Fuji Touring Series III vs IV vs V?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 13,915
Mentioned: 322 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2025 Post(s)
Liked 1,381 Times
in
753 Posts
Dig around in the catalogs and see what you find: https://classicfuji.posthaven.com/archive
Likes For nlerner:
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,167
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 457 Post(s)
Liked 393 Times
in
206 Posts
One standout difference is the V is the first and only one with mid-fork mounts for low-rider racks, if that interests you. I also think it was the best color scheme but that's subjective.
I think I've seen a few very late model IV's that also had the mid-fork mounts but it's certainly not the norm, or perhaps they were added after the fact.
I think I've seen a few very late model IV's that also had the mid-fork mounts but it's certainly not the norm, or perhaps they were added after the fact.
#4
Master Parts Rearranger
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,589
Bikes: 1985 Trek 620 - 25.5"
Mentioned: 192 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1175 Post(s)
Liked 650 Times
in
396 Posts
Look for the early to mid-'80s on these. TS V's have the nicest tubing and best features (braze-ons), but a TS IV is no slouch. Beautiful bikes.
Likes For RiddleOfSteel:
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 361
Bikes: 1970s Coppi/Fiorelli beater, 1973 Raleigh Competition, 1972 Bob Jackson, 1970 Cilo Sprint-X, 1985 Fuji Touring Series IV, 1969 Legnano Roma
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 129 Post(s)
Liked 110 Times
in
67 Posts
I can confirm that some TS IV production was with factory mid-fork mounts - mine has 'em, though have not yet decoded my S/N to work out when it was built. EDIT: turns out it's a November '84 frame
TS V also came with barcons, using a clamp-on cable stop on the down tube. TS IV has shifter braze-ons.
TS V also came with barcons, using a clamp-on cable stop on the down tube. TS IV has shifter braze-ons.
Last edited by niliraga; 12-17-20 at 09:42 PM.
Likes For niliraga:
#6
Senior Member
I can confirm that some TS IV production was with factory mid-fork mounts - mine has 'em, though have not yet decoded my S/N to work out when it was built. EDIT: turns out it's a November '84 frame
TS V also came with barcons, using a clamp-on cable stop on the down tube. TS IV has shifter braze-ons.
TS V also came with barcons, using a clamp-on cable stop on the down tube. TS IV has shifter braze-ons.
All 3 are great bikes.
__________________
Last new bike 1991
Last new bike 1991
Last edited by dmark; 12-18-20 at 09:25 AM.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 20,618
Mentioned: 555 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3657 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,063 Times
in
797 Posts
Hmm, no mentions of the differences in the frame materials;
III was a quad butted VALite frame with VALite fork and stays
IV was a quad butted CrMo frame with VALite fork and stays
V was a quad butted CrMo frame with CrMo fork and stays
III was a quad butted VALite frame with VALite fork and stays
IV was a quad butted CrMo frame with VALite fork and stays
V was a quad butted CrMo frame with CrMo fork and stays
Likes For T-Mar:
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,167
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 457 Post(s)
Liked 393 Times
in
206 Posts
Overall, the V is a really big step up from the III, and a step up enough from the IV that if you like the color scheme it's well worth being the one to choose if given the option.
Likes For polymorphself:
#9
Senior Member
A humble vote here for the TS III as that's the one I acquired at a very good price. For my purposes its just as good as the others. I'm real pleased with it. Granted the tubing is "better" in the IV and V and the components and details are nicer but I do not regret getting "only a TS III". Curious thing is that, despite the differences in the three models, they all weigh the same (within 0.2 lbs). I do not intend to do heavy weight tours, maybe light touring and have it set up as such. Mostly long day trips with room for rain gear, lunch and, If on the CCRT, brownies for my friends. That will do.

I've changed the bars, stem and saddle. I change the middle ring to a 39 as I need that more than the half step gearing. Oh, I installed a very nice Cyclone MK II RD too as the one that came on the bike was wrong anyway.

I've changed the bars, stem and saddle. I change the middle ring to a 39 as I need that more than the half step gearing. Oh, I installed a very nice Cyclone MK II RD too as the one that came on the bike was wrong anyway.
Likes For Prowler:
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,167
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 457 Post(s)
Liked 393 Times
in
206 Posts
A humble vote here for the TS III as that's the one I acquired at a very good price. For my purposes its just as good as the others. I'm real pleased with it. Granted the tubing is "better" in the IV and V and the components and details are nicer but I do not regret getting "only a TS III". Curious thing is that, despite the differences in the three models, they all weigh the same (within 0.2 lbs). I do not intend to do heavy weight tours, maybe light touring and have it set up as such. Mostly long day trips with room for rain gear, lunch and, If on the CCRT, brownies for my friends. That will do.

I've changed the bars, stem and saddle. I change the middle ring to a 39 as I need that more than the half step gearing. Oh, I installed a very nice Cyclone MK II RD too as the one that came on the bike was wrong anyway.

I've changed the bars, stem and saddle. I change the middle ring to a 39 as I need that more than the half step gearing. Oh, I installed a very nice Cyclone MK II RD too as the one that came on the bike was wrong anyway.
"Brownies for his friends" he says...