We have dog threads, sewing machine thread, how about a watch thread.
#176
aged to perfection
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: PacNW
Posts: 1,393
Bikes: Dinucci Allez 2.0, Richard Sachs, Alex Singer, Serotta, Masi GC, Raleigh Pro Mk.1, Hetchins, etc
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 634 Post(s)
Liked 843 Times
in
461 Posts
folks, don't wear a rolex when riding a bike. It beats the hell out of them. Unlike a Seiko, the Rolex's rotor does not turn in a bearing - it turns in an arbor (hole) in the movement top plate. The big fix on a Rolex is to bush that arbor - I've had that done on mine - but don't wear a Rolex when riding your bike.
this was a fun thread. I liked the Zenith El primero chrono
Mark Petry
Bainbridge Island, WA USA
this was a fun thread. I liked the Zenith El primero chrono
Mark Petry
Bainbridge Island, WA USA

#177
Steel is real
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 1,063
Bikes: 39 - accumulated over 39 years
Mentioned: 47 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 357 Post(s)
Liked 944 Times
in
266 Posts
I do not agree at all. You can absolutely wear your Rolex - or any other watch for that matter - when bicycling. What you need to understand - though - is that mechanical watches need maintenance regularly. As any other mechanical device. On an average of 5-6 year the watch needs a service. To have its movement cleaned, lubricated and checked.
Before Rolex sort of got into peoples mind as high end "bling" watches and Rolex themselves began to build their trademark in that direction a Rolex was a tool watch. Most of them still are. And one of the more robust watches out there.
Besides that - there are Rolex watches with ball bearings and there are those with a bushing. There are advantages and disadvantages wtih both solutions. And both are robust.
Before Rolex sort of got into peoples mind as high end "bling" watches and Rolex themselves began to build their trademark in that direction a Rolex was a tool watch. Most of them still are. And one of the more robust watches out there.
Besides that - there are Rolex watches with ball bearings and there are those with a bushing. There are advantages and disadvantages wtih both solutions. And both are robust.
#178
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 1,249
Bikes: Classic lugged-steel road, touring, shopping, semi-recumbent, gravel
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 44 Post(s)
Liked 35 Times
in
25 Posts

1921 New York Standard
My first antique pocket watch. Actually considered low-end in it's day but beautiful nonetheless. Blue hands (although they look black in the photo). And it does run.
#179
Banned.
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: PAZ
Posts: 12,394
Mentioned: 255 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2586 Post(s)
Liked 4,807 Times
in
1,707 Posts
folks, don't wear a rolex when riding a bike. It beats the hell out of them. Unlike a Seiko, the Rolex's rotor does not turn in a bearing - it turns in an arbor (hole) in the movement top plate. The big fix on a Rolex is to bush that arbor - I've had that done on mine - but don't wear a Rolex when riding your bike.

DD
Likes For Drillium Dude:
#182
Steel is real
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 1,063
Bikes: 39 - accumulated over 39 years
Mentioned: 47 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 357 Post(s)
Liked 944 Times
in
266 Posts
# 33
"French" professional divers watch from the very early 90ies. Serious tool but sort of naivistic and it makes me happy.
"French" professional divers watch from the very early 90ies. Serious tool but sort of naivistic and it makes me happy.

Likes For styggno1:
#183
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Point Reyes Station, California
Posts: 4,527
Bikes: Indeed!
Mentioned: 91 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1413 Post(s)
Liked 3,039 Times
in
1,006 Posts
I like that one a lot!
I give it the Brian Baylis award. He had a genius for combining colors on a bike frame that no one else would ever consider.
Brent
I give it the Brian Baylis award. He had a genius for combining colors on a bike frame that no one else would ever consider.
Brent
Likes For obrentharris:
#184
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 763
Bikes: S-Works Stumpjumper HT Disc, Fuji Absolute, Kona Jake the Snake, '85 Cannondale SR900
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 219 Post(s)
Liked 217 Times
in
142 Posts
I like form movements a lot. My wife has this vintage Bulova, which is never worn as it needs a cleaning and a crown. Next project...



Likes For Charliekeet:
#185
Steel is real
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 1,063
Bikes: 39 - accumulated over 39 years
Mentioned: 47 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 357 Post(s)
Liked 944 Times
in
266 Posts
# 34
A more dicrete old divers watch. Still rated 1000m even if they did not advertise it on the dial.
A more dicrete old divers watch. Still rated 1000m even if they did not advertise it on the dial.

#187
Steel is real
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 1,063
Bikes: 39 - accumulated over 39 years
Mentioned: 47 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 357 Post(s)
Liked 944 Times
in
266 Posts
# 35

And that concludes the Zenith El Primero section of my collection - here is a group shot (the 5 digit Daytonas having a de-tuned El Primero movement).

And that concludes the Zenith El Primero section of my collection - here is a group shot (the 5 digit Daytonas having a de-tuned El Primero movement).

Likes For styggno1:
#188
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Hervey Bay, Qld, Australia.
Posts: 2,909
Bikes: Colnago (82, 85, 89, 90, 91, 96, 03), 85 Cinelli, 90 Rossin, 83 Alan, 82 Bianchi, 78 Fountain, 2 x Pinarello, Malvern Star (37), Hillman (70's), 80's Beretto Lo-Pro Track, 80's Kenevans Lo-Pro, Columbus Max (95), DeGrandi (80's) Track.
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 171 Post(s)
Liked 175 Times
in
114 Posts
I do like my Seiko 'divers'.

#189
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Hervey Bay, Qld, Australia.
Posts: 2,909
Bikes: Colnago (82, 85, 89, 90, 91, 96, 03), 85 Cinelli, 90 Rossin, 83 Alan, 82 Bianchi, 78 Fountain, 2 x Pinarello, Malvern Star (37), Hillman (70's), 80's Beretto Lo-Pro Track, 80's Kenevans Lo-Pro, Columbus Max (95), DeGrandi (80's) Track.
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 171 Post(s)
Liked 175 Times
in
114 Posts
What a beautiful collection styggno1.
Last edited by Gary Fountain; 05-14-21 at 05:27 PM.
Likes For Gary Fountain:
#190
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Hervey Bay, Qld, Australia.
Posts: 2,909
Bikes: Colnago (82, 85, 89, 90, 91, 96, 03), 85 Cinelli, 90 Rossin, 83 Alan, 82 Bianchi, 78 Fountain, 2 x Pinarello, Malvern Star (37), Hillman (70's), 80's Beretto Lo-Pro Track, 80's Kenevans Lo-Pro, Columbus Max (95), DeGrandi (80's) Track.
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 171 Post(s)
Liked 175 Times
in
114 Posts
Likes For styggno1:
#192
aged to perfection
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: PacNW
Posts: 1,393
Bikes: Dinucci Allez 2.0, Richard Sachs, Alex Singer, Serotta, Masi GC, Raleigh Pro Mk.1, Hetchins, etc
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 634 Post(s)
Liked 843 Times
in
461 Posts
how about this one - highly modified Seiko 6105 with a Grand Seiko movement (5626) and some other goodies - TSC screw down crown, Bill Yao HA bezel, SAT dial and hands, bead blasted case, etc.

Mark Petry
Bainbridge Island, WA

Mark Petry
Bainbridge Island, WA
Likes For mpetry912:
Likes For twolve:
#194
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Hervey Bay, Qld, Australia.
Posts: 2,909
Bikes: Colnago (82, 85, 89, 90, 91, 96, 03), 85 Cinelli, 90 Rossin, 83 Alan, 82 Bianchi, 78 Fountain, 2 x Pinarello, Malvern Star (37), Hillman (70's), 80's Beretto Lo-Pro Track, 80's Kenevans Lo-Pro, Columbus Max (95), DeGrandi (80's) Track.
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 171 Post(s)
Liked 175 Times
in
114 Posts
#195
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Hervey Bay, Qld, Australia.
Posts: 2,909
Bikes: Colnago (82, 85, 89, 90, 91, 96, 03), 85 Cinelli, 90 Rossin, 83 Alan, 82 Bianchi, 78 Fountain, 2 x Pinarello, Malvern Star (37), Hillman (70's), 80's Beretto Lo-Pro Track, 80's Kenevans Lo-Pro, Columbus Max (95), DeGrandi (80's) Track.
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 171 Post(s)
Liked 175 Times
in
114 Posts
#196
aged to perfection
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: PacNW
Posts: 1,393
Bikes: Dinucci Allez 2.0, Richard Sachs, Alex Singer, Serotta, Masi GC, Raleigh Pro Mk.1, Hetchins, etc
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 634 Post(s)
Liked 843 Times
in
461 Posts
Glad you like it. Absolutely one of a kind, built by Dr. Seiko (Randall Benson) A 3 year project. funnily enough I sourced the movement out of a super ugly Seiko VANAC but it is a 5626 GS movement, completely gone thru of course. Seikos are incredible watches. I wore another 6105, stock, on a trip to Japan, nobody noticed !

Likes For mpetry912:
#197
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Hervey Bay, Qld, Australia.
Posts: 2,909
Bikes: Colnago (82, 85, 89, 90, 91, 96, 03), 85 Cinelli, 90 Rossin, 83 Alan, 82 Bianchi, 78 Fountain, 2 x Pinarello, Malvern Star (37), Hillman (70's), 80's Beretto Lo-Pro Track, 80's Kenevans Lo-Pro, Columbus Max (95), DeGrandi (80's) Track.
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 171 Post(s)
Liked 175 Times
in
114 Posts
Glad you like it. Absolutely one of a kind, built by Dr. Seiko (Randall Benson) A 3 year project. funnily enough I sourced the movement out of a super ugly Seiko VANAC but it is a 5626 GS movement, completely gone thru of course. Seikos are incredible watches. I wore another 6105, stock, on a trip to Japan, nobody noticed !


I bought my first Seiko, a digital, just before I started my teaching career in 1975. I wore it every day until my retirement in 2010. The Seiko 'retired' about 2 months before me - it finally stopped working and couldn't be revived. It kept perfect time and only had 2 batteries in that time, the first one lasting about 30 years.
Likes For Gary Fountain:
#198
Steel is real
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 1,063
Bikes: 39 - accumulated over 39 years
Mentioned: 47 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 357 Post(s)
Liked 944 Times
in
266 Posts
Seiko has a special place in my watch collector’s heart. I have had hundreds of quality watches and still have more than what is healthy – and my “exit watches” has changed thru the years. When all is said and done and the smoke has settled – I now think that I will probably be sitting in the retirement home with all watches sold except three Seiko: s (I have already shown them here). A divers watch (“Cpt Willard”), a chronograph (panda) and a dresswatch (GS Special).
# 37
This was Seiko: s most expensive watch, in steel, in 1977. Top of the line. With an accuracy - within 10 seconds A YEAR. It cost 200 000 yen which was serious money. Carefully chosen and aged quartz crystals, hand built and calibrated to the extreme - it works within 10 seconds a year. A really nice, worked and structured dial in a high quality case with nice beveling. Notice how the indexes and the hands are matched in shape and form. The bracelet is not original to the watch but it is an original Seiko and it fits perfectly.
200 000 yen is about 1850 USD – today – what it was back in 1977, I do not know but it was very, very expensive. The high end quartz watches of that era cannot and should not be compared with what came afterwards. This watch is comparable with the Omega Marine Chronometer (which actually was less accurate). They both are from an era when quartz was top of the line - when superior accuracy was the selling point.
Seiko Superior ref. 4883-8100 from 1977

# 37
This was Seiko: s most expensive watch, in steel, in 1977. Top of the line. With an accuracy - within 10 seconds A YEAR. It cost 200 000 yen which was serious money. Carefully chosen and aged quartz crystals, hand built and calibrated to the extreme - it works within 10 seconds a year. A really nice, worked and structured dial in a high quality case with nice beveling. Notice how the indexes and the hands are matched in shape and form. The bracelet is not original to the watch but it is an original Seiko and it fits perfectly.
200 000 yen is about 1850 USD – today – what it was back in 1977, I do not know but it was very, very expensive. The high end quartz watches of that era cannot and should not be compared with what came afterwards. This watch is comparable with the Omega Marine Chronometer (which actually was less accurate). They both are from an era when quartz was top of the line - when superior accuracy was the selling point.
Seiko Superior ref. 4883-8100 from 1977


Likes For styggno1:
#199
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Hervey Bay, Qld, Australia.
Posts: 2,909
Bikes: Colnago (82, 85, 89, 90, 91, 96, 03), 85 Cinelli, 90 Rossin, 83 Alan, 82 Bianchi, 78 Fountain, 2 x Pinarello, Malvern Star (37), Hillman (70's), 80's Beretto Lo-Pro Track, 80's Kenevans Lo-Pro, Columbus Max (95), DeGrandi (80's) Track.
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 171 Post(s)
Liked 175 Times
in
114 Posts
Seiko has a special place in my watch collector’s heart. I have had hundreds of quality watches and still have more than what is healthy – and my “exit watches” has changed thru the years. When all is said and done and the smoke has settled – I now think that I will probably be sitting in the retirement home with all watches sold except three Seiko: s (I have already shown them here). A divers watch (“Cpt Willard”), a chronograph (panda) and a dresswatch (GS Special).
# 37
This was Seiko: s most expensive watch, in steel, in 1977. Top of the line. With an accuracy - within 10 seconds A YEAR. It cost 200 000 yen which was serious money. Carefully chosen and aged quartz crystals, hand built and calibrated to the extreme - it works within 10 seconds a year. A really nice, worked and structured dial in a high quality case with nice beveling. Notice how the indexes and the hands are matched in shape and form. The bracelet is not original to the watch but it is an original Seiko and it fits perfectly.
200 000 yen is about 1850 USD – today – what it was back in 1977, I do not know but it was very, very expensive. The high end quartz watches of that era cannot and should not be compared with what came afterwards. This watch is comparable with the Omega Marine Chronometer (which actually was less accurate). They both are from an era when quartz was top of the line - when superior accuracy was the selling point.
Seiko Superior ref. 4883-8100 from 1977


# 37
This was Seiko: s most expensive watch, in steel, in 1977. Top of the line. With an accuracy - within 10 seconds A YEAR. It cost 200 000 yen which was serious money. Carefully chosen and aged quartz crystals, hand built and calibrated to the extreme - it works within 10 seconds a year. A really nice, worked and structured dial in a high quality case with nice beveling. Notice how the indexes and the hands are matched in shape and form. The bracelet is not original to the watch but it is an original Seiko and it fits perfectly.
200 000 yen is about 1850 USD – today – what it was back in 1977, I do not know but it was very, very expensive. The high end quartz watches of that era cannot and should not be compared with what came afterwards. This watch is comparable with the Omega Marine Chronometer (which actually was less accurate). They both are from an era when quartz was top of the line - when superior accuracy was the selling point.
Seiko Superior ref. 4883-8100 from 1977


Likes For Gary Fountain: