Road Test/Bike Review (1984) Best Buys for Triathletes
10-09-20, 10:24 AM
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Henderson, NV, USA
Posts: 1,136
Bikes: Litespeed (9); Slingshot (6); Specialized (2); Kestrel (2); Softride (2); Centurion (2); Cervelo (1); FELT (1); Cannondale (1); Fuji (1); Trek (1); Schwinn (1)
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 274 Post(s)
Liked 657 Times
in
303 Posts
Road Test/Bike Review (1984) Best Buys for Triathletes
There were no "triathlete bikes" in 1984, but there were bicycle manufacturers eager to tap into the growing market of a nascent sport.
The article was prescient of the key change to come -- introduction of the Quintana Roo Superform in 1989, and the subsequent acceptance of steep seat tube angle (76 degrees and greater) as the key feature of "tri-specific" frame geometry.
Enough already.
The affordable, tight, short-wheelbase racing bikes reviewed in this article are CENTURION Comp TA, PANASONIC Team, PINARELLO Triathlon G.S.,
AUSTRO-DAIMLER SLE, and SCHWINN Peloton.
The article was prescient of the key change to come -- introduction of the Quintana Roo Superform in 1989, and the subsequent acceptance of steep seat tube angle (76 degrees and greater) as the key feature of "tri-specific" frame geometry.
Enough already.
The affordable, tight, short-wheelbase racing bikes reviewed in this article are CENTURION Comp TA, PANASONIC Team, PINARELLO Triathlon G.S.,
AUSTRO-DAIMLER SLE, and SCHWINN Peloton.
__________________
WTB: Slingshot road model (1990s era; 18" L or 20" XL frame size)
WTB: Slingshot promotional documents (catalog, pamphlets, etc).
WTB: American Cycling Jun-Jul 1965; Jan - Aug, Oct 1966; Mar, Jul 1967.
WTB: Bicycle Guide issues, all you have.
WTB: Bike World issues Feb - Sep 1972; Jun 1974; Mar-Apr 1978.
WTB: ZIPP 500 front wheel (650c clincher)
WTB: Slingshot road model (1990s era; 18" L or 20" XL frame size)
WTB: Slingshot promotional documents (catalog, pamphlets, etc).
WTB: American Cycling Jun-Jul 1965; Jan - Aug, Oct 1966; Mar, Jul 1967.
WTB: Bicycle Guide issues, all you have.
WTB: Bike World issues Feb - Sep 1972; Jun 1974; Mar-Apr 1978.
WTB: ZIPP 500 front wheel (650c clincher)
Likes For SpeedofLite:
10-09-20, 02:57 PM
#2
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 11,954
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 97 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4856 Post(s)
Liked 2,081 Times
in
1,243 Posts
The gearing range even for entry level comp road bikes was crazy back then.
10-09-20, 04:20 PM
#3
Senior Member
What I found interesting were the size of the frames used by "athletes" in this article. Is this what would be referred to as "French Fit" ?
10-09-20, 06:24 PM
#4
2k miles from the midwest
Originally Posted by BikeWonder
What I found interesting were the size of the frames used by "athletes" in this article. Is this what would be referred to as "French Fit" ?
I don't know, but I've had french fit with less seatpost showing than that.
10-10-20, 05:13 AM
#5
Freewheel Medic
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Ascending or Descending the NH Mountains NW of Concord!
Posts: 11,522
Bikes: Snazzy* Schwinns, Classy Cannondales, & a Lonely '83 Santana Tandem (* Ed.)
Mentioned: 95 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 649 Post(s)
Liked 253 Times
in
170 Posts
Interesting that none of the bikes were equipped with either Shimano Dura Ace AX of 600 AX, introduced in 1982, and were touted for their aerodynamic properties which would increase overall speed and reduce time.
I suppose
triathletes in the early 1980s were not concerned about achieving better finish times?
I suppose
triathletes in the early 1980s were not concerned about achieving better finish times?
__________________
Bob
Dreaming about riding in NH's summertime!
Visit my websites:
FreeWheelSpa.com orpastorbobnlnh.com
Bob
Dreaming about riding in NH's summertime!
Visit my websites:
FreeWheelSpa.com orpastorbobnlnh.com
10-10-20, 10:44 PM
#6
Me duelen las nalgas
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 12,271
Bikes: Centurion Ironman, Trek 5900, Univega Via Carisma, Globe Carmel
Mentioned: 186 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3946 Post(s)
Liked 1,704 Times
in
1,096 Posts
Regarding aero bike design, I suspect that then, as now, cyclists knew their own bodies were the main aerodynamic drag. Almost nothing on a road bike creates significant enough drag to worry about, compared with the cyclist's own body position and snug kit.
I noticed the Centurion Ironman bikes tended to incorporate Shimano and Suntour groups that were sorta-aero for that era. The Suntour GPX group has flowing lines in the crank spider, brakes, the usual aero brake hoods, even the downtube shifters are a bit more streamlined than some from that era.
Some users report the Dura Ace AX setup was a PITA, including cable routing for the rear derailleur. I'm sure plenty of wind tunnel tests have been done to check the gains made by internal cable routing, etc., but it's probably still all marginal compared with aero bars of any kind, getting low and a skinsuit or snug kit and reasonably aero helmet.
And some aero components of the era before single purpose TT bikes seemed like a bit of a stretch, such as aero seat posts. Hard to imagine how that could make enough difference to justify the cost on bikes before aero bars were in common use. As uncomfortable as the early Scott bars were, that single addition probably made more practical difference than the shape of any component.
I noticed the Centurion Ironman bikes tended to incorporate Shimano and Suntour groups that were sorta-aero for that era. The Suntour GPX group has flowing lines in the crank spider, brakes, the usual aero brake hoods, even the downtube shifters are a bit more streamlined than some from that era.
Some users report the Dura Ace AX setup was a PITA, including cable routing for the rear derailleur. I'm sure plenty of wind tunnel tests have been done to check the gains made by internal cable routing, etc., but it's probably still all marginal compared with aero bars of any kind, getting low and a skinsuit or snug kit and reasonably aero helmet.
And some aero components of the era before single purpose TT bikes seemed like a bit of a stretch, such as aero seat posts. Hard to imagine how that could make enough difference to justify the cost on bikes before aero bars were in common use. As uncomfortable as the early Scott bars were, that single addition probably made more practical difference than the shape of any component.
