Classic and Vintage bikes that didn’t wow
#26
Senior Member
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: MidWest USA
Posts: 90
Bikes: Colnago Super, Giant, Waterford X11, Look 785 Huez, Merlin Titanium, in past times...Gitane Super Corsa, Ron Stout, Ciocc San Cristabal, Ciocc CX, Colnago Master, Pogliaghi TT, Crescent
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times
in
4 Posts
A first generation Colnago Master. I ride a 53cm and the bike was too stiff. I still ride a 74 Colnago Super and it's one of my favs, but that Master, after about 30 miles was miserable to be on.
#28
bocobiking
#29
aka Tom Reingold
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, USA
Posts: 40,234
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Mentioned: 498 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7046 Post(s)
Liked 1,880 Times
in
1,137 Posts
Like @oddjob2, I also had a Team Fuji that left me feeling cold. It was competent, but it didn't put a smile on my face. I sold it quickly.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
#30
Full Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Parker, Colorado
Posts: 450
Bikes: 1974 Behringer Custom, 1975 Schwinn Paramount, 1975 Windsor Profesional, 1976 Gios Super Record, 1985 Schwinn Paramount, 1985 Trek 770, 2000 Tommasini Sintesi, 2001 Colnago C40, 2019 Canyon Grail AL 7.0
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 113 Post(s)
Liked 112 Times
in
39 Posts
While I loved the aesthetic of my Waterford built '86 Paramount, it lacked the pop I am accustomed to experiencing with my other lightweights. My '74 Paramount is/was a lot more fun to ride than the '86 and floats in comparison to the heavy feeling ride of the '86


#31
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,071
Mentioned: 67 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2842 Post(s)
Liked 2,004 Times
in
1,253 Posts
I'm guessing these bikes mentioned in this threads are dogs. They didn't wow. Instead, they bow wow like a dog. 
I used to work with this girl a long time ago. She would say something she thought was funny. Then she would laugh and say, "sometimes I crack myself up!"

I used to work with this girl a long time ago. She would say something she thought was funny. Then she would laugh and say, "sometimes I crack myself up!"
Last edited by seypat; 10-17-18 at 10:02 AM.
#32
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Fredericksburg, Va
Posts: 9,135
Bikes: '73 Bottecchia Giro d'Italia, '83 Colnago Superissimo, '84 Trek 610, '84 Trek 760, '88 Pinarello Veneto, '88 De Rosa Pro, '89 Pinarello Montello, '94 Burley Duet, 97 Specialized RockHopper, 2010 Langster, Tern Link D8
Mentioned: 67 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1439 Post(s)
Liked 1,780 Times
in
902 Posts
Bought a Peugeot in the late 60's while in Germany. Rode the bearings off it and sold it in 1973.

PBPeugeot, on Flickr
Bought a 1972 Motobecane Le Champion used. I was lusting after Campagnolo and 531 double butted. Never could get to the same level of pleasure riding it. Lost it in an accident in 2009.

2008-06-01 15.25.53 on Flickr.
The Colnago was a replacement and is a wonderful ride along with the Pinarello Montello.

1983 Colnago Superissimo, on Flickr

CConversion95, on Flickr

PBPeugeot, on Flickr
Bought a 1972 Motobecane Le Champion used. I was lusting after Campagnolo and 531 double butted. Never could get to the same level of pleasure riding it. Lost it in an accident in 2009.

2008-06-01 15.25.53 on Flickr.
The Colnago was a replacement and is a wonderful ride along with the Pinarello Montello.

1983 Colnago Superissimo, on Flickr

CConversion95, on Flickr
__________________
Bikes don't stand alone. They are two tired.
Bikes don't stand alone. They are two tired.
#34
Hump, what hump?
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: SC midlands
Posts: 1,937
Bikes: See signature
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 336 Post(s)
Liked 226 Times
in
145 Posts
Worst riding bike I’ve encountered so far was a Japanese Paramount. It was a good-looking bike, but had “twitchy” handling. I suppose that might be good for a crit bike, but I just never got comfortable on it. I also had a nice Pinarello Montello that seemed lackluster, though it was comfortable to ride.
__________________
2010 AB T1X ** 2010 Cannondale SIX-5 ** 1993 Cannondale RS900 ** 1988 Bottecchia Team Record ** 1989 Bianchi Brava ** 1988 Nishiki Olympic ** 1987 Centurion Ironman Expert(2) ** 1985 DeRosa Professional SLX ** 1982 Colnago Super ** 1982 Basso Gap ** 198? Ciocc Competition SL ** 19?? Roberts Audax ** 198? Brian Rourke ** 1982 Mercian Olympic ** 1970 Raleigh Professional MK I ** 1952 Raleigh Sports
2010 AB T1X ** 2010 Cannondale SIX-5 ** 1993 Cannondale RS900 ** 1988 Bottecchia Team Record ** 1989 Bianchi Brava ** 1988 Nishiki Olympic ** 1987 Centurion Ironman Expert(2) ** 1985 DeRosa Professional SLX ** 1982 Colnago Super ** 1982 Basso Gap ** 198? Ciocc Competition SL ** 19?? Roberts Audax ** 198? Brian Rourke ** 1982 Mercian Olympic ** 1970 Raleigh Professional MK I ** 1952 Raleigh Sports
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,071
Mentioned: 67 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2842 Post(s)
Liked 2,004 Times
in
1,253 Posts
On a serious note, which one occurs more often? Is it the bike that totally stands out from the rest and puts a possum grin on your face? Or is it the one that does not wow? We have high expectations for every one we take for a ride.
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 4,117
Mentioned: 101 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1483 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 609 Times
in
401 Posts

My Vitus Carbone did not impress me enough when I got it. Just never felt "alive" under me. It wasn't that bad, but it was hardly any different from the Peugeot PSV that I had since 84. Did not help when I got my ALAN Carbonio after it, which turned out to be the best handling bike I ever owned and rode so far........ So I turned the Vitus Carbone Into my weight weenie project mule just to see how light I can get it to keep it interesting. Fortunately, it did improve markedly when I installed my Roval aero wheelset on it, not too long ago, which kinda tells me, one cannot write off a bike right away as it could only be a few mods away from being much better than it initially is.
Last edited by Chombi1; 10-17-18 at 10:10 AM.
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,071
Mentioned: 67 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2842 Post(s)
Liked 2,004 Times
in
1,253 Posts
#38
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,071
Mentioned: 67 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2842 Post(s)
Liked 2,004 Times
in
1,253 Posts
Definitely some high end, championship level sideburns/hair in that photo. Those sideburns are sweet!
Bought a Peugeot in the late 60's while in Germany. Rode the bearings off it and sold it in 1973.

PBPeugeot, on Flickr
Bought a 1972 Motobecane Le Champion used. I was lusting after Campagnolo and 531 double butted. Never could get to the same level of pleasure riding it. Lost it in an accident in 2009.

2008-06-01 15.25.53 on Flickr.
The Colnago was a replacement and is a wonderful ride along with the Pinarello Montello.

1983 Colnago Superissimo, on Flickr

CConversion95, on Flickr

PBPeugeot, on Flickr
Bought a 1972 Motobecane Le Champion used. I was lusting after Campagnolo and 531 double butted. Never could get to the same level of pleasure riding it. Lost it in an accident in 2009.

2008-06-01 15.25.53 on Flickr.
The Colnago was a replacement and is a wonderful ride along with the Pinarello Montello.

1983 Colnago Superissimo, on Flickr

CConversion95, on Flickr
#39
minimalist cyclist
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,632
Bikes: yes please
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1030 Post(s)
Liked 1,283 Times
in
793 Posts
#40
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 22,247
Bikes: Trek Emonda, Giant Propel, Colnago V3, Co-Motion Supremo, ICE VTX WC
Mentioned: 104 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9969 Post(s)
Liked 3,569 Times
in
1,669 Posts
Second- First generation Trek OCLV carbon fiber (about 1996 or 1997). Spent many miles on a Project One 5200 or 5500 (don't remember which). I was riding a titanium Paramount at the time and the Treks just felt dull and lifeless. It may have been the fancy/horrible Race Lite wheels.

__________________
Keep the chain tight!
#41
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 1,794
Bikes: 1996 Trek 970 ZX 2x11
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 571 Post(s)
Liked 482 Times
in
366 Posts
Can't recall ever having been on a truly astounding "classic" bike of any sort.
But, sure enough, as you describe it, I've been on a few that "wowed" me mightily ... but, based on the essentials: very good fit; very good ride quality; everything working well. Good, effective, "basic" utility and comfort counts for a lot, with me. If that can be had with a lighter, more-capable bike with better components, all the better.
#42
Master Parts Rearranger
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Portlandia's Kuiper Belt, OR
Posts: 4,316
Bikes: 1989 Schwinn Paramount OS - 1982 Trek 720 - 1985 Trek 620 - 1985 Schwinn Voyageur SP - 1989 Cannondale SR - 2006 Orbea Onix - 2012 Specialized Tricross
Mentioned: 213 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1418 Post(s)
Liked 1,550 Times
in
788 Posts
^this While I loved the aesthetic of my Waterford built '86 Paramount, it lacked the pop I am accustomed to experiencing with my other lightweights. My '74 Paramount is/was a lot more fun to ride than the '86 and floats in comparison to the heavy feeling ride of the '86.
bocobiking, I'm curious as to what a larger Paramount would feel like as I ride a 63.5cm/25" normally and the 62cm Paramount is just a little small. What's the serial number on it? I know Waterford made a 62cm CTT and a 63.5cm CTT etc, but a 63cm CTT is not known to me.
To those that say Cannondale, I...I feel ya. I'm a big fan of them, and they are extremely competent and composed bikes. Quite the performers as well, but so far my criterium framed bikes lack a standout feature. NONE have felt harsh to me. I keep trying though--just can't quit them! [the ST's have a bit more soul, IMO, and I think that's due to running larger tires and really being able to work the longer frame and larger tires to a 'spring-like' effect. I love the STs.]
#43
mycocyclist
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Monkey Junction, Wilmington, NC
Posts: 2,089
Bikes: 1964 Schwinn Paramount P-13 DeLuxe, 1964 Schwinn Sport Super Sport, 1972 Falcon San Remo, 1974 Maserati MT-1, 1974 Raleigh International, 1984 Lotus Odyssey, 198? Rossin Ghibli, 1990 LeMond Le Vanquer (sic), 1991 Specialized Allez Transition Pro, +
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 840 Post(s)
Liked 605 Times
in
361 Posts
Worst Of Both Worlds
If these can now be considered vintage-
First- Cannondales 3.0 series road bikes with the aluminum fork. Never could abide the geometry or the ride characteristics. Really almost all of the fist generation aluminum road bikes. Unless you were a monster racing crits they were so stiff they beat you to death (except the gorgeous, flexy Vitus's).
Second- First generation Trek OCLV carbon fiber (about 1996 or 1997). Spent many miles on a Project One 5200 or 5500 (don't remember which). I was riding a titanium Paramount at the time and the Treks just felt dull and lifeless. It may have been the fancy/horrible Race Lite wheels.
First- Cannondales 3.0 series road bikes with the aluminum fork. Never could abide the geometry or the ride characteristics. Really almost all of the fist generation aluminum road bikes. Unless you were a monster racing crits they were so stiff they beat you to death (except the gorgeous, flexy Vitus's).
Second- First generation Trek OCLV carbon fiber (about 1996 or 1997). Spent many miles on a Project One 5200 or 5500 (don't remember which). I was riding a titanium Paramount at the time and the Treks just felt dull and lifeless. It may have been the fancy/horrible Race Lite wheels.
Even worse for me was the aluminum Treks from the 80s. My team had a Trek sponsorship and I never felt right on one. We had team issue 2000s and at first, Trek gave me a 52 which was too small. I complained and they gave me a 54 that was too big. Both rode like tanks. I had a chance to buy the frame for ~$125 at the end of the season and I declined. 

Because I lost a dust cap from a Campagnolo pedal off my LeMond, I pressed a '95 Trek 2120 into service as my beater bike. I had picked it up as corroded as an aluminum/CF mashup can be. I suspect it spent some time under salt water. It cleaned up nicely, and functions within normal parameters. The first generation brifters are why I bought it for $5, and they are easily serviceable and work as designed. (They might be an acceptable "touring" brifter? I'm thinking of putting a pair on my Lotus Odyssey, as I could repair one of these in the field.) The bike fits perfectly, carries a hefty load without complaint, and is absolutely entirely joyless. I don't ever have fun riding it. I can't pin down the source of its soul sucking, and continue to ride it, but after a mile or two, each and every time, I wish I was on another one of my bikes. <sigh emoji> It has a cro-mo stem, oddly, but the aluminum fork still manages to irritate my right shoulder. With an all aluminum bike, both my shoulders demonstrate symptoms of arthritis, which vanishes soon after I switch to a steel rider. The 2120 is a workhorse, I'll give it that, but it's mediocre.
I have no time for mediocrity.
(Unfortunately, with recent weather events, I also haven't had time to transform waiting candidates into "new" beater bikes, and so I dwell in "Mediocre Hell". <sigh emoji>)
#44
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Port Angeles, WA
Posts: 7,924
Bikes: A green one, "Ragleigh," or something.
Mentioned: 192 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1591 Post(s)
Liked 538 Times
in
308 Posts
My only disappointment in the "Legendary Marques" category is my '81 Miata 1000. It's a good bike; as original, maybe even very good, but not great. Its direct competition in my fleet is my more modern '88 Schwinn Voyaguer. Somehow it's an all-around livelier ride which makes me was to just keep riding. In comparison, the Miata just feels a bit dead. I swapped the wheel sets between the two for back to back test riding - I've done this three times - and the Schwinn always comes out on top. They are as close in weight as can be: 26.94 lbs vs 26.98 lbs, on my scale. I'm guessing the more solid feeling Miata would be more stable as a loaded tourer, but the Voyageur wins in the sportier riding outings.

__________________
● 1971 Grandis SL ● 1972 Lambert Grand Prix frankenbike ● 1972 Raleigh Super Course fixie ● 1973 Nishiki Semi-Pro ● 1979 Motobecane Grand Jubile ●1980 Apollo "Legnano" ● 1984 Peugeot Vagabond ● 1985 Shogun Prairie Breaker ● 1986 Merckx Super Corsa ● 1987 Schwinn Tempo ● 1988 Schwinn Voyageur ● 1989 Bottechia Team ADR replica ● 1990 Cannondale ST600 ● 1993 Technium RT600 ● 1996 Kona Lava Dome ●
● 1971 Grandis SL ● 1972 Lambert Grand Prix frankenbike ● 1972 Raleigh Super Course fixie ● 1973 Nishiki Semi-Pro ● 1979 Motobecane Grand Jubile ●1980 Apollo "Legnano" ● 1984 Peugeot Vagabond ● 1985 Shogun Prairie Breaker ● 1986 Merckx Super Corsa ● 1987 Schwinn Tempo ● 1988 Schwinn Voyageur ● 1989 Bottechia Team ADR replica ● 1990 Cannondale ST600 ● 1993 Technium RT600 ● 1996 Kona Lava Dome ●
Last edited by Lascauxcaveman; 10-12-19 at 07:14 PM.
#45
Vello Kombi, baby
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Je suis ici
Posts: 5,321
Bikes: 1973 Eisentraut; 1970s Richard Sachs; 1978 Alfio Bonnano; 1967 Peugeot PX10
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 80 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times
in
10 Posts
I had a Cannondale Black Lightning. It rode like a 2 by 4.
__________________
"It's always darkest right before it goes completely black"
Waste your money! Buy my comic book!
"It's always darkest right before it goes completely black"
Waste your money! Buy my comic book!
Likes For Poguemahone:
#46
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: GWN
Posts: 2,539
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1857 Post(s)
Liked 592 Times
in
395 Posts
I've never owned a paramount but have ridden a few back in the late seventies. I was not impressed at all. Compared to the Trek I was riding at the time they felt sluggish and heavy. The TX 900 was just a better bike in every way.
I would like to try one again though.
I would like to try one again though.
Likes For Wileyone:
#47
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Point Reyes Station, California
Posts: 4,290
Bikes: Indeed!
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1299 Post(s)
Liked 2,636 Times
in
882 Posts
...First generation Trek OCLV carbon fiber (about 1996 or 1997). Spent many miles on a Project One 5200 or 5500 (don't remember which). I was riding a titanium Paramount at the time and the Treks just felt dull and lifeless. It may have been the fancy/horrible Race Lite wheels.

Brent
#48
spondylitis.org
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Fleetwood, PA, USA
Posts: 960
Bikes: '84 Colnago Super; '90 Bridgestone MB-1; '81 Trek 930; '01 Cinelli Supercorsa; '62 Ideor Asso; '87 Tommasini Super Prestige; '13 Lynskey R2300; '84 Serotta Nova Special; '94 Litespeed Catalyst; etc.
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 111 Post(s)
Liked 74 Times
in
50 Posts
My first real road bike was a Schwinn Tempo made from Columbus Tenax. I never really got comfortable on that bike. Probably switching to tubular tires would have helped. I never could understand why people lose their lunches over the pre-Waterford Schwinn Paramounts - not like those things had spectacular build quality. They're chrome with Nervex lugs. So what? Is the ride more magical than what the Italians were building at the time?
As for traditional C&V - I have an '82 Trek 614 that feels a little too slack and a little too floppy. Its stable mate the 710 is better, but that may be due to switching out the stock 531 fork for a Tange CrMo fork.
I once had a PX-10 and wasn't thrilled with the handling (slow) or with the French idiosyncrasies.
I don't have the same negative experiences with the Cinelli Supercorsa that many of you have had. Mine was built (from Neuron tubing) by Losa in 2007. Probably helps that the bike has a Columbus carbon fork and threadless stem setup. It goes where you point it with a pretty decent degree of comfort, and it doesn't pound you to death during long rides.
As for traditional C&V - I have an '82 Trek 614 that feels a little too slack and a little too floppy. Its stable mate the 710 is better, but that may be due to switching out the stock 531 fork for a Tange CrMo fork.
I once had a PX-10 and wasn't thrilled with the handling (slow) or with the French idiosyncrasies.
I don't have the same negative experiences with the Cinelli Supercorsa that many of you have had. Mine was built (from Neuron tubing) by Losa in 2007. Probably helps that the bike has a Columbus carbon fork and threadless stem setup. It goes where you point it with a pretty decent degree of comfort, and it doesn't pound you to death during long rides.
#49
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 1,938
Bikes: ‘87 Marinoni SLX Sports Tourer, ‘79 Miyata 912 by Gugificazione
Mentioned: 162 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 481 Post(s)
Liked 384 Times
in
227 Posts
In my four decades of riding, although with relatively few nice bikes, two were decidedly not keepers.
The ‘76 California Masi Gran Criterium in a tall but steep-angled 65cm frame, a birthday present from my wife, was fabulous on flats and rollers, but it was a scary descender on steep hills, which we’ve got lots of here in the PNW. Felt I could never trust it. Surprising, since the 60cm ‘72 Italian GC I had in my brief racing days was absolutely confident in every situation, just a bit too small.

I sold the ‘76 GC and replaced it with a 2003 Rivendell Rambouillet that was certainly a very solid descender but maybe a bit too solid everywhere else, at least for me that’s all spin, no mashing. I tried very hard to love that one for 10 years, but resurrecting my ‘79 Miyata 912 with modern components, then the arrival of the ‘87 SLX Marinoni very similarly equipped (as were all three for a year), showed that the Riv should go to a more appreciative home.


The bike that that I did love for more than 10 years and over 35,000 mileswas my ‘92 Klein Performance. That bike worked fabulously in fast group rides, many centuries, and three significant long tours including several trips to Europe. No, it has none of the build weirdness that @RobbieTunes found in his earlier version, but it always seemed much better on smooth pavement, even with an after-market CF fork, and it became too small as I lost flexibility in my late 50’s. Wish I’d known about good fatter tires at lower pressures back then. But my adult son is still enjoying it, until his wife can find that perfect orange-colored classic lugged 61-62cm frame as a surprise present for him.

The ‘76 California Masi Gran Criterium in a tall but steep-angled 65cm frame, a birthday present from my wife, was fabulous on flats and rollers, but it was a scary descender on steep hills, which we’ve got lots of here in the PNW. Felt I could never trust it. Surprising, since the 60cm ‘72 Italian GC I had in my brief racing days was absolutely confident in every situation, just a bit too small.

I sold the ‘76 GC and replaced it with a 2003 Rivendell Rambouillet that was certainly a very solid descender but maybe a bit too solid everywhere else, at least for me that’s all spin, no mashing. I tried very hard to love that one for 10 years, but resurrecting my ‘79 Miyata 912 with modern components, then the arrival of the ‘87 SLX Marinoni very similarly equipped (as were all three for a year), showed that the Riv should go to a more appreciative home.


The bike that that I did love for more than 10 years and over 35,000 mileswas my ‘92 Klein Performance. That bike worked fabulously in fast group rides, many centuries, and three significant long tours including several trips to Europe. No, it has none of the build weirdness that @RobbieTunes found in his earlier version, but it always seemed much better on smooth pavement, even with an after-market CF fork, and it became too small as I lost flexibility in my late 50’s. Wish I’d known about good fatter tires at lower pressures back then. But my adult son is still enjoying it, until his wife can find that perfect orange-colored classic lugged 61-62cm frame as a surprise present for him.

Last edited by Dfrost; 10-17-18 at 08:30 PM.