"Gravel Bike" is just the newest term for "Sports Touring Bike" of the C&V era
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: south kansas america
Posts: 1,903
Bikes: too many
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 410 Post(s)
Liked 216 Times
in
136 Posts
"Gravel Bike" is just the newest term for "Sports Touring Bike" of the C&V era
Other than some tires with more aggressive tread and the ever evolving tech refinements any sports equipment sees, these two things are the same thing. Prove me wrong....
Likes For uncle uncle:
#2
Philosopher of Bicycling
Your perception is valid, until the point where it bumps into mine. Riding a bike off pavement is different from riding a bike on pavement. Bigger tires make a less smooth surface more enjoyable. A less smooth surface is probably going to have less motor vehicles on it. Therefore a gravel road bike is likely to be more fun than a paved road bike that is limited to paved roads. Or maybe I didn't understand the question.
Likes For DeadGrandpa:
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: south kansas america
Posts: 1,903
Bikes: too many
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 410 Post(s)
Liked 216 Times
in
136 Posts
Your perception is valid, until the point where it bumps into mine. Riding a bike off pavement is different from riding a bike on pavement. Bigger tires make a less smooth surface more enjoyable. A less smooth surface is probably going to have less motor vehicles on it. Therefore a gravel road bike is likely to be more fun than a paved road bike that is limited to paved roads. Or maybe I didn't understand the question.
#4
Extraordinary Magnitude
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 13,396
Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT
Mentioned: 83 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2506 Post(s)
Liked 1,409 Times
in
794 Posts
I think if you're going to call it with an old sports tourer and a 650B conversion... I think you're on.
Don't a lot of the 80s S/Ts kind of top out at 32mm without fenders? My 86 Trek 400 Elance was happy on 32s, but you weren't getting any more out of it. Right now it's rolling with 27x1 1/8" and that's all the brake bridge will let through.
Honestly, my 86 Trek 400 Elance is my most aggressively angled bike... FWIW.
Don't a lot of the 80s S/Ts kind of top out at 32mm without fenders? My 86 Trek 400 Elance was happy on 32s, but you weren't getting any more out of it. Right now it's rolling with 27x1 1/8" and that's all the brake bridge will let through.
Honestly, my 86 Trek 400 Elance is my most aggressively angled bike... FWIW.
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
Likes For The Golden Boy:
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Jose (Willow Glen) Ca
Posts: 9,300
Bikes: Kirk Custom 85 team Miyata (modern 5800 105) on the sale block , '84 Team Miyata,(dura ace old school) 80?? SR Semi-Pro 600 Arabesque
Mentioned: 100 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2045 Post(s)
Liked 2,129 Times
in
1,205 Posts
I grew up in montana and you rode in town paved (except alleys), On Hiway 2 (still popular with bike tourers) or on gravel. So all our bikes were gravel bikes..... single speed schwinn clones, stingrays, english racer and 10 speeds... I would say bike tires were a bit bigger 1 1/2 1 3/8 1 1/4
__________________
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can
(looking for Torpado Super light frame/fork or whole biked 57,58)
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can
(looking for Torpado Super light frame/fork or whole biked 57,58)
Likes For squirtdad:
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Fairplay Co
Posts: 9,098
Bikes: Current 79 Nishiki Custum Sport, Jeunet 620, notable previous bikes P.K. Ripper loop tail, Kawahara Laser Lite, Paramount Track full chrome, Raliegh Internatioanl, Motobecan Super Mirage. 59 Crown royak 3 speed
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 677 Post(s)
Liked 1,193 Times
in
474 Posts
Seems the Op has newer actually road gravel likely washboard more than 20 miles in there life.
#7
Bike Butcher of Portland
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 11,232
Bikes: It's complicated.
Mentioned: 1246 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4431 Post(s)
Liked 4,797 Times
in
1,996 Posts
A gravel bike is a bike that you ride on gravel.
Really, though, the one commonality of gravel bikes are wide tires. Everything else is optional, and I'd dare say depends on where you're riding gravel at. Here in the PNW we have miles and miles of forestry roads, which are often steep and twisty, so powerful disk brakes are helpful.If it's wet, fenders with lots of clearance make sense.
Really, though, the one commonality of gravel bikes are wide tires. Everything else is optional, and I'd dare say depends on where you're riding gravel at. Here in the PNW we have miles and miles of forestry roads, which are often steep and twisty, so powerful disk brakes are helpful.If it's wet, fenders with lots of clearance make sense.
__________________
If someone tells you that you have enough bicycles and you don't need any more, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
If someone tells you that you have enough bicycles and you don't need any more, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
Likes For gugie:
#8
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: south kansas america
Posts: 1,903
Bikes: too many
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 410 Post(s)
Liked 216 Times
in
136 Posts
I grew up in montana and you rode in town paved (except alleys), On Hiway 2 (still popular with bike tourers) or on gravel. So all our bikes were gravel bikes..... single speed schwinn clones, stingrays, english racer and 10 speeds... I would say bike tires were a bit bigger 1 1/2 1 3/8 1 1/4
Last edited by uncle uncle; 05-15-20 at 10:40 PM.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Portland Oregon
Posts: 973
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 450 Post(s)
Liked 431 Times
in
258 Posts
Heres my gravel bike build, 650b wheelset with a S5 (5 speed) Sturmey archer hub, yea, it weighs 30 pounds, but I love it, 41c tires, set up tubless just for the juxtaposition between 1968 tech and modern tech, plus tubeless is pretty sweet... *ducks!*...

And man does that Campy crank and 53 tooth ring look so good tucked under the chainguard!

And man does that Campy crank and 53 tooth ring look so good tucked under the chainguard!
Likes For jackbombay:
#10
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: south kansas america
Posts: 1,903
Bikes: too many
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 410 Post(s)
Liked 216 Times
in
136 Posts
A gravel bike is a bike that you ride on gravel.
Really, though, the one commonality of gravel bikes are wide tires. Everything else is optional, and I'd dare say depends on where you're riding gravel at. Here in the PNW we have miles and miles of forestry roads, which are often steep and twisty, so powerful disk brakes are helpful.If it's wet, fenders with lots of clearance make sense.
Really, though, the one commonality of gravel bikes are wide tires. Everything else is optional, and I'd dare say depends on where you're riding gravel at. Here in the PNW we have miles and miles of forestry roads, which are often steep and twisty, so powerful disk brakes are helpful.If it's wet, fenders with lots of clearance make sense.
Last edited by uncle uncle; 05-15-20 at 10:46 PM.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 16,534
Mentioned: 449 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3449 Post(s)
Liked 5,376 Times
in
2,198 Posts
I thought it was another term for rigid mtb.
Likes For nlerner:
#12
Extraordinary Magnitude
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 13,396
Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT
Mentioned: 83 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2506 Post(s)
Liked 1,409 Times
in
794 Posts
A couple of weeks ago, my wife and I went for a walk on a "gravel" bike trail. I used to love riding out there because it was rough enough that the 23mm tire guys weren't out there... In the little stretch we walked, there were no fewer than 3 skinny tire guys trucking' along at a high rate of speed. At least they looked like skinny tire go fast bikes to me.
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
Likes For The Golden Boy:
#14
Bike Butcher of Portland
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 11,232
Bikes: It's complicated.
Mentioned: 1246 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4431 Post(s)
Liked 4,797 Times
in
1,996 Posts
Yep, local conditions, local bike.
__________________
If someone tells you that you have enough bicycles and you don't need any more, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
If someone tells you that you have enough bicycles and you don't need any more, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
#15
Senior Member
I'd say a modern gravel bike is a lightweight bike with >40mm tires, sensible gearing for steep terrain, and a more upright geometry for long distance. Sure, C&V sports tourers might have had sensible gearing and more upright geometry, but the wide tire and lightweight categories kill the comparison.
In my mind the only C&V subset that is truly comparable are the old 650b x 42mm French or Japanese randonneur-style bikes, the high-end ones that are below 25 pounds.
In my mind the only C&V subset that is truly comparable are the old 650b x 42mm French or Japanese randonneur-style bikes, the high-end ones that are below 25 pounds.
Likes For TenGrainBread:
#16
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: south kansas america
Posts: 1,903
Bikes: too many
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 410 Post(s)
Liked 216 Times
in
136 Posts
I was going to add too Gugie, prior to having to close the shop and take a shower, that weren't current generation disk brakes developed first for mountain bicycles, and then adapted to road bicycles? So, in a way, disk brakes are an "every bicycle" brake... not just the new gravel bicycles. So a tech evolution for the gravel bicycle, not a revolutionary discovery that then "allows" the creation of the gravel bicycle. Plus, I'm somewhat sure that disk brakes were available for bicycle back in the seventies (even if they weren't very good or popular). I think the bestest appeal of the gravel bike is not really about how it goes on gravel, but more that it's a "can do everything" bicycle, much like the old sports touring segment of C&V bicycles... and the gravel selling point is only to allow you to get on roads less traveled by motor vehicles. Maybe I'm full of it...
#17
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: south kansas america
Posts: 1,903
Bikes: too many
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 410 Post(s)
Liked 216 Times
in
136 Posts
I'd say a modern gravel bike is a lightweight bike with >40mm tires, sensible gearing for steep terrain, and a more upright geometry for long distance. Sure, C&V sports tourers might have had sensible gearing and more upright geometry, but the wide tire and lightweight categories kill the comparison.
In my mind the only C&V subset that is truly comparable are the old 650b x 42mm French or Japanese randonneur-style bikes, the high-end ones that are below 25 pounds.
In my mind the only C&V subset that is truly comparable are the old 650b x 42mm French or Japanese randonneur-style bikes, the high-end ones that are below 25 pounds.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Medford MA
Posts: 2,038
Bikes: Ron Cooper touring, 1959 Jack Taylor 650b ladyback touring tandem, Vitus 979, Joe Bell painted Claud Butler Dalesman, Colin Laing curved tube tandem, heavily-Dilberted 1982 Trek 6xx, René Herse tandem
Mentioned: 78 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 935 Post(s)
Liked 1,373 Times
in
698 Posts
scuse me, *newer know

__________________
Owner & co-founder, Cycles René Hubris. Unfortunately attaching questionable braze-ons to perfectly good frames since about 2015. With style.
Owner & co-founder, Cycles René Hubris. Unfortunately attaching questionable braze-ons to perfectly good frames since about 2015. With style.
Likes For scarlson:
#19
Bike Butcher of Portland
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 11,232
Bikes: It's complicated.
Mentioned: 1246 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4431 Post(s)
Liked 4,797 Times
in
1,996 Posts
I was going to add too Gugie, prior to having to close the shop and take a shower, that weren't current generation disk brakes developed first for mountain bicycles, and then adapted to road bicycles? So, in a way, disk brakes are an "every bicycle" brake... not just the new gravel bicycles. So a tech evolution for the gravel bicycle, not a revolutionary discovery that then "allows" the creation of the gravel bicycle. Plus, I'm somewhat sure that disk brakes were available for bicycle back in the seventies (even if they weren't very good or popular). I think the bestest appeal of the gravel bike is not really about how it goes on gravel, but more that it's a "can do everything" bicycle, much like the old sports touring segment of C&V bicycles... and the gravel selling point is only to allow you to get on roads less traveled by motor vehicles. Maybe I'm full of it...
Modern disk brakes are much better than earlier attempts, but I'd also have to say that most people don't need them. Oddly enough, the MAFAC centerpulls of old work just fine, play well with fenders, and can be purchased new as
Tires, plump, lightweight, supple tires are the real improvement, IMO. For years marketing sold us on skinny high pressure tires, which meant staying away from those nearly car free gravel roads that you and I enjoy. I've never ridden in Kansas, but I imagine gravel roads there to be similar to the wheatfields of the Palouse in Eastern Washington. scozim introduced several of us to them on a ride he organized a couple of years ago. It was the first time I tried "floating" on gravelly washboard, pushing a good pace and finding it quite fun!
Yeah, that's the big appeal of gravel: very few cars. Marketing people need to make a living, so we're sold "gravel bikes" when maybe all you need to do is pull that 70's-80's sports tourer out of the garage and put some new fat rubber on it. And as you imply, they ride great on pavement too!
__________________
If someone tells you that you have enough bicycles and you don't need any more, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
If someone tells you that you have enough bicycles and you don't need any more, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
Likes For gugie:
#20
Ride, Wrench, Swap, Race
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Northern California
Posts: 8,881
Bikes: Cheltenham-Pedersen racer, Boulder F/S Paris-Roubaix, Varsity racer, '52 Christophe, '62 Continental, '92 Merckx, '75 Limongi, '76 Presto, '72 Gitane SC, '71 Schwinn SS, etc.
Mentioned: 127 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1434 Post(s)
Liked 1,058 Times
in
733 Posts
You could certainly do real gravel, even mtb rides on a 70's sport-touring machine like my Pro-Tour, I do it all the time.
You don't even need big tires, 26mm can get the job done (with a bit more in the way of rider effort and controlled speeds).
The modern gravel bikes I've ridden felt kind of ponderous, especially with the very wide, flared bars. I didn't care for the configuration and would be loath to put much on-road riding on one.
But it just depends on how much time is spent on what kind of terrain vs. on the road. Any old mtb or hybrid can easily do both, and I've even set up a couple of touring bikes with "flat" bars and ~30-35mm tires and went everywhere on them, even rough mtb trails and rocky fire roads.
I rode a modern Specialized Sequoia just yeterday and the thing was a tank. My 24-lb Pro-Tour feels like a lively road bike compared to that.
But weight's not everything, and for softer and rockier surfaces the fatter tire always wins.
You don't even need big tires, 26mm can get the job done (with a bit more in the way of rider effort and controlled speeds).
The modern gravel bikes I've ridden felt kind of ponderous, especially with the very wide, flared bars. I didn't care for the configuration and would be loath to put much on-road riding on one.
But it just depends on how much time is spent on what kind of terrain vs. on the road. Any old mtb or hybrid can easily do both, and I've even set up a couple of touring bikes with "flat" bars and ~30-35mm tires and went everywhere on them, even rough mtb trails and rocky fire roads.
I rode a modern Specialized Sequoia just yeterday and the thing was a tank. My 24-lb Pro-Tour feels like a lively road bike compared to that.
But weight's not everything, and for softer and rockier surfaces the fatter tire always wins.
Likes For dddd:
#21
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,347
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 97 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3748 Post(s)
Liked 2,308 Times
in
1,447 Posts
Likes For ThermionicScott:
#22
Senior Member
*Except for mine. Most people need to become very desperate before they will attempt to shove a 2" 26er tube into a 33mm 700c tire.
Likes For jbchybridrider:
#24
Philosopher of Bicycling
I don't deny the truth to everything you've said, except possibly the part where you question yourself for not understanding my question... I'd say to your arguments, that the world has changed, and many bicycle riders have just been pushed off paved roads, more or less, because the increased possibilities of being hit or ran over, and that gravel roads only represent a shared road level frequency of motor vehicles, on par with the paved roads 20 years ago. I actually live just beyond the same paved roads I used to frequent with my road bike in the late 80's. In the 80's, if I had to share the road with 10 vehicles during the whole ride, I would have thought of that as a "car heavy" ride. Now, I can count two dozen vehicles, traveling at speeds 15+ mph over the posted speed limit, in a matter of a few minutes. Gravel just equals "safe experience", like less travel paved roads did 30 years ago. I just can't find any paved roads less traveled now.. anyway, the gravel bike just represents the bicycle for the average ride who wants to do it all... and most of that all, to be safe, is happening on gravel.
Likes For DeadGrandpa:
#25
Full Member
Gravel bikes, at least the ones I compared from Giant look to me like slightly less aggressive road bikes with wider, treaded tires. Perhaps lower gearing, but they all go well beyond what is needed for a fast road bike.
A welcome option for those who don't need the ruggedness and speed penalty of a mountain bike, But need more capability, including tire size options then a road bike. That said, some road bikes might do just fine if we can fit proper 32+ mm gravel tires and we are riding on firm gravel roads.
A welcome option for those who don't need the ruggedness and speed penalty of a mountain bike, But need more capability, including tire size options then a road bike. That said, some road bikes might do just fine if we can fit proper 32+ mm gravel tires and we are riding on firm gravel roads.
Last edited by xroadcharlie; 05-16-20 at 02:50 AM.