Early Cadex 980 C Excitement
#1
1/2 as far in 2x the time
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Northern Bergen County, NJ
Posts: 1,935
Bikes: Yes, Please.
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 499 Post(s)
Liked 283 Times
in
220 Posts
Early Cadex 980 C Excitement
Been on the prowl for one of these for a few years, but wanted to find one cheap, like some of those posted here. It happened yesterday. Nice backdrop, right?

Cadex, as is 100$ 1 1/2 hours away...
One picture and off to work. Yep, I bought another bike at night. Brilliant...
Looks to be in pretty nice shape. And they took 1/2 hour off my drive. Very nice folks.

Last Night, $100, no wheels.

Holy Shimano, wheels do come with it. 600 rear, 105 front, Mavic Open4CD!

7:15 gotta run
Cadex $100 no wheels, 1 1/2 hours away.

Cadex, as is 100$ 1 1/2 hours away...
One picture and off to work. Yep, I bought another bike at night. Brilliant...
Looks to be in pretty nice shape. And they took 1/2 hour off my drive. Very nice folks.

Last Night, $100, no wheels.

Holy Shimano, wheels do come with it. 600 rear, 105 front, Mavic Open4CD!

7:15 gotta run
Cadex $100 no wheels, 1 1/2 hours away.
__________________
I seem to have lost what little mind I had left before this all started.
I seem to have lost what little mind I had left before this all started.
Last edited by Last ride 76; 07-21-20 at 10:36 AM.
Likes For Last ride 76:
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,383
Bikes: too many sparkly Italians, some sweet Americans and a couple interesting Japanese
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 477 Post(s)
Liked 427 Times
in
313 Posts
I had a slightly too small 980C find for a while and greatly enjoyed the ride. Sort out that stem funny business, polish up the aluminum, and wax the carbon and that will be a beauty.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,233
Mentioned: 638 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4707 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2,989 Times
in
1,850 Posts
Interesting mix of 1990 and 1991 frame features. Serial number? FYI, both years came with Shimano 105SC as OEM. Nice acquisition. Enjoy!
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,438
Bikes: my precious steel boys
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 438 Post(s)
Liked 600 Times
in
358 Posts
Saw one of those on the road a while back and loved it. Didn't notice the wishbone stays until now - pretty unusual for a road bike.
Aluminum-lugged carbon is such a look. I dream for a Vitus Carbone...
Aluminum-lugged carbon is such a look. I dream for a Vitus Carbone...
#5
1/2 as far in 2x the time
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Northern Bergen County, NJ
Posts: 1,935
Bikes: Yes, Please.
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 499 Post(s)
Liked 283 Times
in
220 Posts
I was totally sucked in by the George Jetson (not -e Jensen) seat cluster. Still am having seen it in person. Not in love with the graphics. It will always be readily identifiable by the seat cluster anyway.

I plan to refinish the frame like QuangVuong's, though w/o his drill work. Link here: Giant Cadex 980c Build - Ultra Budget and Lightweight He did an amazing job!

Thanks for the comments, all.
Cheers, Eric
I looked for examples of catastrophic carbon failure with Cadex frames but either there were few of them, or they were so bad, that everything, including the riders, just flashed of into a puff of dust... Hopefully the former. It seems that many early carbon frames were sufficiently over-built, as far as the carbon was concerned, at least, to not have to many catastrophic carbon failures, in normal operation, as opposed to more modern (and waaaay lighter) carbon frames. Not so much invisible catastrophic damage.
__________________
I seem to have lost what little mind I had left before this all started.
I seem to have lost what little mind I had left before this all started.
Last edited by Last ride 76; 07-21-20 at 08:47 AM.
#6
1/2 as far in 2x the time
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Northern Bergen County, NJ
Posts: 1,935
Bikes: Yes, Please.
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 499 Post(s)
Liked 283 Times
in
220 Posts

Tmar, it's GC000819 What does this reveal about my new steed? Thank you! 👍
__________________
I seem to have lost what little mind I had left before this all started.
I seem to have lost what little mind I had left before this all started.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,233
Mentioned: 638 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4707 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2,989 Times
in
1,850 Posts
It's hard to say if it's GC0 or GO0. The former would indicate weeks 5-6 of 1990, which would be a 1990 model while the latter would be weeks 29-30 of 1990 and in the grey area where it could be either a 1990 or 1991 model. However, based on the CADEX logo being on the down tube, it should be a 1990 model. Give the serial number a good cleaning and report back.
We had a quite a discussion about the debut year and differences between the 1990 and 1991 models, a few years ago.
Hello! How old is my frame? Thank you!
We had a quite a discussion about the debut year and differences between the 1990 and 1991 models, a few years ago.
Hello! How old is my frame? Thank you!
#8
1/2 as far in 2x the time
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Northern Bergen County, NJ
Posts: 1,935
Bikes: Yes, Please.
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 499 Post(s)
Liked 283 Times
in
220 Posts
It's hard to say if it's GC0 or GO0. The former would indicate weeks 5-6 of 1990, which would be a 1990 model while the latter would be weeks 29-30 of 1990 and in the grey area where it could be either a 1990 or 1991 model. However, based on the CADEX logo being on the down tube, it should be a 1990 model. Give the serial number a good cleaning and report back.
We had a quite a discussion about the debut year and differences between the 1990 and 1991 models, a few years ago.
Hello! How old is my frame? Thank you!
We had a quite a discussion about the debut year and differences between the 1990 and 1991 models, a few years ago.
Hello! How old is my frame? Thank you!



__________________
I seem to have lost what little mind I had left before this all started.
I seem to have lost what little mind I had left before this all started.
Last edited by Last ride 76; 07-21-20 at 12:52 PM.
#9
1/2 as far in 2x the time
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Northern Bergen County, NJ
Posts: 1,935
Bikes: Yes, Please.
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 499 Post(s)
Liked 283 Times
in
220 Posts
My original plan was to remove the somewhat tatty clearcoat and decals, and then reclear with 2x.
Though slightly apprehensive, I removed the tt decal, using a blade, something I have done with re-painted and clearcoated steel frames. The clear-coat peeled up slightly ahead of the blade edge, most but not all of the time. It's the "not all" part that made me try the other method suggested - sanding...
I read that sanding was a safe way to remove the clearcoat, as the carbon used was harder than the paper, and would remain unscathed, within reason. I started to remove the clear, using 3M 320 Blue paper. White powder, coming up nicely, then after a minute or so, (checking ever few seconds) a hint of Gray! Maybe my paper was too coarse, it's also premium, and maybe harder than avg? Ok, I'll try std. wet or dry 600, on a different spot... A little more time, and gray again. How about paper designed for wood? Might be softer, 220 gently as possible... still gray. Now, I know sweet Fanny Adams about carbon fiber.
The gray may simply be some of the epoxy matrix the fiber is embedded in, and removing a small amount will cause no harm.
Then according to this "reasoning" of mine, when the grit hits the carbon, nothing is removed, and all will be well.
Umm, what if that's not the case? I have done no damage yet. So I am at a full stop on this one, until I get more information
Please understand that there is no criticism meant or implied towards anyone. Seriously. The results achieved by the OP whose thread I read, speak for themselves. It's amazing work...
I am frustrated, trying to figure out what is different. I have reached out directly to him, but am also posting this here to see how others have managed, removing clearcoat from bonded carbon tubes,
Hoping to hear of solutions beyond "Don't"
presuming they must exist.
Cheers, Eric
Though slightly apprehensive, I removed the tt decal, using a blade, something I have done with re-painted and clearcoated steel frames. The clear-coat peeled up slightly ahead of the blade edge, most but not all of the time. It's the "not all" part that made me try the other method suggested - sanding...
I read that sanding was a safe way to remove the clearcoat, as the carbon used was harder than the paper, and would remain unscathed, within reason. I started to remove the clear, using 3M 320 Blue paper. White powder, coming up nicely, then after a minute or so, (checking ever few seconds) a hint of Gray! Maybe my paper was too coarse, it's also premium, and maybe harder than avg? Ok, I'll try std. wet or dry 600, on a different spot... A little more time, and gray again. How about paper designed for wood? Might be softer, 220 gently as possible... still gray. Now, I know sweet Fanny Adams about carbon fiber.
The gray may simply be some of the epoxy matrix the fiber is embedded in, and removing a small amount will cause no harm.

Then according to this "reasoning" of mine, when the grit hits the carbon, nothing is removed, and all will be well.
Umm, what if that's not the case? I have done no damage yet. So I am at a full stop on this one, until I get more information
Please understand that there is no criticism meant or implied towards anyone. Seriously. The results achieved by the OP whose thread I read, speak for themselves. It's amazing work...
I am frustrated, trying to figure out what is different. I have reached out directly to him, but am also posting this here to see how others have managed, removing clearcoat from bonded carbon tubes,
Hoping to hear of solutions beyond "Don't"

Cheers, Eric
__________________
I seem to have lost what little mind I had left before this all started.
I seem to have lost what little mind I had left before this all started.
#10
Stop reading my posts!
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 12,362
Mentioned: 82 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1186 Post(s)
Liked 723 Times
in
562 Posts
I would get a good strong magnifying glass and really look over all the areas you've been sanding to see if any fiber has become exposed.If so then I'd say "too far gone" and retire the frame. But I do not buy that carbon fiber is "stronger" than silicon oxide and cannot be damaged with wet sanding it, likewise any other abrasive you may find on "sandpaper", aluminum oxide, garnet, whatever. But that's just me being ultra cautious around CF, I would not want to tempt fate! Any chemical engineer or industry expert is welcome to contradict my superstitions. And if I was sanding the clearcoat I'd be using nothing coarser than 400 wet-dry to start with, moving along to finer grade if needed as soon as it was "smooth enough" I would not try to remove 100% of the OEM clear but ALSO would find out what the OEM clear was and use the very same over it, if possible. If that cannot be determined then MAYBE would trust a waterborne PU finish like one from General Finishes as being "less likely to cause harm", but...YMMV. here's a link https://generalfinishes.com/wood-fin...urethane-water
#11
1/2 as far in 2x the time
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Northern Bergen County, NJ
Posts: 1,935
Bikes: Yes, Please.
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 499 Post(s)
Liked 283 Times
in
220 Posts
I would get a good strong magnifying glass and really look over all the areas you've been sanding to see if any fiber has become exposed.If so then I'd say "too far gone" and retire the frame. But I do not buy that carbon fiber is "stronger" than silicon oxide and cannot be damaged with wet sanding it, likewise any other abrasive you may find on "sandpaper", aluminum oxide, garnet, whatever. But that's just me being ultra cautious around CF, I would not want to tempt fate! Any chemical engineer or industry expert is welcome to contradict my superstitions. And if I was sanding the clearcoat I'd be using nothing coarser than 400 wet-dry to start with, moving along to finer grade if needed as soon as it was "smooth enough" I would not try to remove 100% of the OEM clear but ALSO would find out what the OEM clear was and use the very same over it, if possible. If that cannot be determined then MAYBE would trust a waterborne PU finish like one from General Finishes as being "less likely to cause harm", but...YMMV. here's a link https://generalfinishes.com/wood-fin...urethane-water

I will certainly check, (I actually have a low power microscope that might work well) but the total amount of "gray" dust was perhaps equal a few normal grains of sugar, (from 3 different spots) before I called a halt.. I doubt that the fabric was adversely affected. I agree, erring on the side of caution is a good idea. That Urethane looks good, hard to see how it would be reactive. Thx
__________________
I seem to have lost what little mind I had left before this all started.
I seem to have lost what little mind I had left before this all started.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 4,114
Mentioned: 101 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1482 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 608 Times
in
400 Posts
Quite a few lugged CF frame restorations had come through this forum in the last few years and most of them came out even better than most expected and I never heard of these restored frames failing on the owners.
I also noticed that these Cadex framesets in particular, take very well to sanding and refinishing, looking really nice after a new clearcoat, decals and a polish to the aluminum lugs........ I'd watch out more for any signs of any CF tube separation from the lugs, especially on frames that have evidence of living a hard life or being abused by previous owners. So don't give up on this one yet.
I also noticed that these Cadex framesets in particular, take very well to sanding and refinishing, looking really nice after a new clearcoat, decals and a polish to the aluminum lugs........ I'd watch out more for any signs of any CF tube separation from the lugs, especially on frames that have evidence of living a hard life or being abused by previous owners. So don't give up on this one yet.
#13
1/2 as far in 2x the time
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Northern Bergen County, NJ
Posts: 1,935
Bikes: Yes, Please.
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 499 Post(s)
Liked 283 Times
in
220 Posts
Which one of you said it's gonna be a good day when the seatpost comes right out?
Quite a few lugged CF frame restorations had come through this forum in the last few years and most of them came out even better than most expected and I never heard of these restored frames failing on the owners.
I also noticed that these Cadex framesets in particular, take very well to sanding and refinishing, looking really nice after a new clearcoat, decals and a polish to the aluminum lugs........ I'd watch out more for any signs of any CF tube separation from the lugs, especially on frames that have evidence of living a hard life or being abused by previous owners. So don't give up on this one yet.
I also noticed that these Cadex framesets in particular, take very well to sanding and refinishing, looking really nice after a new clearcoat, decals and a polish to the aluminum lugs........ I'd watch out more for any signs of any CF tube separation from the lugs, especially on frames that have evidence of living a hard life or being abused by previous owners. So don't give up on this one yet.

Pretty happy with the results. The razoring was actually less nerve wracking than removing the decals on most painted frames, and went quickly and smoothly, no carbon scraped or cut, and no black residue on the sand paper.

After about 5 hours of scraping, (and enough 600/1000 wet sanding to keep checking that the carbon layer was safe). There are some chain drop scrapes, that go beyond the clear coat, on the DS chainstay but the other chips which I was concerned with, turned out not to go into the carbon.

Giant apparently clear coated the whole frame as a finished unit, perhaps with the goal of limiting water penetration. So I scraped the flaking clear coat off the DS dropout. Done, and see below.

Not happy. At all. Seems like it aught to be repairable, hopefully something better than just stuffing some JB Weld in. I'm wondering if it might be possible remove the stay to repair the chain damage or just make new one and reinsert/re-cement. While I can't speak about the rest of the bonds, the tubes and lugs seem in excellent condition. Certainly pretty 👍😃
Not sure what my next step is. Reassemble the bike and put it aside, or pack the parts in a box and wrap the frame and put in storage till... Bother. I was so close, (I thought). More to come.

__________________
I seem to have lost what little mind I had left before this all started.
I seem to have lost what little mind I had left before this all started.
Likes For Jimbo1983:
#15
Senior Member
That would probably work, if you can get the pieces apart enough to prep the surfaces. There is however probably a somewhat more optimal 3M epoxy.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,383
Bikes: too many sparkly Italians, some sweet Americans and a couple interesting Japanese
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 477 Post(s)
Liked 427 Times
in
313 Posts
Terrible news. I would be very uncomfortable with a shade tree mechanical approach of just gluing it. Searching for expert repair services with a good track record is where I would look and hopefully getting comfortable with letting them do the work. I have a 979 which are known to have similar issues and saved this site in case disaster ever strikes:
https://www.guywires.com/vitusmain.htm
https://www.guywires.com/vitusmain.htm
#17
1/2 as far in 2x the time
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Northern Bergen County, NJ
Posts: 1,935
Bikes: Yes, Please.
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 499 Post(s)
Liked 283 Times
in
220 Posts
Terrible news. I would be very uncomfortable with a shade tree mechanical approach of just gluing it. Searching for expert repair services with a good track record is where I would look and hopefully getting comfortable with letting them do the work. I have a 979 which are known to have similar issues and saved this site in case disaster ever strikes:
https://www.guywires.com/vitusmain.htm
https://www.guywires.com/vitusmain.htm
__________________
I seem to have lost what little mind I had left before this all started.
I seem to have lost what little mind I had left before this all started.
#18
Stop reading my posts!
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 12,362
Mentioned: 82 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1186 Post(s)
Liked 723 Times
in
562 Posts
I don't know how much I would trust a re-bonded frame BUT if I was going to tackle this I would try to remove the DO from both chainstay (easy since it's loose) and seatstay (unknown) so I could prep both joints both aluminum and CF without stressing any parts. My object would be clean all bond surfaces of ANY and ALL old adhesive (if SAFE to use solvents then acetone and denatured alcohol) roughen up at least the AL plugs and pick one of the super epoxy products from Hysol/Loctite or MasterBond, I suggest you read up and make your own choice about which you trust. I have nothing against JB Weld (use it a lot) but this would NOT be a repair I would trust to that product, YRMV
#19
1/2 as far in 2x the time
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Northern Bergen County, NJ
Posts: 1,935
Bikes: Yes, Please.
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 499 Post(s)
Liked 283 Times
in
220 Posts
I don't know how much I would trust a re-bonded frame BUT if I was going to tackle this I would try to remove the DO from both chainstay (easy since it's loose) and seatstay (unknown) so I could prep both joints both aluminum and CF without stressing any parts. My object would be clean all bond surfaces of ANY and ALL old adhesive (if SAFE to use solvents then acetone and denatured alcohol) roughen up at least the AL plugs and pick one of the super epoxy products from Hysol/Loctite or MasterBond, I suggest you read up and make your own choice about which you trust. I have nothing against JB Weld (use it a lot) but this would NOT be a repair I would trust to that product, YRMV
__________________
I seem to have lost what little mind I had left before this all started.
I seem to have lost what little mind I had left before this all started.
#20
Stop reading my posts!
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 12,362
Mentioned: 82 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1186 Post(s)
Liked 723 Times
in
562 Posts
[QUOTE=. So... the Alan thread, seriously.[/QUOTE] What is "the Alan Thread"? Is it about repairing ALAN frames? Oh, NVM, I think I just stumbled on it, you got an ALAN Carbonio, huh? FUN!
#21
Senior Member
I am assuming the frame was prepped and glued with the same glue on all the joins. If one is noticeably failing the others may or may not be far behind.
Likes For Narhay:
#22
1/2 as far in 2x the time
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Northern Bergen County, NJ
Posts: 1,935
Bikes: Yes, Please.
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 499 Post(s)
Liked 283 Times
in
220 Posts
All sorts of possible scenarios. They don't really matter, since, as already stated, this project is on indefinite long- term hold. (Unless someone knows how to resurrecti safely and cost-effectively now). Perhaps there is a way to cannibalize the good bits, somewhere down the road. Thx all.
__________________
I seem to have lost what little mind I had left before this all started.
I seem to have lost what little mind I had left before this all started.
Last edited by Last ride 76; 08-01-20 at 12:05 AM.