Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Frames and Framebuilding (1982) Straight Talk on Steel

Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Frames and Framebuilding (1982) Straight Talk on Steel

Old 10-24-20, 06:16 AM
  #1  
SpeedofLite 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
SpeedofLite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Henderson, NV, USA
Posts: 1,599

Bikes: Litespeed (9); Slingshot (6); Specialized (2); Kestrel (2); Centurion (2); Cervelo (1); FELT (1); Fuji (1); Trek (2)

Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 351 Post(s)
Liked 1,700 Times in 619 Posts
Frames and Framebuilding (1982) Straight Talk on Steel

Another big article with lots of tables and figures.
Too many pages and too large a file size for a single post.
So here's the deal.
You get first page, tables, figures, and glossary of terms to wet your beak.
If you like your beak wet, you can dive right into the deep end and download the full article pdf here: https://1drv.ms/b/s!AgHfxA8atbGnlj7Z...z-mOY?e=7QjDIs
























__________________
WTB: Slingshot bicycle promotional documents (catalog, pamphlets, etc).
WTB: American Cycling May - Aug, Oct, Dec 1966.
WTB: Bicycle Guide issues 1984 (any); Jun 1987; Jul, Nov/Dec 1992; Apr 1994; 1996 -1998 (any)
WTB: Bike World issue Jun 1974.













SpeedofLite is offline  
Old 10-24-20, 11:43 AM
  #2  
GMS 
Bike Dealer since 1972
 
GMS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Eastern North Carolina
Posts: 288

Bikes: Some of the bikes I've collected: Raleighs ( about 20), Trek ( oldest 1978 770 Columbus tubes), Mercian, Condor, Bob Jackson, Falcon, Holdsworth, Jacques Anquetil, Bianchi, LeMond, Cannondale, Schwinn, Iver Johnson, Dunelt

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 70 Times in 29 Posts
SpeedofLite, I want to thank you for providing these articles!!

I remember a frame we had about 1974 that the seat tube was so thin you could feel it flex just squeezing with your hand. I know it was not Reynolds or Columbus. I think it was Vitus tubing. We were getting frames from UK like Mercian, Condor, Bob Jackson, Ron Kit but can't remember what this one was.
GMS is offline  
Old 10-24-20, 04:37 PM
  #3  
embankmentlb
Senior Member
 
embankmentlb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: North, Ga.
Posts: 2,226

Bikes: 3Rensho-Aerodynamics, Bernard Hinault Look - 1986 tour winner, Guerciotti, Various Klein's & Panasonic's

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 90 Post(s)
Liked 173 Times in 82 Posts
That same issue of bicycling is filled with all kinds of awesome stuff.
The cover and article, Italy vs. Japan is great also!
embankmentlb is offline  
Old 10-24-20, 09:34 PM
  #4  
icemilkcoffee 
Senior Member
 
icemilkcoffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,398
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 820 Post(s)
Liked 674 Times in 410 Posts
Love these old articles! Is the seat tube thickness correct for Columbus SL? 0.9/0.9 would mean a 26.8mm seatpost. I thought a standard SL frame would take a 27.2 seat post?
icemilkcoffee is offline  
Old 10-24-20, 10:29 PM
  #5  
veganbikes
Clark W. Griswold
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ,location, location
Posts: 10,229

Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26

Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2990 Post(s)
Liked 2,213 Times in 1,464 Posts
The articles are super neat but my favorite thing is seeing the old adverts. Those Brooks booty shorts!!!!! Also I kind of like that Montague Road bike, I wonder if anyone has one here with pictures to share.
veganbikes is offline  
Old 10-25-20, 12:23 AM
  #6  
TiHabanero
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 3,853
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1440 Post(s)
Liked 909 Times in 476 Posts
The SL frame I have from the 70's has a 27.0 seat post, yet I have another SL frame from the 80's that uses a 27.2 seat post.
TiHabanero is offline  
Old 10-25-20, 12:50 AM
  #7  
RiddleOfSteel
Master Parts Rearranger
 
RiddleOfSteel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 4,197

Bikes: 1982 Trek 720 - 1985 Trek 620 - 2014 Trek FX 7.3 - 1985 Schwinn Voyageur SP - 1973 Schwinn Paramount P-15

Mentioned: 210 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1367 Post(s)
Liked 1,390 Times in 723 Posts
Tubing thickness down to 0.3mm!!!

My 195-ish lb self would break it!
RiddleOfSteel is offline  
Old 10-25-20, 07:52 AM
  #8  
JohnDThompson 
Old fart
 
JohnDThompson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 23,755

Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.

Mentioned: 142 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3051 Post(s)
Liked 2,181 Times in 1,302 Posts
Originally Posted by icemilkcoffee View Post
Love these old articles! Is the seat tube thickness correct for Columbus SL? 0.9/0.9 would mean a 26.8mm seatpost. I thought a standard SL frame would take a 27.2 seat post?
Columbus SL double butted tubes are 0.9/0.6/0.9, but the seat tube is single-butted, 0.9/0.6 with the thin end at the top.

The Bicycling! article's chart of tubing specifications contains an error in that it gives the Columbus SL seat tube wall thickness as 0.9/0.9

Columbus' own data sheet shows the correct thickness as 0.9/0.6:
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
columbus-sl-specs.jpg (120.4 KB, 92 views)

Last edited by JohnDThompson; 10-25-20 at 01:24 PM. Reason: Notice error in article's chart
JohnDThompson is offline  
Likes For JohnDThompson:
Old 10-25-20, 02:35 PM
  #9  
mstateglfr 
Sunshine
 
mstateglfr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 14,655

Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo

Mentioned: 116 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8667 Post(s)
Liked 5,273 Times in 3,047 Posts
Its always nice to see hard numbers. Reading posts where people wax poetically about the spirit of a tubeset is long on hype and short on substance.

Columbus SL being mostly the same as common man Tange 2, for example(not knowing the butting profiles and assuming they are pretty much the same).
SL had a thinner seat tube as it was single butted, but in identical shapes the Tange 2 stays would be less prone to flex.
Also, 531 had some beefy seat stays for its class/level.

- Tange 1 was a fantastic offering, given the price.
- Ishiwata 019 is on very few prodution road frames that I see, even though specs are solid.
- I don't think I've seen a bike with Columbus Record, KL, or PL tubes.
mstateglfr is offline  
Old 10-27-20, 10:23 AM
  #10  
Sluggo
Senior Member
 
Sluggo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Left bank, Knoxville TN
Posts: 619
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 47 Post(s)
Liked 119 Times in 54 Posts
This is a great compilation of information.

One detail to take with a grain of salt: The weight of tube sets looks like it consistent within a particular manufacturers, but is not necessarily comparable between different manufacturers. For example, Ishwata Magny V and Columbus SP have similar wall thickness but the weight shown differs by a kg. Butting profiles could account for some of that, but I would speculate that the length of the tubes in the two sets are different.
Sluggo is offline  
Likes For Sluggo:
Old 10-27-20, 10:42 AM
  #11  
BFisher
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,208
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 712 Post(s)
Liked 1,667 Times in 796 Posts
Table 2 is interesting in that lots of riders may not consider that info when critiquing a vintage bike. Someone may have a negative opinion of an old race bike, and apply that experience broadly. But then you find out that they weigh 230 lbs., or more! Well, of course that old bike felt like a noodle. It wasn't designed for riders that heavy. Same for a bike that felt "dead" or "stiff." That may be the case if you are 130 lbs. and trying to push an SP framed bike.
BFisher is offline  
Likes For BFisher:
Old 10-27-20, 10:43 AM
  #12  
Salamandrine 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 6,287

Bikes: 78 Masi Criterium, 68 PX10, 2016 Mercian King of Mercia, Rivendell Clem Smith Jr

Mentioned: 120 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2317 Post(s)
Liked 583 Times in 421 Posts
Nice to see all the main tube sets of that era with their specs in one chart. I see now that Tange #2 is almost exactly the same gauge as Columbus SL. It's the same except for the stays being 0.8 mm rather than 0.7 mm. I had always thought it was closer to SP.

A long time ago I had a Mondia made from 531 SL. I don't often see it mentioned, and it was nice to see it listed in this article. The bike built up crazy light, like 18lbs and change with pedals. It was a bit mushy for my taste.
Salamandrine is offline  
Likes For Salamandrine:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright 2021 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.