Advice Needed Installing Acorn on Nitto Rack
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 3,974
Bikes: 82 Medici, 2011 Richard Sachs, 2011 Milwaukee Road
Mentioned: 47 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1584 Post(s)
Liked 1,288 Times
in
768 Posts
Advice Needed Installing Acorn on Nitto Rack
My Mark's rack finally arrived and I was fortunate to get an Acorn Medium Rando Bag for it so I was pretty excited until...
My first install crowded the tops of my bars even with the most forward adjustment on the diving board. Then I cheated and removed the forward bolt and slid it further out and still not cool and clearly not what Nitto had in mind. I thought briefly about a shorter stem and then raising it to the max to give my hands clearance. (I shouldn't have to do that.) Then I tried lowering the rack with a diving board from a Blackburn rear rack that I banged up with a hammer on the vise. This install was better but not good. (I shouldn't have to go that either and the diving board interfered a bit with the brake.) Am I supposed to tilt the rack forward enough to make room for my hands? Do people use a decaleur to push the bag forward as well as provide stability to the bag?
Here are a few pictures.

Standard Nitto Dive board.

I can make room with a 90cm Technomic?



Modified Blackburn dive board. . .

...and raised stem.
My first install crowded the tops of my bars even with the most forward adjustment on the diving board. Then I cheated and removed the forward bolt and slid it further out and still not cool and clearly not what Nitto had in mind. I thought briefly about a shorter stem and then raising it to the max to give my hands clearance. (I shouldn't have to do that.) Then I tried lowering the rack with a diving board from a Blackburn rear rack that I banged up with a hammer on the vise. This install was better but not good. (I shouldn't have to go that either and the diving board interfered a bit with the brake.) Am I supposed to tilt the rack forward enough to make room for my hands? Do people use a decaleur to push the bag forward as well as provide stability to the bag?
Here are a few pictures.

Standard Nitto Dive board.

I can make room with a 90cm Technomic?



Modified Blackburn dive board. . .

...and raised stem.
__________________
I don't do: disks, tubeless, e-shifting, or bead head nymphs.
I don't do: disks, tubeless, e-shifting, or bead head nymphs.
#2
Overdoing projects
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Rotterdam, former republic of the Netherlands
Posts: 2,306
Bikes: Batavus Randonneur GL, Gazelle Orange Excellent, Gazelle Super Licht, Gazelle Grand Tourist, Gazelle Lausanne, Gazelle Tandem, Koga-Miyata SilverAce, Koga-Miyata WorldTraveller
Mentioned: 55 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 743 Post(s)
Liked 1,034 Times
in
596 Posts
#3
Senior Member
What is that, a 13cm stem?
Looks like you are almost there with the repurposed Blackburn diving board. I'd be inclined to make my own with a strap of stainless strip, to get things exactly where they should be, and not get in the way of the brake operation. I see Riv sells a rear Nitto diving board that looks like it might be long enough if it can be rebent to work with a front mount rack. You don't need that much room for your hands really, but it's looks to me like there's plenty of clearance to lower the rack more and not crowd the tire.
Since this will probably get kind of long, I'd go with double struts and lower the P clamps on the fork a bit. Or you could mount the second pair of struts to the brake pivot bolts, but that would take more doing. If you added a sturdy decaleur instead of sticking with a no decaleur system, you might get away with the single pair of struts.
Looks like you are almost there with the repurposed Blackburn diving board. I'd be inclined to make my own with a strap of stainless strip, to get things exactly where they should be, and not get in the way of the brake operation. I see Riv sells a rear Nitto diving board that looks like it might be long enough if it can be rebent to work with a front mount rack. You don't need that much room for your hands really, but it's looks to me like there's plenty of clearance to lower the rack more and not crowd the tire.
Since this will probably get kind of long, I'd go with double struts and lower the P clamps on the fork a bit. Or you could mount the second pair of struts to the brake pivot bolts, but that would take more doing. If you added a sturdy decaleur instead of sticking with a no decaleur system, you might get away with the single pair of struts.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 1,942
Bikes: ‘87 Marinoni SLX Sports Tourer, ‘79 Miyata 912 by Gugificazione
Mentioned: 162 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 483 Post(s)
Liked 385 Times
in
228 Posts
Rando bags are typically sized for the frame+stem.
Seems like a raised or slightly taller stem would work with your modified rack support. Be sure that the front brake function is not compromised! Moving the bag forward might give you room, but generally the bike steering works best when the bag is close to the head tube.
Lack of a decaleur could also be a problem, since the bag won’t be solidly attached relative to steering motion. Check with @gugie for his decaleur approach. He’ll be especially thrilled that you’re doing this on a Raleigh Grand Sports.
Seems like a raised or slightly taller stem would work with your modified rack support. Be sure that the front brake function is not compromised! Moving the bag forward might give you room, but generally the bike steering works best when the bag is close to the head tube.
Lack of a decaleur could also be a problem, since the bag won’t be solidly attached relative to steering motion. Check with @gugie for his decaleur approach. He’ll be especially thrilled that you’re doing this on a Raleigh Grand Sports.
Last edited by Dfrost; 10-28-20 at 06:30 PM.
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 3,974
Bikes: 82 Medici, 2011 Richard Sachs, 2011 Milwaukee Road
Mentioned: 47 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1584 Post(s)
Liked 1,288 Times
in
768 Posts
The stem is a normal 120 and that shot of "almost there" is with the stem raised higher than my normal and I need to save room for fenders.
__________________
I don't do: disks, tubeless, e-shifting, or bead head nymphs.
I don't do: disks, tubeless, e-shifting, or bead head nymphs.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 16,388
Mentioned: 441 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3372 Post(s)
Liked 5,080 Times
in
2,106 Posts
Yeah, tough fit with a stem that long and a rack that sets the bag that close to the headtube. Go with a 100mm stem and set your saddle back 20mm more?
#7
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 3,974
Bikes: 82 Medici, 2011 Richard Sachs, 2011 Milwaukee Road
Mentioned: 47 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1584 Post(s)
Liked 1,288 Times
in
768 Posts
Wow. I had hoped I was putting the pieces together incorrectly or that I needed a decaleur to complete this puzzle. If it turns out I must get a taller and shorter stem, then maybe I'll also get bars with more reach and deeper drop to compensate. Or maybe this rack and bag belongs on another bike.
__________________
I don't do: disks, tubeless, e-shifting, or bead head nymphs.
I don't do: disks, tubeless, e-shifting, or bead head nymphs.
#8
Extraordinary Magnitude
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 13,346
Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT
Mentioned: 81 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2486 Post(s)
Liked 1,361 Times
in
768 Posts
Wow. I had hoped I was putting the pieces together incorrectly or that I needed a decaleur to complete this puzzle. If it turns out I must get a taller and shorter stem, then maybe I'll also get bars with more reach and deeper drop to compensate. Or maybe this rack and bag belongs on another bike.




Yes, my stem is both way higher, and has much shorter reach- But you may need to do some playing around with different racks/bags/stems to suit your own particular... idiom.
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
#9
Bike Butcher of Portland
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 11,068
Bikes: It's complicated.
Mentioned: 1229 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4339 Post(s)
Liked 4,459 Times
in
1,889 Posts
Rando bags are typically sized for the frame+stem.
Seems like a raised or slightly taller stem would work with your modified rack support. Be sure that the front brake function is not compromised! Moving the bag forward might give you room, but generally the bike steering works best when the bag is close to the head tube.
Lack of a decaleur could also be a problem, since the bag won’t be solidly attached relative to steering motion. Check with @gugie for his decaleur approach. He’ll be especially thrilled that you’re doing this on a Raleigh Grand Sports.
Seems like a raised or slightly taller stem would work with your modified rack support. Be sure that the front brake function is not compromised! Moving the bag forward might give you room, but generally the bike steering works best when the bag is close to the head tube.
Lack of a decaleur could also be a problem, since the bag won’t be solidly attached relative to steering motion. Check with @gugie for his decaleur approach. He’ll be especially thrilled that you’re doing this on a Raleigh Grand Sports.
Stem height and length should be adjusted for your riding position, not to fit a bag.
Dave is correct, steering works best when the bag is close to the head tube, also as low as possible, but you shouldn't have to adjust your stem to make this happen. Also, unless you have a very small bag, a decaleur is highly recommended.
Email me if you're interested in a custom solution.
__________________
If someone tells you that you have enough bicycles and you don't need any more, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
If someone tells you that you have enough bicycles and you don't need any more, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
Likes For gugie:
#10
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 15,327
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 120 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9674 Post(s)
Liked 6,048 Times
in
3,477 Posts
#11
Senior Member
I also think that the stem should not be changed to fit a bag. +1 on that. Stick with a stem that fits you and your riding position, and a bag sized to fit your needs. Then position the rack to place the bag where it needs to be.
Mark's racks have very many mounting options. I'm sure you'll be able to get it to work. It looks to me like the rack can be lowered almost an inch, and still have fender clearance. My Peugeot front rack was fixed to my fender at the top. That's pretty normal for a Frenchie style set up.
One of gugie's decaleurs might be the easiest solution. That way you won't need to use the tombstone as a back stop fixing point, as you do with a decaleur-less set up, and the bag could be slid forward and inch or so on the rack. You could still use the stock 'diving board'. (when did this ridiculous term originate?)
Mark's racks have very many mounting options. I'm sure you'll be able to get it to work. It looks to me like the rack can be lowered almost an inch, and still have fender clearance. My Peugeot front rack was fixed to my fender at the top. That's pretty normal for a Frenchie style set up.
One of gugie's decaleurs might be the easiest solution. That way you won't need to use the tombstone as a back stop fixing point, as you do with a decaleur-less set up, and the bag could be slid forward and inch or so on the rack. You could still use the stock 'diving board'. (when did this ridiculous term originate?)
#12
Bike Butcher of Portland
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 11,068
Bikes: It's complicated.
Mentioned: 1229 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4339 Post(s)
Liked 4,459 Times
in
1,889 Posts
To be fair, I always use the tombstone on my racks as well as the decaleur.
__________________
If someone tells you that you have enough bicycles and you don't need any more, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
If someone tells you that you have enough bicycles and you don't need any more, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
Likes For gugie:
#13
Senior Member
If it helps to visualize, here's my Gugie custom decaleur. In my case my bag rode too high and hung a couple of cm above the rack on a straight decaleur. In your case, it could allow you to move yours forward as well as down.

__________________
N = '96 Colnago C40, '04 Wilier Alpe D'Huez, '10 Colnago EPS, '85 Merckx Pro, '89 Merckx Century, '86 Tommasini Professional, '04 Teschner Aero FX Pro, '05 Alan Carbon Cross, '86 De Rosa Professional, '82 Colnago Super, '95 Gios Compact Pro, '95 Carrera Zeus, '84 Basso Gap, ‘89 Cinelli Supercorsa, ‘83 Bianchi Specialissima, ‘VO Randonneur, Ritchey Breakaway Steel, '84 Paletti Super Prestige, Heron Randonneur
N = '96 Colnago C40, '04 Wilier Alpe D'Huez, '10 Colnago EPS, '85 Merckx Pro, '89 Merckx Century, '86 Tommasini Professional, '04 Teschner Aero FX Pro, '05 Alan Carbon Cross, '86 De Rosa Professional, '82 Colnago Super, '95 Gios Compact Pro, '95 Carrera Zeus, '84 Basso Gap, ‘89 Cinelli Supercorsa, ‘83 Bianchi Specialissima, ‘VO Randonneur, Ritchey Breakaway Steel, '84 Paletti Super Prestige, Heron Randonneur
#14
Full Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Marin County, Alta California
Posts: 257
Bikes: Since new: 85/86 Rodriguez Tandem, wife's 87 Gitane Team Pro, 92 Burley Rock-n-Roll, 85 Fisher Comp, 88 Puch Pro, two 92 Bridgestone X0-1s; later: 66/67 Gitane Champion du Monde, late 60s/early 70s B.Carre, my 87 Gitane Team Pro, 77/78 Ritchey Tandem
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 104 Post(s)
Liked 189 Times
in
92 Posts
Don't run tombstone thru leather sleeve on bag as suggested above BUT secure bag to tombstone by running a toeclip strap thru the sleeve and then thru loop in tombstone...snug down just enough to prevent any sway which is what the tombstone is designed for anyway....lots cheaper than sourcing new parts which aren't necessarily a sure fix.
Likes For Markeologist:
#15
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 3,974
Bikes: 82 Medici, 2011 Richard Sachs, 2011 Milwaukee Road
Mentioned: 47 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1584 Post(s)
Liked 1,288 Times
in
768 Posts
I’ve got the rack and bag shelved. I’ll drag them out again soon with a more positive attitude. The modified diving board that I experimented with put the bolts barely above the tire and the 5 or 10mm that could be gained by finding some middle ground are not enough to give my hands as much room as they need. Looks like a decaleur is warranted. Going through Gugie’s link above is worthwhile if you haven’t done it yet. I’ve admired many of his photos when they are posted on the forum but the process shots and all the rest of his flicker record is impressive.
__________________
I don't do: disks, tubeless, e-shifting, or bead head nymphs.
I don't do: disks, tubeless, e-shifting, or bead head nymphs.
#16
Senior Member
I bet one of these would solve the problem, but I'd go for a second set of struts as well. All that and a custom decaleur would be ideal.
https://www.rivbike.com/collections/...ate-rear-20029
Ah, oh. Lightbulb goes off. Boing boing. I get it now. I've never used a rack with a load bearing diving board, and that didn't occur to me. I do have an M18 that I still haven't gotten around to fitting to my Clem Jr. It seems to have an extra thick one to combat the bounce. It doesn't have the quad strut option that Mark's racks have.
https://www.rivbike.com/collections/...ate-rear-20029
Ah, oh. Lightbulb goes off. Boing boing. I get it now. I've never used a rack with a load bearing diving board, and that didn't occur to me. I do have an M18 that I still haven't gotten around to fitting to my Clem Jr. It seems to have an extra thick one to combat the bounce. It doesn't have the quad strut option that Mark's racks have.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 1,809
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 730 Post(s)
Liked 886 Times
in
433 Posts
Seems to me either bending this bracket or using a different one, as well as lowering your struts will get you where you want.
Had the same problem trying to use a VO canti rando rack on my Voyageur. Then I got a Nitto rack and bought longer struts to reach the mid fork eyelets. It now sits lower and level and is near perfect, although a little lower would be ideal. Seems like these racks are made with a certain bike setup in mind, particularly a more modern one, and probably 650b, so they won’t always line up well on vintage roadies out of the box.
Had the same problem trying to use a VO canti rando rack on my Voyageur. Then I got a Nitto rack and bought longer struts to reach the mid fork eyelets. It now sits lower and level and is near perfect, although a little lower would be ideal. Seems like these racks are made with a certain bike setup in mind, particularly a more modern one, and probably 650b, so they won’t always line up well on vintage roadies out of the box.
#18
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 3,974
Bikes: 82 Medici, 2011 Richard Sachs, 2011 Milwaukee Road
Mentioned: 47 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1584 Post(s)
Liked 1,288 Times
in
768 Posts
That Mark's rack is a Rivendell design, it makes sense that it works well with bars that are set up higher than traditional road bike bars. Perhaps the M18 would have been the better choice but I wanted maximum versatility and the geometry looks in pictures to be similar.
The struts are not a problem. When I get the bag in the right place, the struts that came with it and the 420s that I got extra to go with it, will stabilize it well enough. Although, just playing around, there is not much difference with two vs. four bars so no worries there.

__________________
I don't do: disks, tubeless, e-shifting, or bead head nymphs.
I don't do: disks, tubeless, e-shifting, or bead head nymphs.
#19
Bike Butcher of Portland
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 11,068
Bikes: It's complicated.
Mentioned: 1229 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4339 Post(s)
Liked 4,459 Times
in
1,889 Posts
I typically make a custom rack for my bikes. Centerpull brakes require a 4 point connection, using the brake pivot bolts as 2, and some bits brazed on further down. Of course, this ruins the paint, so it's only done on frames that will get a lot of other mods, typically. My Centurion Pro Tour "Zero bike" original finish is too nice, so a Mark's rack was used, along with a custom decaleur. I can make the extension length so that the bag doesn't interfere with hand position. The "standard" Velo Orange decaleur extends 10cm from head tube centerline. I've made the extensions as long as 15 cm, with little ill effect on handling.

pic courtesy of @djkashuba, 2019 TdMIL

pic courtesy of @djkashuba, 2019 TdMIL
__________________
If someone tells you that you have enough bicycles and you don't need any more, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
If someone tells you that you have enough bicycles and you don't need any more, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.