Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Old Canti Questions on an '83 Expedition

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Old Canti Questions on an '83 Expedition

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-07-21, 03:41 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Posts: 11
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Old Canti Questions on an '83 Expedition

Hi,

I just picked up an old 1983 Specialized Expedition frame, and have some questions about how to build it back up.

My biggest question is about the cantilever spacing. I assume this uses the more narrow canti posts. Could I make breaks like the Dia-Compe 980's (the ones sold by Rivendell) work? Or only vintage canti brakes? Any brake suggestions?

If I'm not asking the right questions or there's something glaringly obvious that I'm missing, please point me to the right way. I'm new to this.

Thanks
TrashBoat is offline  
Old 04-07-21, 03:46 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
bikemig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,433

Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones

Mentioned: 178 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5888 Post(s)
Liked 3,471 Times in 2,079 Posts
You're asking the right question. The problem is that the answer is mainly trial and (expensive) error. Maybe someone here has had success with this combo. Alternatively find a set of quality vintage cantilevers.
bikemig is offline  
Old 04-07-21, 03:47 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Portland, Cascadia
Posts: 514
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 226 Post(s)
Liked 258 Times in 112 Posts
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the Dia Compe 980s are about the oldest cantilever that they made (along with 960s). I'm certain they were around in 1983, so unless they changed how they were made they should fit fine.

What was original spec for an '83 Expedition?
jPrichard10 is offline  
Likes For jPrichard10:
Old 04-07-21, 04:08 PM
  #4  
Extraordinary Magnitude
 
The Golden Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 13,644

Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT

Mentioned: 84 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2607 Post(s)
Liked 1,696 Times in 935 Posts
Originally Posted by jPrichard10
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the Dia Compe 980s are about the oldest cantilever that they made (along with 960s). I'm certain they were around in 1983, so unless they changed how they were made they should fit fine.

What was original spec for an '83 Expedition?
They re-used the number.







IIRC- the Expedition came with Shimano BR-MC70 XT brakes.
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*

Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!

"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
The Golden Boy is offline  
Old 04-07-21, 04:31 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Portland, Cascadia
Posts: 514
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 226 Post(s)
Liked 258 Times in 112 Posts
Originally Posted by The Golden Boy
They re-used the number.







IIRC- the Expedition came with Shimano BR-MC70 XT brakes.
Oh, I stand corrected then! I wonder what possessed them to use the same number. Those new 980s look real nice though!

An old set of 980s or 960s shouldn't be hard to come by, but GC 982s are probably my favorite look for an 80s touring bike.
jPrichard10 is offline  
Old 04-07-21, 05:23 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 512

Bikes: 1970s Coppi/Fiorelli beater, 1973 Raleigh Competition, 1972 Bob Jackson, 1970 Cilo Sprint-X, 1985 Fuji Touring Series IV, 1969 Legnano Roma

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 217 Post(s)
Liked 198 Times in 129 Posts
the only 1983 Expedition that passed through my hands (and it was mostly original from what I could tell) had Shimano Deore cantis of similar vintage, even though levers were Suntour's Superbe.

I have a set of pretty DiaCompe 983s I'd be happy to trade out; they don't support 27->700c conversions, but that won't be your problem with the Expedition designed for 700c from the get go.



Last edited by niliraga; 04-07-21 at 05:28 PM.
niliraga is offline  
Old 04-07-21, 05:49 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
scarlson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Medford MA
Posts: 2,089

Bikes: Ron Cooper touring, 1959 Jack Taylor 650b ladyback touring tandem, Vitus 979, Joe Bell painted Claud Butler Dalesman, Colin Laing curved tube tandem, heavily-Dilberted 1982 Trek 6xx, René Herse tandem

Mentioned: 80 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 964 Post(s)
Liked 1,451 Times in 723 Posts
I have a 1983 Expedition frame that I've been thinking about building up here. They came with wide profile Deore cantis, which were essentially the same geometry for some years, thru different models, up until they went to the narrow profile ones.

I can try it out with some 700c wheels and some Deore cantis and also some newer low profile ones and some vee brakes, and see what the deal is. My gut feeling is it'll work with most anything that has a wide range of pad adjustment up and down, but you'll end up near the bottom of the adjustment which is good for mechanical advantage.
__________________
Owner & co-founder, Cycles René Hubris. Unfortunately attaching questionable braze-ons to perfectly good frames since about 2015. With style.
scarlson is offline  
Likes For scarlson:
Old 04-07-21, 07:11 PM
  #8  
Extraordinary Magnitude
 
The Golden Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 13,644

Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT

Mentioned: 84 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2607 Post(s)
Liked 1,696 Times in 935 Posts
Originally Posted by bikemig
You're asking the right question. The problem is that the answer is mainly trial and (expensive) error. Maybe someone here has had success with this combo. Alternatively find a set of quality vintage cantilevers.
Didn't you have problems with narrow canti spacing and Tektro 720s- even with the intended sized wheel?

Originally Posted by scarlson
They came with wide profile Deore cantis, which were essentially the same geometry for some years, thru different models, up until they went to the narrow profile ones.
That's a good point- The early MC-70 brakes were a little more crude- but the later MT-62 and M-732 brakes had a little better adjustment, polished up really nicely and had adjustable return spring tension. They were also SLR compatible. I generally like to side towards the Suntour/Sugino/DiaCompe/Sanshin over Shimano- however Shimano's XT and Deore canti brakes are really really good- until DC caught up with the XC Pro style design.

If'n I were to be building up an 83 Expedition, I would go for XT M-732 brakes. They're just better than the MC70s and I like the big triangle design. I don't think I'd monkey around with new brakes- unless I already had them.


MC70M732MT62 by Dave The Golden Boy, on Flickr



If you do like the early DiaCompe designs- the NGC982s are the cat's pyjamas but they're pretty rare and pricey, and I think the 981s are nicer than the 980s.
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*

Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!

"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
The Golden Boy is offline  
Likes For The Golden Boy:
Old 04-07-21, 08:20 PM
  #9  
Master Parts Rearranger
 
RiddleOfSteel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Portlandia's Kuiper Belt, OR
Posts: 4,402

Bikes: 1982 Trek 720 - 1985 Trek 620 - 1984 Trek 620 - 1980 Trek 510 - Other luminaries past and present

Mentioned: 221 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1556 Post(s)
Liked 2,024 Times in 989 Posts
Another vote for MC70s or M732s.
RiddleOfSteel is offline  
Old 04-08-21, 06:42 AM
  #10  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Posts: 11
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Thanks for all the help I have a lot to think about. My buddy says he might have some MC-70s that I'll give a try and if not I might try to take someone up on there 983s or look for MC-732s.

Are there any other issues/tips you guys have about setup?
TrashBoat is offline  
Old 04-08-21, 09:15 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 512

Bikes: 1970s Coppi/Fiorelli beater, 1973 Raleigh Competition, 1972 Bob Jackson, 1970 Cilo Sprint-X, 1985 Fuji Touring Series IV, 1969 Legnano Roma

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 217 Post(s)
Liked 198 Times in 129 Posts
One thing i've noticed - to be sure the Shimano pieces are pretty and very well engineered. But the exposed spring design on DiaCompes turns out to be really useful when adjusting things; you can neatly disengage spring tension to avoid fighting it the whole time, then re-tension it when done.
niliraga is offline  
Old 04-08-21, 09:22 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Portland, Cascadia
Posts: 514
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 226 Post(s)
Liked 258 Times in 112 Posts
Originally Posted by niliraga
One thing i've noticed - to be sure the Shimano pieces are pretty and very well engineered. But the exposed spring design on DiaCompes turns out to be really useful when adjusting things; you can neatly disengage spring tension to avoid fighting it the whole time, then re-tension it when done.
I definitely don't consider the Shimano cantis to be "pretty," (compared to most of the Dia Compe/ Suntour cantis) but I guess beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

Thanks for the spring tip. I'm looking for any excuse to use GC 960s over the Shimanos, which are definitely the better brake.
jPrichard10 is offline  
Old 04-08-21, 09:55 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 512

Bikes: 1970s Coppi/Fiorelli beater, 1973 Raleigh Competition, 1972 Bob Jackson, 1970 Cilo Sprint-X, 1985 Fuji Touring Series IV, 1969 Legnano Roma

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 217 Post(s)
Liked 198 Times in 129 Posts
Originally Posted by jPrichard10
I definitely don't consider the Shimano cantis to be "pretty," (compared to most of the Dia Compe/ Suntour cantis) but I guess beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

Thanks for the spring tip. I'm looking for any excuse to use GC 960s over the Shimanos, which are definitely the better brake.
I also prefer the DC shape to the Shimanos, but the finish is quite impressive on the early Deore stuff.

I would avoid the 960s - they have shorter arms and provide less power unless you really fine tune the straddle length. They were the budget "base model" compared with the 98x. My experience is that 981s are just as powerful and "fittable" as the MC70s, and also a big step up in every way from the 960s
niliraga is offline  
Old 04-08-21, 10:04 AM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Portland, Cascadia
Posts: 514
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 226 Post(s)
Liked 258 Times in 112 Posts
Originally Posted by niliraga
I also prefer the DC shape to the Shimanos, but the finish is quite impressive on the early Deore stuff.

I would avoid the 960s - they have shorter arms and provide less power unless you really fine tune the straddle length. They were the budget "base model" compared with the 98x. My experience is that 981s are just as powerful and "fittable" as the MC70s, and also a big step up in every way from the 960s
Good to know. I haven't used 960s before, but I'm trying to do a 1979 build without cheating, and I don't like the 980s. Maybe I'll cheat a little here and "update" the brakes to 982s.

That is, if I value stopping more than looks. 960s were original gear on several 70s and early 80s touring bikes, I guess Specialized knew better when they specced Shimano cantis for the Expedition.
jPrichard10 is offline  
Old 04-08-21, 12:20 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
fender1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Berwyn PA
Posts: 6,408

Bikes: I hate bikes!

Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 431 Post(s)
Liked 710 Times in 233 Posts
Originally Posted by niliraga
One thing i've noticed - to be sure the Shimano pieces are pretty and very well engineered. But the exposed spring design on DiaCompes turns out to be really useful when adjusting things; you can neatly disengage spring tension to avoid fighting it the whole time, then re-tension it when done.
+1. I recently converted a 1983 Schwinn Voyageur SP to 700c wheels and the Dia Compe 981 brakes were the only option that worked. I tried about 7 different canti types.

I also found the 981's to be relatively easy to set up because of the exposed spring. The post spacing on my Schwinn was 60mm on the front and 66mm on the rear.
fender1 is offline  
Old 04-08-21, 05:31 PM
  #16  
Disraeli Gears
 
Charles Wahl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 4,093
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 504 Post(s)
Liked 369 Times in 214 Posts
I got an Expedition frame/fork and other parts several years ago that was supposedly a 1983 model (Serial begins with L) and it came with Shimano MT-60 cantilevers. FWIW.
Charles Wahl is offline  
Old 04-08-21, 05:45 PM
  #17  
Overdoing projects
 
JaccoW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Rotterdam, former republic of the Netherlands
Posts: 2,397

Bikes: Batavus Randonneur GL, Gazelle Orange Excellent, Gazelle Super Licht, Gazelle Grand Tourist, Gazelle Lausanne, Gazelle Tandem, Koga-Miyata SilverAce, Koga-Miyata WorldTraveller

Mentioned: 58 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 784 Post(s)
Liked 1,238 Times in 686 Posts
I have an early 80's Batavus frame with narrow canti studs that I used the new Dia-Compe 980's on. They work but do need Koolstop thinlines to work.
The bike originally had wide-profile Mafac cantilever clones by Weinmann but when I got it there was a variant of the Shimano BR-CT91 low-profile cantilevers on the front. Also available in black under the Deore line.
I got my hands on a pair of 90's/00's Empella Frog Legs, which are cyclocross copies of the same brake in black or actual carbon but I haven't tried these on here yet.

According to the spec sheet your Expedition used "Shimano Deore XT Cantilevers" and that was probably the wide-profile Shimano BR-MC70 - Deore XT M700. Though the later low-profile Shimano BR-M737 - Deore XT would also work. Those, and its variants are really common and can still be had brand new.
I've also seen them in black (Shimano BR-M560 - Deore LX) and a weird pinkish chrome in the Shimano STX-RC lineup. They stop pretty well and are cheap.






Last edited by JaccoW; 04-08-21 at 06:05 PM.
JaccoW is offline  
Old 04-08-21, 05:46 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Berea, KY
Posts: 1,135
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 360 Post(s)
Liked 323 Times in 186 Posts
FYI-I had a machinist mill an additional 3-4 mm of material out of the adjustment slot on my DC 981s over a year ago to allow me to fit 700c wheels on my 85 Voyageur. I have had no problems with them since.

Untitled by Andy Beichler, on Flickr
__________________
Andy

Last edited by beicster; 04-09-21 at 08:19 AM. Reason: Added picture
beicster is online now  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.