Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Electro-forged Schwinn Continental at just 39 lbs. !!

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Electro-forged Schwinn Continental at just 39 lbs. !!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-07-19, 10:10 AM
  #51  
Senior Member
 
Fissile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 624
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 43 Post(s)
Liked 28 Times in 20 Posts
Originally Posted by The Golden Boy
They sat on it- they didn't expand upon it- Even when they realized a sizable chunk of the American population had interest in bikes- AND had an interest in bikes that weighed 1/4 less- I think Schwinn chalked that up to not enough Schwinns- why would anyone want a 25 or 30 pound (or less!?!) bike? Clearly inferior to the Schwinns, you ride bikes, not carry them. So in 1975 Schwinn had grand plans to build a new factory in Oklahoma- but that was to be another electroforging facility. Schwinn had expected the world to go on exactly as it had.
Schwinn was run like a feudal operation where they practiced primogeniture. The people running Schwinn were born into it, and they were some arrogant people. They literally had the attitude that the customer is wrong, and only they knew what a bicycle was supposed to be.
Fissile is offline  
Old 04-07-19, 01:02 PM
  #52  
Virgo
 
Phamilton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: KFWA
Posts: 1,267

Bikes: A touring bike and a hybrid

Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 454 Post(s)
Liked 97 Times in 69 Posts
Originally Posted by Fissile
Schwinn was run like a feudal operation where they practiced primogeniture. The people running Schwinn were born into it, and they were some arrogant people. They literally had the attitude that the customer is wrong, and only they knew what a bicycle was supposed to be.
As a sporting good, they’re not very helpful. As transportation, they’re decent bikes. Comfortable, durable, cheap, easy to work on and find parts for, cool colors, retro. Weight is slightly less relevant from a transportation point of view.
Phamilton is offline  
Old 04-07-19, 07:12 PM
  #53  
Senior Member
 
Fissile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 624
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 43 Post(s)
Liked 28 Times in 20 Posts
Originally Posted by Phamilton


As a sporting good, they’re not very helpful. As transportation, they’re decent bikes. Comfortable, durable, cheap, easy to work on and find parts for, cool colors, retro. Weight is slightly less relevant from a transportation point of view.
Transportation? Nope. Bikes stopped being considered transportation in the US of Murica after Crazy Henry rolled out the Model T. Well before mid-century, bikes were considered toys for kids or recreational items for adults. Schwinn prided itself on building bikes that you couldn't bust if you tried. Now I'm not say that durability and value for money are bad things, but some folks were interested in other qualities when it came to bikes. Schwinn was having none of that. Through the 60s the average LBS sold heavy-iron Murican-made coaster brake bikes more dense than a neutron star. If you wanted something 'exotic', the more flamboyant LBS operators offered 'English racers'. Skinny tired, drop bar, derailleur bikes, like them 'men' in ol' Yurp rode? Well, we don't want that type of customer in our shop.
Fissile is offline  
Old 04-07-19, 07:34 PM
  #54  
Full Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: middle of the Great Corn Desert
Posts: 439
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 119 Post(s)
Liked 149 Times in 89 Posts
here are a couple of Contis I converted to single speed bikes.

The yellow came to me in pretty poor condition. It was just donated to a local charity that helps out ex residents of the state who find them jobs and a place to live. I help provide bicycles for transportation.
Here are before and after photos.



This black 28" frame version looks huge and it is. I built it up for a very tall friend who decided he didn't want it. I went for the 1905 racer look. 26" alloy black rims, black spokes, black 1.5" tires. Original paint minus decals, stock fork. Varsity crank, small ring, stem, seat and pedals. Typhoon bars on upside down. New nickel chain. These 28" frames are not your typical ef frames. The rear triangle is ef, the front is fillet brass brazed oversize seamless cromo. I'd like to tell you how it rides but I can't reach the pedals. It is looking for a new owner. $280 local pickup only. 1983 model year. Same year the Chicago factory was shut down.
rickpaulos is offline  
Old 04-07-19, 09:23 PM
  #55  
Virgo
 
Phamilton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: KFWA
Posts: 1,267

Bikes: A touring bike and a hybrid

Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 454 Post(s)
Liked 97 Times in 69 Posts
Originally Posted by Fissile
Transportation? Nope. Bikes stopped being considered transportation in the US of Murica after Crazy Henry rolled out the Model T. Well before mid-century, bikes were considered toys for kids or recreational items for adults. Schwinn prided itself on building bikes that you couldn't bust if you tried. Now I'm not say that durability and value for money are bad things, but some folks were interested in other qualities when it came to bikes. Schwinn was having none of that. Through the 60s the average LBS sold heavy-iron Murican-made coaster brake bikes more dense than a neutron star. If you wanted something 'exotic', the more flamboyant LBS operators offered 'English racers'. Skinny tired, drop bar, derailleur bikes, like them 'men' in ol' Yurp rode? Well, we don't want that type of customer in our shop.
I’m not talking about the history or the company’s marketing techniques. I’m talking about the actual value of the bikes today as transportation for people who travel by bike.
Phamilton is offline  
Old 04-08-19, 06:23 AM
  #56  
Senior Member
 
Fissile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 624
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 43 Post(s)
Liked 28 Times in 20 Posts
Originally Posted by Phamilton


I’m not talking about the history or the company’s marketing techniques. I’m talking about the actual value of the bikes today as transportation for people who travel by bike.
The frames are very strong, and make a solid utility bike, but as for their actual cash value? Not so much. A few early models are collectible, but most of the run of the mill Varsities and Continentals are not worth much.
Fissile is offline  
Old 04-08-19, 08:44 AM
  #57  
Virgo
 
Phamilton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: KFWA
Posts: 1,267

Bikes: A touring bike and a hybrid

Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 454 Post(s)
Liked 97 Times in 69 Posts
Originally Posted by Fissile
The frames are very strong, and make a solid utility bike, but as for their actual cash value? Not so much. A few early models are collectible, but most of the run of the mill Varsities and Continentals are not worth much.
Exactly. Their cash value is low and there’s an abundance of them, so they’re easy to replace. These are generally considered desirable characteristics for transportation bicycles.
Phamilton is offline  
Old 04-14-19, 05:32 AM
  #58  
minimalist cyclist
Thread Starter
 
Deal4Fuji's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,745

Bikes: yes please

Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1119 Post(s)
Liked 1,641 Times in 944 Posts
Originally Posted by rickpaulos
here are a couple of Contis I converted to single speed bikes.

This black 28" frame version looks huge and it is. I built it up for a very tall friend who decided he didn't want it. I went for the 1905 racer look. 26" alloy black rims, black spokes, black 1.5" tires. Original paint minus decals, stock fork. Varsity crank, small ring, stem, seat and pedals. Typhoon bars on upside down. New nickel chain. These 28" frames are not your typical ef frames. The rear triangle is ef, the front is fillet brass brazed oversize seamless cromo. I'd like to tell you how it rides but I can't reach the pedals. It is looking for a new owner. $280 local pickup only. 1983 model year. Same year the Chicago factory was shut down.
Nice job helping the disadvantaged with new transportation but I hope you give them some fixed gear training before putting them out there with no brakes That 28" frame is interesting, obviously special order but looks to be a regular production option.
Deal4Fuji is offline  
Old 04-14-19, 06:00 AM
  #59  
minimalist cyclist
Thread Starter
 
Deal4Fuji's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,745

Bikes: yes please

Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1119 Post(s)
Liked 1,641 Times in 944 Posts
I've finished my few adjustments to the '75 Continental. I found a Schwinn branded front light that fits the old reflector bracket. It's needed because those tall stem shift levers go into the space where a light (even upside down) would normally sit. Still looking for a better rear light, but the flat red light puts out more light than expected and also fit the bracket, both lights attached via black cable ties.




Also added a water bottle cage via hose clamps, and as if pushing 38 lbs isn't hard enough I added a 1 3/8" knobby rear tire that I had available. The front tire is the original Sports Touring that is not in bad shape. The frame has very few scratches, but the most noticeable one was on the top tube, so a strategically place Bike Forum sticker from Dale (speedevil) covers that scratch nicely. I also painted the metal kickstand that had stains on the bare steel that wouldn't buff out.




I can tolerate the original seat with the nose tilted slightly down, so it's pretty much all original and not nearly as hard to ride as I'd expected. I'm over 100 miles from the good weather we had last week and look forward to having this bike in the rotation !

Last edited by Deal4Fuji; 04-17-19 at 07:50 AM.
Deal4Fuji is offline  
Old 04-14-19, 11:16 AM
  #60  
Ride, Wrench, Swap, Race
 
dddd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Northern California
Posts: 9,193

Bikes: Cheltenham-Pedersen racer, Boulder F/S Paris-Roubaix, Varsity racer, '52 Christophe, '62 Continental, '92 Merckx, '75 Limongi, '76 Presto, '72 Gitane SC, '71 Schwinn SS, etc.

Mentioned: 132 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1565 Post(s)
Liked 1,295 Times in 865 Posts
Originally Posted by Fissile
Schwinn was run like a feudal operation where they practiced primogeniture. The people running Schwinn were born into it, and they were some arrogant people. They literally had the attitude that the customer is wrong, and only they knew what a bicycle was supposed to be.
I think it would be more true to say that they were more realistic in terms of how most bikes that were being sold at that time were being used.
The bikes that flooded into the American market, made by super-cheap foreign labor, were quite fragile by comparison, and would fall over while on their flimsy kickstands if the wind so much as blew. No wonder then that riders became virulently anti-kickstand, after seeing their fragile new foreign bike fall onto the concrete when the dog's tail so much as brushed against it, whereas a Schwinn was a solid fixture on it's properly-engineered kickstand.
Schwinn also seemed to be the only company around that consistently required parts vendors to improve their products before OEM orders were placed. Things like right-side sealing added to a freewheel, or beefier adjusters added to derailers and brake levers, lots of small changes that would serve the customer by reducing time in the shop.
Schwinn's bottom bracket had larger balls, featured galvanized cups and cones with chromium bearings when others chrome-plated these parts leaving them to quickly rust out. But it was worse than that when the others used un-sealed cups that trapped moisture in the bottom bracket shell instead of using a design that allowed water to run out of the bearings onto the ground. So it's no coincidence that the used Chicago Schwinn you buy today has perfectly usable original bottom bracket bearings, not to mention that it can be serviced and adjusted without specialty tools!
Schwinn, unlike the foreign competition that benefitted hugely from currency/value imbalances, also had to deal with unions that absorbed profits and pushed the labor-cost imbalance even further away from reality, likely stalling the sort of periodic evolutionary re-designs that could meet marketing needs in real time.
Then there were the "bicycles-101" books that hit the bookstores during the bike-boom, they deliberately lumped Schwinn in with their department-store competition as heavy, poorly-made junk. It was pure, slanted propaganda that convinced buyers that they knew things that they actually had no idea about in real-world terms since they typically had no sporting/racing experience and weren't about to keep their imported lightweight trauma-free and properly maintained.
It is actually the minority (here and in the sports world) that would find Chicago Schwinns to be heavier than desirable for their intended uses, the majority of buyers would have been better served with a more-durable bike. Schwinn ethically made bikes that would better serve their customers in the real world than on the sales floor, and which supported the American economy and work force rather than gutting it.
Most of all, Schwinn clearly eschewed a disposable-bike culture.

Ask yourself which bike company taught the American public how derailers worked using an in-store drivetrain apparatus with a convenient carrying handle that one could operate and observe while safely standing in the bike shop instead of looking down while crashing into a parked car. It wasn't Fuji and it wasn't Nishiki or Peugeot.

Schwinn as a manufacturing company simply did not get to operate in a fair market, so they had to throw in the towel like all of the others as the trade-imbalance-subsidized imports flooded America's shores. By appearances they could have followed Trek's example for perhaps a decade, but remember that Trek came into a completely different market with a fresh start, no unions to deal with, building custom and hand-built frames for a much smaller (but fast-growing and newly-upscale) enthusiast market.

My question then to Fissile is, why did all of the existing American mass-market builders fail, and not just Schwinn?

Last edited by dddd; 04-14-19 at 11:31 AM.
dddd is offline  
Old 04-14-19, 01:44 PM
  #61  
Senior Member
 
3speedslow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Jacksonville, NC
Posts: 9,338

Bikes: A few

Mentioned: 117 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1942 Post(s)
Liked 1,073 Times in 637 Posts
Hello... Continental bike project thread! Not whose fault it is or how bad someone thinks America is...

Ken, great job on your project! I’ve seen it up close and the condition of it is quite nice.
3speedslow is offline  
Old 04-14-19, 03:26 PM
  #62  
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 38
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ryansu
Seems to me some years of Conti's had chrome forks, or maybe I was just seeing ones with replacement forks. I am not a weight weenie but a Varsity/Conti is crossing a line for me. Solid but a bit Hefty at pushing 40 lbs.
A few of the early Conti's in the 60's had chrome forks, then they revived it around '77. I bought a brand new Sierra in '77 (a one year name in the 70's) that was essentially a Conti that had a chrome fork with a black decal on it. They revived the Conti name the next year(as the Conti II IIRC) as sales seemed to suffer. The early Sierra's in the 60's were 15 speeds with a granny gear for getting up those hills - the version I bought in 77 didn't. And those model callout decals are a good indication as to age - the model on the top tube in outlined letters with the Schwinn brand in a similar font on the down tube on some models started around 76.
72SuperSport is offline  
Old 04-14-19, 07:52 PM
  #63  
minimalist cyclist
Thread Starter
 
Deal4Fuji's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,745

Bikes: yes please

Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1119 Post(s)
Liked 1,641 Times in 944 Posts
Originally Posted by 3speedslow
Hello... Continental bike project thread! Not whose fault it is or how bad someone thinks America is...

Ken, great job on your project! I’ve seen it up close and the condition of it is quite nice.
Thanks Law ! I'm just trying to keep up but I don't mind, and rather enjoy the debate on the Schwinn history. That was a big part of the allure to wanting an electro-forged classic Schwinn.

Originally Posted by dddd
Schwinn also seemed to be the only company around that consistently required parts vendors to improve their products before OEM orders were placed. Things like right-side sealing added to a freewheel, or beefier adjusters added to derailers and brake levers, lots of small changes that would serve the customer by reducing time in the shop.
Schwinn's bottom bracket had larger balls, featured galvanized cups and cones with chromium bearings when others chrome-plated these parts leaving them to quickly rust out. But it was worse than that when the others used un-sealed cups that trapped moisture in the bottom bracket shell instead of using a design that allowed water to run out of the bearings onto the ground. So it's no coincidence that the used Chicago Schwinn you buy today has perfectly usable original bottom bracket bearings, not to mention that it can be serviced and adjusted without specialty tools!
I can attest to the ease of service to the bottom bracket, and quality of those larger bearings. I think it's cool that the Schwinn brand or Schwinn approved is on most every component of the Conti - even the bearings. Some real good information and some points I had not considered about the competitive atmosphere in the bike boom and before @dddd thanks!



Last edited by Deal4Fuji; 04-14-19 at 07:59 PM.
Deal4Fuji is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
davidz32z
Classic & Vintage
10
06-11-17 10:27 PM
avalentine94
Classic and Vintage Bicycles: Whats it Worth? Appraisals.
14
09-29-16 06:21 PM
U5512
Classic & Vintage
15
05-12-14 06:42 PM
TokyoZack
Classic & Vintage
57
05-25-13 06:23 PM
SteveSGP
Classic & Vintage
15
03-15-12 10:43 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.