Bike Forums

Bike Forums (https://www.bikeforums.net/forum.php)
-   Classic & Vintage (https://www.bikeforums.net/classic-vintage/)
-   -   The true weight thread (https://www.bikeforums.net/classic-vintage/1163418-true-weight-thread.html)

styggno1 01-02-19 03:03 PM

The true weight thread
 
Bought a scale yesterday. Thought it would be fun to weigh my bikes.

Here is the 1989 Bridgestone MB-1 with a 1994 XT group except FC M563 LX cranks and "modern" Shimano M324 spd/cage pedals (filled with lead I suspect...). On the other hand it does not have a bottlecage.

https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7815/...33b0aa78_b.jpg
https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4497/...343e29ae_b.jpg

mgopack42 01-02-19 03:09 PM

195? oh the bike! I have no idea, because the bike isn't the problem!

styggno1 01-02-19 03:13 PM


Originally Posted by mgopack42 (Post 20729590)
195? oh the bike! I have no idea, because the bike isn't the problem!

Sorry - bare in mind I am not English speaking - What does your comment mean - "195?"?

Wileyone 01-02-19 03:17 PM


Originally Posted by styggno1 (Post 20729580)
Bought a scale yesterday. Thought it would be fun to weigh my bikes.

Here is the 1989 Bridgestone MB-1 with a 1994 XT group except FC M563 LX cranks and "modern" Shimano M324 spd/cage pedals (filled with lead I suspect...). On the other hand it does not have a bottlecage.

https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7815/...33b0aa78_b.jpg
https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4497/...343e29ae_b.jpg

I have the same scale. My advice would be to buy a better one. They are anything but accurate.

ksryder 01-02-19 03:17 PM


Originally Posted by styggno1 (Post 20729595)
Sorry - bare in mind I am not English speaking - What does your comment mean - "195?"?

He's making a joke about how he weighs 195 pounds, and that the weight of the bike isn't as important because his own weight is more relevant to his overall speed.

Admittedly, it gets lost a bit in translation.

Nice Bridgestone, though. Thanks for posting!

TXsailor 01-02-19 03:18 PM

He means he weighs 195 lbs (88.4) Kilograms so the weight of the bike doesn't matter

Andy_K 01-02-19 03:21 PM

I weigh my bikes on a scale very similar to that. It was sold on eBay as a fish scale. I don't have a good way to hang it, so I typically just hold it and lift the bike with the hook. It doesn't stabilize to a single number that way, but I can usually figure out about more or less what it's telling me, probably within the accuracy of the scale. In addition to pounds, ounces, and kilograms, mine will tell me the weight of things in Jin. I haven't had a use for that, but I could do it if I did. Also, the ghost of my freshman college physics professor insists on reminding me that kilograms are a measure of mass, not weight. :p

trailangel 01-02-19 03:21 PM

Those pedals are good but heavy.... steel cages.
Those who post the weight of their bikes without a picture with the scale... well, they are liars.

styggno1 01-02-19 03:23 PM


Originally Posted by TXsailor (Post 20729604)
He means he weighs 195 lbs (88.4) Kilograms so the weight of the bike doesn't matter

Aha! Thanks. Well I am well over 90 kg... I am not weighing my vintage bikes because it would matter in any perfomance kind of way. I do it because 1 - It is fun to know and 2 - there are a lot of fantasy weight quotes floating around on the net.

Andy_K 01-02-19 03:26 PM


Originally Posted by Wileyone (Post 20729598)
I have the same scale. My advice would be to buy a better one. They are anything but accurate.

But it's very precise. ;)

I kind of look at this like I do the pressure gauge on my pump. As long as it's consistent, I'm happy. I can weigh a new bike and know which of my other bikes are about the same weight. Usually all of them, +/- 2 pounds. Within that range I don't think weight is even the dominant factor in the way the ride of the bike feels.

Road Fan 01-02-19 03:34 PM


Originally Posted by Andy_K (Post 20729609)
I weigh my bikes on a scale very similar to that. It was sold on eBay as a fish scale. I don't have a good way to hang it, so I typically just hold it and lift the bike with the hook. It doesn't stabilize to a single number that way, but I can usually figure out about more or less what it's telling me, probably within the accuracy of the scale. In addition to pounds, ounces, and kilograms, mine will tell me the weight of things in Jin. I haven't had a use for that, but I could do it if I did. Also, the ghost of my freshman college physics professor insists on reminding me that kilograms are a measure of mass, not weight. :p

I don't see the problem. Stygg's scale says 12.18, and it is reasonable to assume it is indicating kilograms. The conversion factor for kilograms (mass) to pounds (force) is 2.2 kg per pound. The calculation of that factor includes the conversion from mass to force. The necessary factor is the acceleration due to gravity, which is usually considered a standard value. Multiply 2.2 times 12.18. So the resulting weight of Stygg's mountain bike is 26.8 pounds, which is certainly plausible for a mountain bike.

Again, I don't see a problem. It seems to be a 27# bicycle.

What kind of errors are we worried about, and are they large enough to challenge this answer for any practical purpose?

styggno1 01-02-19 03:35 PM

I will check my scale for accuracy.

Here is another frame+fork i did today:
https://www.bikeforums.net/classic-v...l#post20729554

Cannot be that far off.

PS - please do not make this thread about performance. It is not.
PS II of course it is kilograms - I am European.

noglider 01-02-19 03:39 PM

I have that same scale. I wonder how accurate it is. It seems very cheap.

Andy_K 01-02-19 03:40 PM


Originally Posted by trailangel (Post 20729610)
Those who post the weight of their bikes without a picture with the scale... well, they are liars.

I thought I had a picture in my Flickr stream. Here's what I found.

https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7535/...58bbd9f3_z.jpg

What? I should have shown the bike in the picture too? Well, it's too late for that now. It was this one.

https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7531/...dc8b7e10_z.jpg

Non-vintage bike for comparison. I did it again.

https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7689/...df22d3e8_z.jpg

But trust me, it was this one.

https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7579/...f989c982_z.jpg

Andy_K 01-02-19 03:48 PM


Originally Posted by Road Fan (Post 20729637)
I don't see the problem. Stygg's scale says 12.18, and it is reasonable to assume it is indicating kilograms. The conversion factor for kilograms (mass) to pounds (force) is 2.2 kg per pound. The calculation of that factor includes the conversion from mass to force. The necessary factor is the acceleration due to gravity, which is usually considered a standard value.

There's your problem. The acceleration due to gravity is not constant. It varies based on location. On the moon, for instance, that's still a 12.18 kg bike, but it's weight would only be about 4.5 pounds. Even just taking it to Mexico City would drop the weight to about 26.7 pounds. BTW, it is clear that I was joking, right?

nomadmax 01-02-19 03:54 PM

Anybody have any experience with the Park Tool hanging scale? I'm thinking of getting one.

styggno1 01-02-19 03:55 PM

Haha! Next bike I weigh I will let you know both pounds and Kg. So you who are stuck in medieval times can relate...

I am really curious on some of the bikes - the Masi/Ferretti/Monark (with a lot of light stuff and tricks) and the Merckx MX Leader with modern Super Record 11. They feel light but it could just be my wishful thinking/feeling.

merziac 01-02-19 03:55 PM

This all brings up a good point, I have a Berkley fish scale I use. Got a frame the seller was very detailed with the weight of, 4lb 12.7 oz frame and 1lb 8.8oz fork = 6lb 5.5oz total on his "Postal scale". Frame came and weighs 7lb on my scale, checked my scale with 1, 2 and 10lb weights and it is spot on. By itself not a huge deal or deal breaker per se, but why is nothing ever straightforward? The weight was just one of several things that collectively add up to quite a bit more than I like to let go. :foo:

merziac 01-02-19 04:07 PM


Originally Posted by Andy_K (Post 20729609)
I weigh my bikes on a scale very similar to that. It was sold on eBay as a fish scale. I don't have a good way to hang it, so I typically just hold it and lift the bike with the hook. It doesn't stabilize to a single number that way, but I can usually figure out about more or less what it's telling me, probably within the accuracy of the scale. In addition to pounds, ounces, and kilograms, mine will tell me the weight of things in Jin. I haven't had a use for that, but I could do it if I did. Also, the ghost of my freshman college physics professor insists on reminding me that kilograms are a measure of mass, not weight. :p

Screw an eye bolt into a stud in the garage ceiling, loop of rope, zip ties, wire to adjust drop with a carabiner so you can move the scale. :)

merziac 01-02-19 04:10 PM


Originally Posted by nomadmax (Post 20729677)
Anybody have any experience with the Park Tool hanging scale? I'm thinking of getting one.

No experience, they should be good for the $$$. I think a fishing scale should be fine, mine is spot on after years of use and was very cheap when I bought it. :thumb:

Wileyone 01-02-19 04:44 PM


Originally Posted by noglider (Post 20729646)
I have that same scale. I wonder how accurate it is. It seems very cheap.

Yes I paid 6 bucks for mine they are cheap. I can weigh the same bike 3 times and weight can vary as much as a kilo and a half.

Andy_K 01-02-19 04:49 PM


Originally Posted by merziac (Post 20729697)
Screw an eye bolt into a stud in the garage ceiling, loop of rope, zip ties, wire to adjust drop with a carabiner so you can move the scale. :)

In addition to the method of clamping the scale in my workstand (as seen in my pictures above), I've also had success hanging it from a U-lock hanging from the stand.

Chombi1 01-02-19 05:56 PM

Yes, the scale does not lie, but you do have to get a decent enough scale, or suffer the doubts from others when you call out your bike's weight in any forum.....
https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...436468adb5.jpg
Case in point, my recently finished Davidson build. I myself couldn't believe the sub 20 pound weight, considering it's a steel bike with a Brooks saddle and steel epinrpes and adpes.....but there it is,........ on my overpriced digital bike scale I just bought last summer (used to weigh my bike on a digital luggage scale)....

jamesdak 01-02-19 07:45 PM


Originally Posted by trailangel (Post 20729610)
Those pedals are good but heavy.... steel cages.
Those who post the weight of their bikes without a picture with the scale... well, they are liars.


:p:p:p


https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...8df6dc2416.jpg

Fahrenheit531 01-02-19 08:12 PM


Originally Posted by Chombi1 (Post 20729864)
Yes, the scale does not lie, but you do have to get a decent enough scale, or suffer the doubts from others when you call out your bike's weight in any forum.....
https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...436468adb5.jpg
Case in point, my recently finished Davidson build. I myself couldn't believe the sub 20 pound weight, considering it's a steel bike with a Brooks saddle and steel epinrpes and adpes.....but there it is,........ on my overpriced digital bike scale I just bought last summer (used to weigh my bike on a digital luggage scale)....

HAHAHAHA due to the reflection I kept reading that as 13.89 lbs and thought this a supremely clever joke post. Was trying to figure out what might really be hanging on there, just out of frame. My favorite was a big ol' fish. :p


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:15 PM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.