Vintage or modern for serious touring?
#76
I’m a little Surly
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Southern Germany
Posts: 2,267
Bikes: Two Cross Checks and a Karate Monkey
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 619 Post(s)
Liked 1,162 Times
in
587 Posts
The end state is a steel touring bike is a steel touring bike, unless you need/want some of newer mounts modern bikes have. I don't generally do old chit but there are benefits 7/8/9 speed era like cheap cassettes and chains and they're available everywhere. STI's/Ergo's don't do anything for me on a touring bike since I'd rather have the flexibility to use different wheels with different cassette brands and sizes but both systems at this point are bullet proof.
Last edited by Germany_chris; 10-14-20 at 01:07 AM.
Likes For Germany_chris:
#77
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2020
Posts: 2,351
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 897 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 990 Times
in
594 Posts
You can have a sporty touring bike that is fun to ride unloaded with an old frame or a new frame. My gunnar crosshairs is great as a road bike. Many modern 'gravel bikes' 'cx bikes' make great sport touring rides.
Also new v old, I reckon the best modern advance for touring is a dynamo hub & led light. Not Discs or STI. Rather not have em.
Also new v old, I reckon the best modern advance for touring is a dynamo hub & led light. Not Discs or STI. Rather not have em.
#78
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Eastern Shore, MD
Posts: 1,891
Bikes: Road ready: 1993 Koga Miyata City Liner Touring Hybrid, 1989 Centurion Sport DLX, "I Blame GP" Bridgestone CB-1. Projects: Yea, I got a problem....
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 649 Post(s)
Liked 459 Times
in
302 Posts
Late to the party, but being the 250lb pound guy with gear, I found my 90's Koga Miyata touring hybrid to be like riding a slinky with any kind of load on the back. I'm pretty sure it has the same tubing as a Miyata 1000. I've rode the heck out of it this summer unloaded and its been great. I have a mid 90's Cannondale T700 that I'm going to transfer the cockpit, drivetrain and racks over to. I'm assuming the Cannondale will take a load as well as a Surly frame, and the the Koga will get drop bars and eventually a lighter wheelset. So while its obvious that you need both bikes, I will throw out 250lbs as an arbitrary weight limit on the touring vintage frames, but they are a great Sport tourer for a larger person. I do have a unridden for 30 years Bridgestone T700 with a full set of Rhode Gear luggage that I want to keep as a period piece, but my assumption is that any touring would be overnighters with lightweight gear.
Last edited by bark_eater; 10-14-20 at 09:36 AM.
Likes For bark_eater:
#79
Senior Member
Vintage bikes can cause some problems on an extended tour. If you have to cross a river, sometimes it can lead to the wooden rims delaminating, since they were glued up with hide glue made from old Bessie. At the very least give your rims a frewh coat of varnish before you set off. There is another newfangled device, a freewheel, that can make going down hills much easier, especially on high mountain passes in the Rockies. And if you're going to go that modern, you may as well go all the way and get a coaster brake rear hub. It's a freewheel hub, with a brake built into it! Two things in one! Just an awesome advancement, it allows you to coast -- and brake! Forget that old fashioned stuff!
Likes For Salamandrine:
#80
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 16,523
Mentioned: 449 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3447 Post(s)
Liked 5,344 Times
in
2,188 Posts
Vintage bikes can cause some problems on an extended tour. If you have to cross a river, sometimes it can lead to the wooden rims delaminating, since they were glued up with hide glue made from old Bessie. At the very least give your rims a frewh coat of varnish before you set off. There is another newfangled device, a freewheel, that can make going down hills much easier, especially on high mountain passes in the Rockies. And if you're going to go that modern, you may as well go all the way and get a coaster brake rear hub. It's a freewheel hub, with a brake built into it! Two things in one! Just an awesome advancement, it allows you to coast -- and brake! Forget that old fashioned stuff!

#81
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 16,523
Mentioned: 449 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3447 Post(s)
Liked 5,344 Times
in
2,188 Posts
If I were starting from scratch, I'd be seriously tempted by the Surly Bridge Club: https://surlybikes.com/bikes/bridge_club
Likes For nlerner:
#82
aka Tom Reingold
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, USA
Posts: 40,272
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Mentioned: 499 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7066 Post(s)
Liked 1,917 Times
in
1,160 Posts
That LHT looks like it's almost ready to go. As a theoretical we can discuss vintage vs modern all day long, but as a practical matter I'll be another vote for hopping on the LHT and heading down the road...
On the theoretical matter of vintage vs modern: IMO this notion that vintage components are unreliable just isn't true. Some were, sure, but it could be argued that many vintage parts were more reliable than modern. No cell phones to rely on BITD. A typical quality touring bike build would have been equipped something like this: Sugino Mighty Tour crankset, Phil Wood BB and hubs, Super champion rims (36H front, 40H rear), Suntour derailleurs (VGT. BL or Cyclone), power shifters, Suntour Freewheel, Sedis chain, Mafac canti or Weinmann CP brakes, handlebar and stem by Nitto/SR/Cinelli/etc. What would anyone expect to go wrong vs a modern bike? There's much talk of modern alloys, but no specifics. I'm not aware of any major advances in aluminum alloys recently. I'd venture that most high end parts are still made from 6061 as most have been for decades.
Tires have gotten way better, for sure. Modern tubular steel racks also a good idea. (though custom builders have been making these forever)
On the theoretical matter of vintage vs modern: IMO this notion that vintage components are unreliable just isn't true. Some were, sure, but it could be argued that many vintage parts were more reliable than modern. No cell phones to rely on BITD. A typical quality touring bike build would have been equipped something like this: Sugino Mighty Tour crankset, Phil Wood BB and hubs, Super champion rims (36H front, 40H rear), Suntour derailleurs (VGT. BL or Cyclone), power shifters, Suntour Freewheel, Sedis chain, Mafac canti or Weinmann CP brakes, handlebar and stem by Nitto/SR/Cinelli/etc. What would anyone expect to go wrong vs a modern bike? There's much talk of modern alloys, but no specifics. I'm not aware of any major advances in aluminum alloys recently. I'd venture that most high end parts are still made from 6061 as most have been for decades.
Tires have gotten way better, for sure. Modern tubular steel racks also a good idea. (though custom builders have been making these forever)
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Likes For noglider:
#83
Senior Member
Spokes and rims have gotten much better, too. I was a full time bike mechanic from 1978 through 1984. I first got my hands on DT spokes in around 1981. Holy moly, what an improvement, not just more precise but also more fatigue resistant. And since then, rims got much better, too, in precision and durability. Other than that, I agree with your list. It includes reliable and durable equipment. I've seen more Cyclone derailleurs fail than VGT derailleurs, so I would choose the latter for a tour. I also so more SunTour freewheels fail than other brands. If I had to use a freewheel for some reason, I would choose a modern Shimano.
I built my first wheels with DT spokes in late 79 IIRC, and at the time they were still a little suspect. I broke plenty of them BITD, but I rode a lot of miles. DT seems to have improved their forging and tempering though. I haven't broken one in ages. IIRC, the actually alloy is something unremarkable like 304 stainless. The main improvement seems to me to have been in QC.
Yeah, I've seen plenty of broken Sun Tour derailleurs as well. Usually broken springs IIRC. That's why my early 80s tour bike had Suntour BL. Splits the difference between Cyclones and VGT. They were still more reliable than Cranes/Shimano of the time, and certainly more reliable than the the Duopar. You were pretty safe with a VGT/BL, and Cyclones didn't break that often. Nothing was as rock solid as a Campy NR, but those only worked for 'alpine' gearing if modified a la Spence Wolfe. Rallys were around, but were kind of mediocre and cost a fortune, some versions sucked. Now that you mention it, I think I personally used Atom/Maillard freewheels at the time, maybe Regina. That said I remember New Winners as being pretty solid. I didn't use them because the teeth didn't last as long as Regina and they were heavier.
Rims? Not so sure. With rare exceptions they are made the same way from the same 60xx alloy as always. In general deeper sections is an improvement that should have been made much earlier, but the standard touring rim of the time were Super Champ 58s, and they were pretty good. Some people like Weinmann Concaves, also good. I used training sew ups, which was already archaic. (I've been a retro snob since I was 16!)
To summarize:
Modern Clincher tires are better, cassette and/or thick axle hubs are better, SPD is better or at least more comfortable, slightly taller section rims are stronger, and modern spokes are less likely to break. All of those things can be fitted to a vintage touring bike.
Likes For Salamandrine:
#84
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Eastern Shore, MD
Posts: 1,891
Bikes: Road ready: 1993 Koga Miyata City Liner Touring Hybrid, 1989 Centurion Sport DLX, "I Blame GP" Bridgestone CB-1. Projects: Yea, I got a problem....
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 649 Post(s)
Liked 459 Times
in
302 Posts

Likes For bark_eater:
#85
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 1,841
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 747 Post(s)
Liked 928 Times
in
446 Posts
I remember having this same question a few years ago. I went around and looked at all the modern touring bikes. IMO modern touring bikes tend to be overbuilt. They are optimized for a 250lb dude carrying 75 lbs + of gear. That's fine if you're going to tour Patagonia or something, but for more typical mostly road touring, it's overkill. Vintage touring bikes are more optimal. Bumping up to tourist gauge +1mm is enough, for example Tange #2 instead of #1 , SP instead of SL, 531 'tourist' gauge, etc.
#86
aka Tom Reingold
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, USA
Posts: 40,272
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Mentioned: 499 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7066 Post(s)
Liked 1,917 Times
in
1,160 Posts
@Salamandrine, you and I have a lot of agreement going on. What are we going to argue about now?

__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
#87
aka Tom Reingold
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, USA
Posts: 40,272
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Mentioned: 499 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7066 Post(s)
Liked 1,917 Times
in
1,160 Posts
Touring the world on a penny farthing is a huge undertaking, but perhaps Ed Pratt took on a harder task when he rode around the world on a unicycle. I watched many of the videos.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
#88
Senior Member
@Salamandrine, you and I have a lot of agreement going on. What are we going to argue about now? 



#90
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: STP
Posts: 15,212
Mentioned: 73 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 814 Post(s)
Liked 237 Times
in
135 Posts
If I were starting from scratch, I'd be seriously tempted by the Surly Bridge Club: https://surlybikes.com/bikes/bridge_club
We just added Tubus racks, Niterider mtb lights, King water bottles and a Cambium C17.
Lent him my wife's Ortlieb panniers and he was good to go for an el cheapo price.
Surly ready did that one correctly.
#91
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 16,523
Mentioned: 449 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3447 Post(s)
Liked 5,344 Times
in
2,188 Posts
#92
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: STP
Posts: 15,212
Mentioned: 73 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 814 Post(s)
Liked 237 Times
in
135 Posts
27.5. Most of our trips are on gravel.
The way our infrastructure is going here, we'll be going back to more b roads in the near future.
BTW The stock WTB Riddlers are not bad, but I think he's going to order the RH Pumpkin Ridge tires if they have them in stock.
Tires are obviously super important for every bike, but a really good tire at the correct pressure makes off road riding a treat.
The way our infrastructure is going here, we'll be going back to more b roads in the near future.
BTW The stock WTB Riddlers are not bad, but I think he's going to order the RH Pumpkin Ridge tires if they have them in stock.
Tires are obviously super important for every bike, but a really good tire at the correct pressure makes off road riding a treat.
#93
Zip tie Karen
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Fair Oaks Ranch, TX
Posts: 7,006
Bikes: '13 Motobecane Fantom29 HT, '16 Motobecane Turino Pro Disc, '18 Velobuild VB-R-022, '21 Tsunami SNM-100
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1464 Post(s)
Liked 1,538 Times
in
805 Posts
#94
Member
My 1976 Bob Jackson tourer has never let me down, loaded or unloaded. I'm unfamiliar with more modern touring frames, however.
My wife had a circa 1979 Geoffrey Butler tourer that she was very happy with.
My wife had a circa 1979 Geoffrey Butler tourer that she was very happy with.
#95
I’m a little Surly
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Southern Germany
Posts: 2,267
Bikes: Two Cross Checks and a Karate Monkey
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 619 Post(s)
Liked 1,162 Times
in
587 Posts
27.5. Most of our trips are on gravel.
The way our infrastructure is going here, we'll be going back to more b roads in the near future.
BTW The stock WTB Riddlers are not bad, but I think he's going to order the RH Pumpkin Ridge tires if they have them in stock.
Tires are obviously super important for every bike, but a really good tire at the correct pressure makes off road riding a treat.
The way our infrastructure is going here, we'll be going back to more b roads in the near future.
BTW The stock WTB Riddlers are not bad, but I think he's going to order the RH Pumpkin Ridge tires if they have them in stock.
Tires are obviously super important for every bike, but a really good tire at the correct pressure makes off road riding a treat.
#96
Still learning
[QUOTE=northbend;21739157]Do you own or seek to own just one bike? If not then that is what your other bike(s) are for. I'd use the LHT for it's intended purpose. They are great bikes for serious long distance touring. Out on a long loaded tour, I want reliability and the ability to find replacements if something goes wrong.[/QU
For Shawn, one bike? HaHaHa! It's winter almost, you need a project. so build with a vintage frame. Tektros, barcons, Deore LX, etc. Do a tour with it. Sell it when you are done if you don't like it.
For Shawn, one bike? HaHaHa! It's winter almost, you need a project. so build with a vintage frame. Tektros, barcons, Deore LX, etc. Do a tour with it. Sell it when you are done if you don't like it.
#97
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: STP
Posts: 15,212
Mentioned: 73 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 814 Post(s)
Liked 237 Times
in
135 Posts
I was amazed she could run up to 48's, which are great for our gravel country roads and even the river bottoms.
She didn't seem to lose any speed either.
We do group rides on Tuesdays and Thursdays and she's usually in the first group.
Then I rode a buddies' Yeti SB5 plus and I fell in love. On tight mtb trails and narrow singletrack, the bike felt whippier and lighter on its feet. So I sold my 29'r Yeti and bought the SB5plus from a friend.
Then I bought a PL forum member's 650b Weigle after I gave up looking for a used MAP for myself. That bike fills the same purpose as my wife's MAP. It's a true go anywhere bike as it handles the sand and gravel roads here as well as the MAP.
The 650b wheel size has so many great tires available, I made the jump because I could find nice tires with relative ease. Often spendy, but still easy to find.
Also, I like the comfortable ride I get from my larger width tires and I'm certainly not that fast anymore.
Likes For gomango:
#98
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 651
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 193 Post(s)
Liked 201 Times
in
120 Posts
I know this is a c&v forum, but if you had to pick which would it be for serious long tours? I have a very nice Disc Trucker, I love it but it’s not the greatest for non loaded rides. I’m kicking around the idea of selling it and building up a serious vintage touring bike. Thanks
#99
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 651
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 193 Post(s)
Liked 201 Times
in
120 Posts
I remember having this same question a few years ago. I went around and looked at all the modern touring bikes. IMO modern touring bikes tend to be overbuilt. They are optimized for a 250lb dude carrying 75 lbs + of gear. That's fine if you're going to tour Patagonia or something, but for more typical mostly road touring, it's overkill. Vintage touring bikes are more optimal. Bumping up to tourist gauge +1mm is enough, for example Tange #2 instead of #1 , SP instead of SL, 531 'tourist' gauge, etc. Ultimately I ended up getting a custom Mercian with OS tubeset, which gave me some extra stiffness while keeping the weight comparable or even lighter than high end traditional touring bikes.
I've had vintage touring bike in the past and it was fine then. I'm sure it would be fine now. I'd probably upgrade the wheels to modern cassette hub type, preferably with OS axles. See below. And I'd use SPD pedals. Other than that, vintage touring bikes will still do the job, and be easier to pedal to the top of that mountain.
Yeah. That's a potential weak spot. Phil Wood hubs solved it in another way BITD, with those super thick axles. The stopped making the freewheel version about a year ago though.
I've had vintage touring bike in the past and it was fine then. I'm sure it would be fine now. I'd probably upgrade the wheels to modern cassette hub type, preferably with OS axles. See below. And I'd use SPD pedals. Other than that, vintage touring bikes will still do the job, and be easier to pedal to the top of that mountain.
Yeah. That's a potential weak spot. Phil Wood hubs solved it in another way BITD, with those super thick axles. The stopped making the freewheel version about a year ago though.