback Pro - 56 seat tube, 56 top tube and a 120 stem (lots of seat post showing)
All fit well and feel great. Strava says I am equally slow on all of them.
Witcomb - 60 seat tube, 58 top tube and a 110 stem
Schwinn Fastback Pro - 56 seat tube, 56 top tube and a 120 stem (lots of seat post showing)
All fit well and feel great. Strava says I am equally slow on all of them.
__________________
My bikes: 1970`s Roberts - 1981 Miyata 912 - 1980`s Ocshner (Chrome) - 1987 Schwinn Circuit - 1987 Schwinn Prologue - 1992 Schwinn Crosspoint - 1999 Schwinn Circuit - 2014 Cannondale Super Six EVO
My bikes: 1970`s Roberts - 1981 Miyata 912 - 1980`s Ocshner (Chrome) - 1987 Schwinn Circuit - 1987 Schwinn Prologue - 1992 Schwinn Crosspoint - 1999 Schwinn Circuit - 2014 Cannondale Super Six EVO
Last edited by Steve Whitlatch; 07-16-16 at 10:49 PM.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Near Pottstown, PA: 30 miles NW of Philadelphia
Posts: 2,186
Bikes: 2 Trek Mtn, Cannondale R600 road, 6 vintage road bikes
Mentioned: 83 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 472 Post(s)
Liked 1,028 Times
in
404 Posts
The key measurement for me is from the top of the pedal spindle to the sit bone location. I don't actually know what that is but I made a 'gauge' that has that and I use it on all my bikes so it's set the same. ST and crank arm lengths vary, even saddle heights vary (though most of them are Vetta TriShock) so this gauge (story stick) gives me a quick check. My best fits are 57/58cm but I ride a 61, a well slammed 62cm Moto and the well stretched Trek Mtn bikes.
My story stick also has a mark for sit bone to back-of-the-brake-hoods which helps determine needed stem length and seat set-back. Between these two measurements my basic triangle of contact points is about the same on all 8 bikes. Works for me.
My story stick also has a mark for sit bone to back-of-the-brake-hoods which helps determine needed stem length and seat set-back. Between these two measurements my basic triangle of contact points is about the same on all 8 bikes. Works for me.
Last edited by Prowler; 07-17-16 at 05:24 AM.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,223
Mentioned: 654 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4722 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3,036 Times
in
1,874 Posts
For me, size is dictated by the combination of seat tube angle and top tube length. I'm typically in my zone with a 56 cm (c-t-c) but I've found road and track frame combinations with horizontal top tubes that have worked well as large as 58cm and as small as 48cm.
#20
Senior Member
@OldsCOOL, In short, 56 cm to 60 cm. My ideal size is ~58 cm, depending on TT length.
I try to balance KOPS, leg extension, and TT length more so than ST length. Reach is adjusted with the stem and handle bar combination. The 60 cm bike is my distance bike and I switched to it from a 58 cm frame to make a better compromise fit between using drops and aero bars (It can be windy around here.).
I have to also mention my son's 64 cm French Fit Olmo. It's way out of range for his 6' height, but accommodates his muscular physique wonderfully. It was my first attempt at such a project, but with using one of the 58 cm bikes as a test bed came out perfect.
Brad
I try to balance KOPS, leg extension, and TT length more so than ST length. Reach is adjusted with the stem and handle bar combination. The 60 cm bike is my distance bike and I switched to it from a 58 cm frame to make a better compromise fit between using drops and aero bars (It can be windy around here.).
I have to also mention my son's 64 cm French Fit Olmo. It's way out of range for his 6' height, but accommodates his muscular physique wonderfully. It was my first attempt at such a project, but with using one of the 58 cm bikes as a test bed came out perfect.
Brad
#21
weapons-grade bolognium
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Across the street from Chicago
Posts: 6,344
Bikes: Battaglin Cromor, Ciocc Designer 84, Schwinn Superior 1981
Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 985 Post(s)
Liked 2,378 Times
in
891 Posts
57/58. Anything else requires too much futzing around.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: New York Metro Area
Posts: 3,861
Bikes: '02 Litespeed, '99 Bianchi Alfana. '91 Fuji Saratoga, '84 Peugeot Canyon Express, '82 Moto GR, '81 Fuji America, '81 Fuji Royale; '78 Bridgestone Diamond Touring, '76 Fuji America, plus many more!
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 178 Post(s)
Liked 223 Times
in
126 Posts
58cm to 62cm. I usually prefer a larger frame with a longer top tube. For loaded touring I'll take a 58cm frame.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Soviet of Oregon or Pensacola FL
Posts: 5,342
Bikes: Still have a few left!
Mentioned: 48 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 467 Post(s)
Liked 532 Times
in
267 Posts
Measured C to C, my favorite rides measure from 51 cm to 54cm, with top tube length from 53cm to 55 cm. All are quite comfortable after my compensating of saddle height/position and stem height/reach. I once checked to see if the bar to saddle to pedal center measurements were the same, but they vary by 1/2 to 3/4 inch. Interestingly, the longest top tube (55 cm) is on my 52 cm Bianchi and the Bottom Bracket to ground measurement varies by 1 1/2 centimeter from bike to bike.
For the Clunker Challenge, I am riding a 1966 Schwinn Super Sport which Schwinn calls a 24" frame. That would be around 61 cm, but they measure from crank center to top of the seat tube, which extends quite a bit above the top of TT. Center to TT Center, the bike measures 22 3/8" which is almost exactly 56 cm. I can stand with both feet on the ground and clear the top tube by about the thickness of my shorts. NTL, it is a comfortable ride now that I replaced the original vintage stem with a cheap, short reach SR stem.
In the past, I have ridden a 49 cm Eisentraut framed bike with the aid of a long seat post and North Road bars hung on a long stem. I traded that bike for my 84 Specialized Expedition Touring. I also had a 55 cm Zeus for a while, but eventually gave it to my 6' tall son when his 58 cm Super Le Tour was stolen. We had to add a tall seat post to make it work for him. My son will likely end up with both of the Super Sports I recently acquired. Don
For the Clunker Challenge, I am riding a 1966 Schwinn Super Sport which Schwinn calls a 24" frame. That would be around 61 cm, but they measure from crank center to top of the seat tube, which extends quite a bit above the top of TT. Center to TT Center, the bike measures 22 3/8" which is almost exactly 56 cm. I can stand with both feet on the ground and clear the top tube by about the thickness of my shorts. NTL, it is a comfortable ride now that I replaced the original vintage stem with a cheap, short reach SR stem.
In the past, I have ridden a 49 cm Eisentraut framed bike with the aid of a long seat post and North Road bars hung on a long stem. I traded that bike for my 84 Specialized Expedition Touring. I also had a 55 cm Zeus for a while, but eventually gave it to my 6' tall son when his 58 cm Super Le Tour was stolen. We had to add a tall seat post to make it work for him. My son will likely end up with both of the Super Sports I recently acquired. Don
#25
Hump, what hump?
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: SC midlands
Posts: 1,934
Bikes: See signature
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 337 Post(s)
Liked 227 Times
in
145 Posts
54-58cm range for me. The bike shops that have "fitted" me both recommended a 54cm frame. At this point my 55cm frames are most comfortable, and I don't have to worry about toe overlap that comes with the 54cm frames. At the larger end of the spectrum, I think geometry is more important for ride quality. For example I have owned both an Ironman and a Bianchi in 58cm. The Bianchi was very comfortable to ride. The Ironman, not so much.
__________________
2010 AB T1X ** 2010 Cannondale SIX-5 ** 1993 Cannondale RS900 ** 1988 Bottecchia Team Record ** 1989 Bianchi Brava ** 1988 Nishiki Olympic ** 1987 Centurion Ironman Expert(2) ** 1985 DeRosa Professional SLX ** 1982 Colnago Super ** 1982 Basso Gap ** 198? Ciocc Competition SL ** 19?? Roberts Audax ** 198? Brian Rourke ** 1982 Mercian Olympic ** 1970 Raleigh Professional MK I ** 1952 Raleigh Sports
2010 AB T1X ** 2010 Cannondale SIX-5 ** 1993 Cannondale RS900 ** 1988 Bottecchia Team Record ** 1989 Bianchi Brava ** 1988 Nishiki Olympic ** 1987 Centurion Ironman Expert(2) ** 1985 DeRosa Professional SLX ** 1982 Colnago Super ** 1982 Basso Gap ** 198? Ciocc Competition SL ** 19?? Roberts Audax ** 198? Brian Rourke ** 1982 Mercian Olympic ** 1970 Raleigh Professional MK I ** 1952 Raleigh Sports