Any fans of 590 BSD / 650A / 26x1-3/8 wheel size?
#1
Albatross bars are cool!!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 250
Bikes: 1984 Cannondale ST; 1975 Raleigh Grand Prix; mystery Nashbar tandem MTB; 1991 Paramount Series 20 PDG (in bits); 1984 Raleigh Record (in smaller bits, needs dropout repair); 1985 Raleigh Alyeska (wrecked, needs downtube repair)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Liked 11 Times
in
9 Posts
Any fans of 590 BSD / 650A / 26x1-3/8 wheel size?
I was thinking recently about a situation where long reach sidepulls won't reach 650b wheels on an old 27" frame, but are at about minimum adjustment with 700c wheels, and suddenly thought ... what about that screwy 590mm wheel size? And the more I thought about it, the more it seemed to make at least some sense.
My only experience with 590s to date is *cutting* off a 590 tire that appeared to have been forced with screwdrivers onto a 597mm rim. That was one of my odder bicycle experiences, for sure!
A search on 590s turned up predictably little, but I did find this nice Rivendell Saluki with 590mm Sun CR18 rims laced to Phil hubs: https://www.flickr.com/photos/emptyb...n/photostream/ ... and also this blog entry about trying 590s on a 700c Soma San Marcos: https://somafab.blogspot.com/2013/03...an-marcos.html
So at least I'm not completely crazy to have thought of it - or rather, I'm not the only crazy one? Choices for parts availability are limited (Panaracer Col de la Vie and Sun CR18 rims seem especially to be unobtanium at the moment), but I found some eBay sellers offering 590/650a complete wheels (albeit with nutted axles) for very cheap, and also a NOS lot of six name brand Japanese 650a rims for sale. Current 650a tire choices on Amazon include Schwalbe Marathons and Delta Cruisers. (Come to think of it, it was the size lists at the Schwalbe website that probably got my brain started thinking this way!)
Anyone here running 590s, possibly even on a 27" or 700c frame? I'd imagine it's more common to take a 26x1-3/8 bike and swap to a more popular wheel size, but still.
My only experience with 590s to date is *cutting* off a 590 tire that appeared to have been forced with screwdrivers onto a 597mm rim. That was one of my odder bicycle experiences, for sure!
A search on 590s turned up predictably little, but I did find this nice Rivendell Saluki with 590mm Sun CR18 rims laced to Phil hubs: https://www.flickr.com/photos/emptyb...n/photostream/ ... and also this blog entry about trying 590s on a 700c Soma San Marcos: https://somafab.blogspot.com/2013/03...an-marcos.html
So at least I'm not completely crazy to have thought of it - or rather, I'm not the only crazy one? Choices for parts availability are limited (Panaracer Col de la Vie and Sun CR18 rims seem especially to be unobtanium at the moment), but I found some eBay sellers offering 590/650a complete wheels (albeit with nutted axles) for very cheap, and also a NOS lot of six name brand Japanese 650a rims for sale. Current 650a tire choices on Amazon include Schwalbe Marathons and Delta Cruisers. (Come to think of it, it was the size lists at the Schwalbe website that probably got my brain started thinking this way!)
Anyone here running 590s, possibly even on a 27" or 700c frame? I'd imagine it's more common to take a 26x1-3/8 bike and swap to a more popular wheel size, but still.
Likes For 1987cp:
#2
Overdoing projects
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Rotterdam, former republic of the Netherlands
Posts: 2,356
Bikes: Batavus Randonneur GL, Gazelle Orange Excellent, Gazelle Super Licht, Gazelle Grand Tourist, Gazelle Lausanne, Gazelle Tandem, Koga-Miyata SilverAce, Koga-Miyata WorldTraveller
Mentioned: 55 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 757 Post(s)
Liked 1,086 Times
in
624 Posts
I ran into this size on the Gazelle Tandem. Apparently it used to be a common size on British and Dutch bikes.
The size is close enough to 650B at 584mm that I made the switch. My main motivation was the lack of tyre choice. 650B has lots of different options nowadays ranging from your standard heavy-duty to ultralight skinwalls.
Schwalbe for comparison offers a total of 4 models in ETRTO 37-590 and just one in 42-590. But outside of the places where these used to be sold they are probably hard to come by.
Now I mostly run into this size on drum brake and coaster brake bikes so YMMV. Not sure if there were even rims made in aluminum or if it was all stainless steel and chromed steel?
The size is close enough to 650B at 584mm that I made the switch. My main motivation was the lack of tyre choice. 650B has lots of different options nowadays ranging from your standard heavy-duty to ultralight skinwalls.
Schwalbe for comparison offers a total of 4 models in ETRTO 37-590 and just one in 42-590. But outside of the places where these used to be sold they are probably hard to come by.
Now I mostly run into this size on drum brake and coaster brake bikes so YMMV. Not sure if there were even rims made in aluminum or if it was all stainless steel and chromed steel?
Last edited by JaccoW; 07-24-20 at 02:48 AM.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2019
Posts: 623
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 331 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 354 Times
in
239 Posts
Hey 1987, have you tried obtaining the ancient WEINMANN L.S. 2.8 (complete side pull assembly) from a SCHWINN COLLEGIATE from the seventies, actually I think the 1969 models are marked L.S. 2.8-------------------------the Sixties era COLLEGIATE has the same exact WEINMANN side pulls except that for year model 1968 and earlier the calipers will be stamped WEINMANN model 810 because the Schwinn internal coded size marking didn't begin until 1969 but they are the same exact items.
THE REASON THAT I ASK THIS, IS BECAUSE THE 26 x 1 3/8 (597mm) wheeled COLLEGIATE and the VARSITY 27 x 1 1/4 (630mm) have essentially the same electroforged frames.........................THE 27 inch wheeled VARSITY & SUBURBAN have Weinmann L.S. 2.4 side pulls and the COLLEGIATE and other schwinns like Breeze with handbrakes do have the 597mm 26 inch......................the frames are about the same between the 27 inch (630mm) and 26 inch(597) bikes such that swapping these WEINMANN assemblies gives one the REACH that one would need when building something from say an old bare electroforged frame.
Sorry, but I can't remember what the Weinmann model number for the 27" Varsity brakes(in 1968 and earlier) before they began the L.S. 2.4 designation in 1969........again they are exactly the same. (the L.S. 2.4 or whatever model number Weinmann it was on 1968 & earlier WON'T HELP YOU BECAUSE YOU NEED LONGER REACH, THAT IS WHY I RECOMMEND LOOKING FOR A $6 pair of excellent condition L.S. 2.8 Weinmann sidepulls from the COLLEGIATE etc)
Getting the entire assembly for both front and rear, should not cost you more than about $6 on ebay and the flatrate priority small box might be around another six bucks if the seller doesn't want to box or bag and use regular first class postage which likely be nominally less.
Here is something that might surprise you and might help:
On that SCHWINN coding: THE FIRST NUMBER in example (L.S. 2.8) the first number is TWO as you see and that FIRST NUMBER is the DISTANCE IN INCHES from Center of Mounting Bolt to The Center of The Brake PAD Mounting SLOT.......................but WAIT that isn't all BECAUSE you need to CONSIDER THAT SECOND NUMBER as the "Tenths" -------------------------and each "Tenths" = 3/32 inch-------------------------------------Okay what the heck does that mean? well you see your "Tenths" number is eight........( 8 )................................So Eight times 3/32 equals 24/32. ...........................8 x 3/32 = 24/32...................well you know that 24/32 is actually 3/4.........................you remember your 4th grade elementary school math, right.....................................WELL YOU TAKE THAT AS THE TOTAL DISTANCE from the Center of Mounting Bolt to The Center of the Brake Pad Mounting Slot of this WEINMANN side pull caliper brake assembly of the SCHWINN COLLEGIATE is TWO INCHES and 24/32 inches -or- TWO INCHES and 3/4 inches -or- more simply written 2 3/4 " --------------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't know if using the old alloy L.S. 2.8 will solve your situation but it might. (or Weinmann model 810.........I am fairly certain that Weinmann 810 is the same exact item as I had a 1968 Collegiate that I gave to my neighbor...)
Like I mentioned the L.S. 2.8 and model 810 are identical.................and applicable to the COLLEGIATE and the 597mm 26 inch tire Schwinns.
Millions of bikes, Schwinns and other brands did have these alloy side pull caliper assemblies made by WEINMANN.
Oh, well if you are wondering what the L and S stands for.....................L indicates to be fitted to "LIGHTWEIGHTS" ........Collegiate/Breeze/Varsity/Suburban...etc
S stands for SIDEPULL
So the L.S. 2.8 example..........the first letter tells you L for "LIGHTWEIGHTS (-----if the first letter was M that would be "MIDDLEWEIGHTS and if the first letter was B that would mean "BALLOON TIRE BICYCLES"
The second letter in the example indicates the type of Caliper Brake..................S means SIDEPULLS and if that second letter was C that would mean CENTERPULL
I CAN'T REMEMBER ALL OF THE different size calipers from WEINMANN that Schwinn employed but I think that L.S. 2.8 or model 810 is the one that you should look at.
You're trying to get something with enough slot reach to accomodate your 584mm bead seat diameter tires...............................I am know that these old Weinmanns are employed on non-Schwinns with the 590mm "common" 26 x 1 3/8 and also on SCHWINNS with the 597mm schwinn 26 x 1 3/8.
I don't know if you consider the ancient Weinmann sidepulls to be decent enough for your bike. In my opinion, they are better quality than many of the steel sidepulls seen on ancient Raleighs and other ancient bikes from Italy and France but we are talking about really ancient bikes from say fifty to seventy years ago, so I'm really not sure you'd even consider using such ancient Weinmans, even if they would solve your reach problem.
Perhaps get a photo posted of the necessary reach needed using say a clear ruller with millimeter readings, and ask the folks here on the forum to measure particular caliper assemblies to see if perhaps you can find something more modern than the old WEINMANNS that would work in your situation.
I don't have any L.S. 2.8 or model 810 WEINMANNS in my parts stash, otherwise if I did, I would offer to give them to you and mail it free to you. I do have a collection of Collegiates at the lake house and here at the house and I think two others at Hilton Head, so wherever I'm at, there are Collegiates and Suburbans that are ready to ride, and fully serviced and really nice examples in various colors. What can I say, I'm just an old fool that likes early to mid seventies 5 speed COLLEGIATES and 5 speed SUBURBANS..........
THE REASON THAT I ASK THIS, IS BECAUSE THE 26 x 1 3/8 (597mm) wheeled COLLEGIATE and the VARSITY 27 x 1 1/4 (630mm) have essentially the same electroforged frames.........................THE 27 inch wheeled VARSITY & SUBURBAN have Weinmann L.S. 2.4 side pulls and the COLLEGIATE and other schwinns like Breeze with handbrakes do have the 597mm 26 inch......................the frames are about the same between the 27 inch (630mm) and 26 inch(597) bikes such that swapping these WEINMANN assemblies gives one the REACH that one would need when building something from say an old bare electroforged frame.
Sorry, but I can't remember what the Weinmann model number for the 27" Varsity brakes(in 1968 and earlier) before they began the L.S. 2.4 designation in 1969........again they are exactly the same. (the L.S. 2.4 or whatever model number Weinmann it was on 1968 & earlier WON'T HELP YOU BECAUSE YOU NEED LONGER REACH, THAT IS WHY I RECOMMEND LOOKING FOR A $6 pair of excellent condition L.S. 2.8 Weinmann sidepulls from the COLLEGIATE etc)
Getting the entire assembly for both front and rear, should not cost you more than about $6 on ebay and the flatrate priority small box might be around another six bucks if the seller doesn't want to box or bag and use regular first class postage which likely be nominally less.
Here is something that might surprise you and might help:
On that SCHWINN coding: THE FIRST NUMBER in example (L.S. 2.8) the first number is TWO as you see and that FIRST NUMBER is the DISTANCE IN INCHES from Center of Mounting Bolt to The Center of The Brake PAD Mounting SLOT.......................but WAIT that isn't all BECAUSE you need to CONSIDER THAT SECOND NUMBER as the "Tenths" -------------------------and each "Tenths" = 3/32 inch-------------------------------------Okay what the heck does that mean? well you see your "Tenths" number is eight........( 8 )................................So Eight times 3/32 equals 24/32. ...........................8 x 3/32 = 24/32...................well you know that 24/32 is actually 3/4.........................you remember your 4th grade elementary school math, right.....................................WELL YOU TAKE THAT AS THE TOTAL DISTANCE from the Center of Mounting Bolt to The Center of the Brake Pad Mounting Slot of this WEINMANN side pull caliper brake assembly of the SCHWINN COLLEGIATE is TWO INCHES and 24/32 inches -or- TWO INCHES and 3/4 inches -or- more simply written 2 3/4 " --------------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't know if using the old alloy L.S. 2.8 will solve your situation but it might. (or Weinmann model 810.........I am fairly certain that Weinmann 810 is the same exact item as I had a 1968 Collegiate that I gave to my neighbor...)
Like I mentioned the L.S. 2.8 and model 810 are identical.................and applicable to the COLLEGIATE and the 597mm 26 inch tire Schwinns.
Millions of bikes, Schwinns and other brands did have these alloy side pull caliper assemblies made by WEINMANN.
Oh, well if you are wondering what the L and S stands for.....................L indicates to be fitted to "LIGHTWEIGHTS" ........Collegiate/Breeze/Varsity/Suburban...etc
S stands for SIDEPULL
So the L.S. 2.8 example..........the first letter tells you L for "LIGHTWEIGHTS (-----if the first letter was M that would be "MIDDLEWEIGHTS and if the first letter was B that would mean "BALLOON TIRE BICYCLES"
The second letter in the example indicates the type of Caliper Brake..................S means SIDEPULLS and if that second letter was C that would mean CENTERPULL
I CAN'T REMEMBER ALL OF THE different size calipers from WEINMANN that Schwinn employed but I think that L.S. 2.8 or model 810 is the one that you should look at.
You're trying to get something with enough slot reach to accomodate your 584mm bead seat diameter tires...............................I am know that these old Weinmanns are employed on non-Schwinns with the 590mm "common" 26 x 1 3/8 and also on SCHWINNS with the 597mm schwinn 26 x 1 3/8.
I don't know if you consider the ancient Weinmann sidepulls to be decent enough for your bike. In my opinion, they are better quality than many of the steel sidepulls seen on ancient Raleighs and other ancient bikes from Italy and France but we are talking about really ancient bikes from say fifty to seventy years ago, so I'm really not sure you'd even consider using such ancient Weinmans, even if they would solve your reach problem.
Perhaps get a photo posted of the necessary reach needed using say a clear ruller with millimeter readings, and ask the folks here on the forum to measure particular caliper assemblies to see if perhaps you can find something more modern than the old WEINMANNS that would work in your situation.
I don't have any L.S. 2.8 or model 810 WEINMANNS in my parts stash, otherwise if I did, I would offer to give them to you and mail it free to you. I do have a collection of Collegiates at the lake house and here at the house and I think two others at Hilton Head, so wherever I'm at, there are Collegiates and Suburbans that are ready to ride, and fully serviced and really nice examples in various colors. What can I say, I'm just an old fool that likes early to mid seventies 5 speed COLLEGIATES and 5 speed SUBURBANS..........
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 16,777
Mentioned: 460 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3603 Post(s)
Liked 5,850 Times
in
2,354 Posts
Built this one up with Sun CR-18 EA3 rims and Col de la vie tires:

As others have pointed out, there are far more tire and rim choices these days in 650b/584mm, and most bikes that can be converted to 590mm wheels can likely be converted to 584. However, Grand Bois in Japan shows a couple of intriguing options: https://cyclesgrandbois.com/SHOP/279...5974/list.html
I’ve ordered other things from them, particularly when the dollar buys lots of yen, and service was good, shipping prompt and fairly reasonably priced.

As others have pointed out, there are far more tire and rim choices these days in 650b/584mm, and most bikes that can be converted to 590mm wheels can likely be converted to 584. However, Grand Bois in Japan shows a couple of intriguing options: https://cyclesgrandbois.com/SHOP/279...5974/list.html
I’ve ordered other things from them, particularly when the dollar buys lots of yen, and service was good, shipping prompt and fairly reasonably priced.
Likes For nlerner:
#5
Senior Member
I'll start by saying there are very few instances where using a 650A rim will help with brake reach vs. 650B. There's only a 3mm difference in radius between the two.
650A was very popular in Japan and East Asia for many decades on both utility bikes and the lightweight randonneur and camping bikes inspired by the French constructeurs that were popular in Japan in the 70s, 80s, and 90s. Japanese industry offered lightweight 650A rims and tires during this time period for cyclotourists, and still do. While 650B is taking over as the dominant size in this category in Japan, you will find that many touring bikes of the last 50 years were built for 650A.
650A was very popular in Japan and East Asia for many decades on both utility bikes and the lightweight randonneur and camping bikes inspired by the French constructeurs that were popular in Japan in the 70s, 80s, and 90s. Japanese industry offered lightweight 650A rims and tires during this time period for cyclotourists, and still do. While 650B is taking over as the dominant size in this category in Japan, you will find that many touring bikes of the last 50 years were built for 650A.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 1,988
Bikes: Trek 800 x 2, Schwinn Heavy Duti, Schwinn Traveler, Schwinn Le Tour Luxe, Schwinn Continental, Cannondale M400 and Lambert, Schwinn Super Sport
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 759 Post(s)
Liked 897 Times
in
601 Posts
Yes, I built my wife's Panasonic Mixte with them. I think the size works well since I was starting with 630 (27"). I wanted something wider, softer and shorter than the 27" x 1-1/4" tires. This worked well. As you can see, it has CR-18 rims and Schwalbe Delta Cruiser tires in creme. I need to get a better picture sometime.

Someone on Bike Forums had said that with 26" x 1-3/8" wheels that you are limited to only CR-18 rims. That may be true or mostly true,however, they are good rims. These are polished with eyelets. These are VO fenders and chainguard.

Someone on Bike Forums had said that with 26" x 1-3/8" wheels that you are limited to only CR-18 rims. That may be true or mostly true,however, they are good rims. These are polished with eyelets. These are VO fenders and chainguard.
Likes For Velo Mule:
#7
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,577
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3409 Post(s)
Liked 3,011 Times
in
1,729 Posts
I run 650A/590mm tires on my Raleigh 3-speed. The main disadvantage is a dearth of high-quality tires in that size. The Panaracer "Col de la Vie" is probably the best, and that's largely because the other offerings are quite mediocre. The Col de la Vie has a fairly supple sidewall, like the Pasela, but the tread is thicker than the Pasela. They're wider thasan most other 650A tires, and take a bit of care to ensure mudguard clearance.
Likes For JohnDThompson:
#8
Albatross bars are cool!!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 250
Bikes: 1984 Cannondale ST; 1975 Raleigh Grand Prix; mystery Nashbar tandem MTB; 1991 Paramount Series 20 PDG (in bits); 1984 Raleigh Record (in smaller bits, needs dropout repair); 1985 Raleigh Alyeska (wrecked, needs downtube repair)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Liked 11 Times
in
9 Posts
I do get about switching to 584. And Dia Compe 750 brakes are excellent, and got 584s successfully onto our mixte frame that had this problem.
My info so far is that at minimum, Sun, Araya, and Ukai made alloy 650a rims. Plus whatever (probably) cheaper rim is on the better new offerings I found on eBay.
I seem to recall Harris Cyclery sells (or did sell?) a 650a CR18 laced to an internally geared hub in 130mm OLD - though apparently not a front wheel.
Interesting info about the old Schwinn parts .... lots of that stuff still floating around, if only one knows where to look!
Likes For 1987cp:
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,429
Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones
Mentioned: 177 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5849 Post(s)
Liked 3,355 Times
in
2,011 Posts
ThermionicScott built up a randonneur with this wheel size.
Alloy 650A rims are a good way to soup up an old British 3 speed like JohnDThompson did.
I actually have 2 sets of these rims: a good looking weinmann set with eyelets and an ambrosio set that is hookless which would look good on an old Italian city bike.
I like the OP's idea that this rim size might make sense for getting a fatter tire on a road bike when you are uncertain about the reach if inistalling 650b. We're only talking about 3 mm at the rim but that can make a difference. The Dia compe centerpulls top out at 78 mm. There are some sidepulls out there that have more reach as well as Vintage Schwinn points out.
Tires as others have pointed out is a limiting factor.
I love what nlerner did with his peugeot px 10 with a 3 speed hub, 26 x 1 and 3/8 rims, and flat bars. That is a neat idea for a lightweight city cruiser. Hmm, I have a 70s PR 10 frame sitting around, I have 26 x 1 and 3/8 rims, and a pair of continental city ride 26 x 1 and 3/8 tires . . . . I may have just stumbled into a new project, a 1 x 6 peugeot PR 10 city cruiser with fenders and a flat bar.
Alloy 650A rims are a good way to soup up an old British 3 speed like JohnDThompson did.
I actually have 2 sets of these rims: a good looking weinmann set with eyelets and an ambrosio set that is hookless which would look good on an old Italian city bike.
I like the OP's idea that this rim size might make sense for getting a fatter tire on a road bike when you are uncertain about the reach if inistalling 650b. We're only talking about 3 mm at the rim but that can make a difference. The Dia compe centerpulls top out at 78 mm. There are some sidepulls out there that have more reach as well as Vintage Schwinn points out.
Tires as others have pointed out is a limiting factor.
I love what nlerner did with his peugeot px 10 with a 3 speed hub, 26 x 1 and 3/8 rims, and flat bars. That is a neat idea for a lightweight city cruiser. Hmm, I have a 70s PR 10 frame sitting around, I have 26 x 1 and 3/8 rims, and a pair of continental city ride 26 x 1 and 3/8 tires . . . . I may have just stumbled into a new project, a 1 x 6 peugeot PR 10 city cruiser with fenders and a flat bar.
Last edited by bikemig; 07-24-20 at 09:54 AM.
#10
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 120
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 32 Post(s)
Liked 4 Times
in
3 Posts
I’m a big fan of 650a having accidentally built up a cheap 10 speed with this wheel size. It was a city beater and I didn’t know any better at the time. I was planning to build up my next commuter with this size so it’s nice to see how good the Peugeot looks.
In my perfect world, the 650a size would have been chosen to revive, considering that it was an already well established old standard, so tires can still be found in a pinch at the Walmart’s of the world. It’s still used in Japan on touring bikes, and also happens to be the standard size for wheelchair tires. A 3mm reach difference vs 650b doesn’t sound like much but can make the difference between using long reach brakes or having to resort to much more serious modifications.
In my perfect world, the 650a size would have been chosen to revive, considering that it was an already well established old standard, so tires can still be found in a pinch at the Walmart’s of the world. It’s still used in Japan on touring bikes, and also happens to be the standard size for wheelchair tires. A 3mm reach difference vs 650b doesn’t sound like much but can make the difference between using long reach brakes or having to resort to much more serious modifications.
Likes For Iniezione:
#11
Albatross bars are cool!!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 250
Bikes: 1984 Cannondale ST; 1975 Raleigh Grand Prix; mystery Nashbar tandem MTB; 1991 Paramount Series 20 PDG (in bits); 1984 Raleigh Record (in smaller bits, needs dropout repair); 1985 Raleigh Alyeska (wrecked, needs downtube repair)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Liked 11 Times
in
9 Posts
I'd forgotten about this picture from the Rivendell blog a few years ago (https://www.rivbike.com/blogs/peeking-through-the-knothole/new-blahg-tues-nov-29-tire-size-that-neer-was-carbon-shellac):
Grant mentions cutting and stitching a 700c tire for a one-off rim made by Velocity in a size "between 700c and 650b". Presumably it was not 590 or 597 or he would have mentioned just what it was? Anywhoo.
Grant mentions cutting and stitching a 700c tire for a one-off rim made by Velocity in a size "between 700c and 650b". Presumably it was not 590 or 597 or he would have mentioned just what it was? Anywhoo.

#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 16,777
Mentioned: 460 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3603 Post(s)
Liked 5,850 Times
in
2,354 Posts
Probably not what Grant was referring to, but there was the very short lived 700D size found on some GT bikes. According to Sheldon Brown they were labeled 587mm but were actually 583: https://www.sheldonbrown.com/harris/tires/587.html
Very weird.
Very weird.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,429
Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones
Mentioned: 177 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5849 Post(s)
Liked 3,355 Times
in
2,011 Posts
Probably not what Grant was referring to, but there was the very short lived 700D size found on some GT bikes. According to Sheldon Brown they were labeled 587mm but were actually 583: https://www.sheldonbrown.com/harris/tires/587.html
Very weird.
Very weird.
Jan 23 1991 GT Quatrefoil Tandem | Retrobike
This is a good article discussing the 700D
https://www.bikehugger.com/posts/the...at-wasnt-700d/
Likes For bikemig:
#14
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: SE Pennsylvania
Posts: 20
Bikes: 6 or 7 Raleighs, a Schwinn, a Bianchi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
4 Posts
I’m a big fan of 650a having accidentally built up a cheap 10 speed with this wheel size. It was a city beater and I didn’t know any better at the time. I was planning to build up my next commuter with this size so it’s nice to see how good the Peugeot looks.
In my perfect world, the 650a size would have been chosen to revive, considering that it was an already well established old standard, so tires can still be found in a pinch at the Walmart’s of the world. It’s still used in Japan on touring bikes, and also happens to be the standard size for wheelchair tires. A 3mm reach difference vs 650b doesn’t sound like much but can make the difference between using long reach brakes or having to resort to much more serious modifications.
In my perfect world, the 650a size would have been chosen to revive, considering that it was an already well established old standard, so tires can still be found in a pinch at the Walmart’s of the world. It’s still used in Japan on touring bikes, and also happens to be the standard size for wheelchair tires. A 3mm reach difference vs 650b doesn’t sound like much but can make the difference between using long reach brakes or having to resort to much more serious modifications.
I used a Weinmann 750 centerpull in front and a Sturmey Archer AWC in back which was a coaster brake 3 speed.
Mine was done on the dirt cheap, the only new things I used were tires and tubes.
But it was a fun ride.
Pete
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Evanston, IL
Posts: 5,653
Bikes: many
Mentioned: 61 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1344 Post(s)
Liked 1,180 Times
in
657 Posts
I converted my mid-70s Schwinn Speedster from steel ISO 597 rims to aluminum ISO 590 (CR-18). I've been through a couple sets of Col de la Vie tires and went looking for another set. I'm finding little stock, and none stateside. I presume that's caused mostly by COVID-19-related stock issues. Still, you might find nothing but Kenda (which are just TSOs in my opinion). Clearly, if you can make them fit, 650b will give you many more tire choices.
Likes For smontanaro:
#16
www.theheadbadge.com
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,351
Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2338 Post(s)
Liked 4,031 Times
in
1,988 Posts
Likes For cudak888:
#17
Albatross bars are cool!!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 250
Bikes: 1984 Cannondale ST; 1975 Raleigh Grand Prix; mystery Nashbar tandem MTB; 1991 Paramount Series 20 PDG (in bits); 1984 Raleigh Record (in smaller bits, needs dropout repair); 1985 Raleigh Alyeska (wrecked, needs downtube repair)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Liked 11 Times
in
9 Posts
Did sort through lots of old-school Kendas, one or two nicer Kendas, and also CRT and .... Wanda, I think?
What's a TSO, by the way?
Last edited by 1987cp; 07-25-20 at 08:21 PM.
#18
Señor Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hardy, VA
Posts: 17,773
Bikes: Mostly English - predominantly Raleighs
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1408 Post(s)
Liked 925 Times
in
561 Posts
I was almost forced to go with the size a few years back when I was putting this Clubman on the road. I built the wheels with CR-18's and put Col de la Vies on it. It rides pretty nicely

I've since built another set of wheels for a 1962-ish Lenton Sports that's a slightly longer BB away from being put back on the road.

With some assistance from Cudak888, I am building up a few sets of wheels using rims he scavenged from those Spin bikes. They are alloy and will serve as upgrades for a few bikes that I have that originally came with that size.
None of this really counts as converting wheel size from something that the bike was designed for to 650A, but it is definitely a viable option, and I can imagine circumstances where it would be "just the thing".
Hey Kurt, are those white tires SOMAs?

I've since built another set of wheels for a 1962-ish Lenton Sports that's a slightly longer BB away from being put back on the road.

With some assistance from Cudak888, I am building up a few sets of wheels using rims he scavenged from those Spin bikes. They are alloy and will serve as upgrades for a few bikes that I have that originally came with that size.
None of this really counts as converting wheel size from something that the bike was designed for to 650A, but it is definitely a viable option, and I can imagine circumstances where it would be "just the thing".
Hey Kurt, are those white tires SOMAs?
__________________
In search of what to search for.
In search of what to search for.
Likes For USAZorro:
#20
www.theheadbadge.com
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,351
Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2338 Post(s)
Liked 4,031 Times
in
1,988 Posts
#21
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 120
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 32 Post(s)
Liked 4 Times
in
3 Posts
Sounds like a good build, any pictures?
I converted an 80-ish Schwinn to 650A a few years back when folks on the BOB mailing list were doing 650B conversions.
I used a Weinmann 750 centerpull in front and a Sturmey Archer AWC in back which was a coaster brake 3 speed.
Mine was done on the dirt cheap, the only new things I used were tires and tubes.
But it was a fun ride.
Pete
I used a Weinmann 750 centerpull in front and a Sturmey Archer AWC in back which was a coaster brake 3 speed.
Mine was done on the dirt cheap, the only new things I used were tires and tubes.
But it was a fun ride.
Pete
#23
Overdoing projects
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Rotterdam, former republic of the Netherlands
Posts: 2,356
Bikes: Batavus Randonneur GL, Gazelle Orange Excellent, Gazelle Super Licht, Gazelle Grand Tourist, Gazelle Lausanne, Gazelle Tandem, Koga-Miyata SilverAce, Koga-Miyata WorldTraveller
Mentioned: 55 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 757 Post(s)
Liked 1,086 Times
in
624 Posts
#24
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: SE Pennsylvania
Posts: 20
Bikes: 6 or 7 Raleighs, a Schwinn, a Bianchi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
4 Posts
Yeah, Isn't that something.
I suppose I was getting what info I needed from the Classic Rendezvous and the BOB lists (Bridgestone Owners Bunch)
But I would lurk on this site and some others from time to time.
Pete
I suppose I was getting what info I needed from the Classic Rendezvous and the BOB lists (Bridgestone Owners Bunch)
But I would lurk on this site and some others from time to time.
Pete