Pre 1900 "direct drive" bike - is this a unicorn?
#1
Strong Walker
Thread Starter
Likes For martl:
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Jose (Willow Glen) Ca
Posts: 9,534
Bikes: Kirk Custom JK Special, '84 Team Miyata,(dura ace old school) 80?? SR Semi-Pro 600 Arabesque
Mentioned: 103 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2148 Post(s)
Liked 2,410 Times
in
1,336 Posts
That is a first for me.... interesting, but no help for your question
bis spater
bis spater
__________________
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can
(looking for Torpado Super light frame/fork or for Raleigh International frame fork 58cm)
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can
(looking for Torpado Super light frame/fork or for Raleigh International frame fork 58cm)
#3
Junior Member
Check on The Classic and Antique Bike Exchange. Someone there can probably ID it pretty quickly. www.thecabe.com
#4
Phyllo-buster
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 8,725
Bikes: roadsters, club bikes, fixed and classic
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2254 Post(s)
Liked 1,931 Times
in
1,186 Posts
Pretty sure there's a couple of similar examples in the Pyror Dodge book, The Bicycle
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 4,144
Mentioned: 83 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1681 Post(s)
Liked 2,869 Times
in
1,363 Posts
The Museum of Science and Industry in Chicago used to have a good display of bike technology. I suspect some of it belonged to the Schwinn family collection. Back in 1994, the display included a bike of this type, where a few gears were used to transfer the power from the cranks to the rear wheel.

This collection might be part of the bicycle museum in Ohio (New Bremen?) now.
Steve in Peoria

This collection might be part of the bicycle museum in Ohio (New Bremen?) now.
Steve in Peoria
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NW Burbs, Chicago
Posts: 11,878
Mentioned: 193 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2851 Post(s)
Liked 3,075 Times
in
1,219 Posts
This is certainly not definitive, but I think it is a bit later, early teens, but pre WW1. The frame geometry, at least to me, is more along post 1900. I am happy to be corrected.
#8
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 158
Bikes: '85 Le tour Luxe, Puch Mixtie, Raleigh Gran Sport, Mystery Machine
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 34 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times
in
9 Posts
Pretty wild looking, curious what are the downsides...? Pant legs, fingers? Flex between the gears? Better or worse than a shaft drive? How come turn of the century shaft drives weren't more popular on bicycles?
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,233
Mentioned: 649 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4714 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3,012 Times
in
1,860 Posts
The subject bicycle is what is generically referred to as spur gear drive. In mid-1890s the bicycle industry experienced a boom. resulting in a plethora of new manufacturers. The increased competition led to increasingly lower prices and profits and by the very late 1890s market saturation resulted in an industry recession. At the time, the chain was viewed as the primary area for bicycle improvement and many manufacturers focused on developing chainless models, as a means to increase their market share.
The most common solution was shaft drive but spur gear drive was one alternative selected by some manufacturers. The example in the Museum of Science and Technology is a Caroll (see attached), who patented the bicycle spur gear drive in the USA in 1895 but were out of business before the turn of the century. Personally, I've seen about a handlful of surviving Carroll and there are other known manufacturers of spur gear drive bicycles including Humber and Hildick, so it's not a unicorn, though they are still very rare. The issues with spur gear gear drive were the extra weight and cost, which prevented it from becoming popular. It was primarily a novelty and had largely disappeared by the turn of the century, though there have been periodic attempts at resurrection.
The most common solution was shaft drive but spur gear drive was one alternative selected by some manufacturers. The example in the Museum of Science and Technology is a Caroll (see attached), who patented the bicycle spur gear drive in the USA in 1895 but were out of business before the turn of the century. Personally, I've seen about a handlful of surviving Carroll and there are other known manufacturers of spur gear drive bicycles including Humber and Hildick, so it's not a unicorn, though they are still very rare. The issues with spur gear gear drive were the extra weight and cost, which prevented it from becoming popular. It was primarily a novelty and had largely disappeared by the turn of the century, though there have been periodic attempts at resurrection.

Last edited by T-Mar; 04-19-22 at 01:42 PM. Reason: corrected 1995 to 1895
#11
Senior Member
To heck with that elegantly executed but dumb direct drive contraption,... I want to ride the bike!
Look at those frame angles! Look at that beautiful seat and bars! That thing looks great!
Look at those frame angles! Look at that beautiful seat and bars! That thing looks great!

#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,233
Mentioned: 649 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4714 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3,012 Times
in
1,860 Posts
Many bicycles from this era were capable of reverse. Freewheels were rare and the early coaster brakes weren't very effective, so fixed gears were the most popular configuration. There was also the cost factor. Upgrading to something like a New Departure coaster brake could cost the equivalent of a week's wages for a typical labourer.
Likes For T-Mar:
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NW Ohio
Posts: 3,298
Bikes: 1984 Miyata 310, 1986 Schwinn Sierra, 2011 Jamis Quest, 1980 Peugeot TH8 Tandem, 1992 Performance Parabola, 1987 Ross Mt. Hood, 1988 Schwinn LeTour, 1988 Trek 400T, 1981 Fuji S12-S LTD, 197? FW Evans
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 471 Post(s)
Liked 735 Times
in
412 Posts
The Museum of Science and Industry in Chicago used to have a good display of bike technology. I suspect some of it belonged to the Schwinn family collection. Back in 1994, the display included a bike of this type, where a few gears were used to transfer the power from the cranks to the rear wheel.
This collection might be part of the bicycle museum in Ohio (New Bremen?) now.
Steve in Peoria
This collection might be part of the bicycle museum in Ohio (New Bremen?) now.
Steve in Peoria
THE BICYCLE MUSEUM OF AMERICA



Likes For Pompiere:
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 2,221
Bikes: Drysdale/Gitane/Zeus/Masi/Falcon/Palo Alto/Raleigh/Legnano
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 873 Post(s)
Liked 512 Times
in
339 Posts
Presumably modifying a bike that old is a no-no, but in post #1's photos those two big gears are calling out for drillium.
__________________
Larry:1958 Drysdale, 1961 Gitane Gran Sport, 1974 Zeus track, 1988 Masi Gran Corsa, 1974 Falcon, 1980 Palo Alto, 1973 Raleigh Gran Sport, 1974 Legnano. Susan: 1976 Windsor Profesional.
Larry:1958 Drysdale, 1961 Gitane Gran Sport, 1974 Zeus track, 1988 Masi Gran Corsa, 1974 Falcon, 1980 Palo Alto, 1973 Raleigh Gran Sport, 1974 Legnano. Susan: 1976 Windsor Profesional.
Likes For tiger1964:
#15
It's MY mountain
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mt.Diablo
Posts: 9,898
Bikes: Klein, Merckx, Trek
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4122 Post(s)
Liked 2,679 Times
in
1,461 Posts
It does look like a little frame flex would result in a cog disengagement... not a good bike for sprinters.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 19,169
Mentioned: 125 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3019 Post(s)
Liked 2,197 Times
in
1,582 Posts
Many bicycles from this era were capable of reverse. Freewheels were rare and the early coaster brakes weren't very effective, so fixed gears were the most popular configuration. There was also the cost factor. Upgrading to something like a New Departure coaster brake could cost the equivalent of a week's wages for a typical labourer.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,188
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 121 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4340 Post(s)
Liked 3,410 Times
in
2,208 Posts
Interesting! I bet the drive train efficiency is a lot better than a chain. (Well chains have a 130 year head start, but done right, that rig would have zero sliding frictional loss, just steel pushing steel.)
@repechage, they got it right. Looking from the drive side, ie that photo; pedals go clockwise so the pedal sprocket spins the middle sprocket counter-clockwise which spins the hub cog clockwise. No re-learning required.
@repechage, they got it right. Looking from the drive side, ie that photo; pedals go clockwise so the pedal sprocket spins the middle sprocket counter-clockwise which spins the hub cog clockwise. No re-learning required.
#18
Senior Member
Likes For Bad Lag:
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,570
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17835 Post(s)
Liked 4,275 Times
in
3,189 Posts
I'm not sure there would be flex that would disengage the cogs without some critical damage.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,233
Mentioned: 649 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4714 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3,012 Times
in
1,860 Posts
It looks like it has aluminum discs with steel ring gears. Rather high tech for the era. You'd be cutting and drilling for minimum benefit.
I'm pretty sure it has a solid right chainstay that jogs around the middle sprocket. Although there would have to be provisions for maintenance.
I'm not sure there would be flex that would disengage the cogs without some critical damage.
I'm pretty sure it has a solid right chainstay that jogs around the middle sprocket. Although there would have to be provisions for maintenance.
I'm not sure there would be flex that would disengage the cogs without some critical damage.

On the Caroll, the intermediate sprocket is held within a secondary rear fork that attachs to the rear seat stay. The drive side chainstay only extends horizontally as far back as the axle of the intemediate gear. At that point, it jogs upward to form the inner blade of the secondary rear fork. The intermediate rear gear uses an eccentric axle adjuster to provide proper mesh with the crankset sprocket ( I guess I can't call it a chainwheel). Proper meshing with the teeth on the rear wheel sprocket is then achieved by standard horizontal slots in the rear fork ends. See attached detail photo.

IIRC, the sprockets were quite wide, around 1/4" to 3/8. So, you'd need considerable flex to cause an issue. Besides, these weren't the types of bicycles to be owned by big, strong, flex inducing cyclists. The previously mentioned Hildick provided a solution, as the ring style sprocket allowed a straight, continuous, more rigid, chain stay to pass through the centre.
Last edited by T-Mar; 04-21-22 at 06:46 AM.
Likes For T-Mar:
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Visalia, CA
Posts: 2,105
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 888 Post(s)
Liked 1,550 Times
in
517 Posts
Forward-backward-forward...
-Gregory
#22
Strong Walker
Thread Starter
thanks for all the comments! As opposed to the Caroll design, this one has an "open" chainstay - the only connection between the front stump and the rear half is the axle of the big gear.
The owner has done research in german language collector forums and this seems to be one of 4 currently known, no one knows a thing about the manufacturer even though the large cog is stamped. Owner also believes the bike may have been "refitted" to race spec later (as in around 1910-1920) but is pretty sure about it being pre-1900. He has already restored several bikes of that vintage so i trust his verdict.

The owner has done research in german language collector forums and this seems to be one of 4 currently known, no one knows a thing about the manufacturer even though the large cog is stamped. Owner also believes the bike may have been "refitted" to race spec later (as in around 1910-1920) but is pretty sure about it being pre-1900. He has already restored several bikes of that vintage so i trust his verdict.


#23
Senior Member
The Museum of Science and Industry in Chicago used to have a good display of bike technology. I suspect some of it belonged to the Schwinn family collection. Back in 1994, the display included a bike of this type, where a few gears were used to transfer the power from the cranks to the rear wheel.

This collection might be part of the bicycle museum in Ohio (New Bremen?) now.
Steve in Peoria

This collection might be part of the bicycle museum in Ohio (New Bremen?) now.
Steve in Peoria
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 4,144
Mentioned: 83 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1681 Post(s)
Liked 2,869 Times
in
1,363 Posts
There was some weird/interesting stuff in the museum in Chicago, and I suspect not all of were Schwinn products. Heaven only knows how big the collection actually was. Sometime after(?) my photo, there was a bike museum in downtown Chicago, not far from Navy Pier. Lots of bikes, which I assume all/mostly went to New Bremmen.
They seem to have been happy to show the collection off, at least based on the fact that they put part of the collection on display at the 19th RAGBRAI in 1991. I managed to take a few photos, back in the pre-digital days of photography.....






You never know what you'll see on RAGBRAI!

Steve in Peoria
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: South of the Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 5,755
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1107 Post(s)
Liked 2,142 Times
in
1,264 Posts