Confused by tiny bars
#1
WGB
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Niagara Region
Posts: 2,913
Bikes: Panasonic PT-4500
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1794 Post(s)
Liked 2,328 Times
in
1,375 Posts
Confused by tiny bars
I picked up a junked 1980's Supercycle with really small bars.
I mean really, really narrow width bars (see photos). They are 38cm and I normally have 40 or 42cm bars.
The frame is a 24.5 or 25 inch frame depending on how it's measured so it was meant for a larger person. I get that smaller bars might fit for a race situation on a track but in the real world do they work safely on streets? I'd think that they would mean a more twitchy ride.
Should I switch them for safety or ride with them and see how they work?
I mean reakll
I mean really, really narrow width bars (see photos). They are 38cm and I normally have 40 or 42cm bars.
The frame is a 24.5 or 25 inch frame depending on how it's measured so it was meant for a larger person. I get that smaller bars might fit for a race situation on a track but in the real world do they work safely on streets? I'd think that they would mean a more twitchy ride.
Should I switch them for safety or ride with them and see how they work?
I mean reakll
#2
Bad example
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Seattle and Reims
Posts: 3,042
Bikes: Peugeot: AO-8 1973, PA-10 1971, PR-10 1973, Sante 1988; Masi Gran Criterium 1975, Stevenson Tourer 1980, Stevenson Criterium 1981, Schwinn Paramount 1972, Rodriguez 2006, Gitane Federal ~1975, Holdsworth Pro, Follis 172 ~1973, Bianchi '62
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 816 Post(s)
Liked 175 Times
in
83 Posts
I can’t stand the narrow bars either. Switch ‘em.
__________________
Keeping Seattle’s bike shops in business since 1978
Keeping Seattle’s bike shops in business since 1978
#3
cowboy, steel horse, etc
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The hot spot.
Posts: 44,784
Bikes: everywhere
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12736 Post(s)
Liked 7,647 Times
in
4,055 Posts
They look like track bars, and some crit bars were like that.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,223
Mentioned: 654 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4722 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3,036 Times
in
1,874 Posts
The philosophy on drop width has trended towards wider bars over the years. When I started out, 38-40cm was the most common and you were hard pressed to find anything over 42cm. Also, it was common practice to spec one common bar and stem size for all sizes of frames. This mass volume purchasing philosophy to pinch a few extra pennies was especially important on entry level models for private label brands like Supercycle. Finally, when we're talking low end product like steel bars, it was common for the manufacturers to use the same philosophy and offer only one size. Since many of these bars were sourced from Asia where the tooling had been established based on the smaller Asian physique, it was common for these bars to be 38-39cm.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Bay Area, Calif.
Posts: 7,239
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 659 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
I don't see it as a safety issue since I can steer just as well with my hands in close to the stem as farther out. I'd give them a try and see how you personally either like or dislike them after riding with them for a bit.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Fairplay Co
Posts: 9,512
Bikes: Current 79 Nishiki Custum Sport, Jeunet 620, notable previous bikes P.K. Ripper loop tail, Kawahara Laser Lite, Paramount Track full chrome, Raliegh Internatioanl, Motobecan Super Mirage. 59 Crown royak 3 speed
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 789 Post(s)
Liked 1,739 Times
in
630 Posts
I don't like this style of bars and brake levers that came on most 70's and early 80's Japanese bikes you have a fairly narrow set of old style bars wider on the drops with fairly narrow top and safety levers. They are really intended to be road in drop position almost exclusively yet the safety levers don't brake good from the full drop position. I would say change them and the levers if you want to ride the tops or corners some. If your fine riding mostly the drop position I would suggest you change the levers to some nice classic drop levers with no safety turkey levers.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Point Reyes Station, California
Posts: 4,526
Bikes: Indeed!
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1506 Post(s)
Liked 3,462 Times
in
1,130 Posts
What have you got to lose? Take 'em for a ride and decide for yourself. Wear some gloves and you don't even have to wrap them first. You'll get an education in the process.
Brent
Brent
#8
Forum Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Kalamazoo MI
Posts: 20,630
Bikes: Fuji SL2.1 Carbon Di2 Cannondale Synapse Alloy 4 Trek Checkpoint ALR-5 Viscount Aerospace Pro Colnago Classic Rabobank Schwinn Waterford PMount Raleigh C50 Cromoly Hybrid Legnano Tipo Roma Pista
Mentioned: 58 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3085 Post(s)
Liked 6,566 Times
in
3,764 Posts
Thread moved from Appraisals to regular C&V.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NW Burbs, Chicago
Posts: 12,047
Mentioned: 201 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3011 Post(s)
Liked 3,786 Times
in
1,405 Posts
Yes. They work fine on the "streets".
No. They are not twitchy.
No. They are not twitchy.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Visalia, CA
Posts: 2,249
Mentioned: 45 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 981 Post(s)
Liked 1,844 Times
in
609 Posts
I'm 6'1" and regularly try to find narrow bars for my bikes. I prefer to be tight over the cockpit rather than having my arms spread out while I'm on the drops or over the hoods. I've never considered them unsafe or twitchy - the latter should only be affected by how far forward your controls are over the steer tube (i.e. stem length).
-Gregory
-Gregory
#11
Me duelen las nalgas
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 13,513
Bikes: Centurion Ironman, Trek 5900, Univega Via Carisma, Globe Carmel
Mentioned: 199 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4559 Post(s)
Liked 2,802 Times
in
1,800 Posts
One theory is that if the narrow drops don't suit your body, you'll find yourself flapping your elbows outward to compensate.
But that seems to depend on overall fit, not just the bar width. When my Ironman (original drops, 40 or 42 wide, depending on where you measure) had the original longer stem I tended to bow my elbows outward on longer rides as I got tired. After switching to a shorter stem that suited me better I was able to maintain a natural aero tuck more comfortably longer.
The narrowest bars I've seen recently are flat bars, no arc at all, 30-32 wide, on some pawn shop specials. Looks more cosmetic than functional, aping the trendy messenger bikes without actually being the sort of bike a messenger would actually want to ride. I'd bet the original owners got tired of that pretty quickly. Our streets aren't narrow enough or traffic crowded enough to give narrow bars any advantage.
But that seems to depend on overall fit, not just the bar width. When my Ironman (original drops, 40 or 42 wide, depending on where you measure) had the original longer stem I tended to bow my elbows outward on longer rides as I got tired. After switching to a shorter stem that suited me better I was able to maintain a natural aero tuck more comfortably longer.
The narrowest bars I've seen recently are flat bars, no arc at all, 30-32 wide, on some pawn shop specials. Looks more cosmetic than functional, aping the trendy messenger bikes without actually being the sort of bike a messenger would actually want to ride. I'd bet the original owners got tired of that pretty quickly. Our streets aren't narrow enough or traffic crowded enough to give narrow bars any advantage.
#12
WGB
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Niagara Region
Posts: 2,913
Bikes: Panasonic PT-4500
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1794 Post(s)
Liked 2,328 Times
in
1,375 Posts
Thank you all!
I shall test them and see what we will see. If they don't fit well, the world is full of spares. Just never ridden anything with bars that narrow but then Thursday was the first time I ever wore cleats and now two days later i am married to them!!! The world is full of opportunities.
I shall test them and see what we will see. If they don't fit well, the world is full of spares. Just never ridden anything with bars that narrow but then Thursday was the first time I ever wore cleats and now two days later i am married to them!!! The world is full of opportunities.
#13
Not racing.
I would try 'em. Don't wrap them and leave the cables a little long. Ride them around a bit. If you like them, trim the cables and wrap. If not, no harm done.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,063
Mentioned: 63 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1216 Post(s)
Liked 183 Times
in
116 Posts
What's the trail on that bike?
Bar width can correlate to trail but I'm not entirely convinced it makes a huge amount of difference, mostly preference for road riding I suspect.
Bar width can correlate to trail but I'm not entirely convinced it makes a huge amount of difference, mostly preference for road riding I suspect.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Near Pottstown, PA: 30 miles NW of Philadelphia
Posts: 2,185
Bikes: 2 Trek Mtn, Cannondale R600 road, 6 vintage road bikes
Mentioned: 83 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 472 Post(s)
Liked 1,028 Times
in
404 Posts
I'm 6'1" and regularly try to find narrow bars for my bikes. I prefer to be tight over the cockpit rather than having my arms spread out while I'm on the drops or over the hoods. I've never considered them unsafe or twitchy - the latter should only be affected by how far forward your controls are over the steer tube (i.e. stem length).
#16
What??? Only 2 wheels?
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Boston-ish, MA
Posts: 13,434
Bikes: 72 Peugeot UO-8, 82 Peugeot TH8, 87 Bianchi Brava, 76? Masi Grand Criterium, 74 Motobecane Champion Team, 86 & 77 Gazelle champion mondial, 81? Grandis, 82? Tommasini, 83 Peugeot PF10
Mentioned: 189 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1222 Post(s)
Liked 645 Times
in
232 Posts
I don't think I would like that style but the overall width would be fine. I have 38's on some bikes. They feel narrow if I've been riding one of the others but it doesn't take long to get use to them.
__________________
Real cyclists use toe clips.
With great bikes comes great responsibility.
jimmuller
Real cyclists use toe clips.
With great bikes comes great responsibility.
jimmuller
#17
Senior Member
Narrow bars. Yes 38cm bars were the norm for quite some time. I often say that back in the day... we were just a bunch of skinny kids who liked to ride bikes. 38cm seemed normal and thats what was available. It wasnt until 1984, when I was working at a bike shop, I ordered some Cinelli 40cm bars. Wow were those wide bars! Up thru the 70's you took what you could get. And 38cm was a good fit for most people.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 54
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
My ‘86 Fuji came with the bars that size. In fact, that bike looks nearly identical to yours except for the fork and group set. Even the color is the same. Anyway, the bars perform as safely as any other including fast descents and general gravel rides.
While the size may not be preferred, I don’t have reason to believe they are inherently less stable on the road. I typically ride large sized frames for reference.
While the size may not be preferred, I don’t have reason to believe they are inherently less stable on the road. I typically ride large sized frames for reference.
#19
Extraordinary Magnitude
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 13,642
Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT
Mentioned: 84 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2607 Post(s)
Liked 1,694 Times
in
933 Posts
Most of the reason I prefer wider bars- I use Suntour Command Shifters- they mount inboard of the brake levers. With bars narrower than 40-41 at the hoods it's difficult to get the shifters to work with a handlebar bag.
I think most everything I'd ridden was 38-40 prior to ordering a set of 44 Nitto B177s. Since then, I've found that size to be most comfortable for me and works best for the Command Shifters.
IMG_2402 by Dave The Golden Boy, on Flickr
BTW- a lot of "normal" sized bars give me trouble with the bag and the shifters- even the widest B132 or the widest Compass bars are too narrow at the hoods for the shifters and bag. I'm using narrower bars on bikes that I don't use a front bag on and/or have bar ends (and the one DT shifter bike).
I think most everything I'd ridden was 38-40 prior to ordering a set of 44 Nitto B177s. Since then, I've found that size to be most comfortable for me and works best for the Command Shifters.
IMG_2402 by Dave The Golden Boy, on Flickr
BTW- a lot of "normal" sized bars give me trouble with the bag and the shifters- even the widest B132 or the widest Compass bars are too narrow at the hoods for the shifters and bag. I'm using narrower bars on bikes that I don't use a front bag on and/or have bar ends (and the one DT shifter bike).
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
Last edited by The Golden Boy; 05-27-18 at 08:06 AM.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Seattle WA
Posts: 2,841
Bikes: 2009 Handsome Devil, 1987 Trek 520 Cirrus, 1978 Motobecane Grand Touring, 1987 Nishiki Cresta GT, 1989 Specialized Allez Former bikes; 1986 Miyata Trail Runner, 1979 Miyata 912, 2011 VO Rando, 1999 Cannondale R800, 1986 Schwinn Passage
Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 796 Post(s)
Liked 522 Times
in
367 Posts
#21
Ride, Wrench, Swap, Race
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Northern California
Posts: 9,181
Bikes: Cheltenham-Pedersen racer, Boulder F/S Paris-Roubaix, Varsity racer, '52 Christophe, '62 Continental, '92 Merckx, '75 Limongi, '76 Presto, '72 Gitane SC, '71 Schwinn SS, etc.
Mentioned: 132 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1562 Post(s)
Liked 1,286 Times
in
857 Posts
Not just the Japanese bikes, but French bikes and many others came with narrow bars.
I have an old Gitane Super Corsa in 60cm size with original Pivo Professional stem and bars that measure 8cm and 34cm (not a typo, and no, they aren't crash-damaged) respectively.
The bike rides fine with the original narrow bars, feels a little odd at first but still fine for spirited riding in the foothills.
The old stems often weren't made to resist much torque, so in lieu of any twisting (using the length of the bars as a lever), one just applies lateral force at the bars to counteract out-of-saddle pedaling forces so the lever becomes the vertical distance between the bottom bracket and the handlebar grip area in use. It's force times distance either way.
I have an old Gitane Super Corsa in 60cm size with original Pivo Professional stem and bars that measure 8cm and 34cm (not a typo, and no, they aren't crash-damaged) respectively.
The bike rides fine with the original narrow bars, feels a little odd at first but still fine for spirited riding in the foothills.
The old stems often weren't made to resist much torque, so in lieu of any twisting (using the length of the bars as a lever), one just applies lateral force at the bars to counteract out-of-saddle pedaling forces so the lever becomes the vertical distance between the bottom bracket and the handlebar grip area in use. It's force times distance either way.
#22
Veteran, Pacifist
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 13,327
Bikes: Bikes??? Thought this was social media?!?
Mentioned: 284 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3897 Post(s)
Liked 4,828 Times
in
2,228 Posts
6'1" and prefer 38s, but that's what I started on 38 or so years ago. Reasonable bike size range is 58cm up to 62cm.
Ride what's comfortable, but don't believe that you can't breathe adequately if the bars are narrower than your 'stand tall/military' shoulder width.
The primary reason handlebars got wider is to support all the electronic stuff 'needed' on a bicycle ride in the modern world.
edit: I do have wider bars on the tandem.
Ride what's comfortable, but don't believe that you can't breathe adequately if the bars are narrower than your 'stand tall/military' shoulder width.
The primary reason handlebars got wider is to support all the electronic stuff 'needed' on a bicycle ride in the modern world.
edit: I do have wider bars on the tandem.
__________________
Vintage, modern, e-road. It is a big cycling universe.
Vintage, modern, e-road. It is a big cycling universe.
Last edited by Wildwood; 05-27-18 at 03:26 PM.
#23
feros ferio
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
Posts: 21,793
Bikes: 1959 Capo Modell Campagnolo; 1960 Capo Sieger (2); 1962 Carlton Franco Suisse; 1970 Peugeot UO-8; 1982 Bianchi Campione d'Italia; 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10;
Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1390 Post(s)
Liked 1,322 Times
in
835 Posts
Interesting thread. I have noticed variations in bar width over the years, but have not given the matter a great deal of thought.
1960 Capo Sieger -- deep-curve, narrow (35cm!), track-like bars with Ambrosio adjustable-reach stem.
1959 Capo Modell Campagnolo came with 36mm bars, which I subsequently replaced with 39s.
1982 Bianchi -- 39cm
__________________
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
#24
Pennylane Splitter
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 1,878
Bikes: Yes
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1784 Post(s)
Liked 1,437 Times
in
987 Posts
38mm bars were also standard on the 1960s-early 1970s Schwinn Varsity and continental bicycles. I prefer a 44cm bar for general riding, but use a 46cm bar on a light touring bike that has only front panniers - the extra 2cm may seem inconsequential, but it seems to give me better control of the front end with the panniers on it.
#25
~>~
Basic boom era 10 speeds like that were ridden around the block a few times and put away in the garage or basement for the past few decades, the width of the bars or the material they were made of were as relevant as the color of the bar tape to their "performance": Not at all.
-Bandera
-Bandera