Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  

Go Back   > >

Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

User Tag List

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-07-17, 01:53 PM   #1
Thread Starter
Begemot50's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Los Angeles
Bikes: 2011 Cannondale Caad10; 1985 Raleigh Alyeska
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
A Tale of Two Springs; or Unconditional Love (pt. I)

A Tale of Two Springs; or Unconditional Love

This is a thread for all to tell the stories of the furthest length you have gone to keep a bike in the family, to avoid "n+1" as a solution. Mine takes place over a couple years, so I'll attempt some brevity.

I dig bike touring. There's just nothing like to loading the bike with 60 pounds of gear and tackling unfamiliar roads with a only a map and your wits… and a good 20 pounds of that gear is crap you'll never use but are too afraid to leave without.

I dig it so much, that I set out to procure a dedicated touring rig. Strapped for cash, however, I quickly found that purchasing a contemporary touring bike was out of the question. As has been my M.O. in the past, I went vintage. Over the next several lunar cycles I procured the necessary equipment from old builds I wasn't actively riding ( (n-1)+1=? ), and from craigslist.

The piece de resistance was a paint-intact, undented, undamaged, in-my-size, some-parts-still-attached Raleigh Alyeska frame from 1985. (For those of you familiar with trying to semi-update classic frames, you know just how precious "some-parts-still-attached" can be…)

The problem? I had a set of 700c wheels I wanted to use, but the Alyeska had been built for 27x1.25 wheels. That, I thought, shouldn't be too much of a problem: the difference between 700c and 27x1.25 is only 8mm, and there should be plenty of room to adjust the cantilever brakes to fit, right? Wrong.

The '85 Alyeska shipped with Dia Compe 960 Cantilever Brakes which, in that year/model, only featured radial adjustment of the brake shoes, not vertical adjustment. In spite of this, I managed to make the square peg fit the round hole with hours of fiddling, elbow grease, and countless expletives hurled at the Deity.

Dia Compe 960

The brakes worked (in the sense that, you know, they stopped the bike) but I was only able to accomplish this by trimming and cutting the rubber to artificially flatten the contact surface of the pad with the rim. Otherwise, only the corner of the brake pad would have made contact with the rim, providing significantly less stopping power−though it would have, in time, naturally worn itself into having more and more surface area.

Nevertheless, my nip-tuck was successful and Olga the Alyeska carried me and my gear safely on countless centuries, as well as to Bar Harbor and back (I was working in rural Maine at the time).

En Route to Bar Harbor

But I wasn't satisfied and saved some money for a brand-spanking-new set of cantis. And I did so for three VERY good reasons:

#1: Eventually all brake pads wear away into nothingness, just as mountains return to the sea. This was going to happen even more rapidly due to how much trimming was necessary.
#2: As my C&V pals know, finding replacement parts is always a pain in the a$$, and shoes/pads seem to be particularly scarce due to their nature as consumables.
#3: A healthy dose of vanity.

I ordered the Gran Cru Zeste in chrome. As the package with my bicycle salvation was on its way I had sweet, melodious dreams of the vertically adjustable shoes, of how I could even change the angle of the pad! Not with a knife, but with a wrench!

They arrived, and I set to work… You guessed it. There was another problem.

The Alyeska has the spring block for its cantis mounted on the outside of the seat-stay. This means that the two ends of the spring (where it attaches to the frame, and where it attached to the cantilever) were at a 90-degree angle to one another.

Old Spring

While the contemporary spring (for the Gran Crus) had a spring with 180-degree attachment points, having been designed for mounts on the inside of the seat-stays.

New Spring

This resulted in an inability to attach the brakes to the cantilever bosses, because one would either tighten the spring beyond a useful tension, or bend the spring in the direction opposite the coil. Neither of which are feasible options.

Not to be outdone, however, I decided I would simply have to use the springs from the Dia Compe 960's. The only other option being to take the frame to a builder, have them remove the old canti bosses and replace (to the tune of $125). I opted for another option…

The new springs have a little zig-zag number on them to reach in and attach to the interior of the cantilever arm.
The old springs have a long loop which wrapped around a fixture on the old 960's.
The loop would not fit within the new cantilever arms (no surprise there), but I have a few good tools: wire cutters, a couple pair of pliers, a hot stove, and a metric ton of stubbornness.

I cut the loop at the top to give myself the amount of wire I would need to make the shape

Two Springs

Then applied heat to the extended part of the coil until it was hot enough to be plied into whatever shape I desired. While they're not beautiful, machine-crimped right angles like on the new springs, I am happy to report that they do fit inside the canti arms, and they do their job just fine.

So take that, Murphy. I defy you, and you law. I laugh in the face of both of them… until the next problem arises.

Hope you enjoyed reading.
Begemot50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-17, 02:06 PM   #2
Senior Member
markk900's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ontario
Posts: 1,568
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 55 Post(s)
Fun read so would be nice too though.

I have been where you describe - just one tweak to get something done leads to hours/days/months of ever more crazy attempts to fix things.....
markk900 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-17, 04:12 PM   #3
Señor Member
USAZorro's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Florence, KY
Bikes: Mostly English - predominantly Raleighs
Posts: 15,284
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 383 Post(s)
Wish you had come around near the beginning of your adventure. It might not have made for the same story of perseverance, but I can't tell you the number of times I've read about some obstacle that had been perplexing a member for day/weeks/months - and then within a couple hours, someone here had the solution.

At any rate, I'm glad you got your Alyeska up and going, and I'm looking forward to pictures also.
In search of what to search for.
USAZorro is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:58 PM.

  • Ask a Question
    get answers from real people!
Click to start entering your question.