Weird vintage tech thread.
#51
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2020
Posts: 2,287
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 867 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 942 Times
in
576 Posts
which look very much like those on the bike pictured:

Mine are cable-operated, with a helix driving the pad.
See also:
Great American Bicycle Tour 1975, JCPenneys, Disc Brake
Likes For oneclick:
#52
Death fork? Naaaah!!
Tektro markets a disc caliper nowadays on the same concept.
Top
__________________
You know it's going to be a good day when the stem and seatpost come right out.
(looking for a picture and not seeing it? Thank the Photobucket fiasco.PM me and I'll link it up.)
You know it's going to be a good day when the stem and seatpost come right out.
(looking for a picture and not seeing it? Thank the Photobucket fiasco.PM me and I'll link it up.)
Likes For top506:
#53
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2020
Posts: 2,287
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 867 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 942 Times
in
576 Posts
Shifting while coasting requires that the chain be driven by the rear sprocket; were it to freewheel, that would not happen. FFS only had the FW at the crank.
#54
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 3,868
Mentioned: 77 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1528 Post(s)
Liked 2,464 Times
in
1,198 Posts
the wikipedia page mentions:
"The Shimano Front Freewheel (FFS) was a proprietary bicycle drivetrain design of the 1970s that placed a freewheel between the pedal cranks and the front chainrings — enabling the rider to shift gears while coasting.[1] FFS rear freewheel is different than a standard freewheel because it's "stiff" with more friction than a normal rear freewheel. It will slip if necessary however, to stop the chain in the event of, for example, a clothing tangle — which could otherwise lead to injuries of the leg by the drivetrain, crashing of the bicycle, or both."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Front_freewheel
RJ the Bike Guy has a neat demo of the rear freewheeling mechanism. It's not just a stiffer freewheel, as I'd always heard. He demonstrates that each cog has the ability to freewheel independently, which both surprises me, and makes me wonder why.
Steve in Peoria
Likes For steelbikeguy:
#55
Bikes are okay, I guess.
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Richmond, Virginia
Posts: 8,676
Bikes: Waterford Paramount Touring, Giant CFM-2, Raleigh Sports 3-speeds in M23 & L23, Schwinn Cimarron oddball build, Marin Palisades Trail dropbar conversion, Nishiki Cresta GT
Mentioned: 64 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2532 Post(s)
Liked 1,934 Times
in
1,293 Posts
FFS had its place in the cycling universe. Derailleur operation mystified a lot of folks who did could not grasp "You must be pedaling when you shift" and coordinate the movements. FFS solved that and was widespread at the time, found on several models of many U.S and Asian brands. Many of those bikes also featured Positron derailleurs, the granddaddy of SIS. Maybe not desirable high-end stuff, but it certainly simplified and improved the cycling experience for a whole lot of folks.
Likes For thumpism:
#57
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 3,868
Mentioned: 77 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1528 Post(s)
Liked 2,464 Times
in
1,198 Posts
FFS had its place in the cycling universe. Derailleur operation mystified a lot of folks who did could not grasp "You must be pedaling when you shift" and coordinate the movements. FFS solved that and was widespread at the time, found on several models of many U.S and Asian brands. Many of those bikes also featured Positron derailleurs, the granddaddy of SIS. Maybe not desirable high-end stuff, but it certainly simplified and improved the cycling experience for a whole lot of folks.
Anyway, average people were indeed confused by derailleurs back then, and FFS, and probably Positron, were no doubt intended to make folks more comfortable with this new technology.
Steve in Peoria
Likes For steelbikeguy:
#58
Doesn't brain good.
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 2,473
Bikes: 5 good ones, and the occasional project.
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1363 Post(s)
Liked 1,101 Times
in
632 Posts
not exactly.
the wikipedia page mentions:
"The Shimano Front Freewheel (FFS) was a proprietary bicycle drivetrain design of the 1970s that placed a freewheel between the pedal cranks and the front chainrings — enabling the rider to shift gears while coasting.[1] FFS rear freewheel is different than a standard freewheel because it's "stiff" with more friction than a normal rear freewheel. It will slip if necessary however, to stop the chain in the event of, for example, a clothing tangle — which could otherwise lead to injuries of the leg by the drivetrain, crashing of the bicycle, or both."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Front_freewheel
RJ the Bike Guy has a neat demo of the rear freewheeling mechanism. It's not just a stiffer freewheel, as I'd always heard. He demonstrates that each cog has the ability to freewheel independently, which both surprises me, and makes me wonder why.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J39t1IxAPcg
Steve in Peoria
the wikipedia page mentions:
"The Shimano Front Freewheel (FFS) was a proprietary bicycle drivetrain design of the 1970s that placed a freewheel between the pedal cranks and the front chainrings — enabling the rider to shift gears while coasting.[1] FFS rear freewheel is different than a standard freewheel because it's "stiff" with more friction than a normal rear freewheel. It will slip if necessary however, to stop the chain in the event of, for example, a clothing tangle — which could otherwise lead to injuries of the leg by the drivetrain, crashing of the bicycle, or both."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Front_freewheel
RJ the Bike Guy has a neat demo of the rear freewheeling mechanism. It's not just a stiffer freewheel, as I'd always heard. He demonstrates that each cog has the ability to freewheel independently, which both surprises me, and makes me wonder why.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J39t1IxAPcg
Steve in Peoria
What nobody really covers anywhere is the FFS rear cog can be substituted with a regular conventional freewheel if the FFS freewheel can not be found. The penalty is the loss of the shift-while-coasting function. The gain is the bike can remain in service.
Another weird thing is the Ashtabula style bottom bracket cups are threaded, use a freewheel socket to remove, & have 2 different bearing sizes; The bigger bearing goes on the drive-side. The bearings will "fit" if swapped around, but there will be interference caused by the plastic-rubber dust shield, making proper bearing preload a problematic nightmare. Also the rubber shield will thwart the FFS freewheel action because the dust cap can physically touch the chainwheel & act as a chainwheel brake.
The Freewheel mechanism is about what you'd expect. Regular servicing with Phil's Tenacious Oil keeps it quiet.
__________________
I shouldn't have to "make myself more visible;" Drivers should just stop running people over.
Car dependency is a tax.
I shouldn't have to "make myself more visible;" Drivers should just stop running people over.
Car dependency is a tax.
#59
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: SF Bay Area, East bay
Posts: 7,963
Bikes: Miyata 618 GT, Marinoni, Kestral 200 2002 Trek 5200, KHS Flite, Koga Miyata, Schwinn Spitfire 5, Mondia Special, Univega Alpina, Miyata team Ti, Santa Cruz Highball
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1341 Post(s)
Liked 1,638 Times
in
843 Posts
Likes For curbtender:
#60
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2021
Posts: 693
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 249 Post(s)
Liked 326 Times
in
192 Posts
My recollection of the FFS was that it was trying to be similar to the more common three speed internal gear hubs, a.k.a. "English racers". Three speeds were kinda fancy, back when I was a kid. If I recall... didn't those allow you to shift while coasting to an intersection?
Anyway, average people were indeed confused by derailleurs back then, and FFS, and probably Positron, were no doubt intended to make folks more comfortable with this new technology.
Steve in Peoria
Anyway, average people were indeed confused by derailleurs back then, and FFS, and probably Positron, were no doubt intended to make folks more comfortable with this new technology.
Steve in Peoria
#61
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2021
Posts: 693
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 249 Post(s)
Liked 326 Times
in
192 Posts
Here's a picture that I took almost 2 years ago. I believe it is a mid 80s Schwinn World Tourist with a 1×5 drivetrain.

Same bike, but as singlespeed. I wonder if anyone has fitted a fixed gear rear wheel to one of these bikes.

I've seen several schwin Varsity and Continental models with a one piece version of the front freewheel system. I recently saw an early 70s CCM with a front freewheel system that used cottered cranks.

Same bike, but as singlespeed. I wonder if anyone has fitted a fixed gear rear wheel to one of these bikes.

I've seen several schwin Varsity and Continental models with a one piece version of the front freewheel system. I recently saw an early 70s CCM with a front freewheel system that used cottered cranks.

Last edited by grant40; 11-28-21 at 11:49 AM.
#62
Bikes are okay, I guess.
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Richmond, Virginia
Posts: 8,676
Bikes: Waterford Paramount Touring, Giant CFM-2, Raleigh Sports 3-speeds in M23 & L23, Schwinn Cimarron oddball build, Marin Palisades Trail dropbar conversion, Nishiki Cresta GT
Mentioned: 64 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2532 Post(s)
Liked 1,934 Times
in
1,293 Posts
And here it is in its cotterless glory on a Panasonic Tourist, available in 5- or 10-speed versions. I gave my sister a 5 with a baby seat on it when she had a kid.

Likes For thumpism:
Likes For CMAW:
#64
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 3,868
Mentioned: 77 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1528 Post(s)
Liked 2,464 Times
in
1,198 Posts
I know a guy who sold Schwinns during the seventies bike boom and he said the same thing. He said that people had to thick of skulls to realize derailleurs cannot shift while coasting, unlike the 3 speeds that they are used to. This caused people to go back in the shop claiming that their bike is not working.
Schwinn dealers had a little gadget that could sit on the display counter and allow folks to practice the shifting process without having to worry about riding a bike at the same time. Plus, the person could see what was going on during shifts, which is much harder to do while riding the bike.
One of the older shops in the area still has this one on display.

Considering how few people currently have experience with downtube shifters, maybe there is still a market for these training devices??
Steve in Peoria
Likes For steelbikeguy:
Likes For grant40:
#66
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 3,868
Mentioned: 77 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1528 Post(s)
Liked 2,464 Times
in
1,198 Posts
Bike evolution occurred quickly in the early days, bringing us to the familiar "safety bicycle" configuration once the materials sciences made things like chains and ball bearings possible.
Still, some folks like to go back and take another look at some evolutionary paths, and Dan Henry was one such person.
This is an article he wrote for Bicycling magazine in 1968, describing the recumbent that he designed (excerpted from The Best of Bicycling).



I do wonder how long it took Dan to decide that the 'bent needed full suspension. As a part-time 'bent rider myself, I know that potholes are a bit of a challenge, since you can't just stand up off the saddle to compensate.
Steve in Peoria
Still, some folks like to go back and take another look at some evolutionary paths, and Dan Henry was one such person.
This is an article he wrote for Bicycling magazine in 1968, describing the recumbent that he designed (excerpted from The Best of Bicycling).



I do wonder how long it took Dan to decide that the 'bent needed full suspension. As a part-time 'bent rider myself, I know that potholes are a bit of a challenge, since you can't just stand up off the saddle to compensate.
Steve in Peoria
Likes For steelbikeguy:
#68
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 3,868
Mentioned: 77 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1528 Post(s)
Liked 2,464 Times
in
1,198 Posts
Likes For steelbikeguy:
#69
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 3,868
Mentioned: 77 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1528 Post(s)
Liked 2,464 Times
in
1,198 Posts
from tiny wheels to large wheels.... correction: "wheel"


as weird as it is, I'd love to see someone ride one in person!
Steve in Peoria


as weird as it is, I'd love to see someone ride one in person!
Steve in Peoria
Likes For steelbikeguy:
#70
Palmer
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 7,791
Bikes: Mike Melton custom, 1982 Stumpjumper, Alex Moulton AM, 2010 Dawes Briercliffe, 2017 Dahon Curl i8, 2021 Motobecane Turino 1x12
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1311 Post(s)
Liked 1,173 Times
in
708 Posts
Some of you know about the Cinelli Bivalent hub system. It was a scheme to keep the freewheel mounted to the frame...
Yep, Rene Herse used a hub called RAS in the 1946 Technical Trials, since points were awarded for not needing to touch the chain when changing a flat. I'm not sure if they developed it, or just used it.

Diagram from Hub of the Universe by Tony Hadland.
#71
Palmer
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 7,791
Bikes: Mike Melton custom, 1982 Stumpjumper, Alex Moulton AM, 2010 Dawes Briercliffe, 2017 Dahon Curl i8, 2021 Motobecane Turino 1x12
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1311 Post(s)
Liked 1,173 Times
in
708 Posts
An early drivetrain concept for the safety bike was the shaft drive. Not a weird idea, really, but just not practical for bikes. Most used bevel gears at the end of the drive shaft. One novel technology was the Victor Spinroller. Instead of bevel gear teeth sliding past each other, the friction was reduced by using rollers for gear teeth. Not sure how practical this was, considering the many small rotating parts. It couldn't have been too bad...
#72
Bikes are okay, I guess.
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Richmond, Virginia
Posts: 8,676
Bikes: Waterford Paramount Touring, Giant CFM-2, Raleigh Sports 3-speeds in M23 & L23, Schwinn Cimarron oddball build, Marin Palisades Trail dropbar conversion, Nishiki Cresta GT
Mentioned: 64 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2532 Post(s)
Liked 1,934 Times
in
1,293 Posts
It wasn't as bad as you'd think. Our shop got one out of curiosity and we build it up and we all tried it out. Not dangerous-feeling but also not impressive, mostly because the front "beam" was not aligned with the centerline of the bike, so it felt like you were pedaling into a gentle right turn. I don't recall any bad vibes associated with the weight distribution or that wheelbase but I might have been preoccupied.
#73
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NW Ohio
Posts: 3,107
Bikes: 1984 Miyata 310, 1986 Schwinn Sierra, 2011 Jamis Quest, 1980 Peugeot TH8 Tandem, 1992 Performance Parabola, 1987 Ross Mt. Hood, 1988 Schwinn LeTour, 1988 Trek 400T, 1981 Fuji S12-S LTD, 197? FW Evans
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 400 Post(s)
Liked 506 Times
in
300 Posts

2008 Beijing Olympics Monocycle
Likes For Pompiere:
#74
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,189
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 96 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3691 Post(s)
Liked 2,182 Times
in
1,373 Posts
What's "weird" here? Schwinn made zillions of 1x5 bikes and people converted lots of these old bikes to single-speed or fixed. Just removing the derailleurs and cutting the chain shorter was a common easy way to do it.
#75
Strong Walker
Likes For martl: