Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

How Many Frame Sizes Do You Ride?

Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

How Many Frame Sizes Do You Ride?

Old 07-16-16, 07:07 PM
  #1  
OldsCOOL
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
OldsCOOL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: northern michigan
Posts: 12,416

Bikes: '77 Colnago Super, '76 Fuji The Finest, '88 Cannondale Criterium, '86 Trek 760, '87 Miyata 712

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 413 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
How Many Frame Sizes Do You Ride?

Most of us have different and varying sizes and types/purposes of bikes in their collection they regularly or occasionally ride. I'm wondering what your range of sizes is that you would casually or even thrash now and then.

For me, I have 3. The optimum, perfect frame is the Cdale Crit with 54cm and fits me better than any other 54 I have owned. Then comes the Trek 760 that is one size down at 52. The seat post is a bit more exposed but the racing/crit geo fits just fine. From what I understand it was a common practice among racers in the day. Lastly, the '77 Colnago is my tallest. At 57cm it isnt too tall for comfort and is easily manageable. I'm able to hop from one to the other and feel at home but only that perfect fit 54cm Cannondale goes out on the open road, though I would take any of them for the pure joy of it.

How about you?
OldsCOOL is offline  
Old 07-16-16, 07:11 PM
  #2  
qcpmsame 
Semper Fi
 
qcpmsame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Barrineau Park, Florida
Posts: 12,401

Bikes: '80 Medici Pro Strada, '86 Tommasini Prestige, '12 CAAD 10 Ultegra

Mentioned: 81 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 970 Post(s)
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
My Medici is a 57cm height, the CAAD 10 is a 56cm, no explanation as to why both work, but they both feel right to me.

Bill
__________________
I Didn't Choose To Have Parkinson's Disease, I Have Chosen Not To Allow It To Define How I Live
Life Member "Hairy Eared Engineer's Society"
"I Can Do All Things Through Christ, Whom Strengthens Me" Philippians 4:13
qcpmsame is offline  
Old 07-16-16, 07:22 PM
  #3  
Spaghetti Legs 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Central Virginia
Posts: 3,189

Bikes: Numerous

Mentioned: 63 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 789 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 9 Posts
When I think or talk of frame sizes I refer to top tube length. I tend to ride frames that most people would probably think too small for my height but it's what works for me. (6'2" with long trunk, short legs, short arms) My sweet spot is probably a 57, most of my bikes are 56. My smallest is my Eddy Merckx Pro with a 55 top tube but I think officially a 56 frame. My biggest is my Tommasini with a 57.5. I had a Bianchi 63 CT, 58.5 TT that should technically be my size but felt way too big, so I replaced with the same frame in a 57 TT and it is perfect.

Almost without fail, all my bikes, every ride, I think "this is a sweet bike".
Spaghetti Legs is offline  
Old 07-16-16, 07:26 PM
  #4  
3alarmer
******
 
3alarmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: The Big Tomato
Posts: 17,229

Bikes: old ones

Mentioned: 221 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14245 Post(s)
Liked 44 Times in 39 Posts
...depending on purpose (thus position on the bike), setup, and some fiddling, I regularly ride anything from about a 57-58 setup as an upright town bike to a 62 road bike I can just make the standover on. I think maybe I have one MTB that's even smaller.

I've never understood the fixation on frame size..
3alarmer is offline  
Old 07-16-16, 07:43 PM
  #5  
SkyDog75
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 3,818

Bikes: Bianchi San Mateo and a few others

Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 632 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
My usual comfort zone is the 53-55 cm range, but I've ridden a few bikes outside that range that could've been adjusted to fit without too much fuss. My current bikes all happen to be the same size:

53 cm 2006 Bianchi San Mateo / 53.5 cm effective top tube
53 cm 2011 Diamondback Steilacoom CCX / 54 cm effective top tube
21" 1986 Trek 300 Elance / 54.5 cm top tube
21" 1972 Peugeot UO-8 / roughly 55 cm top tube IIRC

I recently came across a 50 cm 1984 Miyata 1000 that was too nice a bike to pass up. It's a little short, so I've got a fair amount of seatpost and quill showing, but it has a 53.5 cm top tube just like my Bianchi. The Bianchi fits great, so I figure I'll give the Miyata a shot.
SkyDog75 is offline  
Old 07-16-16, 08:23 PM
  #6  
OldsCOOL
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
OldsCOOL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: northern michigan
Posts: 12,416

Bikes: '77 Colnago Super, '76 Fuji The Finest, '88 Cannondale Criterium, '86 Trek 760, '87 Miyata 712

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 413 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Originally Posted by 3alarmer View Post
...depending on purpose (thus position on the bike), setup, and some fiddling, I regularly ride anything from about a 57-58 setup as an upright town bike to a 62 road bike I can just make the standover on. I think maybe I have one MTB that's even smaller.

I've never understood the fixation on frame size..
Oh man, I dont even want to mention the super small 2002 Trek 820st with seatpost above safe range. Or the other MTB, a 58cm Univega Alpina Uno. But those are just fun-bikes.
OldsCOOL is offline  
Old 07-16-16, 08:42 PM
  #7  
79pmooney
A Roadie Forever
 
79pmooney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 6,809

Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder

Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1597 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 37 Times in 30 Posts
I look at: where does the BB sit relative to the wheels, ie how is my weight balance? What do I have to do to [place the seat and handlebars where I want them? Can I do it with off the shelf and reasonably inexpensive parts? Am I willing to spend more/go custom on those parts?

Notice that frame size never enters directly into any of these questions. My preference is 58-59 with steepish angles and long top tubes but my commuters (horizontally dropped early to mid '80s bikes have twice been 25" frames. I don't get to pick when I have to shop for the next one. They die violent deaths. I also have now a considerably smaller Raleigh Competition that with a 140 stem I happened to have and a 60 mm setback seatpost I happened to find for $15 is a sweet fit. 21 1/2"? I measure up the frame to be, enter it into a drafting program with all the rest (to see what seatpost and stem will be needed) and call out the dimensions, but make zero attempt to remember them.

So right now, roughly, I have (2) 59s and a 58 (all custom), a probably 58 commuter and a 55? (the Raleigh).

Ben
79pmooney is offline  
Old 07-16-16, 08:46 PM
  #8  
ddeand 
Senior Member
 
ddeand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Twin Cities
Posts: 680
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 115 Post(s)
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
2015 Cannondale CAADX = 56cm
1985 Gazelle AB frame = 60cm
2015 Cannondale Trail SL 1 29er = large

Measurements indicate a 58cm frame would be best for me fir a typical road bike.
__________________
Some days, it's not even worth gnawing through the restraints.
ddeand is offline  
Old 07-16-16, 08:54 PM
  #9  
nlerner
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 12,066
Mentioned: 240 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1079 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times in 10 Posts
The key measurement for me is 73cm from the center of the crank to the top of the saddle. I can achieve that on frames ranging from 56-61cm seat tubes.
nlerner is offline  
Old 07-16-16, 08:55 PM
  #10  
plonz 
Senior Member
 
plonz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Northampton, MA
Posts: 1,900
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 374 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
My bikes range from 57cm-62cm. 60cm seems to be the best size for me but for some reason I prefer 58s with longer seat posts and stems.
plonz is offline  
Old 07-16-16, 09:01 PM
  #11  
iab
Senior Member
 
iab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NW Burbs, Chicago
Posts: 9,630
Mentioned: 95 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1322 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 41 Times in 27 Posts
Seat tube 55-58cm ctc.

Top tube + stem 68-69cm ctc.
iab is offline  
Old 07-16-16, 09:06 PM
  #12  
John E
feros ferio
 
John E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
Posts: 19,364

Bikes: 1959 & 1960 Capo; 1982 Bianchi; 1988 Schwinn KOM-10;

Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 687 Post(s)
Liked 11 Times in 11 Posts
In a traditional road frame, 55cm C-T is my size. (Bianchi and both Capos.) I get a full, non-stretched leg extension with my heels on the pedals, I can just touch the handlebar with my elbow against the nose of the saddle, and I am just about at knee-over-pedal-spindle. Works for me.

The UO-8 is 53.5cm C-T, but with a disproportionately long top tube, so that also works.
__________________
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324
Capo: 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
John E is offline  
Old 07-16-16, 09:06 PM
  #13  
Dave Cutter
Senior Member
 
Dave Cutter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: D'uh... I am a Cutter
Posts: 6,195

Bikes: '17 Access Old Turnpike Gravel bike, '14 Trek 1.1, '13 Cannondale CAAD 10, '98 CAD 2, R300

Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1569 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
I have an old '88 Trek 360... that I believe it may be a 55cm, and I have a Fuji that I think is a 57cm. I have (another) Trek that is a 56cm as well as a 56cm Cannondale. All the bikes vary a little bit in top tube and seat tube measurements.

But once adjusted (including a shorter stem on the Fuji) they all measure pretty much the same when I put a tape measure to them. And they all feel really comfy. But they all ride differently as well.

Last edited by Dave Cutter; 07-16-16 at 09:11 PM.
Dave Cutter is offline  
Old 07-16-16, 09:13 PM
  #14  
DMC707
Senior Member
 
DMC707's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 3,388

Bikes: Too many to list

Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 694 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
5'8 (but my internet dating profile says i'm 5'9 -- wink) -- I ride 53 or 54 --- and can adequately stretch it to a 55 at the most if the ancillary bits are sized right (crank length, stem, bars etc)
DMC707 is offline  
Old 07-16-16, 09:21 PM
  #15  
gear64
Senior Member
 
gear64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: STL Missouri
Posts: 305

Bikes: Miyata 912, Miyata 1000, Lotus Classique, Terranaut Metro, Trek Alpha 4900

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 33 Post(s)
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
I've been thinking lately about all the threads on fit, and I that regularly switch back and forth between a 52 and 56. Additionally, the 56 has a much longer stem. Both are perfectly comfortable. Really it's just a matter of being more upright, or not so upright. I have a couple others I don't ride nearly as often. Not sure what they are exactly, but reasonably sure within the range of the first two. I have another that's still project stage, a 54. Maybe I'll find that's a sweet spot.
gear64 is offline  
Old 07-16-16, 10:11 PM
  #16  
Loose Chain
Senior Member
 
Loose Chain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 1,934

Bikes: 84 Pinarello Trevisio, 86 Guerciotti SLX, 96 Specialized Stumpjumper, 2010 Surly Cross Check, 88 Centurion Prestige, 73 Raleigh Sports, GT Force, Bridgestone MB4

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 215 Post(s)
Liked 16 Times in 13 Posts
All of my road type bicycles seem to have a 22 inch top tube. The seat tube can vary between 54 and 56cm. For MTBs I seem to wind up on bikes in the 17 to 18 inch seat tube range.
Loose Chain is offline  
Old 07-16-16, 10:41 PM
  #17  
Steve Whitlatch 
Senior Member
 
Steve Whitlatch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 3,621
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 513 Post(s)
Liked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Miyata 912 - 62 seat tube, 58 top tube and a 90mm stem (deep drops)
Witcomb - 60 seat tube, 58 top tube and a 110 stem
Schwinn Fastback Pro - 56 seat tube, 56 top tube and a 120 stem (lots of seat post showing)

All fit well and feel great. Strava says I am equally slow on all of them.
__________________
My bikes: 1970`s Roberts - 1981 Miyata 912 - 1980`s Ocshner (Chrome) - 1987 Schwinn Circuit - 1987 Schwinn Prologue - 1992 Schwinn Crosspoint - 1999 Schwinn Circuit - 2014 Cannondale Super Six EVO

Last edited by Steve Whitlatch; 07-16-16 at 10:49 PM.
Steve Whitlatch is offline  
Old 07-17-16, 05:21 AM
  #18  
Prowler 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Near Pottstown, PA: 30 NW of Philadelphia
Posts: 1,276

Bikes: 2 Trek Mtn, Cannondale R600 road, 6 vintage road bikes

Mentioned: 50 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 147 Post(s)
Liked 11 Times in 6 Posts
The key measurement for me is from the top of the pedal spindle to the sit bone location. I don't actually know what that is but I made a 'gauge' that has that and I use it on all my bikes so it's set the same. ST and crank arm lengths vary, even saddle heights vary (though most of them are Vetta TriShock) so this gauge (story stick) gives me a quick check. My best fits are 57/58cm but I ride a 61, a well slammed 62cm Moto and the well stretched Trek Mtn bikes.

My story stick also has a mark for sit bone to back-of-the-brake-hoods which helps determine needed stem length and seat set-back. Between these two measurements my basic triangle of contact points is about the same on all 8 bikes. Works for me.

Last edited by Prowler; 07-17-16 at 05:24 AM.
Prowler is offline  
Old 07-17-16, 06:05 AM
  #19  
T-Mar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 17,734
Mentioned: 427 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2445 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 45 Times in 42 Posts
For me, size is dictated by the combination of seat tube angle and top tube length. I'm typically in my zone with a 56 cm (c-t-c) but I've found road and track frame combinations with horizontal top tubes that have worked well as large as 58cm and as small as 48cm.
T-Mar is offline  
Old 07-17-16, 06:27 AM
  #20  
bradtx
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Pearland, Texas
Posts: 7,580

Bikes: Cannondale, Trek, Raleigh, Santana

Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 304 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
@OldsCOOL, In short, 56 cm to 60 cm. My ideal size is ~58 cm, depending on TT length.

I try to balance KOPS, leg extension, and TT length more so than ST length. Reach is adjusted with the stem and handle bar combination. The 60 cm bike is my distance bike and I switched to it from a 58 cm frame to make a better compromise fit between using drops and aero bars (It can be windy around here.).

I have to also mention my son's 64 cm French Fit Olmo. It's way out of range for his 6' height, but accommodates his muscular physique wonderfully. It was my first attempt at such a project, but with using one of the 58 cm bikes as a test bed came out perfect.

Brad
bradtx is offline  
Old 07-17-16, 08:11 AM
  #21  
thinktubes 
Fast+Bulbous
 
thinktubes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Across the street from Chicago
Posts: 4,447

Bikes: Battaglin Cromor, Ciocc Designer 84, Schwinn Superior 1981

Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 311 Post(s)
Liked 10 Times in 5 Posts
57/58. Anything else requires too much futzing around.
thinktubes is offline  
Old 07-17-16, 08:19 AM
  #22  
cycleheimer
Senior Member
 
cycleheimer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: New York Metro Area
Posts: 3,982

Bikes: '14 Insight 2, '95 Trek 720 Multi-Track, '94 Cannondale M600; '92 Raleigh Dash Max; '86 Panasonic DX 5000, '81 Fuji S12S, '81 Fuji Royale; '78 Bridgestone Diamond Touring, '78 Motobecane Grand Touring, plus many more!

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 114 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
58cm to 62cm. I usually prefer a larger frame with a longer top tube. For loaded touring I'll take a 58cm frame.
cycleheimer is offline  
Old 07-17-16, 08:29 AM
  #23  
fietsbob 
coprolite
 
fietsbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Posts: 41,572

Bikes: 8

Mentioned: 183 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6744 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 158 Times in 134 Posts
My Brompton Only comes in One size.

Though the Mk4 is longer than the Mk2.
fietsbob is offline  
Old 07-17-16, 08:53 AM
  #24  
ollo_ollo
Senior Member
 
ollo_ollo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Near Sublimity Orygun
Posts: 4,781

Bikes: Still have a few left!

Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 305 Post(s)
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Measured C to C, my favorite rides measure from 51 cm to 54cm, with top tube length from 53cm to 55 cm. All are quite comfortable after my compensating of saddle height/position and stem height/reach. I once checked to see if the bar to saddle to pedal center measurements were the same, but they vary by 1/2 to 3/4 inch. Interestingly, the longest top tube (55 cm) is on my 52 cm Bianchi and the Bottom Bracket to ground measurement varies by 1 1/2 centimeter from bike to bike.

For the Clunker Challenge, I am riding a 1966 Schwinn Super Sport which Schwinn calls a 24" frame. That would be around 61 cm, but they measure from crank center to top of the seat tube, which extends quite a bit above the top of TT. Center to TT Center, the bike measures 22 3/8" which is almost exactly 56 cm. I can stand with both feet on the ground and clear the top tube by about the thickness of my shorts. NTL, it is a comfortable ride now that I replaced the original vintage stem with a cheap, short reach SR stem.

In the past, I have ridden a 49 cm Eisentraut framed bike with the aid of a long seat post and North Road bars hung on a long stem. I traded that bike for my 84 Specialized Expedition Touring. I also had a 55 cm Zeus for a while, but eventually gave it to my 6' tall son when his 58 cm Super Le Tour was stolen. We had to add a tall seat post to make it work for him. My son will likely end up with both of the Super Sports I recently acquired. Don
ollo_ollo is offline  
Old 07-17-16, 10:26 AM
  #25  
horatio 
Hump, what hump?
 
horatio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: SC midlands
Posts: 1,387

Bikes: See signature

Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 161 Post(s)
Liked 14 Times in 11 Posts
54-58cm range for me. The bike shops that have "fitted" me both recommended a 54cm frame. At this point my 55cm frames are most comfortable, and I don't have to worry about toe overlap that comes with the 54cm frames. At the larger end of the spectrum, I think geometry is more important for ride quality. For example I have owned both an Ironman and a Bianchi in 58cm. The Bianchi was very comfortable to ride. The Ironman, not so much.
__________________
2010 AB T1X ** 2010 Cannondale SIX-5 ** 1993 Cannondale RS900 ** 1989 Bianchi Brava ** 1988 Nishiki Olympic ** 1987 Centurion Ironman Expert(2) ** 1985 DeRosa Professional SLX ** 1982 Basso Gap ** 198? Ciocc Designer '84 ** 198? Ciocc Competition SL ** 19?? Roberts Audax ** 198? Brian Rourke ** 1982 Mercian Olympic ** 1970 Raleigh Professional MK I ** 1952 Raleigh Sports
horatio is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.