Crank retightening.. and retightening
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 2,421
Bikes: Drysdale/Gitane/Zeus/Masi/Falcon/Palo Alto/Raleigh/Legnano
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 971 Post(s)
Liked 624 Times
in
399 Posts
Crank retightening.. and retightening
I love how smooth the new Velo Orange sealed bottom bracket is. Finally riding again, the past week or so, recovered from February's crash.
I decided to recheck the crank-to-spindle mounting bolts after a ride or two. Yup, needed a further tightening. Then again after the next ride. And the next (my usual local ride is 18 miles). So, after 7-10 rides, needs it every time, and I suspect again today. Now, it's no more than 1/8th turn or even less each time. This is new to me, never had such a problem before.
So, either (a) I have a spindle-taper issues, somewhere I could possibly look up what taper 1980 Avocet cranks have or (b) the bolts (using the ones supplied with the bottom bracket) are backing out. I am tempted to do something I do not recall ever needed to do on any crankset -- put threadlocker on those bolts. Hmm, that would help if it's (b) but if it's (a) it's going to be hard to diagnose once the thread locker is on. Perhaps there is a (c) that has not yet occurred to me.
Any contraindications here?
I decided to recheck the crank-to-spindle mounting bolts after a ride or two. Yup, needed a further tightening. Then again after the next ride. And the next (my usual local ride is 18 miles). So, after 7-10 rides, needs it every time, and I suspect again today. Now, it's no more than 1/8th turn or even less each time. This is new to me, never had such a problem before.
So, either (a) I have a spindle-taper issues, somewhere I could possibly look up what taper 1980 Avocet cranks have or (b) the bolts (using the ones supplied with the bottom bracket) are backing out. I am tempted to do something I do not recall ever needed to do on any crankset -- put threadlocker on those bolts. Hmm, that would help if it's (b) but if it's (a) it's going to be hard to diagnose once the thread locker is on. Perhaps there is a (c) that has not yet occurred to me.
Any contraindications here?
__________________
Larry:1958 Drysdale, 1961 Gitane Gran Sport, 1974 Zeus track, 1988 Masi Gran Corsa, 1974 Falcon, 1980 Palo Alto, 1973 Raleigh Gran Sport, 1974 Legnano. Susan: 1976 Windsor Profesional.
Larry:1958 Drysdale, 1961 Gitane Gran Sport, 1974 Zeus track, 1988 Masi Gran Corsa, 1974 Falcon, 1980 Palo Alto, 1973 Raleigh Gran Sport, 1974 Legnano. Susan: 1976 Windsor Profesional.
#2
Senior Member
Yes, tapered power-transfer designs behave funny. Remove the cranks, reinstall them with a slight wipe of oil on the tapers, and tighten to 30ish foot pounds (40ish NM). Ride for a few miles, re-tighten, and then leave them alone. You certainly may use loctite the second time you re-tighten, but if they work loose (creaking or knocking), the taper is already shot, and the cranks are NG. This assumes you know the history of the crank, and that the tapers that you have used with it match.
#3
Not lost wanderer.
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Lititz, Pa
Posts: 3,321
Bikes: In USA; 73 Raleigh Super Course dingle speed, 72 Raleigh Gran Sport SS, 72 Geoffry Butler, 81 Centurion Pro-Tour, 74 Gugie Grandier Sportier
Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 885 Post(s)
Liked 985 Times
in
518 Posts
Put some beeswax on the threads and it acts a bit like loctite but easier to remove.
__________________
Cambodia bikes, Bridgestone SRAM 2 speed, 2012 Fuji Stratos...
Cambodia bikes, Bridgestone SRAM 2 speed, 2012 Fuji Stratos...
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 2,421
Bikes: Drysdale/Gitane/Zeus/Masi/Falcon/Palo Alto/Raleigh/Legnano
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 971 Post(s)
Liked 624 Times
in
399 Posts
Interesting. Alas, I have Loctite here, but not beeswax so, this time...
__________________
Larry:1958 Drysdale, 1961 Gitane Gran Sport, 1974 Zeus track, 1988 Masi Gran Corsa, 1974 Falcon, 1980 Palo Alto, 1973 Raleigh Gran Sport, 1974 Legnano. Susan: 1976 Windsor Profesional.
Larry:1958 Drysdale, 1961 Gitane Gran Sport, 1974 Zeus track, 1988 Masi Gran Corsa, 1974 Falcon, 1980 Palo Alto, 1973 Raleigh Gran Sport, 1974 Legnano. Susan: 1976 Windsor Profesional.
#5
multimodal commuter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NJ, NYC, LI
Posts: 19,808
Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...
Mentioned: 584 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1908 Post(s)
Liked 574 Times
in
339 Posts
I have recently had this problem with two different cranks, both older cranks that were new to me. The tapers look fine. I should say they looked fine before I installed. Both cranks worked loose on the first long ride, and I had to tighten them occasionally just as Larry mentioned.
Please don't tell me the taper is shot. These are older cranks, no longer made, and I mean to make them work as long as I can. In both cases, repeated tightening seems to have done the trick for now, but I am prepared to tighten them again if that's what it takes.
Nonetheless, and this is not a rhetorical question: what can possibly go wrong? Seems to me the possibilities are (1) no amount of tightening fixes the problem (either the crank arm eventually bottoms out and can't be tightened anymore, or the crank splits apart at the tapers or (2) we reach a point where the crank arm is permanently pressed onto the spindle and cannot be removed again without serious damage. What else?
Please don't tell me the taper is shot. These are older cranks, no longer made, and I mean to make them work as long as I can. In both cases, repeated tightening seems to have done the trick for now, but I am prepared to tighten them again if that's what it takes.
Nonetheless, and this is not a rhetorical question: what can possibly go wrong? Seems to me the possibilities are (1) no amount of tightening fixes the problem (either the crank arm eventually bottoms out and can't be tightened anymore, or the crank splits apart at the tapers or (2) we reach a point where the crank arm is permanently pressed onto the spindle and cannot be removed again without serious damage. What else?
__________________
www.rhmsaddles.com.
www.rhmsaddles.com.
#6
What??? Only 2 wheels?
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Boston-ish, MA
Posts: 13,434
Bikes: 72 Peugeot UO-8, 82 Peugeot TH8, 87 Bianchi Brava, 76? Masi Grand Criterium, 74 Motobecane Champion Team, 86 & 77 Gazelle champion mondial, 81? Grandis, 82? Tommasini, 83 Peugeot PF10
Mentioned: 189 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1222 Post(s)
Liked 645 Times
in
232 Posts
On the question of Loctite, I would not think the bolt is coming unscrewed. I sure wouldn't put Loctite on the taper itself!
__________________
Real cyclists use toe clips.
With great bikes comes great responsibility.
jimmuller
Real cyclists use toe clips.
With great bikes comes great responsibility.
jimmuller
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Pasadena, CA
Posts: 4,848
Bikes: Schwinn Varsity
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1931 Post(s)
Liked 742 Times
in
422 Posts
Stop retighten the cranks or you will ruin them.
The bolts are not loosening, the crank arms are working their way further up the spindle.
If you tried to pull the cranks off you will find they are on really tight.
https://www.renehersecycles.com/wp-c...2016_03web.pdf
The bolts are not loosening, the crank arms are working their way further up the spindle.
If you tried to pull the cranks off you will find they are on really tight.
https://www.renehersecycles.com/wp-c...2016_03web.pdf
#9
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 2,421
Bikes: Drysdale/Gitane/Zeus/Masi/Falcon/Palo Alto/Raleigh/Legnano
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 971 Post(s)
Liked 624 Times
in
399 Posts
Perhaps Avocet cranks are just soft? NEVER had this before on any cranks -- my own, friends' or the 100's I worked on in my bike-shop days; not even Maxy cranks which I always presumed where made of alumibutter.
Plus I should also check w/VO on the taper type on their bottom brackets.
__________________
Larry:1958 Drysdale, 1961 Gitane Gran Sport, 1974 Zeus track, 1988 Masi Gran Corsa, 1974 Falcon, 1980 Palo Alto, 1973 Raleigh Gran Sport, 1974 Legnano. Susan: 1976 Windsor Profesional.
Larry:1958 Drysdale, 1961 Gitane Gran Sport, 1974 Zeus track, 1988 Masi Gran Corsa, 1974 Falcon, 1980 Palo Alto, 1973 Raleigh Gran Sport, 1974 Legnano. Susan: 1976 Windsor Profesional.
#10
Phyllo-buster
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 8,843
Bikes: roadsters, club bikes, fixed and classic
Mentioned: 133 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2295 Post(s)
Liked 2,044 Times
in
1,252 Posts
#11
Shifting is fun!
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: South Holland, NL
Posts: 10,998
Bikes: Yes, please.
Mentioned: 279 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2192 Post(s)
Liked 4,580 Times
in
1,762 Posts
I have never re-tightened cranks.
Sometimes, when removing, I find the bolts need surprisingly little force.
I have also never experienced any play in my cranks.
FWIW.
Sometimes, when removing, I find the bolts need surprisingly little force.
I have also never experienced any play in my cranks.
FWIW.
#12
Senior Member
I used Avocet cranks for 2 or 3 years BITD. They are rebadged Ofmega CX cranks. While they were nominally campy interchangeable, IIRC, the tapers are somewhat on the small side. Sheldon Brown mentions this somewhere, but exaggerates (IMHO). ISO and JIS spindle standards didn't really exist then, I'd still guess they'd be a much better fit on an ISO BB. I think I used one with an Avocet BB for a time, then moved it to a Zeus, which also have a smallish taper. Both worked no problem.
How far does the end of the spindle extend into the crankarms now, with the bolt taken off?
I don't know what alloy they used but it wasn't soft. Presumably 6061.
Sometimes I'll snug up a crank after the first ride just to check, once. If a crank has to be tightened repeatedly, something is seriously wrong. If cranks have been ridden loose for a while, it generally ruins them.
How far does the end of the spindle extend into the crankarms now, with the bolt taken off?
I don't know what alloy they used but it wasn't soft. Presumably 6061.
Sometimes I'll snug up a crank after the first ride just to check, once. If a crank has to be tightened repeatedly, something is seriously wrong. If cranks have been ridden loose for a while, it generally ruins them.
Last edited by Salamandrine; 04-12-19 at 03:53 PM.
#13
Bad example
Do not rule out the possibility that the bolt is loosening. I had that happen on a Campagnolo Nuovo Record spindle, of all things. It would work itself loose within two miles! Like everyone here I thought it was loosening because I had damaged the drive side arm, but I saw no sign of wear on the spindle or the arm. I finally figured it out and replaced the BB with a Phil, using the original NR crankarms, and it has not budged since.
__________________
Keeping Seattle’s bike shops in business since 1978
Keeping Seattle’s bike shops in business since 1978
#14
señor miembro
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Pac NW
Posts: 6,597
Bikes: '70s - '80s Campagnolo
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3861 Post(s)
Liked 6,450 Times
in
3,190 Posts
#15
Shifting is fun!
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: South Holland, NL
Posts: 10,998
Bikes: Yes, please.
Mentioned: 279 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2192 Post(s)
Liked 4,580 Times
in
1,762 Posts
Thinking about it, since riding around the block is something I generally do several times during a build, as well as checking the most important bolts (stem / seatpost / cranks / chainrings) before considering it done, I may actually have followed Sheldon's advice more often than not.
#16
señor miembro
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Pac NW
Posts: 6,597
Bikes: '70s - '80s Campagnolo
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3861 Post(s)
Liked 6,450 Times
in
3,190 Posts
#17
Senior Member
I have found that the 8mm Allen bolt type crank bolt is prone to stretching. You could use the type with a hex bolt and use a socket to tighten it. In my experience they will hold better.
Last edited by BoozyMcliverRot; 04-12-19 at 04:18 PM.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,890
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4788 Post(s)
Liked 3,914 Times
in
2,545 Posts
Tapered cranks rock slightly as you pedal. In that rocking, they slide slightly inboard. This means that a properly torqued bolt can always be tightened further after you have ridden. Do this and the crank slips further onto the spindle.
Now think about what is happening to your crank as you do this. Every time you re-tighten and ride again, you drive the wedge of the spindle a little further into the tapered hole in the crank. What happens when you drive a wedge into something far enough? That something breaks. Mankind had been using wedges to create cracks and splits for many thousands of years. With a hard enough wedge and enough movement of that wedge, the part always breaks.
Listen to Sheldon. Ride once around the block, re-tighten - and stop there!
Ben
Now think about what is happening to your crank as you do this. Every time you re-tighten and ride again, you drive the wedge of the spindle a little further into the tapered hole in the crank. What happens when you drive a wedge into something far enough? That something breaks. Mankind had been using wedges to create cracks and splits for many thousands of years. With a hard enough wedge and enough movement of that wedge, the part always breaks.
Listen to Sheldon. Ride once around the block, re-tighten - and stop there!
Ben
#19
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 2,421
Bikes: Drysdale/Gitane/Zeus/Masi/Falcon/Palo Alto/Raleigh/Legnano
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 971 Post(s)
Liked 624 Times
in
399 Posts
Another data point - on yesterday's ride, for the 1st time in a while, I had an overshift where going to the outer chainring the chain went off the outside of the outer chainring. Coincidence? Or not? Maybe the crank arm is slowly moving inboard.
__________________
Larry:1958 Drysdale, 1961 Gitane Gran Sport, 1974 Zeus track, 1988 Masi Gran Corsa, 1974 Falcon, 1980 Palo Alto, 1973 Raleigh Gran Sport, 1974 Legnano. Susan: 1976 Windsor Profesional.
Larry:1958 Drysdale, 1961 Gitane Gran Sport, 1974 Zeus track, 1988 Masi Gran Corsa, 1974 Falcon, 1980 Palo Alto, 1973 Raleigh Gran Sport, 1974 Legnano. Susan: 1976 Windsor Profesional.
#20
Extraordinary Magnitude
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 13,641
Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT
Mentioned: 84 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2607 Post(s)
Liked 1,694 Times
in
933 Posts
I used Avocet cranks for 2 or 3 years BITD. They are rebadged Ofmega CX cranks. While they were nominally campy interchangeable, IIRC, the tapers are somewhat on the small side. Sheldon Brown mentions this somewhere, but exaggerates (IMHO). ISO and JIS spindle standards didn't really exist then, I'd still guess they'd be a much better fit on an ISO BB. I think I used one with an Avocet BB for a time, then moved it to a Zeus, which also have a smallish taper. Both worked no problem.
I've been using an Avocet BB and spindle with mine.
1986 Trek 400 Elance by Dave The Golden Boy, on Flickr
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
#21
blahblahblah chrome moly
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,984
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1172 Post(s)
Liked 2,566 Times
in
1,072 Posts
Sounds like you doubt it, but it's true. Due to friction while mounting, the crank is under strain, and when it squirms around from riding, it slides further up the taper on the spindle to relieve that strain. After a while the forces are in equilibrium, and the bolt will seem looser if you wrench on it.
I recommend using crank "dust caps" which are really locknuts for the spindle bolts. The spindle bolt will not loose (as in backing out) if there's a dustcap cinched down on it. I don't always follow that advice myself -- my bikes have often not had dustcaps. But they didn't loosen either. If I had a bike where I suspected the bolts were backing off, I would definitely slap some dustcaps on that bad boy.
Yes you absolutely must have a washer under the bolt head. Some bolts have the washer built in, in which case maybe you don't need a separate washer.
8mm is too much, indicating the wrong spindle taper -- it's too big. A smaller taper will poke through further, giving you more area in contact between spindle and crank.. Too small of course would have it poke all the way through until it hits the washer under the bolt head -- no good, because it can't tighten any further after that point.
Some people think there's just ISO and JIS standards, but those Avocet cranks were made before those standards even existed. BITD, almost every crank maker had their own idiosyncratic taper spec, sometimes interchangeable with some other brands, sometimes not. I don't know what spindle you need, but ISTR Avocet was one of the weirder ones. It may be that the spindle you need is an Avocet and nothing else works (I don't know, but it's possible).
You might want to ask Greg Reiche (pronounced "Rich") of Cycles Hibou, he's the most knowledgeable guy I know about historical spindle tapers and compatibility.
There was a very interesting thread on internet-bob mailing list last year titled "BB taper standards and false binaries". The "false binary" is the ISO/JIS one -- the idea that there are only two taper standards is false.
Mark Bulgier
Seattle
I recommend using crank "dust caps" which are really locknuts for the spindle bolts. The spindle bolt will not loose (as in backing out) if there's a dustcap cinched down on it. I don't always follow that advice myself -- my bikes have often not had dustcaps. But they didn't loosen either. If I had a bike where I suspected the bolts were backing off, I would definitely slap some dustcaps on that bad boy.
Some people think there's just ISO and JIS standards, but those Avocet cranks were made before those standards even existed. BITD, almost every crank maker had their own idiosyncratic taper spec, sometimes interchangeable with some other brands, sometimes not. I don't know what spindle you need, but ISTR Avocet was one of the weirder ones. It may be that the spindle you need is an Avocet and nothing else works (I don't know, but it's possible).
You might want to ask Greg Reiche (pronounced "Rich") of Cycles Hibou, he's the most knowledgeable guy I know about historical spindle tapers and compatibility.
There was a very interesting thread on internet-bob mailing list last year titled "BB taper standards and false binaries". The "false binary" is the ISO/JIS one -- the idea that there are only two taper standards is false.
Mark Bulgier
Seattle
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: PDX
Posts: 13,030
Bikes: Merz x 5 + Specialized Merz Allez x 2, Strawberry/Newlands/DiNucci/Ti x3, Gordon, Fuso/Moulton x2, Bornstein, Paisley,1958-74 Paramounts x3, 3rensho, 74 Moto TC, 73-78 Raleigh Pro's x5, Marinoni x2, 1960 Cinelli SC, 1980 Bianchi SC, PX-10 X 2
Mentioned: 267 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4507 Post(s)
Liked 6,374 Times
in
3,666 Posts
On the 1 or 2 that have done this for me, I apply "diminishing returns" if the bolt is not tight but the crank arm seems to be I just snug the bolt down, not fully retorque and monitor to see. If the crank arm stays tight then you could locktite the bolt and call it good while still keeping an eye on it.
Also fully agree with Mark on the dust caps, one of their many functions are as a failsafe locknut, they also protect the threads so the puller installs properly to remove the cranks.
Also fully agree with Mark on the dust caps, one of their many functions are as a failsafe locknut, they also protect the threads so the puller installs properly to remove the cranks.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 528
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 237 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 83 Times
in
64 Posts
Sounds like you doubt it, but it's true. Due to friction while mounting, the crank is under strain, and when it squirms around from riding, it slides further up the taper on the spindle to relieve that strain. After a while the forces are in equilibrium, and the bolt will seem looser if you wrench on it.
There's the taper (wedge) which wants to push the crank arm outboard. There's the bolt (screw) which wants to pull the crank inboard. Finally there's friction, which is quite high, which wants to resist movement in either direction (crank won't come off without a crank puller).
When you initially tighten the bolt, it works against the taper and friction. Since the initial state is outboard since you are moving the crank inboard with the bolt, friction will resist inboard movement, meaning the crank will be outboard relative to where it would be without friction. (think sticky cables)
Cranking motion imparts loads on the crank that allow it overcome friction and shift slightly, but without tightening the bolt. There will be a tendency for the crank to move inboard since the force initially provided by the crank bolt is equivalent to the force of the taper plus friction. Eventually the crank creeps towards where it would be without friction, which is inboard of the initial tightening.
This means the bolt gets "looser" because what it was pulling against moved, but without unscrewing. At this point, tightening the bolt will preload it and pull the crank inboard more causing it to creep further inwards when it again moves to where it would be without friction. Conversely if you remove the bolt, pedaling action will overcome friction and allow the crank to creep outwards since the taper pushes the crank outboard but there is no bolt to push it inboard. This is also why you're not supposed to tighten crank bolts on cranks already installed. Crank bolt torque is higher than what is is supposed to end up at.
Last edited by Kuromori; 04-13-19 at 02:34 PM.
#24
Senior Member
8mm is way too much. The problem is that the BB has the wrong tapers. As I said previously, I suspect an ISO BB will work pretty well. ISO is just a touch smaller than vintage Campy record, as was Avocet.
#25
Senior Member
When you pedal, you put strong forces on the square taper interface: you're basically rocking the crank arm around on the spindle. If the crank bolt wasn't in place, the crank arm would gradually squirm outboard until it falls off of the spindle.
When you first installed the crank arm, the crank bolt was pressed VERY TIGHT against the arm, since it was just used to push the arm up onto the taper. But as you cause the arm to squirm on the spindle under your pedaling forces, it budges against the crank bolt, causing it to ride inboard up the taper. It will keep moving inboard until its contact with the bolt is soft enough that squirming doesn't budge it inboard anymore. This process happens every time you re-install a crank arm onto a spindle, and every time you re-tighten a crank bolt. It permanently widens the taper on the crank arm, and after enough cycles this will destroy the crank arm.
Because the crank arm crawls away from the bolt, the bolt feels like it's tightened less strongly against the arm, even though the bolt didn't actually back off.
You can check whether the bolt is actually loosening by drawing a line on the head so that you can see if it has rotated since you last looked at it.
When you first installed the crank arm, the crank bolt was pressed VERY TIGHT against the arm, since it was just used to push the arm up onto the taper. But as you cause the arm to squirm on the spindle under your pedaling forces, it budges against the crank bolt, causing it to ride inboard up the taper. It will keep moving inboard until its contact with the bolt is soft enough that squirming doesn't budge it inboard anymore. This process happens every time you re-install a crank arm onto a spindle, and every time you re-tighten a crank bolt. It permanently widens the taper on the crank arm, and after enough cycles this will destroy the crank arm.
Because the crank arm crawls away from the bolt, the bolt feels like it's tightened less strongly against the arm, even though the bolt didn't actually back off.
You can check whether the bolt is actually loosening by drawing a line on the head so that you can see if it has rotated since you last looked at it.